• Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/spa

    From D@21:1/5 to The Natural Philosopher on Mon Oct 28 11:22:01 2024
    XPost: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text,
    while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools.

    On Mon, 28 Oct 2024, The Natural Philosopher wrote:

    On 27/10/2024 21:34, D wrote:


    On Sun, 27 Oct 2024, The Natural Philosopher wrote:

    On 27/10/2024 05:35, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote:
    On 10/26/24 10:21 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
    On Sun, 27 Oct 2024 02:06:21 GMT, Charlie Gibbs wrote:

    "Our whole universe was in a hot dense state..."

    As I look around, I see some in this noisegroup who still seem to be in >>>>> that state ...

       Normally these groups are VERY quiet. But then it's only
       about a week before elections.

       As for the universe, it USED to be in a 'hot dense state',
       but has cooled-off considerably. If 'dark energy' calx are
       correct we're already on the downside - headed for icy doom.

    Well so says the metaphysics of the classical scientific world view.

    We are surfing a wave of entropy created by the big bang and will all end >>> up washed up the beach gasping and then die.

    Of course  the metaphysics of the classical scientific world view is only >>> a man made theory, when it comes down to it. And can neither be proven
    true or false.


    The world actually can be proven true. G.E. Moore did it many decades ago. >> Here's a hand!

    Well no, in any given terms it cant be. At best you end up with 'something exists, even if its only me thinking something exists'

    Moore's logic is flawed. He has to presuppose an external world in which a hand can be held up before he can perform the action.

    Which is in the limit circular thinking, as if you stop thinking (proper transcendental meditation) you and the world both vanish, subjectively.

    Actually, the brilliance is that he does not. The hand is proof of the
    external world. The TM-guy does not cease to exist, and neither does the
    world. You can easily utilize the same proof as Moore. It is brilliant in
    its simplicity, and I think that is why some people don't get it. It is
    simply too "easy".

    Another extremely strong point in its favour is that it is actually the people who propose that there is no external world who need to come up with the arguments for it and so far, no one has been able to successfully convince
    the world at large, that the external world does not exist, by coming up
    with an alternative, that has iron clad proof.

    Another indication of the strength of the position of a material world
    existing is that about 70% of professional philosopher subscribe to this.
    This is of course not a proof, but a strong indication as well.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Natural Philosopher@21:1/5 to All on Mon Oct 28 10:32:10 2024
    XPost: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 28/10/2024 10:22, D wrote:


    On Mon, 28 Oct 2024, The Natural Philosopher wrote:

    On 27/10/2024 21:34, D wrote:


    On Sun, 27 Oct 2024, The Natural Philosopher wrote:

    On 27/10/2024 05:35, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote:
    On 10/26/24 10:21 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
    On Sun, 27 Oct 2024 02:06:21 GMT, Charlie Gibbs wrote:

    "Our whole universe was in a hot dense state..."

    As I look around, I see some in this noisegroup who still seem to
    be in
    that state ...

       Normally these groups are VERY quiet. But then it's only
       about a week before elections.

       As for the universe, it USED to be in a 'hot dense state',
       but has cooled-off considerably. If 'dark energy' calx are
       correct we're already on the downside - headed for icy doom.

    Well so says the metaphysics of the classical scientific world view.

    We are surfing a wave of entropy created by the big bang and will
    all end up washed up the beach gasping and then die.

    Of course  the metaphysics of the classical scientific world view is
    only a man made theory, when it comes down to it. And can neither be
    proven true or false.


    The world actually can be proven true. G.E. Moore did it many decades
    ago. Here's a hand!

    Well no, in any given terms it cant be. At best you end up with
    'something exists, even if its only me thinking something exists'

    Moore's logic is flawed. He has to presuppose an external world in
    which a hand can be held up before he can perform the action.

    Which is in the limit circular thinking, as if you stop thinking
    (proper transcendental meditation) you and the world both vanish,
    subjectively.

    Actually, the brilliance is that he does not. The hand is proof of the external world. The TM-guy does not cease to exist, and neither does the world. You can easily utilize the same proof as Moore. It is brilliant
    in its simplicity, and I think that is why some people don't get it. It
    is simply too "easy".

    Another extremely strong point in its favour is that it is actually the people who propose that there is no external world who need to come up
    with the arguments for it and so far, no one has been able to
    successfully convince the world at large, that the external world does
    not exist, by coming up with an alternative, that has iron clad proof.

    Another indication of the strength of the position of a material world existing is that about 70% of professional philosopher subscribe to
    this. This is of course not a proof, but a strong indication as well.

    I think you are still stuck in the same dichotomy that transcendental
    idealism simply removes from the board.

    Is it all in the mind or is the mind the product of it all?
    TI says 'both, and neither'

    Reality as we understand it is 'something else' interpreted by 'our minds'

    There is no *proof* of any of this. These are metaphysical positions.
    Judged only by their *utility*. Models that are more or less useful

    Their truth content is indecidable.

    And anyone who claims otherwise has missed the boat

    And at least 90% of professional philosophers don't really understand metaphysics.


    --
    Civilization exists by geological consent, subject to change without notice.
    – Will Durant

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From D@21:1/5 to 186282@ud0s4.net on Tue Oct 29 11:32:29 2024
    XPost: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text,
    while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools.

    On Mon, 28 Oct 2024, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote:

    On 10/28/24 6:10 AM, D wrote:


    On Mon, 28 Oct 2024, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote:

    On 10/27/24 5:34 PM, D wrote:


    On Sun, 27 Oct 2024, The Natural Philosopher wrote:

    On 27/10/2024 05:35, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote:
    On 10/26/24 10:21 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
    On Sun, 27 Oct 2024 02:06:21 GMT, Charlie Gibbs wrote:

    "Our whole universe was in a hot dense state..."

    As I look around, I see some in this noisegroup who still seem to be >>>>>>> in
    that state ...

       Normally these groups are VERY quiet. But then it's only
       about a week before elections.

       As for the universe, it USED to be in a 'hot dense state',
       but has cooled-off considerably. If 'dark energy' calx are
       correct we're already on the downside - headed for icy doom.

    Well so says the metaphysics of the classical scientific world view. >>>>>
    We are surfing a wave of entropy created by the big bang and will all >>>>> end up washed up the beach gasping and then die.

    Of course  the metaphysics of the classical scientific world view is >>>>> only a man made theory, when it comes down to it. And can neither be >>>>> proven true or false.


    The world actually can be proven true. G.E. Moore did it many decades
    ago. Here's a hand!


     Even the Buddha said the universe was "real" - just
     that creatures like US, maybe any, could never really
     see it's entirety - barely a key-hole view. Our evolution,
     bodies, senses, brains ... we see things through "Human-
     Colored Glasses" and that's our kinda faux view of things.

    I think this is pretty obvious. I also think it shows that Buddha was a
    wise man!

    If it's obvious, why don't I hear it much ? It represents

    Maybe you are talking with the wrong people? I think about 100% of the
    people I talk with accept that the world is real.

    As for not knowing the entire world, that is also not a shocking
    revelation. Just look at the theoretical amount of information that can be stored in the brain vs the amount of information that makes up the world.
    The world is bigger.

    Or coming at it from another angle, just look at our limited capacities
    across the wave spectrum, and compare with all the events out in the world taking place all across the spectrum.

    The second paragraph not many people think about, so that is probably why
    you (or I) never hear that much.

    a loss of self-determination, a stone wall we can never
    penetrate ... forever trapped in our little tiny warped
    version of the universe.

    I don't understand this.

    Actually, Plato's "Allegory Of The Cave" points to the
    same conclusion, he just kinda leaves off the last para -
    maybe for political reasons. Plato and Buddha were near-
    contemporaries and some ideas may have filtered across
    from the east.

    This is most likely the truth. Have a look at the gymno-sophists. There is proof of interaction between ancient greece and india.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)