• Re: Piece of shit iOS has absolutely zero privacy for God's sake

    From Andrews@21:1/5 to Andrews on Sun Nov 17 03:55:48 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    Andrews wrote on Fri, 15 Nov 2024 23:42:20 -0000 (UTC) :

    Doesn't Apple advertise privacy?
    Where is it?
    Is there a way to SKIP that privacy-robbing collection of your phone?

    It's interesting that Apple trolls know NOTHING about Apple products.

    FACT: Only Apple forces EVERYONE to give them their phone number.
    Nobody else does that but Apple. Not Microsoft. Not Google. Just Apple.

    So I called up Apple and asked why it's impossible to use an iPad without having to give the Apple mothership a valid phone number for them to abuse.

    Apple said, effectively, most of its customers love having no privacy.

    Specifically they said that the "find my" garbage requires the phone
    number, so, they said it was to "protect me" even though I was rather clear that I will never need a "find my" mechanism in my life.

    If I lose the iPad, so what.
    I lose nothing but an iPad.

    Big deal.
    I don't even have biometrics or a passcode on the thing.

    They can have it.
    Anyway, the fact remains Apple is the only common consumer operating system vendor who requires your phone number just to set up your device for apps.

    Even though there is no privacy on any Apple device, there was a secret way
    to get the iPad set up with a new account not associated with another
    account. Sort of.

    <https://i.postimg.cc/VvtMXcL2/noprivacy01.jpg>
    <https://i.postimg.cc/HLjrQC63/noprivacy02.jpg>
    <https://i.postimg.cc/P57XnvMz/noprivacy03.jpg>
    <https://i.postimg.cc/TPSp0HSx/noprivacy04.jpg>
    <https://i.postimg.cc/1XWx0bCc/noprivacy05.jpg>
    <https://i.postimg.cc/6Q7Q8fQm/noprivacy06.jpg>
    <https://i.postimg.cc/bYRqNBTv/noprivacy07.jpg>

    Betcha the Apple trolls don't know that secret either.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?Q?J=C3=B6rg_Lorenz?=@21:1/5 to Peter Piper on Sat Nov 23 11:37:01 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On 19.11.24 17:34, Peter Piper wrote:
    Your Name a.k.a. BungleBob wrote:

    Another brainless moron troll for the killfile. :-\

    This is not "another" troll. It is the same Arlen, making you dance
    simply by changing its posting name.

    Adding it to your killfile will not stop you feeding it. It will simply change its name when it wants you to feed it again.

    It is easy to catch the Arlen with an appropriate filter even if it pops
    up as a reincarnation of itself.

    --
    "Roma locuta, causa finita." (Augustinus)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From *Hemidactylus*@21:1/5 to hugybear@gmx.net on Sat Nov 23 11:57:14 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    Jörg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.net> wrote:
    On 19.11.24 17:34, Peter Piper wrote:
    Your Name a.k.a. BungleBob wrote:

    Another brainless moron troll for the killfile. :-\

    This is not "another" troll. It is the same Arlen, making you dance
    simply by changing its posting name.

    Adding it to your killfile will not stop you feeding it. It will simply
    change its name when it wants you to feed it again.

    It is easy to catch the Arlen with an appropriate filter even if it pops
    up as a reincarnation of itself.

    It has obsessive tropes.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From -hh@21:1/5 to Alan on Sat Nov 23 08:52:13 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On 11/22/24 6:35 PM, Alan wrote:
    On 2024-11-22 13:58, Andrew wrote:
    -hh wrote on Fri, 22 Nov 2024 13:39:24 -0500 :
    In any event, I'd really want to see a clear comparison laydown of just
    what personal information is really required for using Vendor A vs B
    before trying to condemn any one vendor.
    ...
    Not even on Windows 11 where Microsoft tried to copy Apple's model.

    What are the steps an ordinary consumer would have to take to avoid
    setting up Windows 11 without a Microsoft account?

    Yup, still waiting.


    For Android, there is also no requirement whatsoever for an account.

    Google has always allowed you to obtain software from the Google Play
    Store WITHOUT setting up an account, and of course, anywhere else too.

    Cite please!

    Which needs to be reconcile against this, which says that you do:

    " A range of Google applications and services is available on your
    device when you purchase it, for example, Gmail, Google Maps, YouTube,
    and the Google Play application. To get the most out of these services,
    you need a Google account."

    <https://helpguide.sony.net/mobile/xperia-5/v1/en/contents/why-do-i-need-a-google-account.html>

    Plus of course the tracking integral to Google Chrome (see current
    lawsuit) where it effectively doxxes its users without them consenting.

    -hh

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan Browne@21:1/5 to All on Sat Nov 23 12:13:45 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On 2024-11-23 06:57, *Hemidactylus* wrote:

    It has obsessive tropes.

    I'll amend that to ...
    It has excessive obsessive tropes.

    --
    "It would be a measureless disaster if Russian barbarism overlaid
    the culture and independence of the ancient States of Europe."
    Winston Churchill

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From *Hemidactylus*@21:1/5 to Alan Browne on Sat Nov 23 19:48:16 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    Alan Browne <bitbucket@blackhole.com> wrote:
    On 2024-11-23 06:57, *Hemidactylus* wrote:

    It has obsessive tropes.

    I'll amend that to ...
    It has excessive obsessive tropes.

    I stand corrected.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan Browne@21:1/5 to All on Sat Nov 23 20:01:41 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On 2024-11-23 14:48, *Hemidactylus* wrote:
    Alan Browne <bitbucket@blackhole.com> wrote:
    On 2024-11-23 06:57, *Hemidactylus* wrote:

    It has obsessive tropes.

    I'll amend that to ...
    It has excessive obsessive tropes.

    I stand corrected.

    Oh, please, relax, recline, crack a beer if so inclined.

    --
    "It would be a measureless disaster if Russian barbarism overlaid
    the culture and independence of the ancient States of Europe."
    Winston Churchill

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrew@21:1/5 to -hh on Mon Nov 25 00:01:55 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    -hh wrote on Sat, 23 Nov 2024 08:52:13 -0500 :

    What are the steps an ordinary consumer would have to take to avoid
    setting up Windows 11 without a Microsoft account?

    Yup, still waiting.

    It's not surprising the Apple trolls know nothing about anything, but even
    so, since -hh hasn't acted like the rest of the ignorant trolls, note that
    this has been discussed & tested for a long time on the Windows 11 ng.
    <https://www.novabbs.com/computers/thread.php?group=alt.comp.os.windows-10>

    What's funny about that is the Apple trolls only look at Apple marketing brochures to find all their information they think they know about stuff.

    For Android, there is also no requirement whatsoever for an account.

    Google has always allowed you to obtain software from the Google Play
    Store WITHOUT setting up an account, and of course, anywhere else too.

    Cite please!

    Which needs to be reconcile against this, which says that you do:

    " A range of Google applications and services is available on your
    device when you purchase it, for example, Gmail, Google Maps, YouTube,
    and the Google Play application. To get the most out of these services,
    you need a Google account." <https://helpguide.sony.net/mobile/xperia-5/v1/en/contents/why-do-i-need-a-google-account.html>

    Again (and again) it's no longer shocking the Apple trolls know absolutely nothing of everything they think they know anything about such as this.

    Who is that stupid as to think you need a Google account on Android?
    I haven't had a Google account on Android for years and mine works fine.

    All you Apple trolls live on Mount Stupid (in Dunning Kruger inexact
    terms). You're so stupid you don't even realize how stupid you are.

    Bear in mind I'm not stupid.
    You're stupid.
    I'm not.

    Actually, you're incredibly stupid.

    The fact is setting up a Google account on Android is NOT needed to have
    full functionality (such as downloading & installing apps from the App
    Store). I do it all the time and I've been doing it for many years.

    Note that adding a Microsoft account isn't needed on Windows either.

    It's only Apple who murders your privacy.

    Plus of course the tracking integral to Google Chrome (see current
    lawsuit) where it effectively doxxes its users without them consenting.

    I don't have Google Chrome on my Android phone and it works just fine.
    I have *plenty* of web browsers - but none of them are Google Chrome.

    What's no longer shocking is you Apple trolls know nothing about anything.
    And yet... you make these absurd claims... which everyone knows are wrong.

    Seriously.

    I've never met people this stupid in the flesh in my entire life.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From -hh@21:1/5 to Andrew on Sun Nov 24 23:04:26 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On 11/24/24 7:01 PM, Andrew wrote:
    -hh wrote on Sat, 23 Nov 2024 08:52:13 -0500 :

    What are the steps an ordinary consumer would have to take to avoid
    setting up Windows 11 without a Microsoft account?

    Yup, still waiting.

    It's not surprising the Apple trolls know nothing about anything, ...

    No, I just don't really care enough about it to go look it up myself.

    but even
    so, since -hh hasn't acted like the rest of the ignorant trolls, note that this has been discussed & tested for a long time on the Windows 11 ng.
    <https://www.novabbs.com/computers/thread.php?group=alt.comp.os.windows-10>

    Please check your URL, because that link goes to a page with scores of
    subject lines: kindly provide just the needle, not the entire haystack.

    What's funny about that is the Apple trolls only look at Apple marketing brochures to find all their information they think they know about stuff.

    For Android, there is also no requirement whatsoever for an account.

    Google has always allowed you to obtain software from the Google Play
    Store WITHOUT setting up an account, and of course, anywhere else too.

    Cite please!

    Which needs to be reconcile against this, which says that you do:

    " A range of Google applications and services is available on your
    device when you purchase it, for example, Gmail, Google Maps, YouTube,
    and the Google Play application. To get the most out of these services,
    you need a Google account."
    <https://helpguide.sony.net/mobile/xperia-5/v1/en/contents/why-do-i-need-a-google-account.html>

    Again (and again) it's no longer shocking the Apple trolls know absolutely nothing of everything they think they know anything about such as this.

    Who is that stupid as to think you need a Google account on Android?
    I haven't had a Google account on Android for years and mine works fine.

    Oh, so we're to believe your claim over a published guide? Pass.

    The fact is setting up a Google account on Android is NOT needed to have
    full functionality (such as downloading & installing apps from the App Store). I do it all the time and I've been doing it for many years.

    Substantiation: a "Trust me, Bro!" /s


    Note that adding a Microsoft account isn't needed on Windows either.

    It's only Apple who murders your privacy.

    Alan's already published instructions on how to set up an iPad without registering for an Apple account: where did you prove he was incorrect?

    Plus of course the tracking integral to Google Chrome (see current
    lawsuit) where it effectively doxxes its users without them consenting.

    I don't have Google Chrome on my Android phone and it works just fine.
    I have *plenty* of web browsers - but none of them are Google Chrome.

    Not really the point, which was that one can be identified by means
    other than a registration account. It is known that Chrome has this,
    but how do you know that your non-Chrome browser isn't doing it too?



    -hh

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrews@21:1/5 to Andrews on Mon Nov 18 23:42:29 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy, alt.privacy

    Andrews wrote on Sun, 17 Nov 2024 03:55:48 -0000 (UTC) :

    Betcha the Apple trolls don't know that secret.

    It turns out that it's not possible to create a new iCloud account without calling Apple personally and giving them your phone number to verify.

    Not if there is already an iCloud account set up with your Android phone.
    It's impossible to do it from your iPad device. You must talk to Apple.

    And then you must identify yourself to Apple's satisfaction.
    Just to set up an iCloud account on the iPad.

    Which proves there is no privacy with Apple products. None.
    No other operating system vendor has that privacy robbing requirement.

    Not Google. Not Microsoft. Nobody.
    Just Apple.

    All to make their walled-garden work.
    That is, you trade your privacy to get the walled garden to work.

    Great deal.
    For Apple.

    What *they* do, is they set up the Apple account on their side.
    This can only happen if you call them & identify yourself to them.

    Only *after* Apple creates the iCloud account, can you then set it up.
    Even after they've created the iCloud account over the phone, they still require your phone number to verify that iCloud account on the iPad.

    The trick is you can't do it with their iOS system prompts.
    Nope. Won't work.

    You *must* do it through the email app.
    Go figure.

    It's Apple so it doesn't have to make any sense.

    In the end, you *can* create a new iCloud account but you have to trade
    your privacy to do it with Apple products.

    Apple brazenly lies about privacy.
    There is no privacy on Apple products.

    Proof.
    <https://i.postimg.cc/VvtMXcL2/noprivacy01.jpg>
    <https://i.postimg.cc/HLjrQC63/noprivacy02.jpg>
    <https://i.postimg.cc/P57XnvMz/noprivacy03.jpg>
    <https://i.postimg.cc/TPSp0HSx/noprivacy04.jpg>
    <https://i.postimg.cc/1XWx0bCc/noprivacy05.jpg>
    <https://i.postimg.cc/6Q7Q8fQm/noprivacy06.jpg>
    <https://i.postimg.cc/bYRqNBTv/noprivacy07.jpg>

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Your Name@21:1/5 to Andrews on Tue Nov 19 13:33:58 2024
    XPost: alt.privacy, misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On 2024-11-18 23:42:29 +0000, Andrews said:

    Andrews wrote on Sun, 17 Nov 2024 03:55:48 -0000 (UTC) :

    Betcha the Apple trolls don't know that secret.

    It turns out that it's not possible to create a new iCloud account without calling Apple personally and giving them your phone number to verify.

    Not if there is already an iCloud account set up with your Android phone. It's impossible to do it from your iPad device. You must talk to Apple.

    And then you must identify yourself to Apple's satisfaction.
    Just to set up an iCloud account on the iPad.

    Which proves there is no privacy with Apple products. None.
    No other operating system vendor has that privacy robbing requirement.

    Not Google. Not Microsoft. Nobody.
    Just Apple.

    All to make their walled-garden work.
    That is, you trade your privacy to get the walled garden to work.

    Great deal.
    For Apple.

    What *they* do, is they set up the Apple account on their side.
    This can only happen if you call them & identify yourself to them.

    Only *after* Apple creates the iCloud account, can you then set it up.
    Even after they've created the iCloud account over the phone, they still require your phone number to verify that iCloud account on the iPad.

    The trick is you can't do it with their iOS system prompts.
    Nope. Won't work.

    You *must* do it through the email app.
    Go figure.

    It's Apple so it doesn't have to make any sense.

    In the end, you *can* create a new iCloud account but you have to trade
    your privacy to do it with Apple products.

    Apple brazenly lies about privacy.
    There is no privacy on Apple products.

    Proof.
    <https://i.postimg.cc/VvtMXcL2/noprivacy01.jpg>
    <https://i.postimg.cc/HLjrQC63/noprivacy02.jpg>
    <https://i.postimg.cc/P57XnvMz/noprivacy03.jpg>
    <https://i.postimg.cc/TPSp0HSx/noprivacy04.jpg>
    <https://i.postimg.cc/1XWx0bCc/noprivacy05.jpg>
    <https://i.postimg.cc/6Q7Q8fQm/noprivacy06.jpg>
    <https://i.postimg.cc/bYRqNBTv/noprivacy07.jpg>


    Another brainless moron troll for the killfile. :-\

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Peter Piper@21:1/5 to Your Name a.k.a. BungleBob on Tue Nov 19 16:34:18 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    Your Name a.k.a. BungleBob wrote:

    Another brainless moron troll for the killfile. :-\

    This is not "another" troll. It is the same Arlen, making you dance
    simply by changing its posting name.

    Adding it to your killfile will not stop you feeding it. It will simply
    change its name when it wants you to feed it again.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan Browne@21:1/5 to Tom Elam on Tue Nov 19 13:01:17 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy, alt.privacy

    On 2024-11-19 09:55, Tom Elam wrote:

    Apple does not ask for

    SSN, Medicare ID, date of birth, address, etc.

    What evidence do you have that providing Apple a phone number
    compromises your privacy? What evidence that the phone number
    compromises anything?


    _____________________
    /| /| | |
    ||__|| | Please do not |
    / O O\__ | feed the |
    / \ | Trolls |
    / \ \|_____________________|
    / _ \ \ ||
    / |\____\ \ ||
    / | | | |\____/ ||
    / \|_|_|/ | _||
    / / \ |____| ||
    / | | | --|
    | | | |____ --|
    * _ | |_|_|_| | \-/
    *-- _--\ _ \ | ||
    / _ \\ | / `'
    * / \_ /- | | |
    * ___ c_c_c_C/ \C_c_c_c____________


    --
    "It would be a measureless disaster if Russian barbarism overlaid
    the culture and independence of the ancient States of Europe."
    Winston Churchill

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan Browne@21:1/5 to Peter Piper on Tue Nov 19 13:02:47 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On 2024-11-19 11:34, Peter Piper wrote:
    Adding it to your killfile will not stop you feeding it.

    Answering it feeds it.


    _____________________
    /| /| | |
    ||__|| | Please do not |
    / O O\__ | feed the |
    / \ | Trolls |
    / \ \|_____________________|
    / _ \ \ ||
    / |\____\ \ ||
    / | | | |\____/ ||
    / \|_|_|/ | _||
    / / \ |____| ||
    / | | | --|
    | | | |____ --|
    * _ | |_|_|_| | \-/
    *-- _--\ _ \ | ||
    / _ \\ | / `'
    * / \_ /- | | |
    * ___ c_c_c_C/ \C_c_c_c____________



    --
    "It would be a measureless disaster if Russian barbarism overlaid
    the culture and independence of the ancient States of Europe."
    Winston Churchill

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrews@21:1/5 to Alan Browne on Tue Nov 19 21:55:16 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy, alt.privacy

    Alan Browne wrote on Tue, 19 Nov 2024 13:01:17 -0500 :

    _____________________
    /| /| | |
    ||__|| | Please do not |
    / O O\__ | feed the |
    / \ | Trolls |
    / \ \|_____________________|

    The Apple trolls are Alan Browne, Jolly Roger, Alan Baker, Alan Browne,
    Chris, Haemactylus, Joerg Lorenz, Your Name, et al. who know nothing about Apple products.

    None of them realize only Apple forces you to trade your privacy for the privilege of installing apps.
    <https://i.postimg.cc/hvhgB91S/update01.jpg> iPadOS 16.3.1 is available
    <https://i.postimg.cc/Qtfsw654/update02.jpg> 16.3.1 Update Requested
    <https://i.postimg.cc/vmLGL8md/update03.jpg> About 10 minutes remaining
    <https://i.postimg.cc/d11gkJk6/update04.jpg> Preparing Update
    <https://i.postimg.cc/rw1B7n21/update05.jpg> Downloaded
    <https://i.postimg.cc/yN7MKm7w/update06.jpg> Finish Setting Up iPad
    <https://i.postimg.cc/13DSsRwN/update07.jpg> More for your iPad
    <https://i.postimg.cc/Xv80B22j/update08.jpg> Update Apple ID Settings
    <https://i.postimg.cc/TYLGNJP0/update09.jpg> iPadOS Version 16.3.1
    <https://i.postimg.cc/L509Yy8Y/update10.jpg> Sign in to iCloud
    <https://i.postimg.cc/zvfDfm8Y/update11.jpg> Finished Setting up iPad
    <https://i.postimg.cc/Z5Nbnxtn/update12.jpg> Verifying update...

    Microsoft doesn't do that.
    Neither does Google.

    Just Apple.

    That's a fact.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrews@21:1/5 to Tom Elam on Tue Nov 19 21:55:35 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy, alt.privacy

    Tom Elam wrote on Tue, 19 Nov 2024 09:55:52 -0500 :

    And all that is total bullshit.

    I'm going to respond to this particular Apple troll, Tom Elam,
    as if he owns the mentality of an adult. Is that OK with you Tom?

    Since you called well-established facts "bullshit", what exactly are you claiming is "bullshit" since I provided all necessary details, including screenshots, proving Apple *requires* your personal phone number in order
    to set up an iCloud account which is needed to download apps for the iPad.

    Why do you Apple trolls call that "bullshit"?
    Is it because you don't believe it?
    If so, that means you're completely ignorant of how the walled garden
    works.

    Or, is it because you don't like it?

    Then you're just being an ignorant troll by claiming the earth is flat.
    Simply because you don't like that it's round.

    The fact is only Apple forces you to trade your privacy for the privilege
    of installing apps. Google doesn't do it. Microsoft doesn't either.

    Just Apple.
    That's a fact.

    You can call that fact "bullshit", but then, as an adult, I ask why.

    Apple does not ask for

    SSN, Medicare ID, date of birth, address, etc.

    Huh? Nobody said they did. And yet, they do. Apple *requires* your
    government ID whenever you stop logging into your iPad, which you Apple
    trolls are unaware that you're logging into the Apple servers every day.

    Yes. You heard that correctly. Only Apple requires your government issue iD
    to unlock an iPad that Apple unilaterally bricked simply because you
    stopped logging into it for two years (this happened on two different
    iPads!).
    <https://i.postimg.cc/LXzB3Lc0/appleid01.jpg> Apple _forces_ a log in!
    <https://i.postimg.cc/8k3GQyj4/appleid09.jpg> Apple tracks your activity
    <https://i.postimg.cc/hhFNJ5mq/appleid010.jpg> Apps become non functional
    <https://i.postimg.cc/nrFHSvby/appleid11.jpg> Apple _forces_ extra logins!
    <https://i.postimg.cc/Y9kkj19v/appleid12.jpg> Apple tracking server login

    What's interesting is you Apple trolls know nothing about Apple.
    Why don't you Apple trolls know anything about how Apple really works?

    What evidence do you have that providing Apple a phone number
    compromises your privacy? What evidence that the phone number
    compromises anything?

    Huh? It's your phone number. Only you. Nobody else. If you don't understand that it compromises your privacy, then let me ask you why you think NOBODY
    BUT APPLE does this? Nobody. Not Google. Not Microsoft. Just Apple.

    Do you Apple trolls understand anything at the level an adult should?

    Why, Tom Elam, do you think only Apple requires your phone number in order
    to install apps - when NOBODY else who makes an OS requires your privacy?

    You never answer my questions. You don't have answers.

    You make that claim without even realizing I know more about Apple than all
    of you Apple trolls combined do - since NONE of you even know that you're logging into Apple mainframe servers every single moment of every day of
    the rest of your natural life. You don't know that. You think you're not.

    But you are.

    <https://i.postimg.cc/hvhgB91S/update01.jpg> iPadOS 16.3.1 is available
    <https://i.postimg.cc/Qtfsw654/update02.jpg> 16.3.1 Update Requested
    <https://i.postimg.cc/vmLGL8md/update03.jpg> About 10 minutes remaining
    <https://i.postimg.cc/d11gkJk6/update04.jpg> Preparing Update
    <https://i.postimg.cc/rw1B7n21/update05.jpg> Downloaded
    <https://i.postimg.cc/yN7MKm7w/update06.jpg> Finish Setting Up iPad
    <https://i.postimg.cc/13DSsRwN/update07.jpg> More for your iPad
    <https://i.postimg.cc/Xv80B22j/update08.jpg> Update Apple ID Settings
    <https://i.postimg.cc/TYLGNJP0/update09.jpg> iPadOS Version 16.3.1
    <https://i.postimg.cc/L509Yy8Y/update10.jpg> Sign in to iCloud
    <https://i.postimg.cc/zvfDfm8Y/update11.jpg> Finished Setting up iPad
    <https://i.postimg.cc/Z5Nbnxtn/update12.jpg> Verifying update...

    Only Apple forces you to trade your privacy for the privilege of installing apps. Google doesn't do it. Neither does Microsoft. Just Apple.

    Why is that a fact, Tom Elam?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrews@21:1/5 to Peter Piper on Tue Nov 19 21:56:19 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy, alt.privacy

    Peter Piper wrote on Tue, 19 Nov 2024 16:34:18 -0000 :

    This is not "another" troll. It is the same Arlen, making you dance
    simply by changing its posting name.

    Adding it to your killfile will not stop you feeding it. It will simply change its name when it wants you to feed it again.

    Three points for all you uneducated low-IQ ignorant Apple trolls...

    a) I've been posting to Usenet for decades - where only you child-like
    Apple trolls think I post for your affection (or even your response).

    b) You Apple trolls use the word "it" for a person which shows clearly
    your mentality is that of a small child as you think it hurts my
    feelings (the fact you think that shows me how low your IQ is).

    c) The topic is apropos since I proved there is no privacy on Apple
    devices because you must trade your privacy to get into the walled
    garden.

    You ignorant low-IQ uneducated Apple trolls hate these facts.
    So be it.

    FACT:

    Only Apple forces you to trade your privacy for the privilege of installing apps. Nobody else does. Not Microsoft. Not Google. Nobody but Apple.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Andrews on Tue Nov 19 14:23:20 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy, alt.privacy

    On 2024-11-19 13:55, Andrews wrote:
    Tom Elam wrote on Tue, 19 Nov 2024 09:55:52 -0500 :

    And all that is total bullshit.

    I'm going to respond to this particular Apple troll, Tom Elam,
    as if he owns the mentality of an adult. Is that OK with you Tom?

    Since you called well-established facts "bullshit", what exactly are you claiming is "bullshit" since I provided all necessary details, including screenshots, proving Apple *requires* your personal phone number in order
    to set up an iCloud account which is needed to download apps for the iPad.

    Why do you Apple trolls call that "bullshit"?
    Is it because you don't believe it?
    If so, that means you're completely ignorant of how the walled garden
    works.

    Or, is it because you don't like it?

    Then you're just being an ignorant troll by claiming the earth is flat. Simply because you don't like that it's round.

    The fact is only Apple forces you to trade your privacy for the privilege
    of installing apps. Google doesn't do it. Microsoft doesn't either.

    Just Apple.
    That's a fact.

    You can call that fact "bullshit", but then, as an adult, I ask why.

    Apple does not ask for

    SSN, Medicare ID, date of birth, address, etc.

    Huh? Nobody said they did. And yet, they do. Apple *requires* your
    government ID whenever you stop logging into your iPad, which you Apple trolls are unaware that you're logging into the Apple servers every day.

    Yes. You heard that correctly. Only Apple requires your government issue iD to unlock an iPad that Apple unilaterally bricked simply because you
    stopped logging into it for two years (this happened on two different iPads!).
    <https://i.postimg.cc/LXzB3Lc0/appleid01.jpg> Apple _forces_ a log in!
    <https://i.postimg.cc/8k3GQyj4/appleid09.jpg> Apple tracks your activity
    <https://i.postimg.cc/hhFNJ5mq/appleid010.jpg> Apps become non functional
    <https://i.postimg.cc/nrFHSvby/appleid11.jpg> Apple _forces_ extra logins!
    <https://i.postimg.cc/Y9kkj19v/appleid12.jpg> Apple tracking server login

    What's interesting is you Apple trolls know nothing about Apple.
    Why don't you Apple trolls know anything about how Apple really works?

    What evidence do you have that providing Apple a phone number
    compromises your privacy? What evidence that the phone number
    compromises anything?

    Huh? It's your phone number. Only you. Nobody else. If you don't understand that it compromises your privacy, then let me ask you why you think NOBODY BUT APPLE does this? Nobody. Not Google. Not Microsoft. Just Apple.

    Do you Apple trolls understand anything at the level an adult should?

    Why, Tom Elam, do you think only Apple requires your phone number in order
    to install apps - when NOBODY else who makes an OS requires your privacy?

    You never answer my questions. You don't have answers.

    You make that claim without even realizing I know more about Apple than all of you Apple trolls combined do - since NONE of you even know that you're logging into Apple mainframe servers every single moment of every day of
    the rest of your natural life. You don't know that. You think you're not.

    But you are.

    <https://i.postimg.cc/hvhgB91S/update01.jpg> iPadOS 16.3.1 is available
    <https://i.postimg.cc/Qtfsw654/update02.jpg> 16.3.1 Update Requested
    <https://i.postimg.cc/vmLGL8md/update03.jpg> About 10 minutes remaining
    <https://i.postimg.cc/d11gkJk6/update04.jpg> Preparing Update
    <https://i.postimg.cc/rw1B7n21/update05.jpg> Downloaded
    <https://i.postimg.cc/yN7MKm7w/update06.jpg> Finish Setting Up iPad
    <https://i.postimg.cc/13DSsRwN/update07.jpg> More for your iPad
    <https://i.postimg.cc/Xv80B22j/update08.jpg> Update Apple ID Settings
    <https://i.postimg.cc/TYLGNJP0/update09.jpg> iPadOS Version 16.3.1
    <https://i.postimg.cc/L509Yy8Y/update10.jpg> Sign in to iCloud
    <https://i.postimg.cc/zvfDfm8Y/update11.jpg> Finished Setting up iPad
    <https://i.postimg.cc/Z5Nbnxtn/update12.jpg> Verifying update...

    Only Apple forces you to trade your privacy for the privilege of installing apps. Google doesn't do it. Neither does Microsoft. Just Apple.

    Why is that a fact, Tom Elam?

    Google forces you to provide your date of birth and gender...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From *Hemidactylus*@21:1/5 to Your Name on Wed Nov 20 03:14:56 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:
    On 2024-11-19 16:34:18 +0000, Peter Piper said:

    Your Name a.k.a. BungleBob wrote:

    Another brainless moron troll for the killfile. :-\

    This is not "another" troll. It is the same Arlen, making you dance
    simply by changing its posting name.

    Adding it to your killfile will not stop you feeding it. It will simply
    change its name when it wants you to feed it again.

    And yet another brainless moron troll for the killfile. :-\

    I really don’t get why people continue to engage with such an obviously unhinged poster like Arlen. For one thing such engagement feeds his
    delusions of grandeur.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Your Name@21:1/5 to Peter Piper on Wed Nov 20 15:30:04 2024
    XPost: comp.sys.mac.advocacy, misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 2024-11-19 16:34:18 +0000, Peter Piper said:

    Your Name a.k.a. BungleBob wrote:

    Another brainless moron troll for the killfile. :-\

    This is not "another" troll. It is the same Arlen, making you dance
    simply by changing its posting name.

    Adding it to your killfile will not stop you feeding it. It will simply change its name when it wants you to feed it again.

    And yet another brainless moron troll for the killfile. :-\

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From *Hemidactylus*@21:1/5 to Alan Browne on Wed Nov 20 03:29:56 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    Alan Browne <bitbucket@blackhole.com> wrote:
    On 2024-11-19 11:34, Peter Piper wrote:
    Adding it to your killfile will not stop you feeding it.

    Answering it feeds it.

    May as well point that out to a brick wall as people will continue to
    engage this nymshifting trolling nutcase.

    I recall decades ago posting to moderated groups where such abusive nutters would be banhammered on sight. Those were the good ole days of no nonsense moderators. Now groups like this devolve into a shitshow thanks primarily
    to one or more bad actors and their multiple enablers.

    That’s Arlen’s sole raison d'etre, smearing his feces across the group while self-appointed janitors keep trying to clean up after him.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan Browne@21:1/5 to Your Name on Thu Nov 21 10:23:04 2024
    XPost: comp.sys.mac.advocacy, misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 2024-11-19 21:30, Your Name wrote:

    And yet another brainless moron troll for the killfile. :-\

    KF - but quietly.


    _____________________
    /| /| | |
    ||__|| | Please do not |
    / O O\__ | feed the |
    / \ | Trolls |
    / \ \|_____________________|
    / _ \ \ ||
    / |\____\ \ ||
    / | | | |\____/ ||
    / \|_|_|/ | _||
    / / \ |____| ||
    / | | | --|
    | | | |____ --|
    * _ | |_|_|_| | \-/
    *-- _--\ _ \ | ||
    / _ \\ | / `'
    * / \_ /- | | |
    * ___ c_c_c_C/ \C_c_c_c____________

    --
    "It would be a measureless disaster if Russian barbarism overlaid
    the culture and independence of the ancient States of Europe."
    Winston Churchill

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan Browne@21:1/5 to All on Thu Nov 21 10:24:59 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On 2024-11-19 22:29, *Hemidactylus* wrote:
    Alan Browne <bitbucket@blackhole.com> wrote:
    On 2024-11-19 11:34, Peter Piper wrote:
    Adding it to your killfile will not stop you feeding it.

    Answering it feeds it.

    May as well point that out to a brick wall as people will continue to
    engage this nymshifting trolling nutcase.

    I recall decades ago posting to moderated groups where such abusive nutters would be banhammered on sight. Those were the good ole days of no nonsense moderators. Now groups like this devolve into a shitshow thanks primarily
    to one or more bad actors and their multiple enablers.

    That’s Arlen’s sole raison d'etre, smearing his feces across the group while self-appointed janitors keep trying to clean up after him.

    No troll August worked in the main with only a few engaging it.

    Anyway, face it, usenet as meeting point as it used to be is deader than
    a doornail. Other (web based and other) social media has taken over.

    --
    "It would be a measureless disaster if Russian barbarism overlaid
    the culture and independence of the ancient States of Europe."
    Winston Churchill

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jolly Roger@21:1/5 to Alan Browne on Thu Nov 21 15:54:58 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 2024-11-21, Alan Browne <bitbucket@blackhole.com> wrote:
    On 2024-11-19 22:29, *Hemidactylus* wrote:
    Alan Browne <bitbucket@blackhole.com> wrote:
    On 2024-11-19 11:34, Peter Piper wrote:
    Adding it to your killfile will not stop you feeding it.

    Answering it feeds it.

    May as well point that out to a brick wall as people will continue to
    engage this nymshifting trolling nutcase.

    I recall decades ago posting to moderated groups where such abusive
    nutters would be banhammered on sight. Those were the good ole days
    of no nonsense moderators. Now groups like this devolve into a
    shitshow thanks primarily to one or more bad actors and their
    multiple enablers.

    That’s Arlen’s sole raison d'etre, smearing his feces across the
    group while self-appointed janitors keep trying to clean up after
    him.

    No troll August worked

    "No troll August" is a really strange way of saying "allowing trolls to
    lie, belittle, and so on for a month here without objection".

    Anyway, face it, usenet as meeting point as it used to be is deader
    than a doornail.

    When a newsgroup is run by trolls, it becomes just another lame advocacy newsgroup, where friendly mature conversation isn't welcome and sensible
    people just stay away as a result.

    --
    E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
    I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

    JR

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jolly Roger@21:1/5 to Chris on Fri Nov 22 02:13:17 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 2024-11-21, Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> wrote:
    Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote:
    On 2024-11-21, Alan Browne <bitbucket@blackhole.com> wrote:
    On 2024-11-19 22:29, *Hemidactylus* wrote:
    Alan Browne <bitbucket@blackhole.com> wrote:
    On 2024-11-19 11:34, Peter Piper wrote:
    Adding it to your killfile will not stop you feeding it.

    Answering it feeds it.

    May as well point that out to a brick wall as people will continue to
    engage this nymshifting trolling nutcase.

    I recall decades ago posting to moderated groups where such abusive
    nutters would be banhammered on sight. Those were the good ole days
    of no nonsense moderators. Now groups like this devolve into a
    shitshow thanks primarily to one or more bad actors and their
    multiple enablers.

    That’s Arlen’s sole raison d'etre, smearing his feces across the
    group while self-appointed janitors keep trying to clean up after
    him.

    No troll August worked

    "No troll August" is a really strange way of saying "allowing trolls to
    lie, belittle, and so on for a month here without objection".

    You'll note that the trolls posted far less that month.

    Nope.

    Anyway, face it, usenet as meeting point as it used to be is deader
    than a doornail.

    When a newsgroup is run by trolls, it becomes just another lame advocacy
    newsgroup, where friendly mature conversation isn't welcome and sensible
    people just stay away as a result.

    Let us know when you're capable of that.

    You first, asshole.

    --
    E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
    I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

    JR

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrews@21:1/5 to All on Fri Nov 15 23:42:20 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    I'm setting up an iPhone for someone and after setting it up without a login/password, she wants to add apps from the app store. Sigh.

    I already was forced by Apple to set it up with a Wi-Fi access point, which isn't too bad as even Android tablets would need to have Wi-Fi access to be used (although only an iOS device *requires* it for the initial setup!).

    This lack of privacy on an iOS device is simply astounding.
    Yet Apple lies about privacy in their advertising.

    Why don't the idiot consumers realize they're being lied to by Apple?
    Anyway, it's an iPad so I'm stuck with the total loss of privacy.

    So I'm at this moment creating an account which allows me to give bogus information for most of the data (which insists on a last name & DOB).

    But the lack of privacy on an iOS device rears its ugly head with the verification process - which - as far as I can tell - requires your phone!
    <https://i.postimg.cc/nhG215Wb/IMG-0001.jpg>

    WTF?

    Doesn't Apple advertise privacy?
    Where is it?

    Why is it that *every* other common consumer operating system can be set up without giving the mothership your phone - except Apple's POS iOS setup?

    Is there a way to SKIP that privacy-robbing collection of your phone?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrew@21:1/5 to Alan Browne on Fri Nov 22 16:45:17 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    Alan Browne wrote on Thu, 21 Nov 2024 10:24:59 -0500 :

    No troll August worked in the main with only a few engaging it.

    What idiots you Apple trolls are, Alan Browne.

    I was on *vacation* in Germany most of August, you fools.

    You Apple trolls are so stupid you can't understand that I have posted to Usenet for decades, to dozens of groups, where I don't post here for your affection.

    You "think" I post for you love.
    I don't.

    I'm gonna post what needs to be posted whether or not you "love" it.

    You own the mind of a child, Alan Browne, if you think otherwise.
    And the fact you call people an "it" proves you own the mind of a child.

    You think it hurts my feelings for you to call me an "it" Alan Browne.
    While I won't devolve to your level - I will say that proves me right.

    The instant you Apple trolls *leave* this newsgroup, the quality of
    discussion will go up orders of magnitude (to the adult level).

    Jolly Roger
    Alan Baker
    Alan Browne
    Chris
    Haemactylus
    Joerg Lorenz
    et. al

    Back to the topic you Apple trolls hate... there is no privacy on Apple.
    And I proved it.

    Only Apple forces you to identify yourself just to download apps.
    That's just a fact.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrew@21:1/5 to All on Fri Nov 22 16:52:47 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    *Hemidactylus* wrote on Wed, 20 Nov 2024 03:14:56 +0000 :

    I really don't get why people continue to engage

    You Apple trolls can either accept the fact or not that I proved there is
    no way to create an Apple ID without surrendering your privacy to Apple -
    and that no other common consumer OS vendor requires your identity just to
    use the device.

    The topic is: Only Apple has no privacy from the start.

    You Apple trolls don't like that topic.
    So be it.

    It's a fact whether or not you Apple trolls like that fact.
    And the fact you hate me telling you that fact doesn't change it either.

    I am here to post facts about Apple products.
    And to show the world (via the public record) what you Apple trolls are.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrew@21:1/5 to All on Fri Nov 22 16:44:33 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    *Hemidactylus* wrote on Wed, 20 Nov 2024 03:29:56 +0000 :

    Now groups like this devolve into a shitshow thanks primarily
    to one or more bad actors and their multiple enablers.

    Having posted to Usenet for decades, I have to agree with you that the
    Apple trolls like nospam, Lewis & JF Mezei have vastly improved the quality
    of the discussions on this ng when they left....

    We only have to get rid of the remaining "shit-show trolls" (as you refer
    to them) of Jolly Roger, Alan Baker, Alan Browne, Chris, Haemactylus, Joerg Lorenz, et al., and this newsgroup would start to become normal again.

    I'm on many newsgroups daily - but only this ng is a shit show because of
    those trolls - who interestingly - know absolutely nothing about anything.

    Back to the topic you Apple trolls hate... there is no privacy on Apple.
    And I proved it showing you *must* give away your identity to access apps.

    No other operating system but Apple's forces you to surrender your privacy.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrew@21:1/5 to badgolferman on Fri Nov 22 16:58:31 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    badgolferman wrote on Thu, 21 Nov 2024 22:55:02 -0000 (UTC) :

    When a newsgroup is run by trolls, it becomes just another lame advocacy >>> newsgroup, where friendly mature conversation isn't welcome and sensible >>> people just stay away as a result.

    Let us know when you're capable of that.


    +1 (Usenet's Like button)

    An adult observation...

    Everyone (but the Apple trolls) instantly gets the irony of Jolly Roger's holier-than-thou proclamations - but what's also interesting is the Apple trolls actually got it right when they complain that they can't have their 'love fest' with Apple when people other than the Apple trolls post here.

    Notice the Apple trolls said "When a newsgroup is run by trolls, it becomes just another lame advocacy newsgroup".....

    Notice that's EXACTLY what the herd-animal Apple trolls want this ng to be!

    It's the same clique mentality that makes Alan Browne call the "walled
    garden" restrictions an "elite club"...

    Why does Alan Browne call the walled-garden restrictions an "elite club"?
    Think about that.

    Why do the Apple trolls viciously hate anyone telling the truth on this ng?

    The reason is exactly what the Apple trolls said above, unbeknownst to themselves, that they wish this newsgroup to be a "love fest" of Apple.

    With normal people on the ng, their "love fest" falls apart at the seams.
    They *hate* the truth about Apple products.

    So be it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrew@21:1/5 to Andrew on Fri Nov 22 17:01:13 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    Andrew wrote on Fri, 22 Nov 2024 16:58:31 -0000 (UTC) :

    Why do the Apple trolls viciously hate anyone telling the truth on this ng?

    To stay on topic, I should mention that I proved that only Apple requires
    you to surrender your privacy just for the privilege of downloading apps.

    That's just a fact.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From -hh@21:1/5 to Andrew on Fri Nov 22 13:39:24 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On 11/22/24 11:45 AM, Andrew wrote:
    Alan Browne wrote on Thu, 21 Nov 2024 10:24:59 -0500 :

    No troll August worked in the main with only a few engaging it.

    What idiots you Apple trolls are, Alan Browne.

    I was on *vacation* in Germany most of August, you fools.

    As the old saying goes...

    "Pics, or it didn't happen."


    In any event, I'd really want to see a clear comparison laydown of just
    what personal information is really required for using Vendor A vs B
    before trying to condemn any one vendor.

    For example, for setting up an Android phone, my understanding is that
    you're required to provide a Google Account, and to get a Google Account requires providing full name, phone#, date of birth, gender, & location.
    Gosh, that sounds to be more obtrusive than Apple...is it?


    -hh

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrew@21:1/5 to badgolferman on Fri Nov 22 18:45:59 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    badgolferman wrote on Fri, 22 Nov 2024 18:01:08 -0000 (UTC) :

    We only have to get rid of the remaining "shit-show trolls" (as you
    refer to them) of Jolly Roger, Alan Baker, Alan Browne, Chris,
    Haemactylus, Joerg Lorenz, et al., and this newsgroup would start to
    become normal again

    I'd have to excuse Chris from that list. He seems far more reasonable
    than the rest of the hive.

    I agree with you that Chris is "far more reasonable" than the rest of the
    hive as I've studied all of their strange actions, such that I'd put them
    into these loose groupings of similar personalities when posting here.


    Jolly Roger === Lewis
    Alan Baker === Joerg Lorenz
    Haemactylus === Your Name
    Alan Browne === Chris
    nospam === he is in a category of his own

    The reason nospam is in his own category is that he actually knew far more about Apple devices than the rest of the Apple trolls did, even as if we
    took him at face value - we would conclude he knew nothing - but he was
    simply denying everything that Apple didn't do as not needed & not wanted.

    Alan Browne and Chris are together in a category as they can actually think
    for themselves (e.g., Alan Browne *loves* to quote Apple white papers, and
    Alan Browne came up with his own analogy that the walled-garden
    restrictions are an elite "clubhouse" that you have to pay dearly to be admitted to). Likewise, Chris can discuss some things on an adult level.

    Haemactylus & Your Name can't discuss anything at an adult level, and
    neither can Alan Baker & Joerg Lorenz but the category differences are that
    the latter two post frequently to this ng while the former two do not, and, what Haemactylus & Your Name post is drivel never related to the topic.

    Not that Alan Baker & Joerg Lorenz don't post drivel - the difference being Alan & Joerg have no purpose for posting other than for their own
    amusement.

    When it comes to the king of Apple trolls though (now that nospam's
    contract ran out) is Jolly Roger, who has been posting to this newsgroup
    for at least as long as I have and who is the classic epitome of the Apple troll.

    To Jolly Roger, anything that is NOT a cheering squad for the Apple troll
    team, is something to be reviled. Detested to the level that Jolly Roger
    hurls vicious yet childish "your mother is a slut" type of inane childish vindictives (as he's a fifth-grade sadistic bully in all ways possible).

    As for nospam... he was perhaps the most despicable of these Apple trolls,
    in that he brazenly lied to everyone to their face without any qualms.

    Where we can lump both Jolly Roger & nospam is they are both sadistic completely unprepossessing human beings whose very existence proves that
    such evil people who possess no human value can be so horrible to those
    that do simply because they have been told their entire lives that they're stupid - and they want to get back at everyone else for doing that to them.

    Do you think I have them better pegged appropriately enough yet with those clarifying distinctions above?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to badgolferman on Fri Nov 22 12:18:26 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On 2024-11-22 11:17, badgolferman wrote:
    Andrew wrote:

    badgolferman wrote on Fri, 22 Nov 2024 18:01:08 -0000 (UTC) :

    We only have to get rid of the remaining "shit-show trolls" (as
    you refer to them) of Jolly Roger, Alan Baker, Alan Browne, Chris,
    Haemactylus, Joerg Lorenz, et al., and this newsgroup would start
    to become normal again

    I'd have to excuse Chris from that list. He seems far more
    reasonable than the rest of the hive.

    I agree with you that Chris is "far more reasonable" than the rest of
    the hive as I've studied all of their strange actions, such that I'd
    put them into these loose groupings of similar personalities when
    posting here.


    Jolly Roger === Lewis
    Alan Baker === Joerg Lorenz
    Haemactylus === Your Name
    Alan Browne === Chris
    nospam === he is in a category of his own

    The reason nospam is in his own category is that he actually knew far
    more about Apple devices than the rest of the Apple trolls did, even
    as if we took him at face value - we would conclude he knew nothing -
    but he was simply denying everything that Apple didn't do as not
    needed & not wanted.

    Alan Browne and Chris are together in a category as they can actually
    think for themselves (e.g., Alan Browne loves to quote Apple white
    papers, and Alan Browne came up with his own analogy that the
    walled-garden restrictions are an elite "clubhouse" that you have to
    pay dearly to be admitted to). Likewise, Chris can discuss some
    things on an adult level.

    Haemactylus & Your Name can't discuss anything at an adult level, and
    neither can Alan Baker & Joerg Lorenz but the category differences
    are that the latter two post frequently to this ng while the former
    two do not, and, what Haemactylus & Your Name post is drivel never
    related to the topic.

    Not that Alan Baker & Joerg Lorenz don't post drivel - the difference
    being Alan & Joerg have no purpose for posting other than for their
    own amusement.

    When it comes to the king of Apple trolls though (now that nospam's
    contract ran out) is Jolly Roger, who has been posting to this
    newsgroup for at least as long as I have and who is the classic
    epitome of the Apple troll.

    To Jolly Roger, anything that is NOT a cheering squad for the Apple
    troll team, is something to be reviled. Detested to the level that
    Jolly Roger hurls vicious yet childish "your mother is a slut" type
    of inane childish vindictives (as he's a fifth-grade sadistic bully
    in all ways possible).

    As for nospam... he was perhaps the most despicable of these Apple
    trolls, in that he brazenly lied to everyone to their face without
    any qualms.

    Where we can lump both Jolly Roger & nospam is they are both sadistic
    completely unprepossessing human beings whose very existence proves
    that such evil people who possess no human value can be so horrible
    to those that do simply because they have been told their entire
    lives that they're stupid - and they want to get back at everyone
    else for doing that to them.

    Do you think I have them better pegged appropriately enough yet with
    those clarifying distinctions above?


    Maybe Chris should be in his own category. Anyone who can see through
    Jolly Roger's bullshit and calls him out for it is okay with me.


    You know, in many ways you're worse than Arlen.

    Arlen doesn't pretend to be even-handed or unbiased.

    You're really just an asshole.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to badgolferman on Fri Nov 22 12:19:10 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On 2024-11-22 10:01, badgolferman wrote:
    Andrew wrote:

    We only have to get rid of the remaining "shit-show trolls" (as you
    refer to them) of Jolly Roger, Alan Baker, Alan Browne, Chris,
    Haemactylus, Joerg Lorenz, et al., and this newsgroup would start to
    become normal again


    I'd have to excuse Chris from that list. He seems far more reasonable
    than the rest of the hive.


    Because calling people part of a "hive" is so very reasonable...

    🙄

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan Browne@21:1/5 to Jolly Roger on Fri Nov 22 15:20:37 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 2024-11-21 10:54, Jolly Roger wrote:
    On 2024-11-21, Alan Browne <bitbucket@blackhole.com> wrote:
    On 2024-11-19 22:29, *Hemidactylus* wrote:
    Alan Browne <bitbucket@blackhole.com> wrote:
    On 2024-11-19 11:34, Peter Piper wrote:
    Adding it to your killfile will not stop you feeding it.

    Answering it feeds it.

    May as well point that out to a brick wall as people will continue to
    engage this nymshifting trolling nutcase.

    I recall decades ago posting to moderated groups where such abusive
    nutters would be banhammered on sight. Those were the good ole days
    of no nonsense moderators. Now groups like this devolve into a
    shitshow thanks primarily to one or more bad actors and their
    multiple enablers.

    That’s Arlen’s sole raison d'etre, smearing his feces across the
    group while self-appointed janitors keep trying to clean up after
    him.

    No troll August worked

    "No troll August" is a really strange way of saying "allowing trolls to
    lie, belittle, and so on for a month here without objection".

    Anyway, face it, usenet as meeting point as it used to be is deader
    than a doornail.

    When a newsgroup is run by trolls, it becomes just another lame advocacy newsgroup, where friendly mature conversation isn't welcome and sensible people just stay away as a result.

    This group is about 97% bickering induced by trolls and 3% useful.

    Ignore the trolls, filter them. They go away eventually. As long as
    you respond to them you feed them and they own you.


    _____________________
    /| /| | |
    ||__|| | Please do not |
    / O O\__ | feed the |
    / \ | Trolls |
    / \ \|_____________________|
    / _ \ \ ||
    / |\____\ \ ||
    / | | | |\____/ ||
    / \|_|_|/ | _||
    / / \ |____| ||
    / | | | --|
    | | | |____ --|
    * _ | |_|_|_| | \-/
    *-- _--\ _ \ | ||
    / _ \\ | / `'
    * / \_ /- | | |
    * ___ c_c_c_C/ \C_c_c_c____________

    --
    "It would be a measureless disaster if Russian barbarism overlaid
    the culture and independence of the ancient States of Europe."
    Winston Churchill

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan Browne@21:1/5 to Chris on Fri Nov 22 15:21:53 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 2024-11-21 17:28, Chris wrote:
    Alan Browne <bitbucket@blackhole.com> wrote:
    On 2024-11-19 22:29, *Hemidactylus* wrote:
    Alan Browne <bitbucket@blackhole.com> wrote:
    On 2024-11-19 11:34, Peter Piper wrote:
    Adding it to your killfile will not stop you feeding it.

    Answering it feeds it.

    May as well point that out to a brick wall as people will continue to
    engage this nymshifting trolling nutcase.

    I recall decades ago posting to moderated groups where such abusive nutters >>> would be banhammered on sight. Those were the good ole days of no nonsense >>> moderators. Now groups like this devolve into a shitshow thanks primarily >>> to one or more bad actors and their multiple enablers.

    That’s Arlen’s sole raison d'etre, smearing his feces across the group >>> while self-appointed janitors keep trying to clean up after him.

    No troll August worked in the main with only a few engaging it.

    Anyway, face it, usenet as meeting point as it used to be is deader than
    a doornail. Other (web based and other) social media has taken over.

    And likely preferable as Arlen won't ever be found there due to his
    "privacy" issues. He can just rant away here on his own.

    Yep - when I'm looking for info about things or suggestions or whatever,
    usenet has become useless. It's 2024 and people want it to be like in
    1994 - or even 2004.

    --
    "It would be a measureless disaster if Russian barbarism overlaid
    the culture and independence of the ancient States of Europe."
    Winston Churchill

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to badgolferman on Fri Nov 22 12:36:33 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On 2024-11-22 12:34, badgolferman wrote:
    Alan wrote:

    You know, in many ways you're worse than Arlen.

    Arlen doesn't pretend to be even-handed or unbiased.

    You're really just an asshole.


    If that's what you think of me then that says a lot about you.


    If that's why you think, that says a lot about you.

    See how easy that is?

    :-)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to badgolferman on Fri Nov 22 12:48:20 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On 2024-11-22 11:17, badgolferman wrote:
    Andrew wrote:

    badgolferman wrote on Fri, 22 Nov 2024 18:01:08 -0000 (UTC) :

    We only have to get rid of the remaining "shit-show trolls" (as
    you refer to them) of Jolly Roger, Alan Baker, Alan Browne, Chris,
    Haemactylus, Joerg Lorenz, et al., and this newsgroup would start
    to become normal again

    I'd have to excuse Chris from that list. He seems far more
    reasonable than the rest of the hive.

    I agree with you that Chris is "far more reasonable" than the rest of
    the hive as I've studied all of their strange actions, such that I'd
    put them into these loose groupings of similar personalities when
    posting here.


    Jolly Roger === Lewis
    Alan Baker === Joerg Lorenz
    Haemactylus === Your Name
    Alan Browne === Chris
    nospam === he is in a category of his own

    The reason nospam is in his own category is that he actually knew far
    more about Apple devices than the rest of the Apple trolls did, even
    as if we took him at face value - we would conclude he knew nothing -
    but he was simply denying everything that Apple didn't do as not
    needed & not wanted.

    Alan Browne and Chris are together in a category as they can actually
    think for themselves (e.g., Alan Browne loves to quote Apple white
    papers, and Alan Browne came up with his own analogy that the
    walled-garden restrictions are an elite "clubhouse" that you have to
    pay dearly to be admitted to). Likewise, Chris can discuss some
    things on an adult level.

    Haemactylus & Your Name can't discuss anything at an adult level, and
    neither can Alan Baker & Joerg Lorenz but the category differences
    are that the latter two post frequently to this ng while the former
    two do not, and, what Haemactylus & Your Name post is drivel never
    related to the topic.

    Not that Alan Baker & Joerg Lorenz don't post drivel - the difference
    being Alan & Joerg have no purpose for posting other than for their
    own amusement.

    When it comes to the king of Apple trolls though (now that nospam's
    contract ran out) is Jolly Roger, who has been posting to this
    newsgroup for at least as long as I have and who is the classic
    epitome of the Apple troll.

    To Jolly Roger, anything that is NOT a cheering squad for the Apple
    troll team, is something to be reviled. Detested to the level that
    Jolly Roger hurls vicious yet childish "your mother is a slut" type
    of inane childish vindictives (as he's a fifth-grade sadistic bully
    in all ways possible).

    As for nospam... he was perhaps the most despicable of these Apple
    trolls, in that he brazenly lied to everyone to their face without
    any qualms.

    Where we can lump both Jolly Roger & nospam is they are both sadistic
    completely unprepossessing human beings whose very existence proves
    that such evil people who possess no human value can be so horrible
    to those that do simply because they have been told their entire
    lives that they're stupid - and they want to get back at everyone
    else for doing that to them.

    Do you think I have them better pegged appropriately enough yet with
    those clarifying distinctions above?


    Maybe Chris should be in his own category. Anyone who can see through
    Jolly Roger's bullshit and calls him out for it is okay with me.


    Ask your new friend Arlen what other groups he posts in.

    I'd like to check his claim that he isn't universally vilified.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Your Name@21:1/5 to Andrew on Sat Nov 23 09:55:19 2024
    XPost: comp.sys.mac.advocacy, misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    Andrew wrote:

    I agree with you that Chris is "far more reasonable" than the rest of
    the hive as I've studied all of their strange actions, such that I'd
    put them into these loose groupings of similar personalities when
    posting here.
    <snip a load of drivel>

    Another of the constant nymshifting added to the killfile ... simply
    proving the moron is nothing but an idiotic cross-posting troll.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrew@21:1/5 to Your Name on Fri Nov 22 22:03:37 2024
    XPost: comp.sys.mac.advocacy, misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    Your Name wrote on Wed, 20 Nov 2024 15:30:04 +1300 :

    And yet another brainless moron troll for the killfile.

    The fact is that only Apple requires you to lose your privacy just so that
    you can access the app store. Nobody else requires you to set up an account
    on the device just so you can install apps from the official app store.

    Not Google. Not Microsoft.

    Just Apple.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrew@21:1/5 to Alan Browne on Fri Nov 22 21:45:14 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    Alan Browne wrote on Fri, 22 Nov 2024 15:20:37 -0500 :

    Ignore the trolls, filter them. They go away eventually.

    Unfortunately, you Apple trolls will not go away just by ignoring you.

    Jolly Roger === Lewis
    Alan Baker === Joerg Lorenz
    Haemactylus === Your Name
    Alan Browne === Chris
    nospam === he is in a category of his own

    So far we've only managed to lose Lewis, JF Mezei & the sadistic nospam.
    Could you be next Alan Browne?

    One can only hope.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Andrew on Fri Nov 22 14:10:02 2024
    XPost: comp.sys.mac.advocacy, misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 2024-11-22 14:03, Andrew wrote:
    Your Name wrote on Wed, 20 Nov 2024 15:30:04 +1300 :

    And yet another brainless moron troll for the killfile.

    The fact is that only Apple requires you to lose your privacy just so that you can access the app store. Nobody else requires you to set up an account on the device just so you can install apps from the official app store.

    Not Google. Not Microsoft.

    Just Apple.

    Giving one's phone number to a company is not "losing your privacy".

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrew@21:1/5 to -hh on Fri Nov 22 21:58:33 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    -hh wrote on Fri, 22 Nov 2024 13:39:24 -0500 :

    In any event, I'd really want to see a clear comparison laydown of just
    what personal information is really required for using Vendor A vs B
    before trying to condemn any one vendor.

    For example, for setting up an Android phone, my understanding is that
    you're required to provide a Google Account, and to get a Google Account requires providing full name, phone#, date of birth, gender, & location.
    Gosh, that sounds to be more obtrusive than Apple...is it?

    That's a surprisingly adult question for an Apple troll to ask, so I will faithfully answer that question as best I know as if -hh is an adult.

    Fair enough?

    Bear in mind I'm an expert at Windows & Android & iOS accounts, so you're
    going to hear the truth from me - not something Apple marketing would say.

    For Windows, Microsoft would love for you to provide an account, for
    reasons which are obvious, but there is no requirement for an account.

    Not even on Windows 11 where Microsoft tried to copy Apple's model.

    For Linux, I'm sure you're aware there is no requirement to create an
    account, so again, no personal information is required of you to use it.

    For Android, there is also no requirement whatsoever for an account.

    Google has always allowed you to obtain software from the Google Play Store WITHOUT setting up an account, and of course, anywhere else too.

    I have over 900 apps installed on my Android phone, for example, most of
    which are off the Google Play Store and I have no Google account set up.

    It's only Apple that requires that account.

    In reality, you do NOT have to set up an account on an Apple iOS device.
    But... it won't be able to do anything.

    At least a Windows, Linux & Android device works just fine without the
    account, but the Apple device is even more crippled than normal with it.

    Let me know if you have any other questions as I use them all personally.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Andrew on Fri Nov 22 15:35:24 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On 2024-11-22 13:58, Andrew wrote:
    -hh wrote on Fri, 22 Nov 2024 13:39:24 -0500 :

    In any event, I'd really want to see a clear comparison laydown of just
    what personal information is really required for using Vendor A vs B
    before trying to condemn any one vendor.

    For example, for setting up an Android phone, my understanding is that
    you're required to provide a Google Account, and to get a Google Account
    requires providing full name, phone#, date of birth, gender, & location.
    Gosh, that sounds to be more obtrusive than Apple...is it?

    That's a surprisingly adult question for an Apple troll to ask, so I will faithfully answer that question as best I know as if -hh is an adult.

    Fair enough?

    Bear in mind I'm an expert at Windows & Android & iOS accounts, so you're going to hear the truth from me - not something Apple marketing would say.

    For Windows, Microsoft would love for you to provide an account, for
    reasons which are obvious, but there is no requirement for an account.

    Not even on Windows 11 where Microsoft tried to copy Apple's model.

    What are the steps an ordinary consumer would have to take to avoid
    setting up Windows 11 without a Microsoft account?


    For Linux, I'm sure you're aware there is no requirement to create an account, so again, no personal information is required of you to use it.

    For Android, there is also no requirement whatsoever for an account.

    Google has always allowed you to obtain software from the Google Play Store WITHOUT setting up an account, and of course, anywhere else too.

    Cite please!


    I have over 900 apps installed on my Android phone, for example, most of which are off the Google Play Store and I have no Google account set up.

    It's only Apple that requires that account.

    In reality, you do NOT have to set up an account on an Apple iOS device. But... it won't be able to do anything.

    At least a Windows, Linux & Android device works just fine without the account, but the Apple device is even more crippled than normal with it.

    Let me know if you have any other questions as I use them all personally.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan Browne@21:1/5 to -hh on Tue Nov 26 19:39:07 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On 2024-11-24 23:04, -hh wrote:

    No, I


    _____________________
    /| /| | |
    ||__|| | Please do not |
    / O O\__ | feed the |
    / \ | Trolls |
    / \ \|_____________________|
    / _ \ \ ||
    / |\____\ \ ||
    / | | | |\____/ ||
    / \|_|_|/ | _||
    / / \ |____| ||
    / | | | --|
    | | | |____ --|
    * _ | |_|_|_| | \-/
    *-- _--\ _ \ | ||
    / _ \\ | / `'
    * / \_ /- | | |
    * ___ c_c_c_C/ \C_c_c_c____________


    --
    "It would be a measureless disaster if Russian barbarism overlaid
    the culture and independence of the ancient States of Europe."
    Winston Churchill

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From *Hemidactylus*@21:1/5 to Alan Browne on Wed Nov 27 14:12:34 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    Alan Browne <bitbucket@blackhole.com> wrote:
    On 2024-11-24 23:04, -hh wrote:

    No, I


    _____________________
    /| /| | |
    ||__|| | Please do not |
    / O O\__ | feed the |
    / \ | Trolls |
    / \ \|_____________________|
    / _ \ \ ||
    / |\____\ \ ||
    / | | | |\____/ ||
    / \|_|_|/ | _||
    / / \ |____| ||
    / | | | --|
    | | | |____ --|
    * _ | |_|_|_| | \-/
    *-- _--\ _ \ | ||
    / _ \\ | / `'
    * / \_ /- | | |
    * ___ c_c_c_C/ \C_c_c_c____________


    I fully agree with you, but find this a losing battle. People will continue
    to engage with these toxic troll touting some rationalization of countering
    the bullshit, but in reality they just add to the problem. Starve the
    trolls of the attention they crave.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan Browne@21:1/5 to All on Wed Nov 27 11:45:37 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 2024-11-27 09:12, *Hemidactylus* wrote:
    Alan Browne <bitbucket@blackhole.com> wrote:
    On 2024-11-24 23:04, -hh wrote:

    No, I


    _____________________
    /| /| | |
    ||__|| | Please do not |
    / O O\__ | feed the |
    / \ | Trolls |
    / \ \|_____________________|
    / _ \ \ ||
    / |\____\ \ ||
    / | | | |\____/ ||
    / \|_|_|/ | _||
    / / \ |____| ||
    / | | | --|
    | | | |____ --|
    * _ | |_|_|_| | \-/
    *-- _--\ _ \ | ||
    / _ \\ | / `'
    * / \_ /- | | |
    * ___ c_c_c_C/ \C_c_c_c____________


    I fully agree with you, but find this a losing battle. <S>


    It doesn't matter. I've found many other groups where there are more
    people who are:

    -polite
    -humble and/or genuinely subject matter experts (and not snide about it)
    -can talk about a shortcoming of iPhones v. Android w/o making it a
    black and white battle for the souls of the human race
    -broader range of valuable inputs and insights
    -no trolls (not very long anyway)
    -no moderation delay - but a-holes get ejected within hours if not minutes

    So I tell myself at least once per week not to bother coming here ...
    and one day (probably soon) I will heed my own advice. And by "here" I
    mean usenet (I use about 6 NG's).

    A surprising "venue" that I'd never used is Telegram. A local group of
    tech enthusiasts use it and I've joined in for a narrow participation
    around a particular system. (Très nerd).
    I find the Telegram format to be very pleasant. Seems to be moderated
    but I don't see moderation occurring.

    Reddit is a vast area and it's hard to find "the right place" (I don't
    spend enough time on it, so hard to find "the right place").

    --
    "It would be a measureless disaster if Russian barbarism overlaid
    the culture and independence of the ancient States of Europe."
    Winston Churchill

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jolly Roger@21:1/5 to Alan Browne on Wed Nov 27 20:00:43 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 2024-11-27, Alan Browne <bitbucket@blackhole.com> wrote:
    On 2024-11-27 09:12, *Hemidactylus* wrote:
    Alan Browne <bitbucket@blackhole.com> wrote:
    On 2024-11-24 23:04, -hh wrote:

    No, I


    _____________________
    /| /| | |
    ||__|| | Please do not |
    / O O\__ | feed the |
    / \ | Trolls |
    / \ \|_____________________|
    / _ \ \ ||
    / |\____\ \ ||
    / | | | |\____/ ||
    / \|_|_|/ | _||
    / / \ |____| ||
    / | | | --|
    | | | |____ --|
    * _ | |_|_|_| | \-/
    *-- _--\ _ \ | ||
    / _ \\ | / `'
    * / \_ /- | | |
    * ___ c_c_c_C/ \C_c_c_c____________


    I fully agree with you, but find this a losing battle. <S>


    It doesn't matter. I've found many other groups where there are more
    people who are:

    -polite
    -humble and/or genuinely subject matter experts (and not snide about it)
    -can talk about a shortcoming of iPhones v. Android w/o making it a
    black and white battle for the souls of the human race
    -broader range of valuable inputs and insights
    -no trolls (not very long anyway)
    -no moderation delay - but a-holes get ejected within hours if not minutes

    So I tell myself at least once per week not to bother coming here ...
    and one day (probably soon) I will heed my own advice. And by "here"
    I mean usenet (I use about 6 NG's).

    Same, because the signal to noise ratio here is substandard due to the unchecked trolling activity. Look at the group's current activity as an example.

    Reddit is a vast area and it's hard to find "the right place" (I don't
    spend enough time on it, so hard to find "the right place").

    You have some control over what shows up in your Home feed on Reddit. So
    your place can look however you want in that respect. And there are
    moderators (though that can cut both ways).

    --
    E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
    I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

    JR

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)