• Re: did this group die?

    From Andrews@21:1/5 to Chris on Sat Nov 2 16:01:33 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.system

    Chris wrote on Sat, 2 Nov 2024 09:33:12 -0000 (UTC) :

    There are no others, here.

    There are fundamentally only two types of people on this Apple newsgroup.

    One type are those whose ego is tied up in what people think of Apple
    (and who use only Apple products so they know nothing of the real world).

    a. Those people revel in the long lines outside Apple stores
    (because it affirms their decision to join the Apple clique)

    b. They boast absurd concocted arguments touting iPhone resale value
    (because it justifies Apple's ridiculously high cost of ownership)

    c. They bask in Apple white papers replete with lovely technojargon
    (because it makes them feel that the product is differentiated)

    d. But most of all - they will do anything - lie, cheat, steal - whatever
    even to the level of murder - to defend Apple's honor - to the death.

    Unlike those fundamentalist religious zealot Apple trolls, the other type
    on this newsgroup are just those people who happen to use Apple products.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrews@21:1/5 to Jolly Roger on Sat Nov 2 23:26:58 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.apps

    Jolly Roger wrote on 2 Nov 2024 18:31:12 GMT :

    Indeed. But does anyone know where nospam and Lewis are? Both
    disappeared a bit abruptly.

    Between the constant trolls and the people preferring those trolls to dominate the group through lack of correction/truth, I doubt either one
    of them sees much of a benefit in hanging around. If this place is to
    become just another crappy advocacy group where trolls have free reign,
    there isn't much good information to be had here.

    As Jolly Roger clearly showed, all you Apple trolls are the same as nospam
    in almost every way. Same as Lewis. Same as JF Mezei. You're all trolls.

    It was clear to everyone that the only role nospam played was to make inane excuses for why the iPhone didn't have what every other phone already had.

    According to nospam's "nobody wants it" & "nobody needs it" on everything
    that everyone else had except iPhone owners, apparently everyone wants 4G
    (not 5G); and everyone wants anemic RAM; and everyone wants substandard batteries; and everyone wants more zero-day exploits in history than any Android phone every had.

    To you Apple trolls, Lewis, nospam, Jolly Roger, Haemactylus, Chris, Alan Baker, Alan Browne, Joerg Lorenz, etc., nobody wants call recording.

    And yet Apple added it recently. Fancy that. People wanted it after all.

    Same with the laughably paltry RAM Apple chintzes out with on the iPhone. Nobody wants RAM according to all you Apple trolls. Nobody needs it.

    Yet Apple was forced to add RAM to the iPhone 16 due to AI needs.
    Fancy that. People did want modern RAM capacity.

    Speaking of modern capacity, nospam claimed nobody wanted modern batteries. Nobody needed them. And yet, the EU told Apple to stop selling any new
    iPhone 14 models because not a single iPhone prior to the iPhone 15 passes
    the EU's lifetime tests.

    Fancy that.

    Every one of you Apple trolls says nobody wants modern functionality in an iPhone, and yet, the EU told Apple if they don't finally provide modern functionality, Apple would have to stop selling all new iPhones in Europe.

    Finally, Apple added these things that you Apple trolls claim nobody wants. Most Apple had to be forced to add (the RAM they did on their own though).

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From *Hemidactylus*@21:1/5 to Chris on Sat Nov 9 10:42:54 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> wrote:

    [snip useless trolling]

    30,000 nt is tiny compared to 4,000,000 nt for E. coli or 3,200,000,000 nt for human. And of course the human genome is double-stranded and diploid so every call has 12.8G nt - excluding red blood cells which are anuclear. 30k is basically a rounding error.

    Including polyploid hepatocytes?

    [snip useless trolling]

    Given you're the one who doesn't even understand his own quotes. It's clear who's the troll.

    The troll has tiny man ego syndrome. Note how he feigns greater knowledge
    in any endeavor anyone else brings up whether mobile computing, BMWs or immunology. For the last one knowing about SHM is key.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Hill@21:1/5 to Andrews on Sat Nov 9 12:51:55 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.system

    Andrews <andrews@spam.net> wrote:
    John Hill wrote on Tue, 5 Nov 2024 19:56:47 -0000 (UTC) :

    In actual fact, I have a BA and a DPhil in Physics at Oxford. (That is the >> Oxford equivalent of PhD at most universities).

    OK. Then let's take that as prima facie evidence that you claim to have a doctorate in Physics, which means you're familiar with Newton, right?

    Even Newton said a priori that its action at a distance was preposterous,
    but it was the best he could propose until Einstein enlightened all of us.

    What did Einstein postulate is the true source of what we call gravity?

    HINT: Veritasium explains it reasonably well for the hoi polloi.
    *How Gravity Actually Works*
    <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XRr1kaXKBsU>

    *Why Gravity is NOT a Force*

    <https://www.facebook.com/veritasium/videos/why-gravity-is-not-a-force/1041664880521597/>


    https://www.iop.org/events/exploring-end-dark-ages

    It would seem that I am not alone in believing that gravity exists.

    I wouldnโ€™t have bothered, but this turns up in an Institute of Physics
    email that dropped into my inbox this morning. I decided that it was too opportune to waste.

    And so, farewell. May you live long and die happy!

    Old John.

    --
    The Moving Finger writes; and, having writ,
    Moves on: nor all thy Piety nor Wit
    Shall lure it back to cancel half a Line,
    Nor all thy Tears wash out a Word of it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrews@21:1/5 to All on Sat Nov 9 14:30:15 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    *Hemidactylus* wrote on Sat, 09 Nov 2024 10:42:54 +0000 :

    Given you're the one who doesn't even understand his own quotes. It's clear >> who's the troll.

    The troll has tiny man ego syndrome. Note how he feigns greater knowledge
    in any endeavor anyone else brings up whether mobile computing, BMWs or immunology. For the last one knowing about SHM is key.

    No. You Apple trolls understand nothing, not even basic sentences.

    I never claimed to be a BMW expert - I simply claimed to own a bimmer and a beemer and because of that, I know a *lot* about those two vehicles.

    And yet, you Apple trolls who own a bimmer know *nothing* about them.
    All you Apple trolls who own a bimmer know is what BMW MARKETING fed you.

    That's my point.

    It's not that I have "greater knowledge"; it's I have "normal" knowledge. Everyone (but you) knows what I know about bimmers for example.

    You Apple trolls don't even know Apple has the worst (by far!) customer
    support in the industry for example - you have no clue that's just a fact.

    You Apple trolls don't know anything. About anything.
    Least of all about Apple products.

    All you Apple trolls (Lewis, Jolly Roger, Alan Baker, Alan Browne, Chris, Haemactylus, Joerg Lorenz, JF Mezei et. al) merely parrot Apple marketing.

    Which you then defend to the death, no matter what.

    Because your whole life you've been told you are stupid and yet Apple tells
    you that you're a genius for waiting outside the store in long lines.

    And you believe it.
    Because Apple feeds your ego.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrews@21:1/5 to Andrews on Sat Nov 9 14:22:53 2024
    XPost: comp.sys.mac.system, misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    Andrews wrote on Sat, 9 Nov 2024 05:25:08 -0000 (UTC) :

    Alan Baker, who professes to own a BMW, doesn't even know what the term "bimmer" means - and worse - since it was a racing term derived after "beemer" was - he's completely ignorant of what EVERYONE else long knew.

    Everyone makes fun of the noobs who don't know these things.

    The main point here with the beemer/bimmer references is the only thing
    noobs about BMWs know is the (brilliant) marketing propaganda fed to them.

    They don't actually know *anything* about bimmers if they don't know what a
    CCV is, or a DISA valve, or how the Behr expansion tank works, etc.

    They know *nothing* about bimmers - except what's fed to them by marketing.
    Do you see my point?

    These Apple trolls know *nothing* about the Apple product line.
    They only know what Apple feeds them.

    It's in there DNA to not understand anything whatsoever about anything.

    All Apple trolls (e.g., Lewis, Jolly Roger, Alan Baker, Alan Browne, Chris, Haemactylus, Joerg Lorenz, JF Mezei et. al) merely parrot Apple marketing.

    Which they then defend to the death, no matter what.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrews@21:1/5 to John Hill on Sat Nov 9 14:37:52 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.system

    John Hill wrote on Sat, 9 Nov 2024 12:51:55 -0000 (UTC) :

    It would seem that I am not alone in believing that gravity exists.

    The fact that you don't even understand the difference between existing,
    and being a force shows that you are merely an imposter who knows nothing.

    An example is an iPhone exists - but it's not a force.

    The fact you can't separate existing from being a force tells me everything
    I need to know about you - you're just another piece of Apple trolling excrement who lies about everything - as you don't know physics at all.

    The fact remains, Einstein's hypothesis is that gravity is not a force. Everyone knows this.

    Well, everyone but you Apple trolls knows this.
    As it's one of the most basic tenets of all physics.

    Even I know it.
    And I know nothing about physics other than what I learned in school.

    My point is you Apple trolls don't know anything. About anything.
    Least of all about Apple products.

    All you Apple trolls (Lewis, Jolly Roger, Alan Baker, Alan Browne, Chris, Haemactylus, Joerg Lorenz, JF Mezei et. al) merely parrot Apple marketing.

    Which you then defend to the death, no matter what.

    Because your whole life you've been told you are stupid and yet Apple tells
    you that you're a genius for waiting outside their store in long lines.

    And you believe it.
    Because Apple feeds your ego.

    That's why you hate anyone who posts the truth about Apple products here.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From sticks@21:1/5 to Andrews on Sat Nov 9 08:51:42 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.system

    On 11/9/2024 8:37 AM, Andrews wrote:
    John Hill wrote on Sat, 9 Nov 2024 12:51:55 -0000 (UTC) :

    It would seem that I am not alone in believing that gravity exists.

    The fact that you don't even understand the difference between existing,
    and being a force shows that you are merely an imposter who knows nothing.

    An example is an iPhone exists - but it's not a force.

    The fact you can't separate existing from being a force tells me everything
    I need to know about you - you're just another piece of Apple trolling excrement who lies about everything - as you don't know physics at all.

    The fact remains, Einstein's hypothesis is that gravity is not a force. Everyone knows this.

    Well, everyone but you Apple trolls knows this.
    As it's one of the most basic tenets of all physics.

    Even I know it.
    And I know nothing about physics other than what I learned in school.

    My point is you Apple trolls don't know anything. About anything.
    Least of all about Apple products.

    All you Apple trolls (Lewis, Jolly Roger, Alan Baker, Alan Browne, Chris, Haemactylus, Joerg Lorenz, JF Mezei et. al) merely parrot Apple marketing.

    Which you then defend to the death, no matter what.

    Because your whole life you've been told you are stupid and yet Apple tells you that you're a genius for waiting outside their store in long lines.

    And you believe it.
    Because Apple feeds your ego.

    That's why you hate anyone who posts the truth about Apple products here.

    If you pick up the needle and move it past that spot you won't have to
    hear the same thing over and over again.

    --
    I Stand With Israel!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From *Hemidactylus*@21:1/5 to badgolferman on Sat Nov 9 16:51:27 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    badgolferman <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> wrote:

    [snip raving lunatic]

    I'm ignorant as to the difference between a "bimmer" and a "beemer" so
    maybe you can explain it to me. Why don't people just say BMW? It's
    not like that's a long acronym.

    I may have mentioned this once. My mother who is German made sure I
    knew how to pronounce Audi correctly. She hated when people pronounced
    it "au-di" and said it's pronounced "ow-di".

    Arlen is a pseudointellectual hack who introduces irrelevant asides into a discussion to parade why he thinks heโ€™s more knowledgable than his many targets. Why else would anyone arbitrarily introduce Einstein into a
    discussion besides an exercise in pseudointellectual pretense? Only
    wackaloons do that.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrews@21:1/5 to sticks on Sat Nov 9 17:23:08 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.system

    sticks wrote on Sat, 9 Nov 2024 08:51:42 -0600 :

    That's why you hate anyone who posts the truth about Apple products here.

    If you pick up the needle and move it past that spot you won't have to
    hear the same thing over and over again.

    I have two purposes on this Apple newsgroup, one of which is to learn about
    and disseminate information about the Apple product line & Apple strategy.

    The other is to show in the public record for all to see what kind of
    rather strangely unusual people you Apple trolls are. You're not normal.

    As just one example, what kind of moron stands in line outside *any* store
    just for the privilege of paying through the nose for substandard crap?

    Only people like you Apple trolls do that, namely those like Lewis, Jolly Roger, Alan Baker, Alan Browne, Chris, Haemactylus, Joerg Lorenz, JF Mezei
    et. al) all of whom merely parrot Apple marketing in an echo chamber inside their brains.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrews@21:1/5 to badgolferman on Sat Nov 9 17:23:15 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    badgolferman wrote on Sat, 9 Nov 2024 15:05:28 -0000 (UTC) :

    I never claimed to be a BMW expert - I simply claimed to own a bimmer
    and a beemer and because of that, I know a lot about those two
    vehicles.

    I'm ignorant as to the difference between a "bimmer" and a "beemer" so
    maybe you can explain it to me. Why don't people just say BMW? It's
    not like that's a long acronym.

    I may have mentioned this once. My mother who is German made sure I
    knew how to pronounce Audi correctly. She hated when people pronounced
    it "au-di" and said it's pronounced "ow-di".

    I'm of German descent and I've always known what a bimmer & beemer are, badgolferman - but - I've owned both bimmers and beemers also.

    If I own something, I then learn what I need to learn to know everything I
    want to know about it. In the case of the beemer, my 525i happens to have a
    CCV valve, which happens to clog up, which happens to make it fail
    California emissions - which means - I have to learn how to replace it.

    You will *never forget* a CCV replacement badgolferman. Never.
    It's not possible to forget because you have to rip the engine bay apart.

    When you replace the cooling system, you will *never forget* that the Behr expansion tank is just about as complicated as they could have made it.

    When you replace the thermostat & waterpump, you will *never forget* the special 32mm tools you need just to spin off the radiator fan which has to
    be removed before you can get the serpentine belt off.

    To get the serpentine belt off, you will *never forget* how strongly and strangely designed the belt tensioners are that you have to also deal with.

    When you fail emissions again, you have to deal with the DISA valve, which
    is an expensive plastic piece of garbage that is on the intake manifold.

    When you adjust your (admittedly rather comfortable leather) driver seat,
    you will *never forget* the adjusting cable slips out of its clasp because eventually they all get "seat twist" which you then have to deal with.

    Speaking of the interior, the cupholders are a joke but you have to periodically replace them because they break on every single 525i owner.

    The trunk loom is a disaster just waiting to happen, depending on which
    wires chafe and then short out against the others, causing all sorts of
    strange electrical problems which are almost impossible to diagnose.

    Speaking of impossible to diagnose, when the ABS control module goes out,
    and it will because it fails on everyone - when you take it apart, you'll
    be appalled at the "angel hairs" inside which simply break off at the weld.

    All this - and more - is what will be inescapable to any bimmer owner who
    owned the particular model that I owned since these problems are universal.

    Those are just facts - but the *assessment* of those facts is my simple
    summary that BMW does not know how to make systems work together.

    Since *none* of those issues was in the drive train or suspension, I will
    say that BMW makes those two systems work beautifully together.

    Do you see what I'm trying to impart - which has nothing per se to do with
    BMW but to do with *understanding* things that a normal person should do.

    I (think I) understand how BMW thinks about the design of vehicles.
    a. The drive train & suspension are what BMW cares about
    b. Not anything else

    Back to your question, it's a running joke among *all* BMW aficionados that
    the noobs always come into the web site (such as bimmerfest.com) always
    trying to tell us how much they know about their vehicle.

    The instant they use the word beemer for a car, for example, we know
    they're completely clueless morons who are posers like Alan Baker is.

    If someone doesn't even know a beemer from a bimmer, they know nothing
    about BMW vehicles as only the posers confuse the two critically important terms (for most of us who own both - and I know you own a motorcycle too).

    If a person tells you that you "drive" that big heavy Honda you own, you
    would also instantly ascertain they know absolutely nothing about bikes.

    Am I right?

    The point here is the Apple trolls know nothing about Apple products.
    In fact, the Apple trolls know nothing about anything.
    They're all Dunning Kruger left of the first quartile on Mount Stupid.
    You know this. I know this. Everyone knows this.

    But those trolls themselves are who think they're geniuses for standing in
    long lines outside the Apple store waiting along with other likewise Apple geniuses to pay through the nose for a substandard product line from Apple.

    All the Apple trolls (Lewis, Jolly Roger, Alan Baker, Alan Browne, Chris, Haemactylus, Joerg Lorenz, JF Mezei et. al) merely parrot Apple marketing.

    They don't actually know *anything* about the Apple products they love.
    Just like none of them know anything about BMWs (the bikes or the cars).

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrews@21:1/5 to Andrews on Sat Nov 9 17:26:49 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    Andrews wrote on Sat, 9 Nov 2024 17:23:15 -0000 (UTC) :

    In the case of the beemer

    oops. bimmer. :)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From RoadRacer@21:1/5 to Andrews on Sat Nov 9 09:28:02 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On 2024-11-09 09:23, Andrews wrote:
    badgolferman wrote on Sat, 9 Nov 2024 15:05:28 -0000 (UTC) :

    I never claimed to be a BMW expert - I simply claimed to own a bimmer
    and a beemer and because of that, I know a lot about those two
    vehicles.

    I'm ignorant as to the difference between a "bimmer" and a "beemer" so
    maybe you can explain it to me. Why don't people just say BMW? It's
    not like that's a long acronym.

    I may have mentioned this once. My mother who is German made sure I
    knew how to pronounce Audi correctly. She hated when people pronounced
    it "au-di" and said it's pronounced "ow-di".

    I'm of German descent and I've always known what a bimmer & beemer are, badgolferman - but - I've owned both bimmers and beemers also.

    If I own something, I then learn what I need to learn to know everything I want to know about it. In the case of the beemer, my 525i happens to have a CCV valve, which happens to clog up, which happens to make it fail
    California emissions - which means - I have to learn how to replace it.

    You incredible simpleton:

    Every engine is REQUIRED to have a crank case ventilation system.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrews@21:1/5 to All on Sat Nov 9 17:43:53 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    *Hemidactylus* wrote on Sat, 09 Nov 2024 16:51:27 +0000 :

    I'm ignorant as to the difference between a "bimmer" and a "beemer" so
    maybe you can explain it to me. Why don't people just say BMW? It's
    not like that's a long acronym.

    Arlen is a pseudointellectual hack who introduces irrelevant asides into a discussion to parade why he thinks he's more knowledgable than his many targets. Why else would anyone arbitrarily introduce Einstein into a discussion besides an exercise in pseudointellectual pretense? Only wackaloons do that.

    What's interesting is the Apple trolls like Hemidactylus, who know nothing about anything, instantly assume that terms are for "pseudointellectuals".

    Notice that normal people (like badgolferman) simply ask why all BMW aficionados use these specific terms, while the hoi polloi don't know them.

    Yet these Apple trolls, who, of course, don't know BMW terms & yet they
    claim to own BMWs, call anyone who knows anything, a "pseudointellectual".

    Since badgolferman rides a Gold Wing (which Honda doesn't usually refer to
    as a "Goldwing" but many people do), he knows the terms "ride" & "drive".

    If someone walks up to him saying "I know everything about Goldwings
    because I drive one myself", badgolferman would know he is a poser.

    This is relevant because all th Apple trolls are posers.
    They're all on Mount Stupid to the left of the 1st Dunning-Kruger quadrile.

    Which is why it was important to destroy the poser who claimed to be a physicist and yet he didn't even realize gravity is not a force.

    Likewise with Alan Baker who claims to "teach racing" and yet Alan has no
    idea whatsoever of what a catenary is - which is a common term for curves.

    Similarly with Jolly Roger who claims that Apple fully supports older
    releases when the fact is even Apple says they have never ever done that.

    Same with Chris who claims to own a doctorate in the medical sciences and
    yet he ridicules common immunology terms like "vehicle" which everyone
    learns in their very first class in immunology or his claim that an RNA
    genome of 30K subunits is tiny - when in fact - it's HUGE for RNA virions.

    My main point is that all these Apple trolls are posers.

    All the Apple trolls (Lewis, Jolly Roger, Alan Baker, Alan Browne, Chris, Haemactylus, Joerg Lorenz, JF Mezei et. al) merely parrot Apple marketing.

    They don't actually know *anything* about the Apple products they love.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From RoadRacer@21:1/5 to Andrews on Sat Nov 9 10:12:03 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On 2024-11-09 09:43, Andrews wrote:
    *Hemidactylus* wrote on Sat, 09 Nov 2024 16:51:27 +0000 :

    I'm ignorant as to the difference between a "bimmer" and a "beemer" so
    maybe you can explain it to me. Why don't people just say BMW? It's
    not like that's a long acronym.

    Arlen is a pseudointellectual hack who introduces irrelevant asides into a >> discussion to parade why he thinks he's more knowledgable than his many
    targets. Why else would anyone arbitrarily introduce Einstein into a
    discussion besides an exercise in pseudointellectual pretense? Only
    wackaloons do that.

    What's interesting is the Apple trolls like Hemidactylus, who know nothing about anything, instantly assume that terms are for "pseudointellectuals".

    Notice that normal people (like badgolferman) simply ask why all BMW aficionados use these specific terms, while the hoi polloi don't know them.

    I would wager large that most BMW aficionados have never heard most of
    the terms you've used.


    Yet these Apple trolls, who, of course, don't know BMW terms & yet they
    claim to own BMWs, call anyone who knows anything, a "pseudointellectual".

    Since badgolferman rides a Gold Wing (which Honda doesn't usually refer to
    as a "Goldwing" but many people do), he knows the terms "ride" & "drive".

    Honda doesn't, do they?

    <https://powersports.honda.com/motorcycle/touring/gold-wing>


    If someone walks up to him saying "I know everything about Goldwings
    because I drive one myself", badgolferman would know he is a poser.

    This is relevant because all th Apple trolls are posers.
    They're all on Mount Stupid to the left of the 1st Dunning-Kruger quadrile.

    Which is why it was important to destroy the poser who claimed to be a physicist and yet he didn't even realize gravity is not a force.

    Likewise with Alan Baker who claims to "teach racing" and yet Alan has no idea whatsoever of what a catenary is - which is a common term for curves.

    I know exactly what a catenary is and I also know that it is not a
    "common term for curves" in general, but rather a very specific term for
    the curve created by a rope (or chain) supported at both ends and pulled downward by gravity under it's own weight.

    I also know that that it has never been mentioned as the curve a racing
    car follows when going through a corner in any of the numerous books I
    have read on the subject.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From sticks@21:1/5 to Andrews on Sat Nov 9 12:15:11 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.system

    On 11/9/2024 11:23 AM, Andrews wrote:
    sticks wrote on Sat, 9 Nov 2024 08:51:42 -0600 :

    That's why you hate anyone who posts the truth about Apple products here. >>
    If you pick up the needle and move it past that spot you won't have to
    hear the same thing over and over again.

    I have two purposes on this Apple newsgroup, one of which is to learn about and disseminate information about the Apple product line & Apple strategy.

    The other is to show in the public record for all to see what kind of
    rather strangely unusual people you Apple trolls are. You're not normal.

    I could of told you that, Arlen. I'm special. Wanna see my trophy?

    As just one example, what kind of moron stands in line outside *any* store just for the privilege of paying through the nose for substandard crap?

    Hard to say. I don't know anyone who's done that.

    Only people like you Apple trolls do that, namely those like Lewis, Jolly Roger, Alan Baker, Alan Browne, Chris, Haemactylus, Joerg Lorenz, JF Mezei et. al) all of whom merely parrot Apple marketing in an echo chamber inside their brains.

    The world will be a better place when everyone gets back to filtering
    you and just letting you and your golfing buddy rage on!

    --
    I Stand With Israel!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to badgolferman on Sat Nov 9 10:15:14 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On 2024-11-09 07:05, badgolferman wrote:
    Andrews wrote:

    I never claimed to be a BMW expert - I simply claimed to own a bimmer
    and a beemer and because of that, I know a lot about those two
    vehicles.

    I'm ignorant as to the difference between a "bimmer" and a "beemer" so
    maybe you can explain it to me. Why don't people just say BMW? It's
    not like that's a long acronym.

    I'll explain:

    Arlen tried to make a meal out of the fact that I own a BMW (2012 135i M
    Sport Edition in Lemans Blue to be precise) and didn't know
    that--according to him--one of those terms is use to refer to BMW
    motorcycles and the other for BMW cars.

    And from that he tried to claim that:

    1. I couldn't possibly own one.

    2. That I could possibly be a racing driver and road racing instructor.

    :-)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From *Hemidactylus*@21:1/5 to Alan on Sat Nov 9 18:32:21 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
    On 2024-11-09 07:05, badgolferman wrote:

    [snip troll]

    I'm ignorant as to the difference between a "bimmer" and a "beemer" so
    maybe you can explain it to me. Why don't people just say BMW? It's
    not like that's a long acronym.

    I'll explain:

    Arlen tried to make a meal out of the fact that I own a BMW (2012 135i M Sport Edition in Lemans Blue to be precise) and didn't know
    that--according to him--one of those terms is use to refer to BMW
    motorcycles and the other for BMW cars.

    And from that he tried to claim that:

    1. I couldn't possibly own one.

    2. That I could possibly be a racing driver and road racing instructor.

    :-)

    Making an epistemic point here it is often the case those who have a knowledgable grounding in various topics exhibit some humility toward such topics. Those lacking a modicum of knowledge are quite braggadocious. Arlen obviously exhibits a pathological conceit of knowledge most anyone can recognize on the spot, except himself. Arlen lacks reflective
    self-awareness and the result is what we witness on a daily basis on
    usenet.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to badgolferman on Sat Nov 9 10:47:41 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On 2024-11-09 10:42, badgolferman wrote:
    RoadRacer wrote:

    Since badgolferman rides a Gold Wing (which Honda doesn't usually
    refer to as a "Goldwing" but many people do), he knows the terms
    "ride" & "drive".

    Honda doesn't, do they?

    <https://powersports.honda.com/motorcycle/touring/gold-wing>



    Umm...

    https://ibb.co/9V0zXVj
    https://ibb.co/XLSFWBh
    https://ibb.co/NxDGSht
    https://ibb.co/sRxQXBf

    Yes.

    That was MY POINT.

    Learn to read for comprehension.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrews@21:1/5 to sticks on Sat Nov 9 19:38:59 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.system

    sticks wrote on Sat, 9 Nov 2024 12:15:11 -0600 :

    Wanna see my trophy?

    Notice how the Apple trolls act like kindergarten kids when faced with
    backing up their absurd point of view when defending Apple to the death.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrews@21:1/5 to badgolferman on Sat Nov 9 19:44:21 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    badgolferman wrote on Sat, 9 Nov 2024 18:09:39 -0000 (UTC) :

    If someone walks up to him saying "I know everything about Goldwings >>because I drive one myself", badgolferman would know he is a poser.

    Speaking of Goldwings, when I first got mine I noticed on various
    websites the spelling alternated between Goldwing, Gold Wing, and
    GL1800. Of course GL1800 is the official model of the motorcycle, and
    mine is a 2002 GL1800A which denotes one with ABS.

    I asked the guy who sold it to me whether it was a Goldwing or Gold
    Wing and he told me Goldwing. He referred me to the manual and the
    trim pieces on the bike which say Goldwing. I have seen the Honda
    website which says Gold Wing, but frankly I think that was designed or edited by someone who doesn't know the history of the motorcycle. I
    don't really know, other than what the LCD display, manual and placard
    on my bike say -- Goldwing.

    Hi badgolferman,

    You just made my point perfectly for me, in that I don't know a damn thing about Honda bikes - so I don't even know myself if it's a Gold Wing or not.

    I see Honda advertises at their bike site it as a "Gold Wing"... <https://powersports.honda.com/motorcycle/touring/gold-wing>

    But your point is well taken that I don't know a damn thing about GoldWings/Goldwings, and you can tell because I don't know the terms.

    Yet....

    I do know the difference between "riding" a bike and "driving" it.
    As do you.

    Anyone using the term "driving" a bike is a noob so if they then claim to
    know everything about it (as the Apple trolls do for so many things), then they're just posers.

    Which is my point.

    These Apple trolls (Lewis, Jolly Roger, Alan Baker, Alan Browne, Chris, Haemactylus, Joerg Lorenz, JF Mezei et. al) merely parrot Apple marketing.

    They don't actually know anything - about anything.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrews@21:1/5 to badgolferman on Sat Nov 9 19:56:37 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    badgolferman wrote on Sat, 9 Nov 2024 18:25:11 -0000 (UTC) :

    If only they had built
    in an access panel for the air filter...

    Same with the CCV on my 525i which is merely a PCV but with a far more
    complex design such that BMW decided to call it, instead, a CCV.

    It's horribly complicated.

    And as a result, it *always* eats itself up in just a few years.

    So *everyone* with that bimmer model has to replace it.

    Like your Gold%20Wing/Gold-Wing/Goldwing/etc. air filter joke, it's as if
    BMW started with a CCV and then built the entire engine around that one emissions component.

    It wouldn't be so bad if it didn't fail emissions - but it often does.

    So everyone who knows anything about that bimmer model is well acquainted
    with the CCV (among other horridly designed engine components).

    If they claim to be knowledgeable in that model, and if they don't know
    about the CCV, then it's clear that they're just posers playing games.

    Like Alan Baker who never knew what a catenary was until I explained it to
    him in terms of sweeping around curves at constant speeds.

    Alan Baker was so stupid, even after he looked it up - he thought it was
    about bridges - which proves yet again my point these Apple trolls are incredibly uneducated, and hence ignorant of everything - especially Apple products.

    Even when told a catenary had to do with taking curves at speed, these
    Apple trolls insisted a catenary has only to do with suspension bridges.

    That's how stupid these Apple trolls truly are.

    They read Wikipedia, which I'm sure mentions suspension bridges, and they
    don't have the education to flip the terms 90 degrees to sweeping out
    curves at constant speed.

    They're morons.

    Which is my point.

    My main point is that all these Apple trolls are posers.

    All the Apple trolls (Lewis, Jolly Roger, Alan Baker, Alan Browne, Chris, Haemactylus, Joerg Lorenz, JF Mezei et. al) merely parrot Apple marketing.

    They don't actually know *anything* about the Apple products they love.
    In fact, it's patently obvious they don't know anything about anything.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From RoadRacer@21:1/5 to Andrews on Sat Nov 9 13:34:51 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On 2024-11-09 11:56, Andrews wrote:
    badgolferman wrote on Sat, 9 Nov 2024 18:25:11 -0000 (UTC) :

    If only they had built
    in an access panel for the air filter...

    Same with the CCV on my 525i which is merely a PCV but with a far more complex design such that BMW decided to call it, instead, a CCV.

    It's horribly complicated.

    And as a result, it *always* eats itself up in just a few years.

    So *everyone* with that bimmer model has to replace it.

    Like your Gold%20Wing/Gold-Wing/Goldwing/etc. air filter joke, it's as if
    BMW started with a CCV and then built the entire engine around that one emissions component.

    It wouldn't be so bad if it didn't fail emissions - but it often does.

    So everyone who knows anything about that bimmer model is well acquainted with the CCV (among other horridly designed engine components).

    If they claim to be knowledgeable in that model, and if they don't know
    about the CCV, then it's clear that they're just posers playing games.

    Like Alan Baker who never knew what a catenary was until I explained it to him in terms of sweeping around curves at constant speeds.

    Except you don't "sweep around curves at constant speeds" when you're
    road racing, Arlen.


    Alan Baker was so stupid, even after he looked it up - he thought it was about bridges - which proves yet again my point these Apple trolls are incredibly uneducated, and hence ignorant of everything - especially Apple products.

    Nope. That's simply false.


    Even when told a catenary had to do with taking curves at speed, these
    Apple trolls insisted a catenary has only to do with suspension bridges.

    False again.


    That's how stupid these Apple trolls truly are.

    They read Wikipedia, which I'm sure mentions suspension bridges, and they don't have the education to flip the terms 90 degrees to sweeping out
    curves at constant speed.

    You don't take curves at constant speeds when racing, doofus.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From sticks@21:1/5 to Andrews on Sat Nov 9 15:29:44 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.system

    On 11/9/2024 1:38 PM, Andrews wrote:
    sticks wrote on Sat, 9 Nov 2024 12:15:11 -0600 :

    Wanna see my trophy?

    Notice how the Apple trolls act like kindergarten kids when faced with backing up their absurd point of view when defending Apple to the death.

    Is that a no you don't want to see my trophy, or do you simply not
    believe I have one?

    BTW, I don't think I've said much about apple one way or the other.
    Only things about you, and what a trolling idiot you are.

    --
    I Stand With Israel!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jolly Roger@21:1/5 to Alan on Sat Nov 9 23:05:59 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.system

    On 2024-11-08, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
    On 2024-11-08 12:06, Jolly Roger wrote:
    On 2024-11-08, RoadRacer <racer@nunya.biz> wrote:

    Oh, and here's my current road car:

    <https://drive.google.com/file/d/1RksO8IIHEzap0YkYbkLNReU2zKc5WhLw/view?usp=share_link>

    :-)

    Is that a 1-series or a 3? What year/model?

    2012 135i M Sport.

    My 335i is the same color. It's been a great car (fuel pump issues got
    worked out under warranty). ๐Ÿ™‚๐Ÿ‘
    My car had an electric water pump failure under warranty...

    ...and a failure of the o-rings on the oil filter housing...

    ...leading to oil leaking down onto the alternator...

    ...leading to a replacement of the alternator...

    ...and that wasn't under warranty.

    Moral of the story:

    If your 335i is using the same engine design, be very aware of you start
    to smell any oil burning.

    ๐Ÿ˜–

    Mine's a 2008. Just replaced the alternator last year.

    --
    E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
    I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

    JR

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Jolly Roger on Sat Nov 9 15:20:59 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.system

    On 2024-11-09 15:05, Jolly Roger wrote:
    On 2024-11-08, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
    On 2024-11-08 12:06, Jolly Roger wrote:
    On 2024-11-08, RoadRacer <racer@nunya.biz> wrote:

    Oh, and here's my current road car:

    <https://drive.google.com/file/d/1RksO8IIHEzap0YkYbkLNReU2zKc5WhLw/view?usp=share_link>

    :-)

    Is that a 1-series or a 3? What year/model?

    2012 135i M Sport.

    My 335i is the same color. It's been a great car (fuel pump issues got
    worked out under warranty). ๐Ÿ™‚๐Ÿ‘
    My car had an electric water pump failure under warranty...

    ...and a failure of the o-rings on the oil filter housing...

    ...leading to oil leaking down onto the alternator...

    ...leading to a replacement of the alternator...

    ...and that wasn't under warranty.

    Moral of the story:

    If your 335i is using the same engine design, be very aware of you start
    to smell any oil burning.

    ๐Ÿ˜–

    Mine's a 2008. Just replaced the alternator last year.


    Does it have the oil filter on the top of the engine, too?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From sticks@21:1/5 to Andrews on Sat Nov 9 21:05:15 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.system

    On 11/9/2024 8:26 PM, Andrews wrote:
    sticks wrote on Sat, 9 Nov 2024 15:29:44 -0600 :

    I don't think I've said much about apple one way or the other.

    Exactly my point that you Apple trolls know nothing about Apple products.

    Heh, I guess I'm about done with reading any more of your nonsense. All
    you're interested in is causing chaos. Time to put the filters back to
    work. Anything you post, and all subthreads will be blocked. That
    should make the group usable again.

    Good Bye, and hopefully more people will follow.

    --
    I Stand With Israel!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrews@21:1/5 to sticks on Sun Nov 10 02:26:48 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.system

    sticks wrote on Sat, 9 Nov 2024 15:29:44 -0600 :

    I don't think I've said much about apple one way or the other.

    Exactly my point that you Apple trolls know nothing about Apple products.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From *Hemidactylus*@21:1/5 to sticks on Sun Nov 10 03:25:56 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.system

    sticks <wolverine01@charter.net> wrote:
    On 11/9/2024 8:26 PM, Andrews wrote:
    sticks wrote on Sat, 9 Nov 2024 15:29:44 -0600 :

    I don't think I've said much about apple one way or the other.

    Exactly my point that you Apple trolls know nothing about Apple products.

    Heh, I guess I'm about done with reading any more of your nonsense. All you're interested in is causing chaos. Time to put the filters back to
    work. Anything you post, and all subthreads will be blocked. That
    should make the group usable again.

    Good Bye, and hopefully more people will follow.

    I guess if you do a close reading you can see how ridiculous the Arlen
    troll is. We know enough about Apple products to be able to turn them on
    and off, update them, use the keyboard thingy, connect to a network, use a charger, install a newsreader and configure a server and post this reply,
    etc. So what further scrutiny of a ridiculously stupid assertion like
    Arlenโ€™s โ€œyou Apple trolls know nothing about Apple productsโ€ yield besides
    that he has no idea what he is talking about.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to badgolferman on Sat Nov 16 16:44:20 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.system

    On 2024-11-16 15:22, badgolferman wrote:
    *Hemidactylus* wrote:

    Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
    On 2024-11-08 12:06, Jolly Roger wrote:
    On 2024-11-08, RoadRacer <racer@nunya.biz> wrote:

    Oh, and here's my current road car:


    <https://drive.google.com/file/d/1RksO8IIHEzap0YkYbkLNReU2zKc5Wh
    Lw/view?usp=share_link> :-)

    Is that a 1-series or a 3? What year/model?

    2012 135i M Sport.


    My 335i is the same color. It's been a great car (fuel pump
    issues got worked out under warranty). ๐Ÿ™‚๐Ÿ‘
    My car had an electric water pump failure under warranty...

    ...and a failure of the o-rings on the oil filter housing...

    ...leading to oil leaking down onto the alternator...

    ...leading to a replacement of the alternator...

    ...and that wasn't under warranty.

    Moral of the story:

    If your 335i is using the same engine design, be very aware of you
    start to smell any oil burning.

    ๐Ÿ˜–

    I was window shopping Bimmers and found a 1-series online
    (2010-12ish) that was really cheap. Then after it hadnโ€™t been bought
    for a month it got cheaper and the listing started detailing some of
    the issues. Hard pass. Iโ€™ve always been interested in an entry level
    older BMW. There was another one that was kinda cool looking but I
    was already in the process of dealing with my Civic getting
    rear-ended and totaled and replacing it with an HR-V. I also had my
    eye on an ILX around the same price range. Those were pretty much
    fancier Civics. I rarely see them and they were discontinued.

    For some reason my Youtube feed coughs up rando videos on oddball
    cars. Recently it was a 1971 Pantera being driven and I was smitten.
    Looks like the sort of car it would be too easy to die in but having
    too much fun with the demise. Fโ€™in beast.

    Iโ€™m happy with the HR-V as a small crossover with a higher stance
    than my Civic had. Maybe Iโ€™ll keep looking at 1-series Bimmers
    online. They seem expensive to maintain, but cheaper to get into than
    a Mercedes or Porsche. 911s are a bit steep for me.

    A tricked out 1-series would be sweet though Iโ€™d be better off with
    some Japanese platform hot rod. I seriously donโ€™t get stance cars
    with weird camber.


    I am not a BMW fan, but only because I prefer more practical cars.
    However I appreciate the BMW dedication to the driving experience nd
    realize its popularity with people who like a more spirited drive.

    My earlest recollection of BMWs was the BMW 2002 models of the 1970s.
    Maybe someone can describe their experience with those models and
    compare it to today's 1xx or 3xx models.

    I can't speak about any direct comparison between the BWM 2002 and the
    current 1 and 3 series; I can only speak in general.

    Safety regulations and customer expectations have driven cars with
    similar passenger capacity to be larger and a lot heavier than the cars
    from 50 years ago.

    The BMW 2002 has curb weights between 2,100 and 2,400 pounds, while my
    135i weighs 4,250 pounds; almost exactly twice as much as the two-door 2002.

    Of course, my 135i's N55 3 litre turbo 6 cylinder engine has almost
    exactly 3 times the power of 1,990cc engine of the 2002, so...

    So my car is going to feel a little less agile in cornering and braking,
    but there is less difference than you might think. My car has very large
    tires which tend to equalize the that more than you'd expect.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Hill@21:1/5 to Andrews on Mon Nov 4 09:33:37 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.system

    Andrews <andrews@spam.net> wrote:
    John Hill wrote on Fri, 1 Nov 2024 07:56:58 -0000 (UTC) :

    Who cares about the truth?

    "The Earth is flat".
    "No, it not for the following reasonsโ€K".
    "It's obviously flat, becauseโ€K".

    Uneducated people readily & strongly believe that gravity is a force.
    Right?

    But wait... Einstein hypothesized that it's not a force.
    And even Newton thought that the action at a distance was preposterous.

    Doesn't make any difference to its sphericity.

    I live in mountainous boonies above the Silicon Valley & Monterey Bay
    where, since I'm an octogenarian, I seem to fall down a lot lately.

    So I studied why gravity is so immensely powerful given Einstein said it wasn't a force at all but the earth expanding outward at 9.8m/s/s and
    curving spacetime rushing inward at 11km/s - perfectly balancing out such that the earth *becomes* a sphere (almost symmetric in sphericity).


    As a research physicist by training, profession and inclination I needed to read no further. I now know that I can safely disregard anything you write.
    But Iโ€™m in awe of your inventive abilities.

    But as a nonagenarian I do understand about falling down! So far I have
    been lucky and bounced. Walk carefully and avoid turning round on the spot.

    Old John.

    --
    The Moving Finger writes; and, having writ,
    Moves on: nor all thy Piety nor Wit
    Shall lure it back to cancel half a Line,
    Nor all thy Tears wash out a Word of it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From *Hemidactylus*@21:1/5 to badgolferman on Sun Nov 10 14:21:32 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.system

    badgolferman <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> wrote:
    *Hemidactylus* wrote:

    I guess if you do a close reading you can see how


    ...what a shit storm you started with this thread.

    By my count roughly 1/3 of the posts on this thread are from your buddy
    Arlen. Complain to him.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From *Hemidactylus*@21:1/5 to ecphoric@allspamis.invalid on Sun Nov 10 14:32:32 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.system

    *Hemidactylus* <ecphoric@allspamis.invalid> wrote:
    badgolferman <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> wrote:
    *Hemidactylus* wrote:

    I guess if you do a close reading you can see how


    ...what a shit storm you started with this thread.

    By my count roughly 1/3 of the posts on this thread are from your buddy Arlen. Complain to him.


    Actually that was over the past week. Over the course of the thread he contributed 47/209ish posts or 22.5%.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bill Powell@21:1/5 to All on Sun Nov 10 20:09:17 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.system

    On Sun, 10 Nov 2024 14:32:32 +0000, *Hemidactylus* wrote:

    Actually that was over the past week. Over the course of the thread he contributed 47/209ish posts or 22.5%.

    So roughly ~75% of the posts in this thread were from the Apple trolls?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrews@21:1/5 to John Hill on Mon Nov 4 16:41:42 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.system

    John Hill wrote on Mon, 4 Nov 2024 09:33:37 -0000 (UTC) :

    As a research physicist by training, profession and inclination I needed to read no further. I now know that I can safely disregard anything you write. But I'm in awe of your inventive abilities.

    I have a college degree. You do not.

    Most uneducated people actually believe gravity is a force, so I know that you're like all the Apple trolls - you have no college education at all.

    Certainly not in physics.

    It's interesting you lied because no physicist is unaware of Einstein's equivalency principle which hypothesizes about the earth's acceleration.

    And every real physicist is well aware of electromagnetic repulsion.
    Except you.

    Since you lied about being a physicist, please click on this link:
    <https://www.google.com/search?q=why+gravity+is+not+a+force>

    Pick *any* reference that shows that the earth is actually moving up.
    *Why General Relativity (and Newton's Laws) tell us The Sky is Falling Up*
    <https://youtu.be/GuLL_upE4zk>

    But as a nonagenarian I do understand about falling down! So far I have
    been lucky and bounced. Walk carefully and avoid turning round on the spot.

    Watch this video since you're NOT a physicist - this guy *is* a physicist:
    *The TRUE Cause of Gravity in General Relativity*
    <https://youtu.be/PjT85AxTmI0>
    It covers the earth moving up.

    Then watch this from the same physicist. It covers spacetime moving down.
    *The River Model of General Relativity*
    <https://youtu.be/hFlzQvAyH7g>

    You can pick *any* reference you want but those with physics degrees know
    what Einstein's equivalency principle means.

    Essentially the earth is round (and all planets are round) simply because
    the electrostatic outward repulsion exactly equals the inward rushing 4D spacetime attraction to massenergy - which is what determines sphericity.

    Hint: I'm not stupid. Most people are stupid. You are not a physicist.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrews@21:1/5 to Chris on Mon Nov 4 16:29:16 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.apps

    Chris wrote on Mon, 4 Nov 2024 15:52:41 -0000 (UTC) :

    Although I agree the issue is overblown the usual crowd, I disagree it's a non-issue.

    The fact is there is nothing a phone without a headphone jack can do that a phone with the headphone jack can not do. Right?

    So which is better?

    Q1: Which allows the user all possible choices?
    Q2: Which severely limits the users' possible choices?

    The answer is the key to what Apple's fundamental marketing strategy is.

    Note: It's the same reason why Apple doesn't provide portable memory slots.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrews@21:1/5 to All on Mon Nov 4 16:18:36 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    *Hemidactylus* wrote on Mon, 04 Nov 2024 11:10:22 +0000 :

    In five years I'm on my third pair of BT earpods. In the flip side, I still >> have wired headphones that are decades old which work perfectly well.
    Progress?

    I have higher quality headphones not "pods". And they hold a charge for
    quite a time. Not being tethered is progress as is not using an auxillary cable in my car. Bluetooth has been reliable for me and sound quality ok. Again one can use an adaptor cable for the jack into headphones or aux in a car or into RCA adaptors for a home entertainment center. I've done the latter, playing my phone through a cable into a home system. The loss of a headphone specific hole in the phone is a non-issue seized upon by local miscreants for their trolling agenda.

    It's Apple's fundamentally basic marketing strategy to limit users' choice.
    By restricting users' choices, Apple ends up making *lots of money*.

    Chris is correct.

    He has the choice of either bluetooth or wired.
    You do not.

    The fact is there is nothing a phone without this basic functionality of a headphone jack can do that a phone with the headphone jack cannnot do.

    The *only* difference - is your choices are limited, Hemidactylus.
    Chris' choices are not.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Andrews on Mon Nov 4 10:06:20 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On 2024-11-04 08:18, Andrews wrote:
    *Hemidactylus* wrote on Mon, 04 Nov 2024 11:10:22 +0000 :

    In five years I'm on my third pair of BT earpods. In the flip side, I still >>> have wired headphones that are decades old which work perfectly well.
    Progress?

    I have higher quality headphones not "pods". And they hold a charge for
    quite a time. Not being tethered is progress as is not using an auxillary
    cable in my car. Bluetooth has been reliable for me and sound quality ok.
    Again one can use an adaptor cable for the jack into headphones or aux in a >> car or into RCA adaptors for a home entertainment center. I've done the
    latter, playing my phone through a cable into a home system. The loss of a >> headphone specific hole in the phone is a non-issue seized upon by local
    miscreants for their trolling agenda.

    It's Apple's fundamentally basic marketing strategy to limit users' choice. By restricting users' choices, Apple ends up making *lots of money*.

    Chris is correct.

    He has the choice of either bluetooth or wired.
    You do not.

    Wrong.

    Simply, factually wrong.

    <https://www.amazon.ca/s?k=lightning+earbuds&crid=3OU842X7KFK27&sprefix=lightning+ear%2Caps%2C160&ref=nb_sb_ss_ts-doa-p_1_13>

    <https://www.amazon.ca/s?k=usb+c+earbuds&crid=384MZJRK653TE&sprefix=usb+c+ear%2Caps%2C165&ref=nb_sb_ss_ts-doa-p_2_9>

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Richard L. Hamilton@21:1/5 to Andrews on Mon Nov 4 17:20:54 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.apps

    In article <vg6cg1$19s5$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>,
    Andrews <andrews@spam.net> writes:
    Jolly Roger wrote on 2 Nov 2024 18:31:12 GMT :

    Indeed. But does anyone know where nospam and Lewis are? Both
    disappeared a bit abruptly.

    Between the constant trolls and the people preferring those trolls to
    dominate the group through lack of correction/truth, I doubt either one
    of them sees much of a benefit in hanging around. If this place is to
    become just another crappy advocacy group where trolls have free reign,
    there isn't much good information to be had here.

    As Jolly Roger clearly showed, all you Apple trolls are the same as nospam
    in almost every way. Same as Lewis. Same as JF Mezei. You're all trolls.

    It was clear to everyone that the only role nospam played was to make inane excuses for why the iPhone didn't have what every other phone already had.

    According to nospam's "nobody wants it" & "nobody needs it" on everything that everyone else had except iPhone owners, apparently everyone wants 4G (not 5G); and everyone wants anemic RAM; and everyone wants substandard batteries; and everyone wants more zero-day exploits in history than any Android phone every had.

    To you Apple trolls, Lewis, nospam, Jolly Roger, Haemactylus, Chris, Alan Baker, Alan Browne, Joerg Lorenz, etc., nobody wants call recording.

    And yet Apple added it recently. Fancy that. People wanted it after all.

    Same with the laughably paltry RAM Apple chintzes out with on the iPhone. Nobody wants RAM according to all you Apple trolls. Nobody needs it.

    Yet Apple was forced to add RAM to the iPhone 16 due to AI needs.
    Fancy that. People did want modern RAM capacity.

    Speaking of modern capacity, nospam claimed nobody wanted modern batteries. Nobody needed them. And yet, the EU told Apple to stop selling any new
    iPhone 14 models because not a single iPhone prior to the iPhone 15 passes the EU's lifetime tests.

    Fancy that.

    Every one of you Apple trolls says nobody wants modern functionality in an iPhone, and yet, the EU told Apple if they don't finally provide modern functionality, Apple would have to stop selling all new iPhones in Europe.

    Finally, Apple added these things that you Apple trolls claim nobody wants. Most Apple had to be forced to add (the RAM they did on their own though).

    The EU does what they do to Apple (and Google too, and others), not because they love their consumers (who are responsible for their own buying
    choices, and deserve the consequences for better or worse), but because
    those are huge and profitable American companies. It's their version of protectionism, hogtie with red tape.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Andrews on Mon Nov 4 10:53:58 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.system

    On 2024-11-04 08:41, Andrews wrote:
    John Hill wrote on Mon, 4 Nov 2024 09:33:37 -0000 (UTC) :

    As a research physicist by training, profession and inclination I needed to >> read no further. I now know that I can safely disregard anything you write. >> But I'm in awe of your inventive abilities.

    I have a college degree. You do not.

    Most uneducated people actually believe gravity is a force, so I know that you're like all the Apple trolls - you have no college education at all.

    Certainly not in physics.

    It's interesting you lied because no physicist is unaware of Einstein's equivalency principle which hypothesizes about the earth's acceleration.

    And every real physicist is well aware of electromagnetic repulsion.
    Except you.

    Since you lied about being a physicist, please click on this link:
    <https://www.google.com/search?q=why+gravity+is+not+a+force>

    Pick *any* reference that shows that the earth is actually moving up.
    *Why General Relativity (and Newton's Laws) tell us The Sky is Falling Up*
    <https://youtu.be/GuLL_upE4zk>

    But as a nonagenarian I do understand about falling down! So far I have
    been lucky and bounced. Walk carefully and avoid turning round on the spot.

    Watch this video since you're NOT a physicist - this guy *is* a physicist:
    *The TRUE Cause of Gravity in General Relativity*
    <https://youtu.be/PjT85AxTmI0>
    It covers the earth moving up.

    Then watch this from the same physicist. It covers spacetime moving down.
    *The River Model of General Relativity*
    <https://youtu.be/hFlzQvAyH7g>

    You can pick *any* reference you want but those with physics degrees know what Einstein's equivalency principle means.

    Essentially the earth is round (and all planets are round) simply because
    the electrostatic outward repulsion exactly equals the inward rushing 4D spacetime attraction to massenergy - which is what determines sphericity.

    Hint: I'm not stupid. Most people are stupid. You are not a physicist.

    Hint: You're showing yourself more and more to be a certifiable wackdoodle.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Andrews on Mon Nov 4 12:20:24 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.system

    On 2024-11-04 08:41, Andrews wrote:
    John Hill wrote on Mon, 4 Nov 2024 09:33:37 -0000 (UTC) :

    As a research physicist by training, profession and inclination I needed to >> read no further. I now know that I can safely disregard anything you write. >> But I'm in awe of your inventive abilities.

    I have a college degree. You do not.

    He just said he's a research physicist, Arlen.

    Why shouldn't we believe him?


    Most uneducated people actually believe gravity is a force, so I know that you're like all the Apple trolls - you have no college education at all.

    Certainly not in physics.

    It's interesting you lied because no physicist is unaware of Einstein's equivalency principle which hypothesizes about the earth's acceleration.

    He's not unaware of it.

    He's just aware that it doesn't mean that the earth is accelerating
    outward at constant 9.8m/s^2.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From -hh@21:1/5 to badgolferman on Mon Nov 11 12:46:20 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On 11/9/24 10:05 AM, badgolferman wrote:
    Andrews wrote:

    I never claimed to be a BMW expert - I simply claimed to own a bimmer
    and a beemer and because of that, I know a lot about those two
    vehicles.

    I'm ignorant as to the difference between a "bimmer" and a "beemer" so
    maybe you can explain it to me. Why don't people just say BMW? It's
    not like that's a long acronym.

    Looks like no one cleanly answered your question.

    FWIW, I always have to go look up this trivia, as I've never become
    invested enough in BMW to care enough to remember:

    Bimmer is the slang for BMW's automobiles;
    Beemer is the slang for BMW's motorcycles.


    I may have mentioned this once. My mother who is German made sure I
    knew how to pronounce Audi correctly. She hated when people pronounced
    it "au-di" and said it's pronounced "ow-di".

    Similarly, that Porsche is two syllables, not one.


    -hh

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Your Name@21:1/5 to -hh on Tue Nov 12 10:12:52 2024
    XPost: comp.sys.mac.advocacy, misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 2024-11-11 17:46:20 +0000, -hh said:

    On 11/9/24 10:05 AM, badgolferman wrote:
    Andrews wrote:

    I never claimed to be a BMW expert - I simply claimed to own a bimmer
    and a beemer and because of that, I know a lot about those two
    vehicles.

    I'm ignorant as to the difference between a "bimmer" and a "beemer" so
    maybe you can explain it to me. Why don't people just say BMW? It's
    not like that's a long acronym.

    Looks like no one cleanly answered your question.

    FWIW, I always have to go look up this trivia, as I've never become
    invested enough in BMW to care enough to remember:

    Bimmer is the slang for BMW's automobiles;
    Beemer is the slang for BMW's motorcycles.

    Doesn't work. Many people call the cars "Beemers".



    I may have mentioned this once. My mother who is German made sure I
    knew how to pronounce Audi correctly. She hated when people pronounced
    it "au-di" and said it's pronounced "ow-di".

    Similarly, that Porsche is two syllables, not one.

    It's likely mostly Americans who can't pronounce it properly. They have
    enough trouble with proper English, let alone any other language. :-p

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Your Name on Mon Nov 11 14:27:06 2024
    XPost: comp.sys.mac.advocacy, misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 2024-11-11 13:12, Your Name wrote:
    On 2024-11-11 17:46:20 +0000, -hh said:

    On 11/9/24 10:05 AM, badgolferman wrote:
    Andrews wrote:

    I never claimed to be a BMW expert - I simply claimed to own a bimmer
    and a beemer and because of that, I know a lot about those two
    vehicles.

    I'm ignorant as to the difference between a "bimmer" and a "beemer" so
    maybe you can explain it to me.ย  Why don't people just say BMW?ย  It's
    not like that's a long acronym.

    Looks like no one cleanly answered your question.

    FWIW, I always have to go look up this trivia, as I've never become
    invested enough in BMW to care enough to remember:

    Bimmer is the slang for BMW's automobiles;
    Beemer is the slang for BMW's motorcycles.

    Doesn't work. Many people call the cars "Beemers".

    And normal people don't decide that people can't own a BMW...

    ...based on whether or not they know the slang terminology.

    :-)



    I may have mentioned this once.ย  My mother who is German made sure I
    knew how to pronounce Audi correctly.ย  She hated when people pronounced >>> it "au-di" and said it's pronounced "ow-di".

    Similarly, that Porsche is two syllables, not one.

    It's likely mostly Americans who can't pronounce it properly. They have enough trouble with proper English, let alone any other language.ย  :-p
    "Hey I finished painting, but you don't have a "porch"...

    ...you've got a Ferrari".

    :-)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jolly Roger@21:1/5 to Alan on Tue Nov 12 01:36:27 2024
    XPost: comp.sys.mac.advocacy, misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 2024-11-11, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
    On 2024-11-11 13:12, Your Name wrote:
    On 2024-11-11 17:46:20 +0000, -hh said:
    On 11/9/24 10:05 AM, badgolferman wrote:
    Andrews wrote:

    I never claimed to be a BMW expert - I simply claimed to own a
    bimmer and a beemer and because of that, I know a lot about those
    two vehicles.

    I'm ignorant as to the difference between a "bimmer" and a "beemer"
    so maybe you can explain it to me.ย  Why don't people just say BMW?ย 
    It's not like that's a long acronym.

    Looks like no one cleanly answered your question.

    FWIW, I always have to go look up this trivia, as I've never become
    invested enough in BMW to care enough to remember:

    Bimmer is the slang for BMW's automobiles;
    Beemer is the slang for BMW's motorcycles.

    Doesn't work. Many people call the cars "Beemers".

    And normal people don't decide that people can't own a BMW...

    ...based on whether or not they know the slang terminology.

    :-)

    Which slang to use isn't anywhere near a high priority for normal
    people. And the only reason Arlen mentions it is to belittle people he dislikes..

    --
    E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
    I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

    JR

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jolly Roger@21:1/5 to Alan on Tue Nov 12 01:29:27 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.system

    On 2024-11-09, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
    On 2024-11-09 15:05, Jolly Roger wrote:
    On 2024-11-08, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
    On 2024-11-08 12:06, Jolly Roger wrote:
    On 2024-11-08, RoadRacer <racer@nunya.biz> wrote:

    Oh, and here's my current road car:

    <https://drive.google.com/file/d/1RksO8IIHEzap0YkYbkLNReU2zKc5WhLw/view?usp=share_link>

    :-)

    Is that a 1-series or a 3? What year/model?

    2012 135i M Sport.

    My 335i is the same color. It's been a great car (fuel pump issues got >>>> worked out under warranty). ๐Ÿ™‚๐Ÿ‘
    My car had an electric water pump failure under warranty...

    ...and a failure of the o-rings on the oil filter housing...

    ...leading to oil leaking down onto the alternator...

    ...leading to a replacement of the alternator...

    ...and that wasn't under warranty.

    Moral of the story:

    If your 335i is using the same engine design, be very aware of you start >>> to smell any oil burning.

    ๐Ÿ˜–

    Mine's a 2008. Just replaced the alternator last year.

    Does it have the oil filter on the top of the engine, too?

    Yep. It's up front at the top above the alternator. I'll keep an eye on
    it. ๐Ÿ˜…

    --
    E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
    I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

    JR

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrews@21:1/5 to Your Name on Tue Nov 12 02:27:38 2024
    XPost: comp.sys.mac.advocacy, misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    Your Name wrote on Tue, 12 Nov 2024 10:12:52 +1300 :

    Bimmer is the slang for BMW's automobiles;
    Beemer is the slang for BMW's motorcycles.

    Doesn't work. Many people call the cars "Beemers".

    Just like nobody who owns a motorcycle "drives" it, anyone calling their
    car a "beamer" is instantly recognizable as a poser who knows nothing.

    Which was my point that Alan G. Baker claimed to own a bimmer and to teach racing and yet he doesn't know the very first thing about either topic.

    All you Apple trolls are posers (Jolly Roger, Alan Baker, Alan Browne,
    Chris, Haemactylus, Joerg Lorenz, et al.) who know nothing about anything.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrews@21:1/5 to Jolly Roger on Tue Nov 12 02:39:28 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.system

    Jolly Roger wrote on 12 Nov 2024 01:29:27 GMT :

    Mine's a 2008. Just replaced the alternator last year.

    Does it have the oil filter on the top of the engine, too?

    Yep. It's up front at the top above the alternator. I'll keep an eye on
    it.

    My 525i had the Mann/Hengst/Mahle oil filter on top also, where in the beginning we suctioned the oil out the top but it's better to drain it.

    I did an entire tutorial buying all the oil filters possible and showed
    which were good and which were crap for the bimmers that I discussed.

    But when I got rid of the bimmer, I stopped posting tutorial after tutorial after tutorial for how to fix it - including the alternator, serpentine
    belt, tensioners and cooling system R&R tutorials (best on the net).

    Now I only have the beemer... K1200 (two wheels, not four!)
    <https://www.bmwgrandblanc.com/blogs/4100/why-is-bmw-called-beamer >

    It's no longer shocking though that you Apple trolls know nothing about
    bimmers or beemers - since Apple trolls don't know anything about anything.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From RoadRacer@21:1/5 to Andrews on Mon Nov 11 19:01:47 2024
    XPost: comp.sys.mac.advocacy, misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 2024-11-11 18:46, Andrews wrote:
    Jolly Roger wrote on 12 Nov 2024 01:36:27 GMT :

    Which slang to use isn't anywhere near a high priority for normal
    people. And the only reason Arlen mentions it is to belittle people he
    dislikes..
    The point of bringing up the catenary or bimmer is that you Apple trolls don't know anything about anything - which is a trait you all possess.

    And my point is that you know nothing about racing, because not a SINGLE experienced racing driver I've ever known has ever mentioned the
    catenary curve as being in any way related to the fastest line through a corner.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrews@21:1/5 to Jolly Roger on Tue Nov 12 02:46:27 2024
    XPost: comp.sys.mac.advocacy, misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    Jolly Roger wrote on 12 Nov 2024 01:36:27 GMT :

    Which slang to use isn't anywhere near a high priority for normal
    people. And the only reason Arlen mentions it is to belittle people he dislikes..

    The point of bringing up the catenary or bimmer is that you Apple trolls
    don't know anything about anything - which is a trait you all possess.

    Both are the most basic terms *anyone* would know who knows anything.
    But not you Apple trolls.

    You know nothing.

    Apple trolls are squarely on top of Mount Stupid on everything, JR.

    None of you Apple trolls understands even the DK seminal papers, but in
    their terminology, you're all to the left of the first DK quadrile.

    "The Dunning-Kruger effect is strongest when we're in the
    first stage, unconscious incompetence. If we don't know what
    we don't know, the Dunning-Kruger effect says, then we're
    actually more likely to feel confident than others at higher
    stages of competence."

    You Apple trolls don't know the first thing about anything.

    Not cars. Not curves. Not immunology. Not even headers for God's sake
    <https://groups.google.com/g/misc.phone.mobile.iphone/c/EiNl6hyMBDo/>

    Who on earth is _that_ stupid? Nobody.

    Except you Apple trolls.

    All the Apple trolls (Jolly Roger, Alan Baker, Alan Browne, Chris,
    Haemactylus, Joerg Lorenz, et. al) know nothing about anything.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From RoadRacer@21:1/5 to Andrews on Mon Nov 11 19:03:50 2024
    XPost: comp.sys.mac.advocacy, misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 2024-11-11 18:27, Andrews wrote:
    Your Name wrote on Tue, 12 Nov 2024 10:12:52 +1300 :

    Bimmer is the slang for BMW's automobiles;
    Beemer is the slang for BMW's motorcycles.

    Doesn't work. Many people call the cars "Beemers".

    Just like nobody who owns a motorcycle "drives" it, anyone calling their
    car a "beamer" is instantly recognizable as a poser who knows nothing.

    Which was my point that Alan G. Baker claimed to own a bimmer and to teach racing and yet he doesn't know the very first thing about either topic.
    I only "claim" it, because:

    I do--in fact--own a 2012 BMW 135i,

    and I do--in fact--teach road racing as well as race a 1998 Van Diemen
    RF98-2 Formula F Honda.

    :-)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Jolly Roger on Mon Nov 11 19:16:18 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.system

    On 2024-11-11 17:29, Jolly Roger wrote:
    On 2024-11-09, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
    On 2024-11-09 15:05, Jolly Roger wrote:
    On 2024-11-08, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
    On 2024-11-08 12:06, Jolly Roger wrote:
    On 2024-11-08, RoadRacer <racer@nunya.biz> wrote:

    Oh, and here's my current road car:

    <https://drive.google.com/file/d/1RksO8IIHEzap0YkYbkLNReU2zKc5WhLw/view?usp=share_link>

    :-)

    Is that a 1-series or a 3? What year/model?

    2012 135i M Sport.

    My 335i is the same color. It's been a great car (fuel pump issues got >>>>> worked out under warranty). ๐Ÿ™‚๐Ÿ‘
    My car had an electric water pump failure under warranty...

    ...and a failure of the o-rings on the oil filter housing...

    ...leading to oil leaking down onto the alternator...

    ...leading to a replacement of the alternator...

    ...and that wasn't under warranty.

    Moral of the story:

    If your 335i is using the same engine design, be very aware of you start >>>> to smell any oil burning.

    ๐Ÿ˜–

    Mine's a 2008. Just replaced the alternator last year.

    Does it have the oil filter on the top of the engine, too?

    Yep. It's up front at the top above the alternator. I'll keep an eye on
    it. ๐Ÿ˜…


    Good on ya!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Hill@21:1/5 to Andrews on Tue Nov 5 19:56:47 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.system

    Andrews <andrews@spam.net> wrote:
    John Hill wrote on Mon, 4 Nov 2024 09:33:37 -0000 (UTC) :

    As a research physicist by training, profession and inclination I needed to >> read no further. I now know that I can safely disregard anything you write. >> But I'm in awe of your inventive abilities.

    I have a college degree. You do not.

    Well now! That is a very dogmatic assertion, made out of total ignorance.

    In actual fact, I have a BA and a DPhil in Physics at Oxford. (That is the Oxford equivalent of PhD at most universities).

    And I can prove it, naturally. But it would be better, since you are who
    you are, for you to look it up for yourself.

    But perhaps you do not regard Oxford as a proper college?

    Old John.

    --
    The Moving Finger writes; and, having writ,
    Moves on: nor all thy Piety nor Wit
    Shall lure it back to cancel half a Line,
    Nor all thy Tears wash out a Word of it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to John Hill on Tue Nov 5 12:52:46 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.system

    On 2024-11-05 11:56, John Hill wrote:
    Andrews <andrews@spam.net> wrote:
    John Hill wrote on Mon, 4 Nov 2024 09:33:37 -0000 (UTC) :

    As a research physicist by training, profession and inclination I needed to >>> read no further. I now know that I can safely disregard anything you write. >>> But I'm in awe of your inventive abilities.

    I have a college degree. You do not.

    Well now! That is a very dogmatic assertion, made out of total ignorance.

    In actual fact, I have a BA and a DPhil in Physics at Oxford. (That is the Oxford equivalent of PhD at most universities).

    And I can prove it, naturally. But it would be better, since you are who
    you are, for you to look it up for yourself.

    But perhaps you do not regard Oxford as a proper college?

    Old John.


    Hey...

    He refuses to believe I'm an amateur road racer and credentialed road
    racing driving instructor, so...

    :-)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to John Hill on Tue Nov 5 12:55:50 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.system

    On 2024-11-05 11:56, John Hill wrote:
    Andrews <andrews@spam.net> wrote:
    John Hill wrote on Mon, 4 Nov 2024 09:33:37 -0000 (UTC) :

    As a research physicist by training, profession and inclination I needed to >>> read no further. I now know that I can safely disregard anything you write. >>> But I'm in awe of your inventive abilities.

    I have a college degree. You do not.

    Well now! That is a very dogmatic assertion, made out of total ignorance.

    In actual fact, I have a BA and a DPhil in Physics at Oxford. (That is the Oxford equivalent of PhD at most universities).

    And I can prove it, naturally. But it would be better, since you are who
    you are, for you to look it up for yourself.

    But perhaps you do not regard Oxford as a proper college?

    Old John.


    Oh, and be prepared for Andrew/Arlen/(however many other nyms) to post
    pictures of textbooks as proof of his education.

    :-)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From sticks@21:1/5 to John Hill on Tue Nov 5 14:35:42 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.system

    On 11/5/2024 1:56 PM, John Hill wrote:
    Andrews <andrews@spam.net> wrote:
    John Hill wrote on Mon, 4 Nov 2024 09:33:37 -0000 (UTC) :

    As a research physicist by training, profession and inclination I needed to >>> read no further. I now know that I can safely disregard anything you write. >>> But I'm in awe of your inventive abilities.

    I have a college degree. You do not.

    Well now! That is a very dogmatic assertion, made out of total ignorance.

    In actual fact, I have a BA and a DPhil in Physics at Oxford. (That is the Oxford equivalent of PhD at most universities).

    And I can prove it, naturally. But it would be better, since you are who
    you are, for you to look it up for yourself.

    But perhaps you do not regard Oxford as a proper college?

    Old John.


    Crap, I was hoping you would encourage him to prove gravity is not a
    force by walking off a cliff.


    --
    I Stand With Israel!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jolly Roger@21:1/5 to Alan on Tue Nov 5 22:12:28 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.system

    On 2024-11-05, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
    On 2024-11-05 11:56, John Hill wrote:
    Andrews <andrews@spam.net> wrote:
    John Hill wrote on Mon, 4 Nov 2024 09:33:37 -0000 (UTC) :

    As a research physicist by training, profession and inclination I
    needed to read no further. I now know that I can safely disregard
    anything you write. But I'm in awe of your inventive abilities.

    I have a college degree. You do not.

    Well now! That is a very dogmatic assertion, made out of total
    ignorance.

    In actual fact, I have a BA and a DPhil in Physics at Oxford. (That
    is the Oxford equivalent of PhD at most universities).

    And I can prove it, naturally. But it would be better, since you are
    who you are, for you to look it up for yourself.

    But perhaps you do not regard Oxford as a proper college?

    Old John.

    Hey...

    He refuses to believe I'm an amateur road racer and credentialed road
    racing driving instructor, so...

    :-)

    Get used to it. Little Andrews can't help himself. His unchecked
    narcissism is so strong that he regularly gets into these ridiculous
    pissing contests making weak attacks like this about anyone who dares to
    stand up to his bullshit.

    --
    E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
    I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

    JR

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From -hh@21:1/5 to RoadRacer on Tue Nov 12 14:15:44 2024
    XPost: comp.sys.mac.advocacy, misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 11/11/24 10:01 PM, RoadRacer wrote:
    On 2024-11-11 18:46, Andrews wrote:
    Jolly Roger wrote on 12 Nov 2024 01:36:27 GMT :

    Which slang to use isn't anywhere near a high priority for normal
    people. And the only reason Arlen mentions it is to belittle people he
    dislikes..

    Yup. I've seen similar 'gotcha' attempts by gun nutz over terminology too.

    Of course they don't see outside of their little niche that those with
    equally deep but broader experience means that one's trivial knowledge
    includes different niche definitions of the same term. In such
    situations, the solution is to ignore the niche pedantry attempts.


    The point of bringing up the catenary or bimmer is that you Apple trolls
    don't know anything about anything - which is a trait you all possess.

    And my point is that you know nothing about racing, because not a SINGLE experienced racing driver I've ever known has ever mentioned the
    catenary curve as being in any way related to the fastest line through a corner.

    For motorsports, I've watched at least hundreds of races, and during all
    those decades, I've never heard any NASCAR/Indy/F1/etc race announcers
    ever mention the word "catenary" ...

    ... let alone used it in the alleged context herein of guidance for
    optimizing the line in a corner to minimize peak cornering forces.

    But I'm sure that Arlen can provide multiple youtube clips of TV
    broadcasts, with timestamps which show that I'm not misremembering.

    -hh

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to -hh on Tue Nov 12 12:26:40 2024
    XPost: comp.sys.mac.advocacy, misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 2024-11-12 11:15, -hh wrote:
    On 11/11/24 10:01 PM, RoadRacer wrote:
    On 2024-11-11 18:46, Andrews wrote:
    Jolly Roger wrote on 12 Nov 2024 01:36:27 GMT :

    Which slang to use isn't anywhere near a high priority for normal
    people. And the only reason Arlen mentions it is to belittle people he >>>> dislikes..

    Yup. I've seen similar 'gotcha' attempts by gun nutz over terminology too.

    Of course they don't see outside of their little niche that those with equally deep but broader experience means that one's trivial knowledge includes different niche definitions of the same term.ย  In such
    situations, the solution is to ignore the niche pedantry attempts.


    The point of bringing up the catenary or bimmer is that you Apple trolls >>> don't know anything about anything - which is a trait you all possess.

    And my point is that you know nothing about racing, because not a
    SINGLE experienced racing driver I've ever known has ever mentioned
    the catenary curve as being in any way related to the fastest line
    through a corner.

    For motorsports, I've watched at least hundreds of races, and during all those decades, I've never heard any NASCAR/Indy/F1/etc race announcers
    ever mention the word "catenary" ...

    ... let alone used it in the alleged context herein of guidance for optimizing the line in a corner to minimize peak cornering forces.

    But I'm sure that Arlen can provide multiple youtube clips of TV
    broadcasts, with timestamps which show that I'm not misremembering.
    He finally found his one reference...

    ...and it's about wooden toy cars running down a ramp!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrews@21:1/5 to -hh on Wed Nov 13 04:57:51 2024
    XPost: comp.sys.mac.advocacy, misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    -hh wrote on Tue, 12 Nov 2024 14:15:44 -0500 :

    I've never heard any NASCAR/Indy/F1/etc race announcers> ever mention the word "catenary" ...

    ... let alone used it in the alleged context herein of guidance for optimizing the line in a corner to minimize peak cornering forces.

    Had any of you uneducated Apple trolls taken even a single class in
    Physics, you'd know centripedal/centrifugal forces exist in the X plane.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Andrews on Tue Nov 12 21:51:57 2024
    XPost: comp.sys.mac.advocacy, misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 2024-11-12 20:57, Andrews wrote:
    -hh wrote on Tue, 12 Nov 2024 14:15:44 -0500 :

    I've never heard any NASCAR/Indy/F1/etc race announcers> ever mention the word "catenary" ...

    ... let alone used it in the alleged context herein of guidance for
    optimizing the line in a corner to minimize peak cornering forces.

    Had any of you uneducated Apple trolls taken even a single class in
    Physics, you'd know centripedal/centrifugal forces exist in the X plane.

    Everyone knows that, doofus.

    And it's "centripetal" force. With a "T".

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Hill@21:1/5 to Chris on Wed Nov 6 20:00:13 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.system

    Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> wrote:
    John Hill <yclept@outlook.com> wrote:
    Andrews <andrews@spam.net> wrote:
    John Hill wrote on Mon, 4 Nov 2024 09:33:37 -0000 (UTC) :

    As a research physicist by training, profession and inclination I needed to
    read no further. I now know that I can safely disregard anything you write.
    But I'm in awe of your inventive abilities.

    I have a college degree. You do not.

    Well now! That is a very dogmatic assertion, made out of total ignorance.

    In actual fact, I have a BA and a DPhil in Physics at Oxford. (That is the >> Oxford equivalent of PhD at most universities).

    He won't believe you in the same way he didn't believe me.

    And I can prove it, naturally.

    I offered to do a show-and-tell with him with my PhD certificate if he was willing to show his college "degrees". He chickened out.

    But it would be better, since you are who
    you are, for you to look it up for yourself.

    But perhaps you do not regard Oxford as a proper college?

    Depends which one(s) you were in ;-)

    Keble. But that is really only significant as an undergraduate, and then
    only from a tutorial point of view. Lectures, practical work were
    university matters. Post graduate work was pretty much independent of
    college, far more on your supervisor.

    Old John.

    --
    The Moving Finger writes; and, having writ,
    Moves on: nor all thy Piety nor Wit
    Shall lure it back to cancel half a Line,
    Nor all thy Tears wash out a Word of it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Hill@21:1/5 to Alan on Wed Nov 6 19:40:18 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.system

    Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
    On 2024-11-05 11:56, John Hill wrote:
    Andrews <andrews@spam.net> wrote:
    John Hill wrote on Mon, 4 Nov 2024 09:33:37 -0000 (UTC) :

    As a research physicist by training, profession and inclination I needed to
    read no further. I now know that I can safely disregard anything you write.
    But I'm in awe of your inventive abilities.

    I have a college degree. You do not.

    Well now! That is a very dogmatic assertion, made out of total ignorance.

    In actual fact, I have a BA and a DPhil in Physics at Oxford. (That is the >> Oxford equivalent of PhD at most universities).

    And I can prove it, naturally. But it would be better, since you are who
    you are, for you to look it up for yourself.

    But perhaps you do not regard Oxford as a proper college?

    Old John.


    Oh, and be prepared for Andrew/Arlen/(however many other nyms) to post pictures of textbooks as proof of his education.

    :-)


    Thatโ€™s OK. You will notice that I did NOT challenge that. He may be a professor for all I know or care.

    Old John.

    --
    The Moving Finger writes; and, having writ,
    Moves on: nor all thy Piety nor Wit
    Shall lure it back to cancel half a Line,
    Nor all thy Tears wash out a Word of it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From -hh@21:1/5 to Alan on Wed Nov 13 08:10:15 2024
    XPost: comp.sys.mac.advocacy, misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
    On 2024-11-12 20:57, Andrews wrote:
    -hh wrote on Tue, 12 Nov 2024 14:15:44 -0500 :

    I've never heard any NASCAR/Indy/F1/etc race announcers> ever mention
    the word "catenary" ...

    ... let alone used it in the alleged context herein of guidance for
    optimizing the line in a corner to minimize peak cornering forces.

    Had any of you uneducated Apple trolls taken even a single class in
    Physics, you'd know centripedal/centrifugal forces exist in the X plane.

    Everyone knows that, doofus.

    And it's "centripetal" force. With a "T".


    And why the sudden change by Arlen to centripetal forces, when his claims
    have used catenary?

    Maybe because heโ€™s not found any TV video of race announcers using the
    term?
    Nah โ€ฆ too quick of a reply for that: heโ€™s either profoundly lazy or
    he knows heโ€™s lying.

    -hh

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrews@21:1/5 to -hh on Wed Nov 13 21:15:38 2024
    XPost: comp.sys.mac.advocacy, misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    -hh wrote on Wed, 13 Nov 2024 08:10:15 -0500 :

    And why the sudden change to centripetal forces, when his claims
    have used catenary?

    A catenary can be in any direction, horizontal or vertical, "hh".

    It's not the *direction* that defines the catenary but the uniformity of
    force over length - which - you'd have known if you had ever taken physics.

    My point is that the Apple trolls know nothing about anything, where one of
    the Apple trolls claims to "teach racing" yet he knows nothing of physics.

    They claim to get paid to help people with computers and yet they insist
    for weeks that the nntp header is impossible to change on your own.

    Who is that stupid?

    They claim to know bimmers and yet they don't even know what they're
    called, always my point being they are all on top of Mount Stupid.

    Their whole lives they're told they're stupid from everyone but Apple.
    Apple loves them.

    Apple tells these Apple trolls that they're geniuses for standing in long
    lines overnight at the Apple store waiting for new products to purchase.

    For that, these genius Apple trolls defend everything Apple to the death.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From RoadRacer@21:1/5 to Andrews on Wed Nov 13 17:38:48 2024
    XPost: comp.sys.mac.advocacy, misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 2024-11-13 13:15, Andrews wrote:
    -hh wrote on Wed, 13 Nov 2024 08:10:15 -0500 :

    And why the sudden change to centripetal forces, when his claims
    have used catenary?

    A catenary can be in any direction, horizontal or vertical, "hh".

    No one here doesn't understand that, doofus.


    It's not the *direction* that defines the catenary but the uniformity of force over length - which - you'd have known if you had ever taken physics.

    The forces are NOT uniform, doofus.

    The ends of a catenary (in the typical, vertical form) have to support
    the weight of all of the chain or rope located beneath them; a force
    which diminishes as you approach the bottom of the curve.


    My point is that the Apple trolls know nothing about anything, where one of the Apple trolls claims to "teach racing" yet he knows nothing of physics.

    There is no one aside from you who doubts that I teach racing, doofus.

    Again, here are my credentials:

    <https://drive.google.com/file/d/1K_iC3Vtkp5gP36T4lBZFc7rAkmzQ7x9u/view?usp=share_link>


    They claim to get paid to help people with computers and yet they insist
    for weeks that the nntp header is impossible to change on your own.

    No once insisted that, doofus.


    Who is that stupid?

    They claim to know bimmers and yet they don't even know what they're
    called, always my point being they are all on top of Mount Stupid.

    Not knowing that there is a difference between "bimmer" and "beemer"
    doesn't disqualify one from actually owning a 2012 BMW 135i M Sport:

    <https://drive.google.com/file/d/1RksO8IIHEzap0YkYbkLNReU2zKc5WhLw/view?usp=share_link>

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrews@21:1/5 to John Hill on Thu Nov 7 15:42:37 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.system

    John Hill wrote on Wed, 6 Nov 2024 19:40:18 -0000 (UTC) :

    That's OK. You will notice that I did NOT challenge that. He may be a professor for all I know or care.

    I accepted, a priori, that you own the cognitive skills to earn a
    doctorate, Mr. John Hill - which means therefore you're on my level.

    If you do own the mental acuity to comprehend complex facts, then you will
    be able to understand what Einstein said about the equivalence principle.
    <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equivalence_principle>

    While *you* (and I) may own a receptive IQ, the sad fact is that the Apple trolls do not - as none of them owns the mental capacity that you claim.

    So let's forget about those uneducated ignorant low-IQ Apple trolls.
    Let's ask *you* if you understand why gravity is not a force, shall we?

    Given the proletariat are whom we are addressing here, let's look at how well-known well-educated science educators explain the source of gravity.

    *Why is gravity not a real force?*
    <https://www.wtamu.edu/~cbaird/sq/2022/08/05/why-is-gravity-not-a-real-force/>

    *Gravity is not a force. But what does that mean?*
    <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R3LjJeeae68>

    *Discovery That Changed Physics! Gravity is NOT a Force!*
    <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3pZNzF6LBII>

    Since those cites are meant for the unwashed masses, (and yet you and I
    rise above them by virtue of being born with at least normal IQs), how
    would *YOU* now describe the true source of gravity having now seen them?

    HINT: Your response will tell me more about your "education" than you may realize.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrews@21:1/5 to John Hill on Thu Nov 7 15:17:49 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.system

    John Hill wrote on Tue, 5 Nov 2024 19:56:47 -0000 (UTC) :

    In actual fact, I have a BA and a DPhil in Physics at Oxford. (That is the Oxford equivalent of PhD at most universities).

    OK. Then let's take that as prima facie evidence that you claim to have a doctorate in Physics, which means you're familiar with Newton, right?

    Even Newton said a priori that its action at a distance was preposterous,
    but it was the best he could propose until Einstein enlightened all of us.

    What did Einstein postulate is the true source of what we call gravity?

    HINT: Veritasium explains it reasonably well for the hoi polloi.
    *How Gravity Actually Works*
    <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XRr1kaXKBsU>

    *Why Gravity is NOT a Force*
    <https://www.facebook.com/veritasium/videos/why-gravity-is-not-a-force/1041664880521597/>

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrews@21:1/5 to Jolly Roger on Thu Nov 7 15:31:29 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.system

    Jolly Roger wrote on 5 Nov 2024 22:12:28 GMT :

    Get used to it. Little Andrews can't help himself. His unchecked
    narcissism is so strong that he regularly gets into these ridiculous
    pissing contests making weak attacks like this about anyone who dares to stand up to his bullshit.

    I've studied you Apple trolls; but I study you the most, Jolly Roger.
    *I learn a lot about you from what you write*, Jolly Roger.

    From what you and the other Apple trolls write, I've concluded that nary a single one of you Apple trolls owns a college degree - which is important.

    The fact you can't even earn your GED, Jolly Roger, shows that none of you Apple trolls owns the mental capabilities to comprehend complex situations.

    Hence, you fall for every trick in the book Apple feeds you to believe.

    Your whole life you've been told you are stupid - but not by Apple.
    Apple tells you that your decision to wait outside in long lines is smart.

    You *love* Apple for that reason.

    Why do you think Alan Browne loves those Apple white papers so much, JR? Because they affirm that he chose the "superior product".

    Why do all of you Apple trolls hate people who tell the truth about Apple? HINT: Same reason all religious zealots hate someone stating the truth.

    Part of the reason you're an Apple troll, Jolly Roger, is that you don't
    own the mental abilities to comprehend Apple manipulates you perfectly.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrews@21:1/5 to sticks on Thu Nov 7 15:25:30 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.system

    sticks wrote on Tue, 5 Nov 2024 14:35:42 -0600 :

    Crap, I was hoping you would encourage him to prove gravity is not a
    force by walking off a cliff.

    What is hilarious about that statement is it shows how ignorant these low
    IQ uneducated Apple religious zealot trolls are, because.... because...

    Because...
    ...
    ...

    That was *exactly* what Einstein said was the happiest moment of his life!

    ...
    ...
    ...

    Since you ignorant uneducated low-IQ Apple trolls have no idea what I'm
    talking about, Einstein's revelation that there was no gravity when a
    window washer fell off a roof (substitute cliff) was the happiest moment in
    his entire life of discovery of the true nature of gravity.

    ...
    ...
    ...

    I doubt any of you low IQ uneducated ignorant Apple zealots can comprehend
    a word I'm explaining to you - but the fact that gravity hence disappeared faster than the speed of light was a key revelation for Einstein's theory!

    *Albert Einstein's most happy thought*
    <https://www.sciencemusings.com/albert-einsteins-most-happy-thought/>

    "The young physicist was sitting at his desk in the patent office at
    Bern when this thought occurred to him: If a person fell freely from
    the roof of his house, he would not feel his own weight. While he
    was falling it would be (at least in his immediate surroundings)
    as if there were no gravity."

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrews@21:1/5 to Chris on Thu Nov 7 15:50:15 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.system

    Chris wrote on Wed, 6 Nov 2024 18:08:19 -0000 (UTC) :

    In actual fact, I have a BA and a DPhil in Physics at Oxford. (That is the >> Oxford equivalent of PhD at most universities).

    He won't believe you in the same way he didn't believe me.

    Your response tells me more about your "education" than you may
    realize, Chris. Remember - I have a good memory of your actions.

    Remember you ridiculed the use of "vehicle" in immunological reference?
    And yet, it's an extremely common word every biologist is well aware of.

    Because a biologist has taken a few basic classes in immunology, Chris.
    But not you.

    Why have you never taken even a single class in fundamental immunology?
    And yet, you claim to own a doctorate in the medical sciences, Chris.

    How is that even possible?

    Remember you also ridiculed the commonly known assessment that 30,000
    subunits as being large for a non-living SARS-COV-2 viral particle?

    Given you claimed a doctorate in the medical sciences, you could never have earned that degree without at least one course in genetics, and yet, your response tells me instantly that you know nothing about genetics, Chris.

    Why haven't you taken even a single basic course in genetics, Chris?
    I know the answer - but I want *YOU* to answer that question for us, Chris.

    It's what you write, Chris - that informs me most about your "education".

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From sticks@21:1/5 to Andrews on Thu Nov 7 10:12:06 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.system

    On 11/7/2024 9:25 AM, Andrews wrote:
    sticks wrote on Tue, 5 Nov 2024 14:35:42 -0600 :

    Crap, I was hoping you would encourage him to prove gravity is not a
    force by walking off a cliff.

    What is hilarious about that statement is it shows

    No, what is hilarious is your inability to see that no one cares about
    what YOU think they should consider an issue, and therefore can't see
    the humor in the joke. Of course, that was predictable.


    --
    I Stand With Israel!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jolly Roger@21:1/5 to Andrews on Thu Nov 7 17:01:40 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.system

    On 2024-11-07, Andrews <andrews@spam.net> wrote:
    Jolly Roger wrote on 5 Nov 2024 22:12:28 GMT :

    Get used to it. Little Andrews can't help himself. His unchecked
    narcissism is so strong that he regularly gets into these ridiculous
    pissing contests making weak attacks like this about anyone who dares
    to stand up to his bullshit.

    I've studied you Apple trolls; but I study you the most, Jolly Roger.
    *I learn a lot about you from what you write*, Jolly Roger.

    From what you and the other Apple trolls write, I've concluded that
    nary a single one of you Apple trolls owns a college degree - which is important.

    The fact you can't even earn your GED, Jolly Roger, shows that none of
    you Apple trolls owns the mental capabilities to comprehend complex situations.

    Hence, you fall for every trick in the book Apple feeds you to
    believe.

    Your whole life you've been told you are stupid - but not by Apple.
    Apple tells you that your decision to wait outside in long lines is
    smart.

    You *love* Apple for that reason.

    Why do you think Alan Browne loves those Apple white papers so much,
    JR? Because they affirm that he chose the "superior product".

    Why do all of you Apple trolls hate people who tell the truth about
    Apple? HINT: Same reason all religious zealots hate someone stating
    the truth.

    Part of the reason you're an Apple troll, Jolly Roger, is that you
    don't own the mental abilities to comprehend Apple manipulates you
    perfectly.

    To wit. ๐Ÿ˜‰

    --
    E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
    I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

    JR

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From sticks@21:1/5 to Andrews on Thu Nov 7 12:07:33 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.system

    On 11/7/2024 11:43 AM, Andrews wrote:
    sticks wrote on Thu, 7 Nov 2024 10:12:06 -0600 :

    What is hilarious about that statement is it shows

    No, what is hilarious is your inability to see that no one cares about
    what YOU think they should consider an issue, and therefore can't see
    the humor in the joke. Of course, that was predictable.

    Just like what matters to the USA election is to *understand* why people voted the way they did, what matters for this Apple newsgroup is why the rather strange Apple trolls do what it is that they do.

    Why do the Trumpian Apple trolls such as Lewis, nospam, Jolly Roger, Alan Baker, Alan Browne, Haemactylus, Chris, Joerg Lorenz, et.al) incessantly troll Apple ng's by denying all facts about Apple they simply don't like?

    It turns out that their *ego* is tied up in their perception of Apple products, where they "feel" emotionally they belong to an elite clique.

    A clique who stands outside Apple stores waiting for products to buy.

    Most of the people here could actually write your posts for you.....


    --
    I Stand With Israel!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrews@21:1/5 to sticks on Thu Nov 7 17:43:31 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.system

    sticks wrote on Thu, 7 Nov 2024 10:12:06 -0600 :

    What is hilarious about that statement is it shows

    No, what is hilarious is your inability to see that no one cares about
    what YOU think they should consider an issue, and therefore can't see
    the humor in the joke. Of course, that was predictable.

    Just like what matters to the USA election is to *understand* why people
    voted the way they did, what matters for this Apple newsgroup is why the
    rather strange Apple trolls do what it is that they do.

    Why do the Trumpian Apple trolls such as Lewis, nospam, Jolly Roger, Alan Baker, Alan Browne, Haemactylus, Chris, Joerg Lorenz, et.al) incessantly
    troll Apple ng's by denying all facts about Apple they simply don't like?

    It turns out that their *ego* is tied up in their perception of Apple
    products, where they "feel" emotionally they belong to an elite clique.

    A clique who stands outside Apple stores waiting for products to buy.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrews@21:1/5 to sticks on Thu Nov 7 18:16:22 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.system

    sticks wrote on Thu, 7 Nov 2024 12:07:33 -0600 :

    A clique who stands outside Apple stores waiting for products to buy.

    Most of the people here could actually write your posts for you.....

    Only one of the Apple trolls knew anything about Apple products, and nospam isn't posting anymore. David Empson knew a lot but he doesn't post either.

    All the Apple trolls (such as Lewis, Jolly Roger, Alan Baker, Alan Browne, Haemactylus, Chris, Joerg Lorenz, JF Mezei et. al) parrot Apple marketing.

    That's why they hate anyone who posts the truth about Apple products here.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From sticks@21:1/5 to Andrews on Thu Nov 7 12:22:37 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.system

    On 11/7/2024 12:16 PM, Andrews wrote:
    sticks wrote on Thu, 7 Nov 2024 12:07:33 -0600 :

    A clique who stands outside Apple stores waiting for products to buy.

    Most of the people here could actually write your posts for you.....

    Only one of the Apple trolls knew anything about Apple products, and nospam isn't posting anymore. David Empson knew a lot but he doesn't post either.

    All the Apple trolls (such as Lewis, Jolly Roger, Alan Baker, Alan Browne, Haemactylus, Chris, Joerg Lorenz, JF Mezei et. al) parrot Apple marketing.

    That's why they hate anyone who posts the truth about Apple products here.

    <yawn>

    --
    I Stand With Israel!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From RoadRacer@21:1/5 to -hh on Thu Nov 14 13:13:31 2024
    XPost: comp.sys.mac.advocacy, misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 2024-11-14 12:20, -hh wrote:
    On 11/13/24 4:15 PM, Andrews wrote:
    -hh wrote on Wed, 13 Nov 2024 08:10:15 -0500 :

    And why the sudden change to centripetal forces, when his claims
    have used catenary?

    A catenary can be in any direction, horizontal or vertical, "hh".

    Pedantically, sure ...

    It's not the *direction* that defines the catenary but the uniformity of
    force over length - which - you'd have known if you had ever taken
    physics.

    ...but pragmatically, the reason why catenary doesn't apply to laeral non-gravitational based forces is because it is difficult for them to be sufficiently homogeneous: this theoretical doesn'tpragmatically occur in reality.

    Case in point, if this factor really was as significant as you're trying
    to imply that it is, then the real world ramifications are that during
    races, there would *never* able to be any passing in corners.

    And he's simply wrong.

    The forces in rope/chain/etc. hanging between points (i.e. in a catenary
    curve) is most definitely NOT uniform.

    The the ends of rope/chain/etc. need to support the weight of all the
    material that hangs below, whereas the middle of the hanging whatever
    doesn't.

    (If he hadn't hidden himself away from me, I could easily write him a
    thought experiment by steps, where I could absolutely prove that fact so completely that he'd have to agree or shut his eyes to truth.


    Little Arlen is probably remembering what he was taught in high school
    physics where they say that the tension in an idealized rope
    (/chain/etc.) is the same everywhere *

    * and where there's probably a footnote that says "ignoring the weight
    of rope itself".

    Guys like him hear/read the first explanation of such phenomena they're
    give and never are able to move beyond it.

    :-)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From -hh@21:1/5 to Andrews on Thu Nov 14 15:20:31 2024
    XPost: comp.sys.mac.advocacy, misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 11/13/24 4:15 PM, Andrews wrote:
    -hh wrote on Wed, 13 Nov 2024 08:10:15 -0500 :

    And why the sudden change to centripetal forces, when his claims
    have used catenary?

    A catenary can be in any direction, horizontal or vertical, "hh".

    Pedantically, sure ...

    It's not the *direction* that defines the catenary but the uniformity of force over length - which - you'd have known if you had ever taken physics.

    ...but pragmatically, the reason why catenary doesn't apply to laeral non-gravitational based forces is because it is difficult for them to be sufficiently homogeneous: this theoretical doesn'tpragmatically occur in reality.

    Case in point, if this factor really was as significant as you're trying
    to imply that it is, then the real world ramifications are that during
    races, there would *never* able to be any passing in corners.


    My point is that the Apple trolls know nothing about anything, where one of the Apple trolls claims to "teach racing" yet he knows nothing of physics.

    But they're not who needs to think things through more completely,
    particularly in looking at theory vs applied.


    [more reams of butthurt whining ... snipped]



    -hh

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrews@21:1/5 to John Hill on Fri Nov 1 16:26:48 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.system

    John Hill wrote on Fri, 1 Nov 2024 07:56:58 -0000 (UTC) :

    Who cares about the truth?

    "The Earth is flat".
    "No, it not for the following reasonsíK".
    "It's obviously flat, becauseíK".

    Uneducated people readily & strongly believe that gravity is a force.
    Right?

    But wait... Einstein hypothesized that it's not a force.
    And even Newton thought that the action at a distance was preposterous.

    Doesn't make any difference to its sphericity.

    I live in mountainous boonies above the Silicon Valley & Monterey Bay
    where, since I'm an octogenarian, I seem to fall down a lot lately.

    So I studied why gravity is so immensely powerful given Einstein said it
    wasn't a force at all but the earth expanding outward at 9.8m/s/s and
    curving spacetime rushing inward at 11km/s - perfectly balancing out such
    that the earth *becomes* a sphere (almost symmetric in sphericity).

    My point is that the Apple trolls like Jolly Roger, nospam, Lewis, Alan
    Baker, Alan Browne, Joerg Lorenz, Chris, Hemidactylus, et al., are Apple
    trolls *because* they don't have the intelligence or education to know the difference between what Apple marketing (cleverly) feeds them - and truth.

    They just don't have the intelligence but that alone isn't what makes these Apple trolls the deniers of facts that they are (as they probably all think gravity is a force for example - simply because they are ignorant people).

    Just as Alan Baker claims to know bimmers but he doesn't know the basics,
    and just as he claims to teach racing but he knows nothing about curves,
    these uneducated low-IQ Apple trolls all are to the left of the 1st DK quartile.

    In common vernacular, these Apple trolls are all to the left of Mount
    Stupid because not only do they know nothing, but they think they're
    geniuses (which is witnessed by them exclaiming they "found me!!!!" after I posted scores of messages with the same photos I've been using for decades,
    and all I did was add "s" to the moniker (which threw them off for weeks!).

    You see, John Hill, I've established these Apple trolls all share common traits, one of which is they're incredibly uneducated and of very low IQ.

    But being stupid alone isn't what makes them an Apple troll, right?

    What's different about these strange Apple trolls like nospam was, is they defend everything Apple to the death - no matter what it is they defend.

    If Apple doesn't have automatic call recording, they come up with inane
    excuses for apologizing for why Apple doesn't have that feature.

    Their lack of education and low IQ shows up in those absurd excuses, from
    it being illegal to nobody needs it and nobody wants it, etc.

    Notice these traits ALWAYS show up with the Apple trolls who are zealots:
    1. They're incredibly *uneducated* because all own abnormally low IQs
    2. Yet, they *believe* in everything Apple marketing feeds them to believe
    3. So they *defend to the death* everything Apple - no matter the truth

    There's only one more major trait of these Apple trolls that an intelligent well educated person would instantly notice - which makes them *different*
    from normal people who speak about the other common operating systems.

    A. Windows users don't defend Microsoft to the death - they know the truth.
    (And they *accept* that truth - without becoming a religious zealot.)
    B. Android users don't defend Google to the death - they know the truth.'
    (They also *accept* that truth - without becoming a religious zealot.)
    C. Apple trolls defend everything Apple - to the death - no matter what.
    (Why?)

    After studying why these strange Apple trolls are so *different* from
    normal people - and putting together how incredibly ignorant and uneducated
    all of them are - I've realized they have been told their entire lives how stupid they are. How worthless they are. How they can't fathom truth.

    Yet Apple marketing *loves* these Apple trolls!

    Apple marketing tells these Apple trolls everything that these Apple trolls want to hear - about how great they are for choosing the Apple ecosystem.

    Notice all the Apple trolls get their ego fed to them by Apple marketing. Notice I don't feed their ego - so they hate me - with a passion.

    But they *love* Apple Marketing because Apple tells them how great their
    choice of ecosystem is. They *identify* with the clever Apple marketing.

    This *identity* ego comes out in everything Alan Browne posts for example.
    Just watch.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Andrews on Fri Nov 1 10:20:30 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.system

    On 2024-11-01 09:26, Andrews wrote:
    John Hill wrote on Fri, 1 Nov 2024 07:56:58 -0000 (UTC) :

    Who cares about the truth?

    "The Earth is flat".
    "No, it not for the following reasons๏ฟฝK".
    "It's obviously flat, because๏ฟฝK".

    Uneducated people readily & strongly believe that gravity is a force.
    Right?

    But wait... Einstein hypothesized that it's not a force.
    And even Newton thought that the action at a distance was preposterous.

    Doesn't make any difference to its sphericity.

    I live in mountainous boonies above the Silicon Valley & Monterey Bay
    where, since I'm an octogenarian, I seem to fall down a lot lately.

    So I studied why gravity is so immensely powerful given Einstein said it wasn't a force at all but the earth expanding outward at 9.8m/s/s and
    curving spacetime rushing inward at 11km/s - perfectly balancing out such that the earth *becomes* a sphere (almost symmetric in sphericity).

    Einstein never said that what we experience as gravity was caused by the
    Earth expanding outward.


    My point is that the Apple trolls like Jolly Roger, nospam, Lewis, Alan Baker, Alan Browne, Joerg Lorenz, Chris, Hemidactylus, et al., are Apple trolls *because* they don't have the intelligence or education to know the difference between what Apple marketing (cleverly) feeds them - and truth.

    They just don't have the intelligence but that alone isn't what makes these Apple trolls the deniers of facts that they are (as they probably all think gravity is a force for example - simply because they are ignorant people).

    Just as Alan Baker claims to know bimmers but he doesn't know the basics,
    and just as he claims to teach racing but he knows nothing about curves, these uneducated low-IQ Apple trolls all are to the left of the 1st DK quartile.
    I claim to teach road racing... ...because I do, in fact, teach road racing.

    I started road racing in 2013 and was invited to join the Race Drivers Committee of the Sports Car Club of BC after the 2016 season, and I've
    been teaching every year since.

    <https://martinsactionphotography.smugmug.com/2024-SCCBC-Driver-Training-June-9-2024/i-Fkd9344/buy>

    That's me on the left with my fellow instructor, Paul Bunbury.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrews@21:1/5 to Chris on Fri Nov 8 18:44:44 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.system

    Chris wrote on Fri, 8 Nov 2024 17:43:09 +0000 :

    I corrected you in that the "RNA ball" is not huge. Viruses have tiny genomes. RNA viruses are smaller than DNA viruses, which are smaller
    than bacterial genomes, which are smaller than eukaryotic (like plants
    and mammals) genomes.

    The fact remains that you ridiculed the use of "vehicle" in immunology, and
    you claimed that a RNA viral genome of the SARS-COV-2 size was smaller in comparison to other viruses. Both are preposterous statements by you.

    I don't care that you make absurd assessments, Chris. The fact you do that simply proves me right when I assess all you Apple trolls as uneducated.


    Even this paper on viruses says so. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4093846/

    I've always wondered if you Apple trolls even *read* your own cites, Chris.

    That paper says *exactly* what I have been saying all along, and which you
    had said was wrong - and yet - that paper shows *exactly* what I said.

    This is a direct quote about RNA viral genomes from that very paper, Chris.

    "viruses exhibit a wide diversity of genome sizes. RNA viruses
    possess genomes that are universally small, ranging from 1,682
    nucleotides (nt) (hepatitis delta virus [Deltavirus]) to 31,526
    nt (murine hepatitis virus [Coronaviridae])."

    Clue by four: 30K subunits is big for an RNA viral particle, Chris.
    Very big.

    The fact you don't understand the paper is consistent with all the Apple
    trolls never understanding anything slightly complex - you prove me right.

    Given you claimed a doctorate in the medical sciences, you could never have >> earned that degree without at least one course in genetics,

    You don't understand UK PhDs. We don't sit classes or courses. It's all
    pure research. And just because someone may have a PhD in, say,
    population health (a medical science) doesn't mean you know about
    molecular biology, genetics or immunology.

    However, I did do genetics as part of my UG.

    You know nothing about immunology or viral genomes, Chris.
    Simply because you don't even know what everyone else knows about them.

    Just as Alan Baker knows nothing about racing or owning & driving BMWs.
    For the same reason as you - he doesn't know the first thing about them.

    None of you Apple trolls has the mental capacity to understand anything.
    You prove me right every time you post.

    and yet, your
    response tells me instantly that you know nothing about genetics, Chris.

    Why haven't you taken even a single basic course in genetics, Chris?
    I know the answer - but I want *YOU* to answer that question for us, Chris. >>
    It's what you write, Chris - that informs me most about your "education".

    Your photos of books tell us all about the reality of your "degrees".
    You also think youtube is a valid source. lol.

    And yet, I know immunology & genetics - and most of my life I wasn't even
    in the biological sciences (although my undergraduate degree was in that).

    The overall conclusion is readily apparent that none of you Apple trolls
    owns the basic normal mental capacity to comprehend any technical subject.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrews@21:1/5 to sticks on Fri Nov 8 18:44:43 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.system

    sticks wrote on Thu, 7 Nov 2024 12:22:37 -0600 :

    <yawn>

    Notice how all you Apple zealot trolls can't discuss topics like an adult
    so you instantly digress to your childish kindergarten responses like that.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From sticks@21:1/5 to Andrews on Fri Nov 8 13:14:17 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.system

    On 11/8/2024 12:44 PM, Andrews wrote:
    sticks wrote on Thu, 7 Nov 2024 12:22:37 -0600 :

    <yawn>

    Notice how all you Apple zealot trolls can't discuss topics like an adult
    so you instantly digress to your childish kindergarten responses like that.

    Thanks for predictably adding me to your "Apple zealot troll" list.
    Oh, and <yawn> is a well known historical method of telling a usenet
    troll such as yourself to basically fuck off. Your response is a bit
    childish, but we've all come to expect nothing less from you. Perhaps
    you just don't understand the *gravity* of your current lack of
    acceptance anywhere. Ha!

    --
    I Stand With Israel!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From RoadRacer@21:1/5 to Andrews on Fri Nov 8 11:06:16 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.system

    On 2024-11-08 10:44, Andrews wrote:
    Chris wrote on Fri, 8 Nov 2024 17:43:09 +0000 :

    I corrected you in that the "RNA ball" is not huge. Viruses have tiny
    genomes. RNA viruses are smaller than DNA viruses, which are smaller
    than bacterial genomes, which are smaller than eukaryotic (like plants
    and mammals) genomes.

    The fact remains that you ridiculed the use of "vehicle" in immunology, and you claimed that a RNA viral genome of the SARS-COV-2 size was smaller in comparison to other viruses. Both are preposterous statements by you.

    I don't care that you make absurd assessments, Chris. The fact you do that simply proves me right when I assess all you Apple trolls as uneducated.


    Even this paper on viruses says so.
    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4093846/

    I've always wondered if you Apple trolls even *read* your own cites, Chris.

    That paper says *exactly* what I have been saying all along, and which you had said was wrong - and yet - that paper shows *exactly* what I said.

    This is a direct quote about RNA viral genomes from that very paper, Chris.

    "viruses exhibit a wide diversity of genome sizes. RNA viruses
    possess genomes that are universally small, ranging from 1,682
    nucleotides (nt) (hepatitis delta virus [Deltavirus]) to 31,526
    nt (murine hepatitis virus [Coronaviridae])."

    Clue by four: 30K subunits is big for an RNA viral particle, Chris.
    Very big.

    The fact you don't understand the paper is consistent with all the Apple trolls never understanding anything slightly complex - you prove me right.

    Given you claimed a doctorate in the medical sciences, you could never have >>> earned that degree without at least one course in genetics,

    You don't understand UK PhDs. We don't sit classes or courses. It's all
    pure research. And just because someone may have a PhD in, say,
    population health (a medical science) doesn't mean you know about
    molecular biology, genetics or immunology.

    However, I did do genetics as part of my UG.

    You know nothing about immunology or viral genomes, Chris.
    Simply because you don't even know what everyone else knows about them.

    Just as Alan Baker knows nothing about racing or owning & driving BMWs.
    For the same reason as you - he doesn't know the first thing about them.

    For the record:

    Me in my current road racing car:

    <https://martinsactionphotography.smugmug.com/2018-SCCBC-Race-5-Saturday-September-15-2018/i-sNsJqTR/A>

    My current race license:

    <https://drive.google.com/file/d/1TGOu7kBmLk6XwQgLz7h1PX0FTyMrtSDG/view?usp=share_link>

    My current road racing instructor's license:

    <https://drive.google.com/file/d/1K_iC3Vtkp5gP36T4lBZFc7rAkmzQ7x9u/view?usp=share_link>

    You can use the QR codes to check that they're valid...

    ...and I can take a picture of all of them back to 2013 and 2017
    respectively.

    Oh, and here's my current road car:

    <https://drive.google.com/file/d/1RksO8IIHEzap0YkYbkLNReU2zKc5WhLw/view?usp=share_link>

    :-)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From sticks@21:1/5 to Andrews on Fri Nov 8 13:57:58 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.system

    On 11/8/2024 1:39 PM, Andrews wrote:
    sticks wrote on Fri, 8 Nov 2024 13:14:17 -0600 :

    <yawn>

    Notice how all you Apple zealot trolls can't discuss topics like an adult >>> so you instantly digress to your childish kindergarten responses like that. >>
    Thanks for predictably adding me to your "Apple zealot troll" list.
    Oh, and <yawn> is a well known historical method of telling a usenet
    troll such as yourself to basically fuck off. Your response is a bit
    childish, but we've all come to expect nothing less from you. Perhaps
    you just don't understand the *gravity* of your current lack of
    acceptance anywhere. Ha!

    Every response from these Apple zealot trolls is that of a child, which, let's be clear - is a key component of *why* their ego is tied up in Apple products - and why they therefore defend Apple products to the death.

    Why do you think Alan Browne loves to quote Apple white papers?
    Why did nospam always claim nobody wanted anything Apple didn't have?
    Why does Jolly Roger repeatedly defend even Apple's illegal actions?

    All you zealot Apple trolls have been told your entire life you're stupid. But Apple loves you.

    Apple tells you that you're a genius for standing in long lines waiting for the Apple Store doors to open so that you can affirm your genius with cash.

    Afterward, Apple laughs at you Apple zealot trolls all the way to the bank.

    <yawn>


    --
    I Stand With Israel!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrews@21:1/5 to sticks on Fri Nov 8 19:39:47 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.system

    sticks wrote on Fri, 8 Nov 2024 13:14:17 -0600 :

    <yawn>

    Notice how all you Apple zealot trolls can't discuss topics like an adult
    so you instantly digress to your childish kindergarten responses like that.

    Thanks for predictably adding me to your "Apple zealot troll" list.
    Oh, and <yawn> is a well known historical method of telling a usenet
    troll such as yourself to basically fuck off. Your response is a bit childish, but we've all come to expect nothing less from you. Perhaps
    you just don't understand the *gravity* of your current lack of
    acceptance anywhere. Ha!

    Every response from these Apple zealot trolls is that of a child, which,
    let's be clear - is a key component of *why* their ego is tied up in Apple products - and why they therefore defend Apple products to the death.

    Why do you think Alan Browne loves to quote Apple white papers?
    Why did nospam always claim nobody wanted anything Apple didn't have?
    Why does Jolly Roger repeatedly defend even Apple's illegal actions?

    All you zealot Apple trolls have been told your entire life you're stupid.
    But Apple loves you.

    Apple tells you that you're a genius for standing in long lines waiting for
    the Apple Store doors to open so that you can affirm your genius with cash.

    Afterward, Apple laughs at you Apple zealot trolls all the way to the bank.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jolly Roger@21:1/5 to RoadRacer on Fri Nov 8 20:06:36 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.system

    On 2024-11-08, RoadRacer <racer@nunya.biz> wrote:

    Oh, and here's my current road car:

    <https://drive.google.com/file/d/1RksO8IIHEzap0YkYbkLNReU2zKc5WhLw/view?usp=share_link>

    :-)

    Is that a 1-series or a 3? What year/model?

    My 335i is the same color. It's been a great car (fuel pump issues got
    worked out under warranty). ๐Ÿ™‚๐Ÿ‘

    --
    E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
    I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

    JR

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From sticks@21:1/5 to Andrews on Fri Nov 8 14:04:29 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.system

    On 11/7/2024 11:43 AM, Andrews wrote:
    sticks wrote on Thu, 7 Nov 2024 10:12:06 -0600 :

    What is hilarious about that statement is it shows

    No, what is hilarious is your inability to see that no one cares about
    what YOU think they should consider an issue, and therefore can't see
    the humor in the joke. Of course, that was predictable.

    Just like what matters to the USA election is to *understand* why people voted the way they did, what matters for this Apple newsgroup is why the rather strange Apple trolls do what it is that they do.

    Why do the Trumpian Apple trolls such as Lewis, nospam, Jolly Roger, Alan Baker, Alan Browne, Haemactylus, Chris, Joerg Lorenz, et.al) incessantly troll Apple ng's by denying all facts about Apple they simply don't like?

    It turns out that their *ego* is tied up in their perception of Apple products, where they "feel" emotionally they belong to an elite clique.

    A clique who stands outside Apple stores waiting for products to buy.

    Since this arlen troll loves to mix these two things, I think this was
    made just for him

    <https://rumble.com/v5n47ct-the-ones-who-think-everyone-else-is-delusional-may-be-delusional.html>


    --
    I Stand With Israel!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Jolly Roger on Fri Nov 8 12:26:55 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.system

    On 2024-11-08 12:06, Jolly Roger wrote:
    On 2024-11-08, RoadRacer <racer@nunya.biz> wrote:

    Oh, and here's my current road car:

    <https://drive.google.com/file/d/1RksO8IIHEzap0YkYbkLNReU2zKc5WhLw/view?usp=share_link>

    :-)

    Is that a 1-series or a 3? What year/model?

    2012 135i M Sport.


    My 335i is the same color. It's been a great car (fuel pump issues got
    worked out under warranty). ๐Ÿ™‚๐Ÿ‘
    My car had an electric water pump failure under warranty...

    ...and a failure of the o-rings on the oil filter housing...

    ...leading to oil leaking down onto the alternator...

    ...leading to a replacement of the alternator...

    ...and that wasn't under warranty.

    Moral of the story:

    If your 335i is using the same engine design, be very aware of you start
    to smell any oil burning.

    ๐Ÿ˜–

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to All on Fri Nov 8 15:50:34 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.system

    On 2024-11-08 15:27, *Hemidactylus* wrote:
    Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
    On 2024-11-08 12:06, Jolly Roger wrote:
    On 2024-11-08, RoadRacer <racer@nunya.biz> wrote:

    Oh, and here's my current road car:

    <https://drive.google.com/file/d/1RksO8IIHEzap0YkYbkLNReU2zKc5WhLw/view?usp=share_link>

    :-)

    Is that a 1-series or a 3? What year/model?

    2012 135i M Sport.


    My 335i is the same color. It's been a great car (fuel pump issues got
    worked out under warranty). ๐Ÿ™‚๐Ÿ‘
    My car had an electric water pump failure under warranty...

    ...and a failure of the o-rings on the oil filter housing...

    ...leading to oil leaking down onto the alternator...

    ...leading to a replacement of the alternator...

    ...and that wasn't under warranty.

    Moral of the story:

    If your 335i is using the same engine design, be very aware of you start
    to smell any oil burning.

    ๐Ÿ˜–

    I was window shopping Bimmers and found a 1-series online (2010-12ish) that was really cheap. Then after it hadnโ€™t been bought for a month it got cheaper and the listing started detailing some of the issues. Hard pass. Iโ€™ve always been interested in an entry level older BMW. There was another one that was kinda cool looking but I was already in the process of dealing with my Civic getting rear-ended and totaled and replacing it with an HR-V.
    I also had my eye on an ILX around the same price range. Those were pretty much fancier Civics. I rarely see them and they were discontinued.

    Well, for me, I've experienced three real problems with my 1-Series:

    1. The failed water pump (warrantied).

    2. The failed oil sealing leading to a failed alternator (partially bad
    design, but basically my fault for not investigating the smell of oil
    far enough).

    3. A failed turbocharger charge pipe; where the plastic pipe failed
    where it was clipped to the metal intake plenum. I fixed that one myself
    with about $70 in parts and (maybe) an hour of labour.


    For some reason my Youtube feed coughs up rando videos on oddball cars. Recently it was a 1971 Pantera being driven and I was smitten. Looks like
    the sort of car it would be too easy to die in but having too much fun with the demise. Fโ€™in beast.

    All part of the trend to stick American V8s into European sports cars. :-)


    Iโ€™m happy with the HR-V as a small crossover with a higher stance than my Civic had. Maybe Iโ€™ll keep looking at 1-series Bimmers online. They seem expensive to maintain, but cheaper to get into than a Mercedes or Porsche. 911s are a bit steep for me.

    A tricked out 1-series would be sweet though Iโ€™d be better off with some Japanese platform hot rod. I seriously donโ€™t get stance cars with weird camber.
    It's a classic thing with faddests of all types.

    Racing cars started using more camber when tire construction went from
    bias plies to radial, and if some was good for a racing car, then more
    must be even better...

    ...right?

    ๐Ÿ˜Ž

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From *Hemidactylus*@21:1/5 to Alan on Fri Nov 8 23:27:29 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.system

    Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
    On 2024-11-08 12:06, Jolly Roger wrote:
    On 2024-11-08, RoadRacer <racer@nunya.biz> wrote:

    Oh, and here's my current road car:

    <https://drive.google.com/file/d/1RksO8IIHEzap0YkYbkLNReU2zKc5WhLw/view?usp=share_link>

    :-)

    Is that a 1-series or a 3? What year/model?

    2012 135i M Sport.


    My 335i is the same color. It's been a great car (fuel pump issues got
    worked out under warranty). ๐Ÿ™‚๐Ÿ‘
    My car had an electric water pump failure under warranty...

    ...and a failure of the o-rings on the oil filter housing...

    ...leading to oil leaking down onto the alternator...

    ...leading to a replacement of the alternator...

    ...and that wasn't under warranty.

    Moral of the story:

    If your 335i is using the same engine design, be very aware of you start
    to smell any oil burning.

    ๐Ÿ˜–

    I was window shopping Bimmers and found a 1-series online (2010-12ish) that
    was really cheap. Then after it hadnโ€™t been bought for a month it got
    cheaper and the listing started detailing some of the issues. Hard pass.
    Iโ€™ve always been interested in an entry level older BMW. There was another one that was kinda cool looking but I was already in the process of dealing with my Civic getting rear-ended and totaled and replacing it with an HR-V.
    I also had my eye on an ILX around the same price range. Those were pretty
    much fancier Civics. I rarely see them and they were discontinued.

    For some reason my Youtube feed coughs up rando videos on oddball cars. Recently it was a 1971 Pantera being driven and I was smitten. Looks like
    the sort of car it would be too easy to die in but having too much fun with
    the demise. Fโ€™in beast.

    Iโ€™m happy with the HR-V as a small crossover with a higher stance than my Civic had. Maybe Iโ€™ll keep looking at 1-series Bimmers online. They seem expensive to maintain, but cheaper to get into than a Mercedes or Porsche.
    911s are a bit steep for me.

    A tricked out 1-series would be sweet though Iโ€™d be better off with some Japanese platform hot rod. I seriously donโ€™t get stance cars with weird camber.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrews@21:1/5 to All on Sat Nov 9 00:55:06 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.system

    *Hemidactylus* wrote on Fri, 08 Nov 2024 23:27:29 +0000 :

    I've always been interested in an entry level older BMW.

    I once owned a 525i on which I had to replace almost everything because BMW only knows how to make drive trains - BMW has no idea how systems work together.

    An example is the DISA valve is an abomination, as is the CCV and even the
    ABS control module has those angel hairs which break in the goop they're intertwined with.

    The seat cables cause seat twist. Even something as simple as the
    cupholders break. The Dorman window regulators have too small of a nylon
    roller so the cable falls off. And don't even get me started on the Behr plastic overly complex expansion tanks.

    The water pump fails prematurely (and requires two special tools, including
    a very thin very long 32mm open-end wrench to access), while the trunk loom constantly frays causing shorts all over the place due to bare wires
    touching.

    Everyone had the BMW software (much of which was in German) including but
    not limited to dis, easydis, gt1, progman, inpa, and ncs dummies & expert.

    Much as I've studied the strange nature of you Apple trolls, I've always wondered why BMW engineers can't make two systems work together other than
    the drive train and suspension. Those do work fantastically together.

    Nothing else does though... (at least not on the 525i which is the only
    bimmer that I know about - but don't get me started on the beemers).

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Andrews on Fri Nov 8 17:00:54 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.system

    On 2024-11-08 16:55, Andrews wrote:
    *Hemidactylus* wrote on Fri, 08 Nov 2024 23:27:29 +0000 :

    I've always been interested in an entry level older BMW.

    I once owned a 525i on which I had to replace almost everything because BMW only knows how to make drive trains - BMW has no idea how systems work together.

    An example is the DISA valve is an abomination, as is the CCV and even the ABS control module has those angel hairs which break in the goop they're intertwined with.

    The seat cables cause seat twist. Even something as simple as the
    cupholders break. The Dorman window regulators have too small of a nylon roller so the cable falls off. And don't even get me started on the Behr plastic overly complex expansion tanks.

    The water pump fails prematurely (and requires two special tools, including
    a very thin very long 32mm open-end wrench to access), while the trunk loom constantly frays causing shorts all over the place due to bare wires touching.

    Everyone had the BMW software (much of which was in German) including but
    not limited to dis, easydis, gt1, progman, inpa, and ncs dummies & expert.

    Much as I've studied the strange nature of you Apple trolls, I've always wondered why BMW engineers can't make two systems work together other than the drive train and suspension. Those do work fantastically together.

    Nothing else does though... (at least not on the 525i which is the only bimmer that I know about - but don't get me started on the beemers).

    Translation:

    You don't actually know why you had problems with your 525i

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From *Hemidactylus*@21:1/5 to Alan on Sat Nov 9 01:43:32 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.system

    Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
    On 2024-11-08 16:55, โ€”โ€”โ€” wrote:

    [snip kook]

    Translation:

    You don't actually know why you had problems with your 525i

    I doubt he ever had a BMW. Seems more the vintage AMC Pacer type.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to All on Fri Nov 8 17:58:07 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.system

    On 2024-11-08 17:43, *Hemidactylus* wrote:
    Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
    On 2024-11-08 16:55, โ€”โ€”โ€” wrote:

    [snip kook]

    Translation:

    You don't actually know why you had problems with your 525i

    I doubt he ever had a BMW. Seems more the vintage AMC Pacer type.



    Meh.... ...anybody can buy an old BMW.

    ;-)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From *Hemidactylus*@21:1/5 to Alan on Sat Nov 9 02:03:08 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.system

    Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
    On 2024-11-08 17:43, *Hemidactylus* wrote:
    Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
    On 2024-11-08 16:55, โ€”โ€”โ€” wrote:

    [snip kook]

    Translation:

    You don't actually know why you had problems with your 525i

    I doubt he ever had a BMW. Seems more the vintage AMC Pacer type.



    Meh.... ...anybody can buy an old BMW.

    ;-)

    AMC Pacer with moon caps. Suits him to a T.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrews@21:1/5 to All on Sat Nov 9 05:13:46 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.system

    *Hemidactylus* wrote on Sat, 09 Nov 2024 02:03:08 +0000 :

    I doubt he ever had a BMW. Seems more the vintage AMC Pacer type.


    Meh.... ...anybody can buy an old BMW.

    ;-)

    AMC Pacer with moon caps. Suits him to a T.

    Given all you Apple trolls are worthless pieces of shit who have never in
    your entire lives done anything worthwhile for other fellow human beings
    it's not surprising that you don't understand even what a CCV is.

    Alan Baker, who claims to own bimmers, doesn't know what a CCV is.
    He has no idea what a DISA valve is either.
    He knows nothing of INPA nor EDIABAS. He can't even spell them.

    And yet, you claim out of your sheer ignorance, that nobody could know this stuff simply because none of you Apple trolls can know anything at all.

    It's who you are. Worthless pieces of human excrement. Every one of you.
    The minute you Apple trolls leave this group, it will return to normal.

    Thank God those worthless nospam & Lewis & JF Mezei Apple trolls are gone. Let's hope you're next.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrews@21:1/5 to All on Sat Nov 9 05:08:16 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.system

    *Hemidactylus* wrote on Sat, 09 Nov 2024 01:43:32 +0000 :

    I doubt he ever had a BMW. Seems more the vintage AMC Pacer type.

    Heh heh heh ... when I left the BMW forums, they went *looking* for me.

    I'm famous there for the detailed writeups of the failed parts.
    And the tutorials.

    But all you Apple trolls together have never written even *one* tutorial.
    The reason is none of you own a helpful bone in your bodies.

    Every one of you Apple trolls is a despicably horrid person.
    It's part of why you are Apple trolls.

    Your whole life everyone told you that you were stupid.
    But not Apple.

    Apple tells you that you're a genius for waiting in long lines.
    And for paying through the nose to get half the functionality.

    You, Hemidactylus, are not as sadistic as Jolly Roger or nospam is though.
    Nor are you as incredibly stupid as Alan Baker & Snit are.

    You're just a deceitful worthless piece of Apple trolling shit.
    I apologize if I'm telling you what you already know about yourself.

    All you Apple trolls are worthless pieces of shit who have never in your
    entire lives done anything worthwhile for other fellow human beings.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrews@21:1/5 to sticks on Sat Nov 9 05:16:33 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.system

    sticks wrote on Fri, 8 Nov 2024 13:57:58 -0600 :

    Afterward, Apple laughs at you Apple zealot trolls all the way to the bank.

    <yawn>

    The truth about you Apple trolls doth hurt, does it not!

    None of you Apple trolls owns an IQ above about a 60 or so.

    Your response proves me right every time.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Your Name@21:1/5 to All on Sat Nov 9 18:17:17 2024
    XPost: comp.sys.mac.system, misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 2024-11-09 02:03:08 +0000, *Hemidactylus* said:
    Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
    On 2024-11-08 17:43, *Hemidactylus* wrote:
    Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
    On 2024-11-08 16:55, โ€”โ€”โ€” wrote:

    [snip kook]

    Translation:

    You don't actually know why you had problems with your 525i

    I doubt he ever had a BMW. Seems more the vintage AMC Pacer type.

    Meh.... ...anybody can buy an old BMW.

    ;-)

    AMC Pacer with moon caps. Suits him to a T.

    A toddler's pedal car would probably be a better match. ;-)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrews@21:1/5 to sticks on Sat Nov 9 05:18:42 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.system

    sticks wrote on Fri, 8 Nov 2024 14:04:29 -0600 :

    I think this was made just for him

    What's clear is you Apple trolls have the same traits in common:

    1. All of you were told your entire lives you were stupid.
    2. But Apple loves you.
    3. Apple tells you that you're smart for waiting in those long lines.

    So you defend Apple to the death.
    No matter what.

    All the Apple trolls (such as Lewis, Jolly Roger, Alan Baker, Alan Browne, Haemactylus, Chris, Joerg Lorenz, JF Mezei et. al) are loyal to Apple.

    I grant you that.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrews@21:1/5 to Your Name on Sat Nov 9 05:25:08 2024
    XPost: comp.sys.mac.system, misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    Your Name wrote on Sat, 9 Nov 2024 18:17:17 +1300 :

    AMC Pacer with moon caps. Suits him to a T.

    A toddler's pedal car would probably be a better match. ;-)

    Notice how embarrassed these ignorant Apple trolls are that someone
    actually knows something about cars (in this case, bimmers) that they themselves can't possibly know (because they lack a normal IQ).

    Alan Baker, who professes to *race* cars doesn't even know what a catenary
    is, when it's one of the most critically important terms in physics when it comes to *understanding* curved shapes and how they sweep over distance).

    Alan Baker, who professes to own a BMW, doesn't even know what the term "bimmer" means - and worse - since it was a racing term derived after
    "beemer" was - he's completely ignorant of what EVERYONE else long knew.

    Everyone makes fun of the noobs who don't know these things.
    Alan Baker is a classic noob far to the left of DK's Mount Stupid.

    Why?
    These ignorant Apple trolls were told their whole lives they're stupid.

    So when someone (anyone) knows more than they do (which is just about everyone), they make these lame kindergarten jokes to cover their shame.

    Why don't you Apple trolls simply admit you know nothing about anything?

    HINT: You can't.

    Go back to the observation every Apple troll has told his entire life that
    he's stupid - but - Apple tells him he's a genius for waiting outside the
    Apple store all night with other Apple geniuses just like he feels he is.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From RoadRacer@21:1/5 to Andrews on Fri Nov 8 22:32:36 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.system

    On 2024-11-08 21:13, Andrews wrote:
    *Hemidactylus* wrote on Sat, 09 Nov 2024 02:03:08 +0000 :

    I doubt he ever had a BMW. Seems more the vintage AMC Pacer type.


    Meh.... ...anybody can buy an old BMW.

    ;-)

    AMC Pacer with moon caps. Suits him to a T.

    Given all you Apple trolls are worthless pieces of shit who have never in your entire lives done anything worthwhile for other fellow human beings
    it's not surprising that you don't understand even what a CCV is.

    Alan Baker, who claims to own bimmers, doesn't know what a CCV is.
    He has no idea what a DISA valve is either.
    He knows nothing of INPA nor EDIABAS. He can't even spell them.

    But why do I NEED to know what a CCV is, Arlen? As it happens, I figured
    it was short for "CrankCase Ventilation", but who cares? Even if I
    didn't happen to know what it was, I could look it up when I need to; as
    I did when you mentioned the DISA valve earlier.

    I want to USE a car. I pay others to fix it when it breaks; mostly. I've certainly done some fixes myself and I do have a Bluetooth OBD II
    adapter and the appropriate software to check on issues that arise.

    I notice you haven't address my post where I layout my current cars and credentials.

    Was that just cowardice?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From RoadRacer@21:1/5 to Andrews on Fri Nov 8 22:39:45 2024
    XPost: comp.sys.mac.system, misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 2024-11-08 21:25, Andrews wrote:
    Your Name wrote on Sat, 9 Nov 2024 18:17:17 +1300 :

    AMC Pacer with moon caps. Suits him to a T.

    A toddler's pedal car would probably be a better match. ;-)

    Notice how embarrassed these ignorant Apple trolls are that someone
    actually knows something about cars (in this case, bimmers) that they themselves can't possibly know (because they lack a normal IQ).

    Alan Baker, who professes to *race* cars doesn't even know what a catenary is, when it's one of the most critically important terms in physics when it comes to *understanding* curved shapes and how they sweep over distance).

    I know exactly what a catenary is.


    Alan Baker, who professes to own a BMW, doesn't even know what the term "bimmer" means - and worse - since it was a racing term derived after "beemer" was - he's completely ignorant of what EVERYONE else long knew.

    I do own a BMW...

    ...but I race a Van Diemen.

    <https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/19bcmcwANrxaHzebNKWGu2V-lvQgTtCl-?usp=share_link>

    I don't care who uses the the term "bimmer" or "beemer".

    I'm about the actual driving.

    :-)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)