• Quickie Report - Installing Fedora on BMAX Mini-PC

    From 186283@ud0s4.net@21:1/5 to All on Fri Aug 9 23:20:18 2024
    BMAX (almost identical to BeeLink) boxes are mostly
    about 6 inches square an maybe two inches thick.
    A large variety of CPUs/configs can be hand. The
    prices are VERY good. Typically two 4k HDMI plugs
    (cable included !). 2xUSB2 + 2xUSB3 is typical.
    They have space in the bottom for an 8mm thick
    SATA laptop drive/SSD. They run off a wall-wart.

    A few months ago I attempted to install Fedora-40
    (which was brand new at the time) on a BMAX N95
    box (LXDE spin). As I'd mentioned here it was NOT
    particularly successful. Wound up using Manjaro
    on two such units (I'm OFF debians since Worm).

    THIS time however things went quite well (with the
    XFCE spin) on an N100 box (N95/N100 are almost
    identical - low-end Celeron range laptop chips ...
    search "amazon laptop N100"). 16gb RAM + 512gb
    NVRam chip - perfect for Linux. This unit was
    $149 USD. It DOES come with Win11 ... which I
    did not want to run for even a microsecond
    for reasons of pride :-)

    Procedure : Insert USB drive with Fedora ISO.
    Power-up and tap Del and F10 (not sure which
    works, so tap 'em both). This brings up the
    BIOS menus. Change the default boot drive to
    the USB. DO turn on the "last state" option
    for restarts (it's easier to find in newer
    units - BURIED on older ones) while you're
    in there. Set the date/time and such.

    Reboot. The Fedora Live should come up automagically.
    Like since forever it IS the Anaconda installer
    utility you want.

    In the drives setup part, choose 'custom' and
    manually DELETE everything on the internal SSD.
    DIE WINDERS DIE !!!

    Then add an EFI partition (maybe 100mb) and
    then a "/" partition. EFI should be "sda1" and
    the system part "sda2". A variety of partition
    types can be had, but for MY uses plain old
    EXT4 was the most straight-up by far. Note
    Anaconda has a "delete existing partitions
    AS NEEDED" default but there's no obvious
    "Use Entire Disk" like you see in many other
    installers. So, 'custom' is best to get
    exactly what you want.

    All the other settings were pretty strightforward,
    box net name, user/root setup, the usual. Then
    you can proceed to the install. I'd suggest
    having a live hardwired ethernet connection, but
    with Fedora Live MOST of the setup requiring
    such seems to be in the immediate post-install
    reboot.

    Anyway, once installed, reboot and deal with
    the typical crap. Then use 'dnfdragora' to
    get all the updates. Note the "apply" button
    MAY be hidden down at the bottom of your
    display (mine was small).

    Reboot once more and you're ready. Install
    what you will. I'm using TigerVNC for remote
    access (or ssh, on alt port). Also installed
    SAMBA since I might use this box attached to
    some external USB drives as a local storage
    center.

    Note that in Fedora your 'regular
    user' is NOT in /etc/sudoers - you have
    to edit and add (and yes you CAN use nano
    or whatever, just be careful). Sudo CAN
    be adjusted to use the ROOT pw instead
    of the 'regular users' - which seems smarter.

    Odd bit - in TigerVNC - POP-UP notices,
    like password queries, do NOT show up
    on the vitual console. Run dnfdragora as
    root to get around this. This XFCE also
    does not have right-click options like
    "add to desktop" on the main menu items,
    you have to use 'create shortcut' from
    the main screen. Put Tiger into the
    'autostart' - works best there and
    you can add the '-geometry' and screen
    number params. Auto-Login is in a
    /etc/lightdm config file - uncomment
    and fill in user and grace time.

    Finally, note the default (RHEL-type) firewall
    is a pain in the ass to figure out how to let
    SSH/VNC/etc ports through from the outside.
    I *never* use the defaults since that's what
    all the bots look for.

    Anyway - MUCH better experience this time.
    I think the XFCE spin gets more attention
    than old LXDE plus the whole system has
    had a few months to get past those post-
    release bugs. F40 now seems GOOD.

    If you don't need all the I/O pins found on
    a PI then these cheap little boxes are the
    cat's meow for practical Linux uses. The
    "low end" CPUs (for Winders concerns) are
    "plenty fast" for Linux - an N100 is over
    twice as fast as a Pi5. You CAN get BMax/Link
    with up to i7's or AMD equivs - but it all
    depends on what YOU plan to do.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From rbowman@21:1/5 to 186282@ud0s4.net on Sat Aug 10 04:49:53 2024
    On Fri, 9 Aug 2024 23:20:18 -0400, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote:

    BMAX (almost identical to BeeLink) boxes are mostly about 6 inches
    square an maybe two inches thick.
    A large variety of CPUs/configs can be hand. The prices are VERY good. Typically two 4k HDMI plugs (cable included !). 2xUSB2 + 2xUSB3 is
    typical. They have space in the bottom for an 8mm thick SATA laptop drive/SSD. They run off a wall-wart.

    I've been running Ubuntu 22.04 on a BeeLink for a couple of years and am
    very happy with it. It is a little upscale from your BMAX with a Ryzen 7
    4700U. It was an experiment that worked out well.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From D@21:1/5 to 186282@ud0s4.net on Sat Aug 10 11:11:16 2024
    On Sat, 10 Aug 2024, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote:

    On 8/10/24 12:49 AM, rbowman wrote:
    On Fri, 9 Aug 2024 23:20:18 -0400, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote:

    BMAX (almost identical to BeeLink) boxes are mostly about 6 inches
    square an maybe two inches thick.
    A large variety of CPUs/configs can be hand. The prices are VERY good.
    Typically two 4k HDMI plugs (cable included !). 2xUSB2 + 2xUSB3 is
    typical. They have space in the bottom for an 8mm thick SATA laptop
    drive/SSD. They run off a wall-wart.

    I've been running Ubuntu 22.04 on a BeeLink for a couple of years and am
    very happy with it. It is a little upscale from your BMAX with a Ryzen 7
    4700U. It was an experiment that worked out well.

    I have both brands - and they're mostly identical hardware.
    As said, there are a LOT of configs to be had - from very
    low-performance on up. Real i3's and above DO need a cooling
    fan however. The "laptop" chips seem to work OK without fans.

    In any case, if you really don't need a PI and all the
    I/O pins then THESE seem to be THE way to go - compact,
    cheap, good performance. Anything you need for a very
    good price.

    Still have some PIs ... and DO need those I/O pins for
    certain needs. NICE to have such a broad selection of
    boards these days - something perfect for each need.

    As reported, my current experience with Fedora is now GOOD.
    I've had weird problems with Deb WORM and have just abandoned
    that whole line for now. Manjaro and other Arch derivs ARE
    pretty good - but Fedora is just more "general consumer".
    I'm too old now to put up with big fights making an OS
    work. If you want WORK ... well ... there's always SlackWare :-)

    Oddly, I accidentally ordered TWO BMax ... must have pushed
    the "order again" button but seen no effect. Now I have to
    figure out what to DO with the extra unit. I've got an ISO
    of FreeBSD ... so maybe ........ if so I'll post a little
    summary of that experience.


    A NAS and off site backup solution?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From 186283@ud0s4.net@21:1/5 to rbowman on Sat Aug 10 04:51:37 2024
    On 8/10/24 12:49 AM, rbowman wrote:
    On Fri, 9 Aug 2024 23:20:18 -0400, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote:

    BMAX (almost identical to BeeLink) boxes are mostly about 6 inches
    square an maybe two inches thick.
    A large variety of CPUs/configs can be hand. The prices are VERY good.
    Typically two 4k HDMI plugs (cable included !). 2xUSB2 + 2xUSB3 is
    typical. They have space in the bottom for an 8mm thick SATA laptop
    drive/SSD. They run off a wall-wart.

    I've been running Ubuntu 22.04 on a BeeLink for a couple of years and am
    very happy with it. It is a little upscale from your BMAX with a Ryzen 7 4700U. It was an experiment that worked out well.

    I have both brands - and they're mostly identical hardware.
    As said, there are a LOT of configs to be had - from very
    low-performance on up. Real i3's and above DO need a cooling
    fan however. The "laptop" chips seem to work OK without fans.

    In any case, if you really don't need a PI and all the
    I/O pins then THESE seem to be THE way to go - compact,
    cheap, good performance. Anything you need for a very
    good price.

    Still have some PIs ... and DO need those I/O pins for
    certain needs. NICE to have such a broad selection of
    boards these days - something perfect for each need.

    As reported, my current experience with Fedora is now GOOD.
    I've had weird problems with Deb WORM and have just abandoned
    that whole line for now. Manjaro and other Arch derivs ARE
    pretty good - but Fedora is just more "general consumer".
    I'm too old now to put up with big fights making an OS
    work. If you want WORK ... well ... there's always SlackWare :-)

    Oddly, I accidentally ordered TWO BMax ... must have pushed
    the "order again" button but seen no effect. Now I have to
    figure out what to DO with the extra unit. I've got an ISO
    of FreeBSD ... so maybe ........ if so I'll post a little
    summary of that experience.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From 186283@ud0s4.net@21:1/5 to All on Sat Aug 10 05:16:43 2024
    On 8/10/24 5:11 AM, D wrote:


    On Sat, 10 Aug 2024, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote:

    On 8/10/24 12:49 AM, rbowman wrote:
    On Fri, 9 Aug 2024 23:20:18 -0400, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote:

    BMAX (almost identical to BeeLink) boxes are mostly about 6 inches
    square an maybe two inches thick.
    A large variety of CPUs/configs can be hand. The prices are VERY good. >>>> Typically two 4k HDMI plugs (cable included !). 2xUSB2 + 2xUSB3 is
    typical. They have space in the bottom for an 8mm thick SATA laptop
    drive/SSD. They run off a wall-wart.

    I've been running Ubuntu 22.04 on a BeeLink for a couple of years and am >>> very happy with it. It is a little upscale from your BMAX with a Ryzen 7 >>> 4700U. It was an experiment that worked out well.

     I have both brands - and they're mostly identical hardware.
     As said, there are a LOT of configs to be had - from very
     low-performance on up. Real i3's and above DO need a cooling
     fan however. The "laptop" chips seem to work OK without fans.

     In any case, if you really don't need a PI and all the
     I/O pins then THESE seem to be THE way to go - compact,
     cheap, good performance. Anything you need for a very
     good price.

     Still have some PIs ... and DO need those I/O pins for
     certain needs. NICE to have such a broad selection of
     boards these days - something perfect for each need.

     As reported, my current experience with Fedora is now GOOD.
     I've had weird problems with Deb WORM and have just abandoned
     that whole line for now. Manjaro and other Arch derivs ARE
     pretty good - but Fedora is just more "general consumer".
     I'm too old now to put up with big fights making an OS
     work. If you want WORK ... well ... there's always SlackWare  :-)

     Oddly, I accidentally ordered TWO BMax ... must have pushed
     the "order again" button but seen no effect. Now I have to
     figure out what to DO with the extra unit. I've got an ISO
     of FreeBSD ... so maybe ........ if so I'll post a little
     summary of that experience.


    A NAS and off site backup solution?

    Possibly ... I'll have to get creative :-)

    I've got a 4-bay external USB-3 unit ... some
    12gb Gold drives and ....

    I trust the BSDs more for 'security' these days.

    OpenBSD is probably the MOST secure, but as a
    result it's harder to work with and the DRIVERS
    are years behind the hardware curve. That may
    or may not be relevant, depending on your app.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)