Sysop: | Amessyroom |
---|---|
Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
Users: | 28 |
Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
Uptime: | 50:37:01 |
Calls: | 422 |
Files: | 1,024 |
Messages: | 90,516 |
On 17 May 2025 18:01:35 GMT, vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote:
On Thu, 15 May 2025 18:42:47 +0000, Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> wrote
in <pan$e6d88$f019cb49$2e3cccf9$253bfbf1@linux.rocks>:
GNU/Linux has total IPv6 capabilities but this is also fully
configurable.
Since I operate a standalone workstation that is only connected to the
Internet via Comcast, my system and software configuration only
includes IPv4. (My local network certainly does not require it.)
IOW, I don't need IPv6 and therefore I exclude it.
Does anybody use or need IPv6?
I suppose that since the vast majority of GNU/Linux users depend on a
distro and that since most distros automatically enable IPv6 the
answer is that most users have IPv6 enabled whether they need it or
not.
(It's considered good netiquette to announce a followup-to when >>crossposting. Please consider doing that in the future.)
I didn't notice the OP had set a follow up to COLA. Had I
noticed I wouldn't have replied....
COLA is Troll-Land.
[]'s
On Sat, 17 May 2025 15:13:28 -0300, Shadow <Sh@dow.br> wrote in <r7kh2ktuo8sl5hrn77gih786uqdklfnvqq@4ax.com>:
On 17 May 2025 18:01:35 GMT, vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote:
On Thu, 15 May 2025 18:42:47 +0000, Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> wrote
in <pan$e6d88$f019cb49$2e3cccf9$253bfbf1@linux.rocks>:
GNU/Linux has total IPv6 capabilities but this is also fully
configurable.
Since I operate a standalone workstation that is only connected to the >>>> Internet via Comcast, my system and software configuration only
includes IPv4. (My local network certainly does not require it.)
IOW, I don't need IPv6 and therefore I exclude it.
Does anybody use or need IPv6?
I suppose that since the vast majority of GNU/Linux users depend on a
distro and that since most distros automatically enable IPv6 the
answer is that most users have IPv6 enabled whether they need it or
not.
(It's considered good netiquette to announce a followup-to when
crossposting. Please consider doing that in the future.)
I didn't notice the OP had set a follow up to COLA. Had I
noticed I wouldn't have replied....
COLA is Troll-Land.
[]'s
Some of us folks are trying to be topical in cola. Still, it needs
a fairly robust killfile, because it gets a lot of political spam.
(For a while, I was posting build reports in there as new
kernels came out, but there doesn't seem to be much interest.)
One could argue that Linux advocacy isn't all that necessary
anymore, since it has already all but taken over the planet.
(Except for the desktop, of course -- that is still a Windows world.)
Ummmm ... Linux/BSD is a *niche* ... but has not
'taken over the planet' and likely never will
except in the 'systems' universe.
As for IPV6 ... my ISP doesn't use it. NO use at
all - so I disable it to prevent problems.
Servers? The market is led by Unixoid systems. The vast majority of
existing cloud systems runs GNU/Linux.
On Sun, 18 May 2025 10:02:22 +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
Servers? The market is led by Unixoid systems. The vast majority of
existing cloud systems runs GNU/Linux.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Azure_Linux
If you look at AWS Linux becomes very attractive. A Windows Server
instance is much more expensive than any of the Linux flavors.
Call it
what you will but for some strange reason Windows Server is cheaper on
Azure.