Sysop: | Amessyroom |
---|---|
Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
Users: | 43 |
Nodes: | 6 (1 / 5) |
Uptime: | 38:53:59 |
Calls: | 282 |
Calls today: | 1 |
Files: | 884 |
Messages: | 75,727 |
https://www.majorgeeks.com/content/page/stop_apple_scanning_iphone_photos.html
Apple's new photo-scanning feature will scan photos stored in iCloud to
see whether they match known Child Sexual Abuse Material (CSAM).
Chips Loral wrote on Mon, 29 Jul 2024 18:10:29 -0600 :
https://www.majorgeeks.com/content/page/stop_apple_scanning_iphone_photos.html
Apple's new photo-scanning feature will scan photos stored in iCloud to
see whether they match known Child Sexual Abuse Material (CSAM).
Wow. I'm impressed. I thought there weren't any other adults on this Apple newsgroup, but apparently there are people who also read the news.
Because I only think logically, my rather sensible position has never
changed,
You have variously said that "CSAM is bullshit", "applauded Apple" for shelving their plan, that there were "zero convictions", and that the conviction rate "was the most important" thing.
something Apple didn't actually end up doing?
Alan wrote:
something Apple didn't actually end up doing?
https://www.majorgeeks.com/content/page/stop_apple_scanning_iphone_photos.html
Apple’s new iPhone photo-scanning feature is a very controversial thing. You might want to consider the only current option to stop Apple from scanning your photos.
Alan wrote:
This is all talking about something that Apple did not end up doing,
https://www.majorgeeks.com/content/page/stop_apple_scanning_iphone_photos.html
Apple’s new iPhone photo-scanning feature is a very controversial thing. You might want to consider the only current option to stop Apple from scanning your photos.
This is all talking about something that Apple did not end up doing,
Alan wrote:
Why do you think this is a good strategy?
https://www.majorgeeks.com/content/page/stop_apple_scanning_iphone_photos.html
Apple’s new iPhone photo-scanning feature is a very controversial thing. You might want to consider the only current option to stop Apple from scanning your photos.
Andrew <andrew@spam.net> wrote:
Wow. I'm impressed. I thought there weren't any other adults on this
Apple newsgroup, but apparently there are people who also read the
news.
I'm sure the Apple zealots, who only watch Apple's (admittedly
brilliant) advertisements for all their news, will folllow their
normal procedure of
1. First they will brazenly deny any and all facts they didn't know
2. When you persist and send them a link - they will NOT click on the
link as they continue to brazenly deny all facts they don't know 3.
If you persist, they will say that the link doesn't support what they
"think" you said - and they'll try to deflect that way) 4. For a
while they'll deflect the conversation any way their childish brains
can think of (usually claiming Samsung made Apple do it) 5. At some
point they're forced to accept the fact but they will still
childishly claim that the link isn't what you said it was 6. Then
their childish brains will concoct all sorts of excuses (usually
claiming it's a bug so it's not Apple's fault after all, or they
often use the excuse that Apple only "thought" about it) 7. Finally,
they'll start calling you vitriolic names because their childish
brains can't handle any fact about Apple they don't like
Just watch. They're so childish, they're 100% predictable.
Apple zealots *hate* that Apple never is what Apple told them Apple
was.
Jolly Roger jumps to #7 immediately.