| Sysop: | Amessyroom |
|---|---|
| Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
| Users: | 43 |
| Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
| Uptime: | 104:25:46 |
| Calls: | 290 |
| Files: | 905 |
| Messages: | 76,612 |
guar's new logo and branding
Jaguar Rebrand Sparks Confusion, Angers Anti-‘Woke’ Critics
2 days ago
By Conor Murray
Radical Jaguar rebrand and new logo sparks ire online
2 days ago
Phone brand Nothing teases Jaguar’s ‘Copy Nothing’ rebrand
1 hour ago
By Brandon Doerrer
Hats off to Jaguar’s ‘inclusive’ new branding: now people of all backgrounds won’t buy its cars
4 hours ago
By Marina Hyde
Lifelong Jaguar customer troubled by 'baffling' 'woke' rebrand: 'Going
in a very sad direction'
2 days ago
By Kristine Parks
Jaguar Rebrand Is Pink, Diverse and Doesn’t Feature Any Cars
22 hours ago
By Mengqi Sun
GREG GUTFELD: Jaguar rebrand has everyone talking when they aren't
actually puking
14 hours ago
By Greg Gutfeld
Elon Musk and others pile on mocking luxury car brand’s ‘woke’ new ad: ‘Bud Light 2.0’
2 days ago
By Taylor Walters
Jaguar Sees Rebranding Backlash After Rolling Out Divisive, Abstract New Campaign
2 days ago
By Stacey Ritzen
The insecure lash out.
In article <vhsbt7$1m16a$1@dont-email.me>,Describe exactly what you mean.
Geoff <geoff@nospamgeoffwood.org> wrote:
The insecure lash out.
No.
It's the divide between rationality and objective truth on the one
hand against ideology and "feelings" on the other.
guar's new logo and branding
Jaguar Rebrand Sparks Confusion, Angers Anti-‘Woke’ Critics
2 days ago
By Conor Murray
Radical Jaguar rebrand and new logo sparks ire online
2 days ago
Phone brand Nothing teases Jaguar’s ‘Copy Nothing’ rebrand
1 hour ago
By Brandon Doerrer
Hats off to Jaguar’s ‘inclusive’ new branding: now people of all backgrounds won’t buy its cars
a425couple wrote:
guar's new logo and branding
Jaguar Rebrand Sparks Confusion, Angers Anti-ÉWokeæ Critics
2 days ago
By Conor Murray
Radical Jaguar rebrand and new logo sparks ire online
2 days ago
Phone brand Nothing teases Jaguaræs ÉCopy Nothingæ rebrand
1 hour ago
By Brandon Doerrer
Hats off to Jaguaræs Éinclusiveæ new branding: now people of all backgrounds wonæt buy its cars
I mostly see Jags at the golf club, driven by grey-haired men.
On 2024-11-23 03:14, Bob Latham wrote:
In article <vhsbt7$1m16a$1@dont-email.me>,
Geoff <geoff@nospamgeoffwood.org> wrote:
The insecure lash out.
No.
It's the divide between rationality and objective truth on the oneDescribe exactly what you mean.
hand against ideology and "feelings" on the other.
In article <vhu9f8$1v2tv$2@dont-email.me>,
Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On 2024-11-23 03:14, Bob Latham wrote:
In article <vhsbt7$1m16a$1@dont-email.me>,Describe exactly what you mean.
Geoff <geoff@nospamgeoffwood.org> wrote:
The insecure lash out.
No.
It's the divide between rationality and objective truth on the one
hand against ideology and "feelings" on the other.
You know exactly what I'm saying but I'm not going to be drawn to
specifics when 'free speech' can carry a prison sentence.
On 2024-11-25 09:32, Bob Latham wrote:
In article <vi29pq$2s83m$1@dont-email.me>,
Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On 2024-11-25 01:04, Bob Latham wrote:
In article <vhu9f8$1v2tv$2@dont-email.me>,That's exactly what I thought...
Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On 2024-11-23 03:14, Bob Latham wrote:
In article <vhsbt7$1m16a$1@dont-email.me>,Describe exactly what you mean.
Geoff <geoff@nospamgeoffwood.org> wrote:
The insecure lash out.
No.
It's the divide between rationality and objective truth on the one >>>>> hand against ideology and "feelings" on the other.
You know exactly what I'm saying but I'm not going to be drawn to
specifics when 'free speech' can carry a prison sentence.
...bigot.
Under the current circumstances where people who believe in
reality as opposed to ideological nonsense and stupidity are
called bigots I'm more than happy and proud to wear that badge.
I'm sure all bigots are very happy to "wear that badge".
In article <vi29pq$2s83m$1@dont-email.me>,
Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On 2024-11-25 01:04, Bob Latham wrote:
In article <vhu9f8$1v2tv$2@dont-email.me>,That's exactly what I thought...
Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On 2024-11-23 03:14, Bob Latham wrote:
In article <vhsbt7$1m16a$1@dont-email.me>,Describe exactly what you mean.
Geoff <geoff@nospamgeoffwood.org> wrote:
The insecure lash out.
No.
It's the divide between rationality and objective truth on the one
hand against ideology and "feelings" on the other.
You know exactly what I'm saying but I'm not going to be drawn to
specifics when 'free speech' can carry a prison sentence.
...bigot.
Under the current circumstances where people who believe in realityI'm sure all bigots are very happy to "wear that badge".
as opposed to ideological nonsense and stupidity are called bigots
I'm more than happy and proud to wear that badge.
On 2024-11-25 01:04, Bob Latham wrote:
In article <vhu9f8$1v2tv$2@dont-email.me>,
Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On 2024-11-23 03:14, Bob Latham wrote:
In article <vhsbt7$1m16a$1@dont-email.me>,Describe exactly what you mean.
Geoff <geoff@nospamgeoffwood.org> wrote:
The insecure lash out.
No.
It's the divide between rationality and objective truth on the one
hand against ideology and "feelings" on the other.
You know exactly what I'm saying but I'm not going to be drawn to
specifics when 'free speech' can carry a prison sentence.
That's exactly what I thought...
...bigot.
In article <vi2cme$2t2sk$1@dont-email.me>,You're a bigot, Bob.
Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On 2024-11-25 09:32, Bob Latham wrote:
In article <vi29pq$2s83m$1@dont-email.me>,
Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On 2024-11-25 01:04, Bob Latham wrote:
In article <vhu9f8$1v2tv$2@dont-email.me>,That's exactly what I thought...
Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On 2024-11-23 03:14, Bob Latham wrote:
In article <vhsbt7$1m16a$1@dont-email.me>,Describe exactly what you mean.
Geoff <geoff@nospamgeoffwood.org> wrote:
The insecure lash out.
No.
It's the divide between rationality and objective truth on the one >>>>>>> hand against ideology and "feelings" on the other.
You know exactly what I'm saying but I'm not going to be drawn to
specifics when 'free speech' can carry a prison sentence.
...bigot.
Under the current circumstances where people who believe in
reality as opposed to ideological nonsense and stupidity are
called bigots I'm more than happy and proud to wear that badge.
I'm sure all bigots are very happy to "wear that badge".
And lefties adore little more than insulting their opponents it's
always their first action. They do this because their various
arguments are so weak that they're easily demolished by people like
Douglas Murray who never fails to wipe the floor with them.
On 2024-11-25 09:55, Bob Latham wrote:
In article <vi2cme$2t2sk$1@dont-email.me>,
Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On 2024-11-25 09:32, Bob Latham wrote:
In article <vi29pq$2s83m$1@dont-email.me>,
Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On 2024-11-25 01:04, Bob Latham wrote:
In article <vhu9f8$1v2tv$2@dont-email.me>,That's exactly what I thought...
Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On 2024-11-23 03:14, Bob Latham wrote:
In article <vhsbt7$1m16a$1@dont-email.me>,Describe exactly what you mean.
Geoff <geoff@nospamgeoffwood.org> wrote:
The insecure lash out.
No.
It's the divide between rationality and objective truth on the one >>>>>>> hand against ideology and "feelings" on the other.
You know exactly what I'm saying but I'm not going to be drawn to
specifics when 'free speech' can carry a prison sentence.
...bigot.
Under the current circumstances where people who believe in
reality as opposed to ideological nonsense and stupidity are
called bigots I'm more than happy and proud to wear that badge.
I'm sure all bigots are very happy to "wear that badge".
And lefties adore little more than insulting their opponents it'sYou're a bigot, Bob.
always their first action. They do this because their various
arguments are so weak that they're easily demolished by people
like Douglas Murray who never fails to wipe the floor with them.
Plain and simple.
Judging people because they are different than you is the very
heart and soul of bigotry.
In article <vi2hqj$2u6id$1@dont-email.me>,Who do you think you're fooling?
Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On 2024-11-25 09:55, Bob Latham wrote:
In article <vi2cme$2t2sk$1@dont-email.me>,You're a bigot, Bob.
Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On 2024-11-25 09:32, Bob Latham wrote:
In article <vi29pq$2s83m$1@dont-email.me>,
Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On 2024-11-25 01:04, Bob Latham wrote:
In article <vhu9f8$1v2tv$2@dont-email.me>,That's exactly what I thought...
Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On 2024-11-23 03:14, Bob Latham wrote:
In article <vhsbt7$1m16a$1@dont-email.me>,Describe exactly what you mean.
Geoff <geoff@nospamgeoffwood.org> wrote:
The insecure lash out.
No.
It's the divide between rationality and objective truth on the one >>>>>>>>> hand against ideology and "feelings" on the other.
You know exactly what I'm saying but I'm not going to be drawn to >>>>>>> specifics when 'free speech' can carry a prison sentence.
...bigot.
Under the current circumstances where people who believe in
reality as opposed to ideological nonsense and stupidity are
called bigots I'm more than happy and proud to wear that badge.
I'm sure all bigots are very happy to "wear that badge".
And lefties adore little more than insulting their opponents it's
always their first action. They do this because their various
arguments are so weak that they're easily demolished by people
like Douglas Murray who never fails to wipe the floor with them.
Plain and simple.
Judging people because they are different than you is the very
heart and soul of bigotry.
Sorry you don't understand my position.
I'm not judging anyone and before you say it, I don't hate anyone
either. I am however, judging current modern ideologies and religions
which deny objective truth. I'm happy for anyone to live as they
wish to live *provided* that lifestyle isn't to the detriment of
other people's lives.
My problem comes when I'm expected to say things and agree with
things that are clearly nonsense. Or indeed when I hear people making
these absurd claims especially when there are children around.
Abandoning reality because it doesn't fit modern sensitivities is the
heart and soul of stupidity. Objective truth will remain even if it's
not sayable in "progressive" company.
On 2024-11-25 09:32, Bob Latham wrote:
In article <vi29pq$2s83m$1@dont-email.me>,I'm sure all bigots are very happy to "wear that badge".
Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On 2024-11-25 01:04, Bob Latham wrote:
In article <vhu9f8$1v2tv$2@dont-email.me>,That's exactly what I thought...
Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On 2024-11-23 03:14, Bob Latham wrote:
In article <vhsbt7$1m16a$1@dont-email.me>,Describe exactly what you mean.
Geoff <geoff@nospamgeoffwood.org> wrote:
The insecure lash out.
No.
It's the divide between rationality and objective truth on the one >>>>>> hand against ideology and "feelings" on the other.
You know exactly what I'm saying but I'm not going to be drawn to
specifics when 'free speech' can carry a prison sentence.
...bigot.
Under the current circumstances where people who believe in reality
as opposed to ideological nonsense and stupidity are called bigots
I'm more than happy and proud to wear that badge.
On 2024-11-25 11:48, Bob Latham wrote:
Sorry you don't understand my position.
I'm not judging anyone and before you say it, I don't hate anyone
either. I am however, judging current modern ideologies and
religions which deny objective truth. I'm happy for anyone to
live as they wish to live *provided* that lifestyle isn't to the
detriment of other people's lives.
My problem comes when I'm expected to say things and agree with
things that are clearly nonsense. Or indeed when I hear people
making these absurd claims especially when there are children
around.
Abandoning reality because it doesn't fit modern sensitivities is
the heart and soul of stupidity. Objective truth will remain even
if it's not sayable in "progressive" company.
Who do you think you're fooling?
Racists made EXACTLY the same argument about people whose skin was
a different colour.
They claimed it was "objective truth" that certain people were
inferior.
In article <vi2t7t$31qci$1@dont-email.me>,
Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On 2024-11-25 11:48, Bob Latham wrote:
Sorry you don't understand my position.
I'm not judging anyone and before you say it, I don't hate anyone
either. I am however, judging current modern ideologies and
religions which deny objective truth. I'm happy for anyone to
live as they wish to live *provided* that lifestyle isn't to the
detriment of other people's lives.
My problem comes when I'm expected to say things and agree with
things that are clearly nonsense. Or indeed when I hear people
making these absurd claims especially when there are children
around.
Abandoning reality because it doesn't fit modern sensitivities is
the heart and soul of stupidity. Objective truth will remain even
if it's not sayable in "progressive" company.
Who do you think you're fooling?
I don't need to make a fool of you......
Racists made EXACTLY the same argument about people whose skin was
a different colour.
They claimed it was "objective truth" that certain people were
inferior.
Did "they"? Well I can't speak for others but I've not gone there or anywhere near it.
But you raise an obvious diversion from the argument, clearly you
know your position is weak.
The truth is you believe in progressive, finger wagging crap and I
don't. I believe in immutable biological sex. The fact based belief
that the whole world believed a few short decades ago and the vast
majority of it still does.
It's only a handful of activists in the spoilt decadent west that
have such a privileged lifestyles they can afford to engage with this ideological clap-trap. They then force their nonsense on others with
the racists or bigots, climate deniers, claims or whatever the
current insult.
It looks like most of the USA now don't care for leftist nonsense any
longer, Trump victory is overwhelming, thank God.
Like him I have seen no evidence of a climate crisis or any tangible
basis for reparations either. More leftists crap.
I see no point in further argument with you, clearly your argument is entirely ideological. You seem to think having "nice views" and
"feelings" is paramount regardless of the need to deny objective
truth and reality itself to hold them. Good luck with that.
On 2024-11-26 01:02, Bob Latham wrote:
In article <vi2t7t$31qci$1@dont-email.me>,
Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On 2024-11-25 11:48, Bob Latham wrote:
Sorry you don't understand my position.
I'm not judging anyone and before you say it, I don't hate anyone
either. I am however, judging current modern ideologies and
religions which deny objective truth. I'm happy for anyone to
live as they wish to live *provided* that lifestyle isn't to the
detriment of other people's lives.
My problem comes when I'm expected to say things and agree with
things that are clearly nonsense. Or indeed when I hear people
making these absurd claims especially when there are children
around.
Abandoning reality because it doesn't fit modern sensitivities is
the heart and soul of stupidity. Objective truth will remain even
if it's not sayable in "progressive" company.
Who do you think you're fooling?
I don't need to make a fool of you......
Racists made EXACTLY the same argument about people whose skin was
a different colour.
They claimed it was "objective truth" that certain people were
inferior.
Did "they"? Well I can't speak for others but I've not gone
there or anywhere near it.
That is EXACTLY where you go.
But you raise an obvious diversion from the argument, clearly you
know your position is weak.
The truth is you believe in progressive, finger wagging crap and I
don't. I believe in immutable biological sex. The fact based belief
that the whole world believed a few short decades ago and the vast
majority of it still does.
You do, huh?
Then you don't understand biology to begin with.
In article <vi2t7t$31qci$1@dont-email.me>,'Like him', I'm so relieved that you have a better understanding of
Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
It looks like most of the USA now don't care for leftist nonsense any
longer, Trump victory is overwhelming, thank God.
Like him I have seen no evidence of a climate crisis or any tangible
basis for reparations either. More leftists crap.
On 26/11/2024 10:02 pm, Bob Latham wrote:
In article <vi2t7t$31qci$1@dont-email.me>,
Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
It looks like most of the USA now don't care for leftist nonsense
any longer, Trump victory is overwhelming, thank God.
Like him I have seen no evidence of a climate crisis or any
tangible basis for reparations either. More leftists crap.
'Like him', I'm so relieved that you have a better understanding of
climate science than the vast vast majority (as in all but a tiny
few with wacky alternative agendas) of those who have spent their
academic and professional lives studying that sort of thing.