On 2024-09-22 13:52, Ruvim wrote:
On 2024-09-21 23:37, Anthony Howe wrote:
On 2024-07-01 05:02, Ruvim wrote:
And if the term "minimum search order" is renamed to "small search order" (as
an example), will this solve the problem?
Minimum functional search order?
I like `functional`.
Good idea!
Similar variants:
- minimum usable search order
- minimum operable search order
- minimum operative search order
- minimum operational search order
And this one -----^ `operational`
But I think as long as the wording makes clear its not the empty set, pick something nice and use consistently should be good.
--
Anthony C Howe
achowe@snert.com BarricadeMX & Milters
http://nanozen.snert.com/ http://software.snert.com/
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)