Sysop: | Amessyroom |
---|---|
Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
Users: | 42 |
Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
Uptime: | 01:52:34 |
Calls: | 220 |
Calls today: | 1 |
Files: | 824 |
Messages: | 121,543 |
Posted today: | 6 |
Makes sense. I'll look into the ebuild thing and writing whatever script
it needs. That might make things easier as well.
On 11/8/24 18:05, Phillip Frabott wrote:
Makes sense. I'll look into the ebuild thing and writing whatever
script it needs. That might make things easier as well.
I would recommend that you read / familiarize yourself with creating
your own repo that can be used beside the Gentoo repo.
That way you can integrate your own packages into the Gentoo emerge
ecosystem via your own repo.
You can also copy ebuilds for versions of things that you want from the Gentoo repo to your repo as oldest things do eventually get cleaned up
out of the Gentoo repo. But if you have a copy of the desired ebuild in your own repo, you'll always have it.
So I'm considering a move from my own source-built install of Linux to something else. Trying to install new versions of KDE have become a
problem and I'm not interested in going the LFS route. I've started to consider other distros. I looked at Arch/Manjaro which I thought were
close to what I wanted but I didn't like the fact that most things are
still binary. As a source-only type of guy I was hoping to find
something that was more source-only based. A friend recommended I use
Gentoo. I took a quick look at the web site but I wanted to get a few thoughts from others.
My basic requirements are as follows.
1: Needs to be fully source built. No pre-built binaries or shortcuts.
This includes during initial installation as well. (I'm sure a few core pre-builts are required for the install disc/USB flash to work. I'll
accept that if I have to, but install to /dev/sda should be built from source)
2: Needs to be fully configurable. If I want to remove /usr I should be
able to do so (I won't do that but this expresses the amount of config freedom I want out of it).
3: Needs to support manual building from source without a package
manager should I need to. (I don't mind if the main system uses a
package manager to build from source but I want to be able to have the
option not to use a package manager once the system is up, something
that is hard to do with Arch/Manjaro)
4: I want to be able to use Systemd. I know Gentoo uses OpenRC but I've
heard I can use Systemd instead.
5: I need to be able to use GRUB as a bootloader.
6: I need to still dual-boot Windows 11. I work from home and
unfortunately I need to have access to Windows 11 on the same machine.
Since GRUB would be required, I assume this is a non-issue but I'm
putting it on the list anyways.
Based on all that, would you all recommend Gentoo as a viable option for
my requirements? If not, what would be other options you'd recommend
that fit all these requirements?
[ Please note, I'm not going to discuss alternatives to GRUB, KDE, and Systemd. I'm sure everyone has their own opinions about these but I'm
just not interested in switching to anything else. ]
Thank you all for your time,
So I'm considering a move from my own source-built install of Linux to something else. Trying to install new versions of KDE have become a
problem and I'm not interested in going the LFS route. I've started to consider other distros. I looked at Arch/Manjaro which I thought were
close to what I wanted but I didn't like the fact that most things are
still binary. As a source-only type of guy I was hoping to find
something that was more source-only based. A friend recommended I use
Gentoo. I took a quick look at the web site but I wanted to get a few thoughts from others.
My basic requirements are as follows.
1: Needs to be fully source built. No pre-built binaries or shortcuts.
This includes during initial installation as well. (I'm sure a few
core pre-builts are required for the install disc/USB flash to work.
I'll accept that if I have to, but install to /dev/sda should be built
from source)
2: Needs to be fully configurable. If I want to remove /usr I should
be able to do so (I won't do that but this expresses the amount of
config freedom I want out of it).
3: Needs to support manual building from source without a package
manager should I need to. (I don't mind if the main system uses a
package manager to build from source but I want to be able to have the
option not to use a package manager once the system is up, something
that is hard to do with Arch/Manjaro)
4: I want to be able to use Systemd. I know Gentoo uses OpenRC but
I've heard I can use Systemd instead.
5: I need to be able to use GRUB as a bootloader.
6: I need to still dual-boot Windows 11. I work from home and
unfortunately I need to have access to Windows 11 on the same machine.
Since GRUB would be required, I assume this is a non-issue but I'm
putting it on the list anyways.
Based on all that, would you all recommend Gentoo as a viable option
for my requirements? If not, what would be other options you'd
recommend that fit all these requirements?
[ Please note, I'm not going to discuss alternatives to GRUB, KDE, and Systemd. I'm sure everyone has their own opinions about these but I'm
just not interested in switching to anything else. ]
Thank you all for your time,
So I'm considering a move from my own source-built install of Linux to something else. Trying to install new versions of KDE have become a
problem and I'm not interested in going the LFS route. I've started to consider other distros. I looked at Arch/Manjaro which I thought were
close to what I wanted but I didn't like the fact that most things are
still binary. As a source-only type of guy I was hoping to find
something that was more source-only based. A friend recommended I use
Gentoo. I took a quick look at the web site but I wanted to get a few thoughts from others.
My basic requirements are as follows.
1: Needs to be fully source built. No pre-built binaries or shortcuts.
This includes during initial installation as well. (I'm sure a few core pre-builts are required for the install disc/USB flash to work. I'll
accept that if I have to, but install to /dev/sda should be built from source)
2: Needs to be fully configurable. If I want to remove /usr I should be
able to do so (I won't do that but this expresses the amount of config freedom I want out of it).
3: Needs to support manual building from source without a package
manager should I need to. (I don't mind if the main system uses a
package manager to build from source but I want to be able to have the
option not to use a package manager once the system is up, something
that is hard to do with Arch/Manjaro)
4: I want to be able to use Systemd. I know Gentoo uses OpenRC but I've
heard I can use Systemd instead.
5: I need to be able to use GRUB as a bootloader.
6: I need to still dual-boot Windows 11. I work from home and
unfortunately I need to have access to Windows 11 on the same machine.
Since GRUB would be required, I assume this is a non-issue but I'm
putting it on the list anyways.
On 08/11/2024 19.32, Phillip Frabott wrote:
So I'm considering a move from my own source-built install of Linux to
something else. Trying to install new versions of KDE have become a
problem and I'm not interested in going the LFS route. I've started to
consider other distros. I looked at Arch/Manjaro which I thought were
close to what I wanted but I didn't like the fact that most things are
still binary. As a source-only type of guy I was hoping to find
something that was more source-only based. A friend recommended I use
Gentoo. I took a quick look at the web site but I wanted to get a few
thoughts from others.
My basic requirements are as follows.
1: Needs to be fully source built. No pre-built binaries or shortcuts.
This includes during initial installation as well. (I'm sure a few
core pre-builts are required for the install disc/USB flash to work.
I'll accept that if I have to, but install to /dev/sda should be built
from source)
Most people install stage 3, this has the core prebuilt, you are free to explore stage 1 or stage 2 installation, not as well documented.
2: Needs to be fully configurable. If I want to remove /usr I should
be able to do so (I won't do that but this expresses the amount of
config freedom I want out of it).
As long as you don't use systemd you should have full control of your
setup, for sure some stuff may need you to patch builds yourself if you
stray too far from the "default".
3: Needs to support manual building from source without a package
manager should I need to. (I don't mind if the main system uses a
package manager to build from source but I want to be able to have the
option not to use a package manager once the system is up, something
that is hard to do with Arch/Manjaro)
All distros supports building, just no distro's package manager will be
aware of your manual built stuff
The ebuild is the instruction how to build, so if you know what to do on
the command line, then it will not be too difficult to write a simple
ebuild for it and then things are taken care of. You will have saved
time already if you compile something more than once.
Keep in mind that Gentoo has USE flags, which enables/disables features
in a package, so you shouldn't build your own version of libpng
manually, but adjust the USE flags to get one that fits you. Otherwise
when you emerge a package that depends on libpng, it will build a libpng based on the defaults and that application you wanted will use the
gentoo libpng and not the one you built.
4: I want to be able to use Systemd. I know Gentoo uses OpenRC but
I've heard I can use Systemd instead.
Yes, Gentoo allows you to use systemd instead of OpenRC, but that comes
with it's limitations.
5: I need to be able to use GRUB as a bootloader.
Gentoo uses GRUB2, it dropped support for GRUB quite many years ago.
6: I need to still dual-boot Windows 11. I work from home and
unfortunately I need to have access to Windows 11 on the same machine.
Since GRUB would be required, I assume this is a non-issue but I'm
putting it on the list anyways.
lilo works too for dual boot... but default for amd64 installs is GRUB2.
Yes, Gentoo allows you to use systemd instead of OpenRC, but that comes
with it's limitations.
1: Needs to be fully source built. No pre-built binaries or
shortcuts. This includes during initial installation as well. (I'm
sure a few core pre-builts are required for the install disc/USB
flash to work. I'll accept that if I have to, but install to /dev/sda
should be built from source)
2: Needs to be fully configurable. If I want to remove /usr I should
be able to do so (I won't do that but this expresses the amount of
config freedom I want out of it).
3: Needs to support manual building from source without a package
manager should I need to. (I don't mind if the main system uses a
package manager to build from source but I want to be able to have
the option not to use a package manager once the system is up,
something that is hard to do with Arch/Manjaro)
4: I want to be able to use Systemd. I know Gentoo uses OpenRC but
I've heard I can use Systemd instead.
5: I need to be able to use GRUB as a bootloader.
6: I need to still dual-boot Windows 11. I work from home and
unfortunately I need to have access to Windows 11 on the same
machine. Since GRUB would be required, I assume this is a non-issue
but I'm putting it on the list anyways.
Based on all that, would you all recommend Gentoo as a viable option
for my requirements? If not, what would be other options you'd
recommend that fit all these requirements?