• Re: A good thing or a bad thing

    From AJL@21:1/5 to Frank Slootweg on Wed Apr 9 17:00:06 2025
    On 4/9/25 8:35 AM, Frank Slootweg wrote:
    Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> wrote:

    ...free apps can be
    downloaded again from the original source.

    I have no beef in this (non-)discussion, but you can only download
    again, if the "original source" still exists!

    That's often - and probably even most of the time - the case for
    software downloaded from Apple's App Store. But in some cases, an app
    might be withdrawn from the App Store, which means it is no longer
    available for download/installation on a new device.

    My problem in the (on-topic for this Android group) Play Store is not so
    much apps disappearing but rather the 'won't work on this device' label.
    And they won't even let me try.

    That *is* a difference with (free (as in no-cost)) Android apps and
    many free Windows software. That's why I save Android APKs

    Me too. I have a Groundhog newsreader installed on this Amazon Fire tablet
    from my APK collection and use it as a reader. Much easier to read with
    than the PhoNews reader. Unfortunately Groundhog can't transmit on later
    Android versions because part of the menu is missing so I have to revert to
    PhoNews if I want to say anything.

    and
    Windows install packages, in case I want/need to install them on a new >device. (Case in point: The *22 year old* Hamster news server which
    brings you this article! :-))

    Gosh, I've made it over a week now without any Windows stuff in the house.
    Haven't missed it a bit...

    [Apple wars/name calling/cross posting edited out. Well actually the cross
    posting was eliminated by a PhoNews newsreader bug. Or perhaps it's a
    feature more newsreaders need?]

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Frank Slootweg@21:1/5 to AJL on Wed Apr 9 17:29:30 2025
    AJL <noemail@none.com> wrote:
    On 4/9/25 8:35 AM, Frank Slootweg wrote:
    Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> wrote:

    ...free apps can be
    downloaded again from the original source.

    I have no beef in this (non-)discussion, but you can only download
    again, if the "original source" still exists!

    That's often - and probably even most of the time - the case for
    software downloaded from Apple's App Store. But in some cases, an app
    might be withdrawn from the App Store, which means it is no longer >available for download/installation on a new device.

    My problem in the (on-topic for this Android group) Play Store is not so
    much apps disappearing but rather the 'won't work on this device' label.
    And they won't even let me try.

    If it's a free (as in no-cost/not-paid) app, you can often find it on
    APK archive sites and try it that way. That's what I did for alleged incompatabilities, geo-fencing, etc.. My main source was/is apkpure.com
    where you can also search on the 'id=' which you see in the Google Play
    URL.

    [...]

    Gosh, I've made it over a week now without any Windows stuff in the house.
    Haven't missed it a bit...

    Are you for real!? What on earth will you do with all that spare time?
    Don't you know that we're all *entitled* to problems!?

    [...]

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From AJL@21:1/5 to Frank Slootweg on Wed Apr 9 19:33:12 2025
    On 4/9/25 10:29 AM, Frank Slootweg wrote:
    AJL <noemail@none.com> wrote:

    My problem in the Play Store is not so
    much apps disappearing but rather the 'won't work on this device' label.
    And they won't even let me try.

    If it's a free (as in no-cost/not-paid) app, you can often find it on
    APK archive sites and try it that way. That's what I did for alleged >incompatabilities, geo-fencing, etc.. My main source was/is apkpure.com
    where you can also search on the 'id=' which you see in the Google Play
    URL.

    I used to get apks from several sources in the olden days when my Android
    toys didn't have anything sensitive on them. Only my (gasp) Windows stuff
    had the sensitive stuff back then. But nowadays since I've been Google
    assimilated, my Chromium stuff won't let anything in except the Play Store.
    It's apparently a "security" thing and since my Chromebooks and tablet are
    locked together (a change on one is a change on all) one bad app could
    spread like a virus... 8-O

    But then I'm not completely celibate. I do take some chances. Installing my
    Google account and some external Android apps on my Amazon tablets may not
    be in security's best interests. Also that's where I do use some of my old
    apks (like Groundhog). And mixing the Amazon App store apps with my Play
    Store stuff? I'm kinda surprised that Google and Amazon haven't griped
    about each other. But so far (fingers crossed) all seems to be working
    well...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From AJL@21:1/5 to Frank Slootweg on Fri Apr 11 15:04:04 2025
    On 4/11/25 5:00 AM, Frank Slootweg wrote:
    Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> wrote:
    Frank Slootweg, 2025-04-09 17:35:

    Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> wrote:
    Marion, 2025-04-07 22:34:

    [...]
    When an IPA is installed on an iOS device, it's signed with a
    provisioning profile that is tied to a specific Apple Developer
    account and a set of authorized devices. For apps downloaded from
    the App Store, this process is managed by Apple and linked to your
    Apple ID.

    All apps, even those which might be considered "free & open
    source" suffer this process, since every single app ever
    downloaded from Apple's App Store restricts their usage to the
    Apple ID that originally downloaded them.

    Well - in that case this is irrelevant, since free apps can be
    downloaded again from the original source.

    I have no beef in this (non-)discussion, but you can only download
    again, if the "original source" still exists!

    Which also applies to Android. So what?

    Ah! You now resort to lying by omission? In the (big) part you
    'conveniently' silently snipped, I specificall said (amongst others)
    "That's why I save Android APKs ...".
    So in the iOS case,


    if the original source does no longer exist,
    you're out of luck, but in the Android case, you can install the app
    from it's backed up APK.

    Sometimes I use an old backed up apk even when the Play Store and/or Amazon
    Appstore still has the app available because I like the old version better.
    Course I have to turn off the automatic app updates and do them manually, a
    bit of a PITA but then I've got lots of free time...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From AJL@21:1/5 to Marion on Fri Apr 11 19:49:38 2025
    On 4/11/25 11:36 AM, Marion wrote:
    On Fri, 11 Apr 2025 15:04:04 -0000 (UTC), AJL wrote :

    Sometimes I use an old backed up apk even when the Play Store and/or Amazon >> Appstore still has the app available because I like the old version better. >> Course I have to turn off the automatic app updates and do them manually, a >> bit of a PITA but then I've got lots of free time...


    How is it a "bit of a pita" when every APK you installed is always >automatically saved to your Windows PC (as Android is mounted as a drive)?
    <https://i.postimg.cc/hjkVFyqJ/scrcpy07.jpg> Android mnt as drive letter


    I think you misunderstood me. Let me give an example. I'm now posting using
    an Amazon Fire HD10 tablet. It came with the Amazon Appstore. I have since
    installed Google stuff on it and thus it also has the Play Store. Both
    stores came set to automatically update apps.

    So when I install an old preferred apk version of a still available (in the
    stores) app on this tablet it wouldn't stay old long because one of the
    stores would automatically update it to the current version.

    So I've turned off auto-updating in both stores. The PITA is that I now have
    to periodically check both stores and manually update the other apps that
    do need updates...


    All you do is select APKs in Windows File Explore GUI, and just slide them


    Perhaps you missed it but I announced here a few weeks ago that I had a
    religious experience and gave away all my Windows stuff. I am now going
    exclusively to the Google/Android church. I do get the shakes sometimes
    cause I do kinda miss the old TB newsreader. On the other hand PhoNew's one
    group only posting defect/feature keeps me safe and out of the group
    wars...



    over to the two-foot-tall Android image on the monitor to install them
    <https://i.postimg.cc/wvsbcNBz/scrcpy05.jpg> Drag & drop APK to install

    You can install a thousand APKs in a single action.

    *How is drag-and-drop a PITA?*

    Especially when the APKs are saved, hands off, totally automatically.
    <https://i.postimg.cc/9FJMKYch/scrcpy21.jpg> Windows Drive: === Android

    Re-use of Android APKs is, I'd wager, the easiest of all platforms.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From AJL@21:1/5 to Marion on Sat Apr 12 02:20:57 2025
    On 4/11/25 6:01 PM, Marion wrote:
    On Fri, 11 Apr 2025 19:49:38 -0000 (UTC), AJL wrote :


    How is it a "bit of a pita" when every APK you installed is always >>>automatically saved to your Windows PC (as Android is mounted as a drive)? >>> <https://i.postimg.cc/hjkVFyqJ/scrcpy07.jpg> Android mnt as drive letter

    I think you misunderstood me. Let me give an example. I'm now posting using >> an Amazon Fire HD10 tablet. It came with the Amazon Appstore. I have since >> installed Google stuff on it and thus it also has the Play Store. Both
    stores came set to automatically update apps.

    Oh. I'm sorry. You're right. I don't use a newsreader so I don't know whom >I'm speaking with (unless I specifically look at the attribute line).

    I thought you were the guy who was trying to claim that Android APKs are
    done similarly to iOS IPAs, which put me in a bad mood responding to him.

    I apologize for being a dolt.

    So when I install an old preferred apk version of a still available (in the >> stores) app on this tablet it wouldn't stay old long because one of the
    stores would automatically update it to the current version.

    Yup. I agree. Your observation of what happens is likely what happens to
    most people, and, in fact, my wife drives me nuts because I put the last >known good version of PulseSMS on her phone and she lets it update!

    Obviously I don't even have the Google Play Store app on my phone, so any >update that it might do, it can't do - simply because it doesn't exist. :)

    But I do have the FOSS Google Play Store apps, which will update by default >(so obviously I turn that off for the reasons you so helpfully explained).

    So I've turned off auto-updating in both stores. The PITA is that I now have >> to periodically check both stores and manually update the other apps that >> do need updates...

    Yes. I agree. Although there _is_ a solution which most people don't know. >That solution is NOT intuitive. It's completely unintuitive in fact.

    Actually, what I'm going to tell you only one in a million people (my >estimate) have any inkling of - and I only know it because I'm not the kind >of guy that assumes things so I only know it because I *tested* it out.

    On Android, the Google Play Store app has a checkbox to "update apps" but
    in reality, it updates almost nothing. Yup. Almost nothing.
    <https://i.postimg.cc/HsXKj7WK/updateallapps01.jpg> <https://i.postimg.cc/4djB69pr/updateallapps02.jpg> <https://i.postimg.cc/02xKj04h/updateallapps03.jpg> <https://i.postimg.cc/3xxyCJYB/updateallapps04.jpg>

    The funny thing is it does that update of almost nothing without you even >being logged into a Google Account on your phone. Ask me how I know that.

    There are threads on this where I tested the Google App Store update
    against "real" updaters, and the difference was completely shocking.
    The real updaters go onto the Google Play Store repository and for every
    app that has an update, they give you a GUI that you can update it.
    If you want to update it.
    You don't have to.


    But what's SHOCKING different is the Google Play Store update mechanism is >shocking deficient. It's so bad I'd assess it at almost totally worthless.


    I'm satisfied with how the Play Store updates this Amazon tablet considering
    that Google is a trespasser. When I check every few days (because
    auto-update is off) there usually are apps wanting update so it's working,
    perhaps not to your standards, but good enough for me (YMMV). And some apps
    wanting update in the Play Store were originally installed from the Amazon
    Appstore. Apparently Amazon uses older app versions that Google wants to
    update which I suppose is logical since the Fire OS is based on an earlier
    Android version.


    Even the Apple Play Store update mechanism is better than that of Google.
    In summary, and this is *important* because everyone "assumes"
    (incorrectly) that the Google Play Store "update" mechanism will update all >your apps that have available updates in the Google Play repo.
    It does not.
    It's not even close.
    You can see that easily by running two steps that I've run so I know this.
    1. Update using the Google Play Store update mechanism, and then,
    2. Run a real updater.
    You'll be shocked at the differences (hundreds of updates are missing!).
    Not to give you too much information, but there are updaters and there are >updaters, where some updaters actually look at other repositories, while >other updaters only look at the Google Play Store repository.

    Thanks for the info but I think I'd be pushing things trying to mod this
    tablet any more. It works as well as some much higher priced Android
    tablets I've had in the past. And it's light and very comfortable to hold.
    Amazon still updates the tablet OS from time to time and I do worry that
    one day it will kick Google out... 8-O

    BTW, For anyone reading this and thinking of trying the same Amazon/Google
    mod there is another benefit. Amazon Fire tablets come with ads on the
    lockscreen. For $30US Amazon will remove the ads. But with this Google mod
    the lockscreen ads go away, no 30 bucks needed. Take that Amazon...




    Here are some from my notes... if you're interested in checking them out.
    1. Obtainium <https://github.com/ImranR98/Obtainium>
    GitHub, GitLab, SourceForge, F-Droid, IzzyOnDroid,
    APKPure, Aptoide, Uptodown, APKMirror (Track-Only), etc.
    2. APK Updater <https://github.com/rumboalla/apkupdater>
    GitHub, GitLab, F-Droid, APKPure, Aptoide, APKMirror, IzzyOnDroid, etc.
    3. App Updater <com.update.software.updateallapps> (has ads)
    Google Play Store repository

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marion@21:1/5 to All on Tue Apr 15 18:09:48 2025
    XPost: comp.sys.mac.system, alt.os.linux, comp.sys.mac.apps

    On Sun, 13 Apr 2025 18:50:04 -0000 (UTC), candycanearter07 wrote :


    Then use the far simpler method of connecting to your Windows machine via
    the Files app. Make sure you have Sharing enabled in Windows first. Simple >> and new apps required.

    Thanks, but I use Linux, and I already stated I'm fine with just using
    ifuse and a usb cable. Or KDE Connect.

    I will agree with anyone who says something sensible that is logically defensible, where I agree with candycane that Linux iFuse is the way to go.

    What AFC/iFuse allows on Linux is bidirectional iOS transfers over USB!

    When I used to dual boot my Windows desktop to Ubuntu, I was initially
    shocked at how *easy* it was to attain USB read access to iOS' file system!
    <https://i.postimg.cc/s2x0f9Js/files14.jpg> Linux, win10 & iOS together
    <https://i.postimg.cc/g269S8rT/files13.jpg> How does macOS work with iOS?
    <https://i.postimg.cc/pVJf72fN/files12.jpg> iOS hacks very often will fail
    <https://i.postimg.cc/cChf8mx1/files11.jpg> iOS requires hacks to copy
    <https://i.postimg.cc/9MGdc2s7/files10.jpg> Android is 2-way fast over USB
    <https://i.postimg.cc/mDx3xkp4/files09.jpg> iOS is only DCIM & only 1-way
    <https://i.postimg.cc/3xcCBngd/files08.jpg> iOS is a dumb brick on Windows
    <https://i.postimg.cc/KjK4nHwf/files07.jpg> Ubuntu is two-way, everything
    <https://i.postimg.cc/Jhmy9KH7/files06.jpg> Ubuntu iFuse is just magical
    <https://i.postimg.cc/qqg61Rh8/files05.jpg> Ubuntu, movies _to_ iOS on USB
    <https://i.postimg.cc/QMk7tvZW/files04.jpg> Ubuntu is two way, everything
    <https://i.postimg.cc/d3SGkdgr/files03.jpg> Android is two way, everything
    <https://i.postimg.cc/L8b18Zmx/files02.jpg> iOS "Files" is nothing useful
    <https://i.postimg.cc/NFkXsJ0X/files01.jpg> iOS/Win is 1-way & DCIM only

    That's USB. Not SMB. Not anything else. It's USB file transfers with iOS!

    Since all that USB magic was done by iFuse, I desperately searched for a Windows implementation of iFuse - but alas - it doesn't appear to exist.

    That's sad because with tricks using Apple File Conduit (AFC) over USB that only one in a million people are aware of, you can write to iOS' filesys.

    Yes. Write. To much of the iOS filesys. Not just to DCIM!
    <http://img4.imagetitan.com/img.php?image=18_ios180.jpg> Read & write all!
    <http://img4.imagetitan.com/img.php?image=18_ios170.jpg> Anywhere you want
    <http://img4.imagetitan.com/img.php?image=18_ios160.jpg> Any file you want
    <http://img4.imagetitan.com/img.php?image=18_ios150.jpg> Copy Win10 to iOS
    <http://img4.imagetitan.com/img.php?image=18_ios140.jpg> read & write iOS
    <http://img4.imagetitan.com/img.php?image=18_ios130.jpg> iFuse mounts all!
    <http://img4.imagetitan.com/img.php?image=18_ios120.jpg> iFuse mounts iOS
    <http://img4.imagetitan.com/img.php?image=18_ios110.jpg> iFuse Windows mnt
    <http://img4.imagetitan.com/img.php?image=18_ios100.jpg> iFuse is native
    <http://img4.imagetitan.com/img.php?image=18_ios090.jpg> Nobody knows this
    <http://img4.imagetitan.com/img.php?image=18_ios080.jpg> The trick!
    <http://img4.imagetitan.com/img.php?image=18_ios070.jpg> Look closely
    <http://img4.imagetitan.com/img.php?image=18_ios060.jpg> Both read & write
    <http://img4.imagetitan.com/img.php?image=18_ios050.jpg> Including DCIM
    <http://img4.imagetitan.com/img.php?image=18_ios040.jpg> View iOS filesys
    <http://img4.imagetitan.com/img.php?image=18_ios030.jpg> iOS mounts
    <http://img4.imagetitan.com/img.php?image=18_ios020.jpg> Allow access?
    <http://img4.imagetitan.com/img.php?image=18_ios010.jpg> Trust Computer?
    <http://img4.imagetitan.com/img.php?image=18_ios000.jpg> Ubuntu before iOS

    Notice I copied huge feature-length films from Ubuntu to iOS sandboxes!
    Alas, iFuse & AFC do not exist (AFAIK) on either Windows and Android.

    If anyone knows of an AFC/iFuse implementation on Android/Windows, please
    let me know as being able to do USB bidirectional file xfer is fantastic!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marion@21:1/5 to badgolferman on Tue Apr 15 17:54:11 2025
    XPost: comp.sys.mac.system, alt.os.linux, comp.sys.mac.apps
    XPost: comp.mobile.ipad

    On Tue, 15 Apr 2025 17:26:01 -0000 (UTC), badgolferman wrote :


    Actions speak louder than words, little boy. And you always side with
    Arlen - religiously (you even forgave him for impersonating you lol).

    I will agree with anyone who speaks the truth or makes a rational
    statement, even you on occasion. But I learned my lesson the last time
    I agreed with you when I realized you were lying.

    Hi badgolferman,

    Logic. And sense. Equals reason.

    Like you, and like any logically sensible adult, I will agree with anyone
    who makes a claim that is logically and sensibly sound, and you know that.

    I will even openly & willingly apologize publicly if I say something that
    turns out to be incorrect - and you know that also.

    These Apple trolls? Hmmm.... they never do either.
    Their only goal is to defend Apple's honor... to the death. No matter what.

    With respect to the technical problem of copying files off of iOS to any
    other platform without using the cloud, the Apple trolls claim that iTunes
    can do it and that SMB can do it.

    And yet, Apple publicly disavows any support whatsoever of Linux.
    And Android.

    So how do these Apple trolls copy files from iOS to Android?
    (HINT: They don't. They lied.)

    When the Apple trolls claim to copy from iOS to Android using the Files SMB capability, they're lying because it's not possible (to my knowledge).

    If it is possible to copy from iOS to Android using SMB, let them tell me
    how they did it because Frank Slootweg taught me years ago that an unrooted Android can't set up an SMB server (due to the SMB ports being below 1024).

    And how do these Apple trolls use iTunes on Windows safely & securely?
    (HINT: They don't. They lied.)

    The Apple trolls are banking on us not knowing the facts about iTunes.

    It has been *many* years since the iTunes bloatware abomination had the capability of copying the IPA to the Windows platform (and even then,
    iTunes grabbed that IPA from the App Store - not from the iOS device!)

    So the only way they're doing it, today, is that they're not.
    They lied.

    Not only does that many years old iTunes bloatware abomination have known zero-day exploit which Apple has not fixed in those deprecated versions,
    but if the Apple trolls were to initiate that backup today using that old software, it *still* grabs the IPA from the *current* iOS App Store.

    So they lied doubly so (since what they claim is impossible to do).
    They can NOT get older IPAs. They can only get the *current* IPA.

    Not only do these Apple trolls have to use known exploited bloatware to do that, but that bloatware doesn't work on Android nor on Linux (which Apple
    says they will never support).

    In summary, I think I make a logically sensible reasonable case against
    using iTunes to copy files between iOS and every other platform we use.

    The Apple trolls vehemently (actually viciously) disagree. By lying.
    (HINT: That's what Apple trolls do.)

    Apple trolls think nothing of lying to defend Apple's honor to the death.
    --
    This lack of logic & sense has been what the Apple Trolls have been doing
    for decades on any newsgroup which contains any other operating system.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Marion on Tue Apr 15 11:26:14 2025
    XPost: comp.sys.mac.system, alt.os.linux, comp.sys.mac.apps
    XPost: comp.mobile.ipad

    On 2025-04-15 10:54, Marion wrote:
    On Tue, 15 Apr 2025 17:26:01 -0000 (UTC), badgolferman wrote :


    Actions speak louder than words, little boy. And you always side with
    Arlen - religiously (you even forgave him for impersonating you lol).

    I will agree with anyone who speaks the truth or makes a rational
    statement, even you on occasion. But I learned my lesson the last time
    I agreed with you when I realized you were lying.

    Hi badgolferman,

    Logic. And sense. Equals reason.

    Like you, and like any logically sensible adult, I will agree with anyone
    who makes a claim that is logically and sensibly sound, and you know that.

    I will even openly & willingly apologize publicly if I say something that turns out to be incorrect - and you know that also.

    You claimed I could own a BMW 135i because I didn't know how "bimmer"
    and "beemer" were used...

    ...yet you said just today:

    "Alan Baker has owned a bimmer for years and yet disputed what they're
    commonly called in technical circles; and Alan Baker claims to 'teach
    racing' and yet clearly has never studied the physics involved in
    navigating differently various basic curves."

    And given that I can prove beyond any doubt that I am a member (and past chairman) of the Race Drivers Committee of the Sports Car Club of
    British Columbia, and have SHOWN the proof, the last part of that
    sentence is clearly false as well.

    'The Race Drivers Committee organizes and operates the SCCBC Race Driver Training Program. The driver training program is an important part of
    preparing to enter the sport of racing at Mission and is a prerequisite
    to acquiring a Novice race license. The twice annual Race Driver
    Training program provides unparalleled instruction on handling vehicles
    under extreme conditions. For more information, visit the Race Drivers
    Training Program page.

    Membership on the Race Drivers Committee is by invitation only. The
    committee is comprised of some of the best racers in British Columbia.
    Most committee members have won championships in their class while
    others have done consistently well over the years and have proven
    themselves capable of excelling in all race conditions.'

    <https://www.sccbc.net/about-sccbc/race-drivers/>

    'SCCBC Race Drivers Committee

    Race Drivers Committee Chairman Alan Baker
    Driver Training Registrar Keith Robinson'

    <https://web.archive.org/web/20230209055254/https://www.sccbc.net/about-sccbc/race-drivers/>


    These Apple trolls? Hmmm.... they never do either.
    Their only goal is to defend Apple's honor... to the death. No matter what.

    With respect to the technical problem of copying files off of iOS to any other platform without using the cloud, the Apple trolls claim that iTunes can do it and that SMB can do it.
    And yet, Apple publicly disavows any support whatsoever of Linux.

    Another factual claim without any supporting evidence...

    And Android.

    So how do these Apple trolls copy files from iOS to Android?
    (HINT: They don't. They lied.)

    No one I saw claimed that files can be copied from iOS to Android.


    When the Apple trolls claim to copy from iOS to Android using the Files SMB capability, they're lying because it's not possible (to my knowledge).

    No one I saw claimed that.

    The rest of your straw man argument snipped.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jolly Roger@21:1/5 to Marion on Tue Apr 15 21:36:03 2025
    XPost: comp.sys.mac.system, alt.os.linux, comp.sys.mac.apps
    XPost: comp.mobile.ipad

    On 2025-04-15, Marion <marion@facts.com> wrote:
    On Tue, 15 Apr 2025 17:26:01 -0000 (UTC), badgolferman wrote :


    Actions speak louder than words, little boy. And you always side with >>>Arlen - religiously (you even forgave him for impersonating you lol).

    I will agree with anyone who speaks the truth or makes a rational
    statement, even you on occasion. But I learned my lesson the last
    time I agreed with you when I realized you were lying.

    You *regularly* side with Arlen, who *constantly* lies. So your
    judgement there is laughably questionable at best, and a fucking joke at
    worst.

    But I'll indulge you anyway: Go ahead and point out this supposed "lie"
    you claim I made, badgolferman. Absent of that, it's you who are lying.
    🙂

    --
    E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
    I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

    JR

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marion@21:1/5 to AJL on Sat Apr 12 04:51:55 2025
    On Sat, 12 Apr 2025 02:20:57 -0000 (UTC), AJL wrote :


    But what's SHOCKING different is the Google Play Store update mechanism is >>shocking deficient. It's so bad I'd assess it at almost totally worthless.

    I'm satisfied with how the Play Store updates this Amazon tablet considering
    that Google is a trespasser. When I check every few days (because
    auto-update is off) there usually are apps wanting update so it's working,
    perhaps not to your standards, but good enough for me (YMMV). And some apps
    wanting update in the Play Store were originally installed from the Amazon
    Appstore. Apparently Amazon uses older app versions that Google wants to
    update which I suppose is logical since the Fire OS is based on an earlier
    Android version.

    If it's working for you, that's all that matters. I don't do Amazon or
    Samsung stores, but I often have an app that I don't remember if it came
    from F-Droid, Google Play, GitHub, or what, but the "signatures" get in the
    way of updating it. I never bothered to figure out a real solution.

    So I just uninstall it completely.
    And re-install the update.

    That always works.

    You'll be shocked at the differences (hundreds of updates are missing!). >>Not to give you too much information, but there are updaters and there are >>updaters, where some updaters actually look at other repositories, while >>other updaters only look at the Google Play Store repository.

    Thanks for the info but I think I'd be pushing things trying to mod this
    tablet any more. It works as well as some much higher priced Android
    tablets I've had in the past. And it's light and very comfortable to hold.
    Amazon still updates the tablet OS from time to time and I do worry that
    one day it will kick Google out... 8-O

    Personally, I think Android has matured, so the version isn't all that important. Same with iOS and Windows. Linux too but I haven't used Ubuntu
    or CentOS in a long time so I'm out of that arena lately.

    BTW, For anyone reading this and thinking of trying the same Amazon/Google
    mod there is another benefit. Amazon Fire tablets come with ads on the
    lockscreen. For $30US Amazon will remove the ads. But with this Google mod
    the lockscreen ads go away, no 30 bucks needed. Take that Amazon...

    Good for you that you found a way around the ads. I don't think I've seen
    an ad in a while, although I did see one in the cartoonify apps so about
    once every few months I see an ad (but only in apps like the cartooning).

    With over 900 apps on my phone, only 1 or 2 have ads, so that's not too
    shabby either. We both found a way to remove them - and that's good.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)