• Re: Sainz to Williams

    From Alan@21:1/5 to Geoff on Sun Aug 4 15:59:59 2024
    On 2024-08-04 15:27, Geoff wrote:
    On 2/08/2024 3:26 am, Alan wrote:
    On 2024-08-01 05:35, ~misfit~ wrote:
    On 1/08/2024 9:29 pm, Sir Tim wrote:
    ~misfit~ <shaun.at.pukekohe@gmail.com> wrote:

    Lando's relatively poor performance at Spa I think is down to him
    not being able to keep the win in the previous race. He took a
    psych hit
    realising that the team
    he's spent so long developing with don't value him as much as he
    thought
    they did and don't
    consider him to be number one.

    Yes. IIRC, Lando committed to a long contract with, what was then, a
    team
    in the doldrums. That act of faith deserves a reward.

    I agree. Without the unwavering services of such a talented driver
    they couldn't have developed the car as much as they have. It's as
    much Lando's car as it is the design team's who built it around him.
    Oscar will have his day but the present and near future at McLaren
    IMO should belong to Lando when it comes down to the team deciding
    who wins a race.


    McLaren fairly clearly had an agreement about keeping the order of
    finish the same as immediately prior to the final pit stops of the race.

    Norris was right to swap places if he agreed to that.

    And if he had done it earlier, the presumably they would have been free
    to subsequently race. Shoots himself in foot....

    I'm sorry, but if WHO had done WHAT earlier?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Geoff@21:1/5 to Alan on Mon Aug 5 10:27:57 2024
    On 2/08/2024 3:26 am, Alan wrote:
    On 2024-08-01 05:35, ~misfit~ wrote:
    On 1/08/2024 9:29 pm, Sir Tim wrote:
    ~misfit~ <shaun.at.pukekohe@gmail.com> wrote:

    Lando's relatively poor performance at Spa I think is down to him
    not being able to keep the win in the previous race. He took a psych
    hit
    realising that the team
    he's spent so long developing with don't value him as much as he
    thought
    they did and don't
    consider him to be number one.

    Yes. IIRC, Lando committed to a long contract with, what was then, a
    team
    in the doldrums. That act of faith deserves a reward.

    I agree. Without the unwavering services of such a talented driver
    they couldn't have developed the car as much as they have. It's as
    much Lando's car as it is the design team's who built it around him.
    Oscar will have his day but the present and near future at McLaren IMO
    should belong to Lando when it comes down to the team deciding who
    wins a race.


    McLaren fairly clearly had an agreement about keeping the order of
    finish the same as immediately prior to the final pit stops of the race.

    Norris was right to swap places if he agreed to that.

    And if he had done it earlier, the presumably they would have been free
    to subsequently race. Shoots himself in foot....

    geoff

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Geoff@21:1/5 to Alan on Mon Aug 5 13:20:53 2024
    On 5/08/2024 10:59 am, Alan wrote:
    On 2024-08-04 15:27, Geoff wrote:
    On 2/08/2024 3:26 am, Alan wrote:
    On 2024-08-01 05:35, ~misfit~ wrote:
    On 1/08/2024 9:29 pm, Sir Tim wrote:
    ~misfit~ <shaun.at.pukekohe@gmail.com> wrote:

    Lando's relatively poor performance at Spa I think is down to him
    not being able to keep the win in the previous race. He took a
    psych hit
    realising that the team
    he's spent so long developing with don't value him as much as he
    thought
    they did and don't
    consider him to be number one.

    Yes. IIRC, Lando committed to a long contract with, what was then,
    a team
    in the doldrums. That act of faith deserves a reward.

    I agree. Without the unwavering services of such a talented driver
    they couldn't have developed the car as much as they have. It's as
    much Lando's car as it is the design team's who built it around him.
    Oscar will have his day but the present and near future at McLaren
    IMO should belong to Lando when it comes down to the team deciding
    who wins a race.


    McLaren fairly clearly had an agreement about keeping the order of
    finish the same as immediately prior to the final pit stops of the race. >>>
    Norris was right to swap places if he agreed to that.

    And if he had done it earlier, the presumably they would have been
    free to subsequently race. Shoots himself in foot....

    I'm sorry, but if WHO had done WHAT earlier?


    "....to swap places if he agreed to that."

    geoff

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Geoff on Mon Aug 5 14:05:09 2024
    On 2024-08-04 18:20, Geoff wrote:
    On 5/08/2024 10:59 am, Alan wrote:
    On 2024-08-04 15:27, Geoff wrote:
    On 2/08/2024 3:26 am, Alan wrote:
    On 2024-08-01 05:35, ~misfit~ wrote:
    On 1/08/2024 9:29 pm, Sir Tim wrote:
    ~misfit~ <shaun.at.pukekohe@gmail.com> wrote:

    Lando's relatively poor performance at Spa I think is down to him >>>>>>> not being able to keep the win in the previous race. He took a
    psych hit
    realising that the team
    he's spent so long developing with don't value him as much as he >>>>>>> thought
    they did and don't
    consider him to be number one.

    Yes. IIRC, Lando committed to a long contract with, what was then, >>>>>> a team
    in the doldrums. That act of faith deserves a reward.

    I agree. Without the unwavering services of such a talented driver
    they couldn't have developed the car as much as they have. It's as
    much Lando's car as it is the design team's who built it around
    him. Oscar will have his day but the present and near future at
    McLaren IMO should belong to Lando when it comes down to the team
    deciding who wins a race.


    McLaren fairly clearly had an agreement about keeping the order of
    finish the same as immediately prior to the final pit stops of the
    race.

    Norris was right to swap places if he agreed to that.

    And if he had done it earlier, the presumably they would have been
    free to subsequently race. Shoots himself in foot....

    I'm sorry, but if WHO had done WHAT earlier?


    "....to swap places if he agreed to that."

    Remove the pronouns and try again:


    "And if he had done it earlier, the presumably they would have been free
    to subsequently race."

    Just recast that sentence using nouns/names.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From pP85PrR@21:1/5 to All on Tue Jul 30 14:08:40 2024
    On 2024-07-30 9:16 AM, ~misfit~ wrote:
    I'm really looking forward to seeing how he does against Albon. I've
    always thought Albon to be a top driver - and I think Sainz is up there
    too. It'll be interesting, I think Albon will have the edge though.

    One reads about drivers having a preference for a car that has
    over/understeer or some other drivability trait. Does this give Albon a
    bit of an edge since he knows how the car drives? (Assuming that he has persuaded the team to set the car the way he likes. And assuming that
    the car can be setup the way he likes.)

    And will the car have the same traits next year?

    And finally, does Sainz prefer a different setup compared to Albon?

    With me being a non-F1 driver, of course, some will want to point out my ignorance and the error of my ways with all this. <g>

    It will be something to check out next year, regardless of my knowledge
    or lack thereof.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Geoff@21:1/5 to All on Wed Aug 7 13:28:58 2024
    On 6/08/2024 12:56 am, ~misfit~ wrote:
    On 5/08/2024 10:27 am, Geoff wrote:
    On 2/08/2024 3:26 am, Alan wrote:
    On 2024-08-01 05:35, ~misfit~ wrote:
    On 1/08/2024 9:29 pm, Sir Tim wrote:
    ~misfit~ <shaun.at.pukekohe@gmail.com> wrote:

    Lando's relatively poor performance at Spa I think is down to him
    not being able to keep the win in the previous race. He took a
    psych hit
    realising that the team
    he's spent so long developing with don't value him as much as he
    thought
    they did and don't
    consider him to be number one.

    Yes. IIRC, Lando committed to a long contract with, what was then,
    a team
    in the doldrums. That act of faith deserves a reward.

    I agree. Without the unwavering services of such a talented driver
    they couldn't have developed the car as much as they have. It's as
    much Lando's car as it is the design team's who built it around him.
    Oscar will have his day but the present and near future at McLaren
    IMO should belong to Lando when it comes down to the team deciding
    who wins a race.


    McLaren fairly clearly had an agreement about keeping the order of
    finish the same as immediately prior to the final pit stops of the race. >>>
    Norris was right to swap places if he agreed to that.

    And if he had done it earlier, the presumably they would have been
    free to subsequently race. Shoots himself in foot....

    How could he be free to race if they agreed to keep the order the same
    as prior to the final pit stop? Lando's no dullard, if that was an
    option he'd have taken it.

    We cannot know the details, but I would imagine such an agreement would
    relate to routine' pitstops , and not strategic ones like this.

    geoff

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Geoff on Tue Aug 6 18:32:36 2024
    On 2024-08-06 18:28, Geoff wrote:
    On 6/08/2024 12:56 am, ~misfit~ wrote:
    On 5/08/2024 10:27 am, Geoff wrote:
    On 2/08/2024 3:26 am, Alan wrote:
    On 2024-08-01 05:35, ~misfit~ wrote:
    On 1/08/2024 9:29 pm, Sir Tim wrote:
    ~misfit~ <shaun.at.pukekohe@gmail.com> wrote:

    Lando's relatively poor performance at Spa I think is down to him >>>>>>> not being able to keep the win in the previous race. He took a
    psych hit
    realising that the team
    he's spent so long developing with don't value him as much as he >>>>>>> thought
    they did and don't
    consider him to be number one.

    Yes. IIRC, Lando committed to a long contract with, what was then, >>>>>> a team
    in the doldrums. That act of faith deserves a reward.

    I agree. Without the unwavering services of such a talented driver
    they couldn't have developed the car as much as they have. It's as
    much Lando's car as it is the design team's who built it around
    him. Oscar will have his day but the present and near future at
    McLaren IMO should belong to Lando when it comes down to the team
    deciding who wins a race.


    McLaren fairly clearly had an agreement about keeping the order of
    finish the same as immediately prior to the final pit stops of the
    race.

    Norris was right to swap places if he agreed to that.

    And if he had done it earlier, the presumably they would have been
    free to subsequently race. Shoots himself in foot....

    How could he be free to race if they agreed to keep the order the same
    as prior to the final pit stop? Lando's no dullard, if that was an
    option he'd have taken it.

    We cannot know the details, but I would imagine such an agreement would relate to  routine' pitstops , and not strategic ones like this.

    What is the difference between a "routine" and a "strategic" pitstop?

    Both Piastri and Norris were on a two stop strategy.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Sir Tim@21:1/5 to shaun.at.pukekohe@gmail.com on Thu Aug 1 09:29:02 2024
    ~misfit~ <shaun.at.pukekohe@gmail.com> wrote:

    Lando's relatively poor performance at Spa I think is down to him
    not being able to keep the win in the previous race. He took a psych hit realising that the team
    he's spent so long developing with don't value him as much as he thought
    they did and don't
    consider him to be number one.

    Yes. IIRC, Lando committed to a long contract with, what was then, a team
    in the doldrums. That act of faith deserves a reward.

    --
    Sir Tim

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Geoff@21:1/5 to Alan on Thu Aug 8 16:00:36 2024
    On 7/08/2024 1:32 pm, Alan wrote:
    On 2024-08-06 18:28, Geoff wrote:
    On 6/08/2024 12:56 am, ~misfit~ wrote:
    On 5/08/2024 10:27 am, Geoff wrote:
    On 2/08/2024 3:26 am, Alan wrote:
    On 2024-08-01 05:35, ~misfit~ wrote:
    On 1/08/2024 9:29 pm, Sir Tim wrote:
    ~misfit~ <shaun.at.pukekohe@gmail.com> wrote:

    Lando's relatively poor performance at Spa I think is down to him >>>>>>>> not being able to keep the win in the previous race. He took a >>>>>>>> psych hit
    realising that the team
    he's spent so long developing with don't value him as much as he >>>>>>>> thought
    they did and don't
    consider him to be number one.

    Yes. IIRC, Lando committed to a long contract with, what was
    then, a team
    in the doldrums. That act of faith deserves a reward.

    I agree. Without the unwavering services of such a talented driver >>>>>> they couldn't have developed the car as much as they have. It's as >>>>>> much Lando's car as it is the design team's who built it around
    him. Oscar will have his day but the present and near future at
    McLaren IMO should belong to Lando when it comes down to the team
    deciding who wins a race.


    McLaren fairly clearly had an agreement about keeping the order of
    finish the same as immediately prior to the final pit stops of the
    race.

    Norris was right to swap places if he agreed to that.

    And if he had done it earlier, the presumably they would have been
    free to subsequently race. Shoots himself in foot....

    How could he be free to race if they agreed to keep the order the
    same as prior to the final pit stop? Lando's no dullard, if that was
    an option he'd have taken it.

    We cannot know the details, but I would imagine such an agreement
    would relate to  routine' pitstops , and not strategic ones like this.

    What is the difference between a "routine" and a "strategic" pitstop?

    Both Piastri and Norris were on a two stop strategy.

    And PIA's second stop was stragetic for a specific defensive purpose
    (for NOR's benefit) as opposed to any pre-planned tyre stragety which
    would not have had him so disadvantaged.

    Which is why NOR was leaned on to give the place back.

    geoff

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Dumas Walker@21:1/175 to SIR TIM on Thu Aug 1 08:12:00 2024
    Lando's relatively poor performance at Spa I think is down to him
    not being able to keep the win in the previous race. He took a psych hit realising that the team
    he's spent so long developing with don't value him as much as he thought they did and don't
    consider him to be number one.

    Yes. IIRC, Lando committed to a long contract with, what was then, a team
    in the doldrums. That act of faith deserves a reward.

    Because of this, and their IndyCar driver drama this year, I am starting to wonder if McLaren has an issue in the driver relations department.


    * SLMR 2.1a * I had another drink...Drink-a-drink-a-drink-a-drink...
    --- SBBSecho 3.20-Linux
    * Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (21:1/175)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to All on Thu Aug 1 08:26:16 2024
    On 2024-08-01 05:35, ~misfit~ wrote:
    On 1/08/2024 9:29 pm, Sir Tim wrote:
    ~misfit~ <shaun.at.pukekohe@gmail.com> wrote:

    Lando's relatively poor performance at Spa I think is down to him
    not being able to keep the win in the previous race. He took a psych hit >>> realising that the team
    he's spent so long developing with don't value him as much as he thought >>> they did and don't
    consider him to be number one.

    Yes. IIRC, Lando committed to a long contract with, what was then, a team
    in the doldrums. That act of faith deserves a reward.

    I agree. Without the unwavering services of such a talented driver they couldn't have developed the car as much as they have. It's as much
    Lando's car as it is the design team's who built it around him. Oscar
    will have his day but the present and near future at McLaren IMO should belong to Lando when it comes down to the team deciding who wins a race.


    McLaren fairly clearly had an agreement about keeping the order of
    finish the same as immediately prior to the final pit stops of the race.

    Norris was right to swap places if he agreed to that.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)