• Re: EI mew ;abeling regulations June 20th 2025

    From Andy Burns@21:1/5 to Pamela on Sun Jan 5 16:29:15 2025
    XPost: uk.telecom.mobile, misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    Pamela wrote:

    Wasn't there also a requirement for the battery to be user replaceable?

    Not in effect for a couple of years, I think ...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Scott@21:1/5 to usenet.tweed@gmail.com on Sun Jan 5 17:25:51 2025
    XPost: uk.telecom.mobile, misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On Sun, 5 Jan 2025 16:45:14 -0000 (UTC), Tweed
    <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> wrote:

    Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> wrote:
    Pamela wrote:

    Wasn't there also a requirement for the battery to be user replaceable?

    Not in effect for a couple of years, I think ...


    https://environment.ec.europa.eu/news/new-law-more-sustainable-circular-and-safe-batteries-enters-force-2023-08-17_en

    2027, though I canÆt find an exact date. Not just phones either.

    Electric vehicles?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Scott@21:1/5 to usenet.tweed@gmail.com on Sun Jan 5 17:44:47 2025
    XPost: uk.telecom.mobile, misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On Sun, 5 Jan 2025 17:33:29 -0000 (UTC), Tweed
    <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> wrote:

    Scott <newsgroups@gefion.myzen.co.uk> wrote:
    On Sun, 5 Jan 2025 16:45:14 -0000 (UTC), Tweed
    <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> wrote:

    Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> wrote:
    Pamela wrote:

    Wasn't there also a requirement for the battery to be user replaceable? >>>>
    Not in effect for a couple of years, I think ...


    https://environment.ec.europa.eu/news/new-law-more-sustainable-circular-and-safe-batteries-enters-force-2023-08-17_en

    2027, though I can?t find an exact date. Not just phones either.

    Electric vehicles?

    I donÆt think so. Things like power tools, radios, toothbrushes etc. A user >replaceable EV battery could be quite a dangerous affair.

    It might improve the residual value though.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Scott@21:1/5 to usenet.tweed@gmail.com on Sun Jan 5 18:05:16 2025
    XPost: uk.telecom.mobile, misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On Sun, 5 Jan 2025 17:47:44 -0000 (UTC), Tweed
    <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> wrote:

    Scott <newsgroups@gefion.myzen.co.uk> wrote:
    On Sun, 5 Jan 2025 17:33:29 -0000 (UTC), Tweed
    <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> wrote:

    Scott <newsgroups@gefion.myzen.co.uk> wrote:
    On Sun, 5 Jan 2025 16:45:14 -0000 (UTC), Tweed
    <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> wrote:

    Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> wrote:
    Pamela wrote:

    Wasn't there also a requirement for the battery to be user replaceable? >>>>>>
    Not in effect for a couple of years, I think ...


    https://environment.ec.europa.eu/news/new-law-more-sustainable-circular-and-safe-batteries-enters-force-2023-08-17_en

    2027, though I can?t find an exact date. Not just phones either.

    Electric vehicles?

    I don?t think so. Things like power tools, radios, toothbrushes etc. A user >>> replaceable EV battery could be quite a dangerous affair.

    It might improve the residual value though.

    Unlikely. Batteries are around ú2500 per 10kWhr retail judging by the cost
    of a house battery.

    Would it not allow an aftermarket for generic batteries instead of
    being bound by the OEM? I was offered a second hand Zoe at a very low
    price at one stage but when I realised the battery arrangements (lease
    from Renault) and the very low range of such a model I dismissed the
    idea very quickly.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Theo@21:1/5 to Scott on Sun Jan 5 20:19:22 2025
    XPost: uk.telecom.mobile, misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    In uk.telecom.mobile Scott <newsgroups@gefion.myzen.co.uk> wrote:
    On Sun, 5 Jan 2025 17:47:44 -0000 (UTC), Tweed
    <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> wrote:

    Scott <newsgroups@gefion.myzen.co.uk> wrote:
    On Sun, 5 Jan 2025 17:33:29 -0000 (UTC), Tweed
    <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> wrote:

    Scott <newsgroups@gefion.myzen.co.uk> wrote:
    On Sun, 5 Jan 2025 16:45:14 -0000 (UTC), Tweed
    <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> wrote:

    Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> wrote:
    Pamela wrote:

    Wasn't there also a requirement for the battery to be user replaceable?

    Not in effect for a couple of years, I think ...


    https://environment.ec.europa.eu/news/new-law-more-sustainable-circular-and-safe-batteries-enters-force-2023-08-17_en

    2027, though I can?t find an exact date. Not just phones either.

    Electric vehicles?

    I don?t think so. Things like power tools, radios, toothbrushes etc. A user
    replaceable EV battery could be quite a dangerous affair.

    It might improve the residual value though.

    Unlikely. Batteries are around £2500 per 10kWhr retail judging by the cost >of a house battery.

    Would it not allow an aftermarket for generic batteries instead of
    being bound by the OEM? I was offered a second hand Zoe at a very low
    price at one stage but when I realised the battery arrangements (lease
    from Renault) and the very low range of such a model I dismissed the
    idea very quickly.

    EV batteries weigh about 200kg. Consumers aren't going to be changing them because they don't have the lifting gear (hydraulic lifts and scissor
    tables). If you have gear unscrewing them from the bottom of the vehicle is not complicated, although could be dangerous without safety precautions. In
    no world are consumers going to be changing them like they change wiper
    blades.

    Batteries are designed to fit the car so you need to swap in an OEM battery
    - just like engines it may theoretically be possible to swap something else, but it's a lot of work (mechanically, electrically and software). There is
    no standard 1.6 engine that'll fit in every car, and batteries are similarly bespoke.

    Theo

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Scott@21:1/5 to theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk on Sun Jan 5 20:44:40 2025
    XPost: uk.telecom.mobile, misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 05 Jan 2025 20:19:22 +0000 (GMT), Theo
    <theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> wrote:

    In uk.telecom.mobile Scott <newsgroups@gefion.myzen.co.uk> wrote:
    On Sun, 5 Jan 2025 17:47:44 -0000 (UTC), Tweed
    <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> wrote:

    Scott <newsgroups@gefion.myzen.co.uk> wrote:
    On Sun, 5 Jan 2025 17:33:29 -0000 (UTC), Tweed
    <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> wrote:

    Scott <newsgroups@gefion.myzen.co.uk> wrote:
    On Sun, 5 Jan 2025 16:45:14 -0000 (UTC), Tweed
    <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> wrote:

    Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> wrote:
    Pamela wrote:

    Wasn't there also a requirement for the battery to be user replaceable?

    Not in effect for a couple of years, I think ...


    https://environment.ec.europa.eu/news/new-law-more-sustainable-circular-and-safe-batteries-enters-force-2023-08-17_en

    2027, though I can?t find an exact date. Not just phones either.

    Electric vehicles?

    I don?t think so. Things like power tools, radios, toothbrushes etc. A user
    replaceable EV battery could be quite a dangerous affair.

    It might improve the residual value though.

    Unlikely. Batteries are around ú2500 per 10kWhr retail judging by the cost >> >of a house battery.

    Would it not allow an aftermarket for generic batteries instead of
    being bound by the OEM? I was offered a second hand Zoe at a very low
    price at one stage but when I realised the battery arrangements (lease
    from Renault) and the very low range of such a model I dismissed the
    idea very quickly.

    EV batteries weigh about 200kg. Consumers aren't going to be changing them >because they don't have the lifting gear (hydraulic lifts and scissor >tables). If you have gear unscrewing them from the bottom of the vehicle is >not complicated, although could be dangerous without safety precautions. In >no world are consumers going to be changing them like they change wiper >blades.

    Batteries are designed to fit the car so you need to swap in an OEM battery
    - just like engines it may theoretically be possible to swap something else, >but it's a lot of work (mechanically, electrically and software). There is >no standard 1.6 engine that'll fit in every car, and batteries are similarly >bespoke.

    That puts paid to the idea of having a standard battery for all the
    cars and swapping them from underneath at the filling station using a mechanical arm as was suggested at one time :-)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Your Name@21:1/5 to Scott on Mon Jan 6 10:15:03 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, uk.telecom.mobile

    On 2025-01-05 20:44:40 +0000, Scott said:
    On 05 Jan 2025 20:19:22 +0000 (GMT), Theo
    <theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> wrote:
    In uk.telecom.mobile Scott <newsgroups@gefion.myzen.co.uk> wrote:
    On Sun, 5 Jan 2025 17:47:44 -0000 (UTC), Tweed
    <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> wrote:
    Scott <newsgroups@gefion.myzen.co.uk> wrote:
    On Sun, 5 Jan 2025 17:33:29 -0000 (UTC), Tweed
    <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> wrote:
    Scott <newsgroups@gefion.myzen.co.uk> wrote:
    On Sun, 5 Jan 2025 16:45:14 -0000 (UTC), Tweed
    <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> wrote:
    Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> wrote:
    Pamela wrote:

    Wasn't there also a requirement for the battery to be user replaceable?

    Not in effect for a couple of years, I think ...

    https://environment.ec.europa.eu/news/new-law-more-sustainable-circular-and-safe-batteries-enters-force-2023-08-17_en


    2027, though I can?t find an exact date. Not just phones either. >>>>>>>
    Electric vehicles?

    I don?t think so. Things like power tools, radios, toothbrushes etc. A >>>>>> user replaceable EV battery could be quite a dangerous affair.

    It might improve the residual value though.

    Unlikely. Batteries are around ú2500 per 10kWhr retail judging by the
    cost of a house battery.

    Would it not allow an aftermarket for generic batteries instead of
    being bound by the OEM? I was offered a second hand Zoe at a very low
    price at one stage but when I realised the battery arrangements (lease
    from Renault) and the very low range of such a model I dismissed the
    idea very quickly.

    EV batteries weigh about 200kg. Consumers aren't going to be changing them >> because they don't have the lifting gear (hydraulic lifts and scissor
    tables). If you have gear unscrewing them from the bottom of the vehicle is >> not complicated, although could be dangerous without safety precautions. In >> no world are consumers going to be changing them like they change wiper
    blades.

    Batteries are designed to fit the car so you need to swap in an OEM battery >> - just like engines it may theoretically be possible to swap something else, >> but it's a lot of work (mechanically, electrically and software). There is >> no standard 1.6 engine that'll fit in every car, and batteries are similarly >> bespoke.

    That puts paid to the idea of having a standard battery for all the
    cars and swapping them from underneath at the filling station using a mechanical arm as was suggested at one time :-)

    There are already some battery pack swapping robot places for EV cars
    and it can be done in five minutes or less, although it depends on the
    car model, etc. and reportedly is expensive. Most of these places are
    currently in China, but there are a few in other places (California has
    a few Nio swap stations).

    At one point there was the idea of having multiple smaller battery
    packs that could be easily user swappable in the same simple "plug 'n'
    play" way as many electric tools. It was also suggest the small battery
    packs could be swapped at places like supermarkets and petrol stations
    (deposit a flat battery, take a full one, and the flat battery is
    recharged for another user). This idea hasn't been taken up by any
    manufacturer yet.

    Part of the problem is the cvar manufacturers all having their own
    designs for the battery packs and how they are fitted. There would need
    to be a standardisation before easy battery swapping became a real
    possibility.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Carlos E.R.@21:1/5 to Scott on Sun Jan 5 22:29:21 2025
    XPost: uk.telecom.mobile, misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 2025-01-05 21:44, Scott wrote:
    On 05 Jan 2025 20:19:22 +0000 (GMT), Theo
    <theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> wrote:

    In uk.telecom.mobile Scott <newsgroups@gefion.myzen.co.uk> wrote:
    On Sun, 5 Jan 2025 17:47:44 -0000 (UTC), Tweed
    <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> wrote:

    Scott <newsgroups@gefion.myzen.co.uk> wrote:
    On Sun, 5 Jan 2025 17:33:29 -0000 (UTC), Tweed
    <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> wrote:

    Scott <newsgroups@gefion.myzen.co.uk> wrote:
    On Sun, 5 Jan 2025 16:45:14 -0000 (UTC), Tweed
    <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> wrote:

    Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> wrote:
    Pamela wrote:

    Wasn't there also a requirement for the battery to be user replaceable?

    Not in effect for a couple of years, I think ...


    https://environment.ec.europa.eu/news/new-law-more-sustainable-circular-and-safe-batteries-enters-force-2023-08-17_en

    2027, though I can?t find an exact date. Not just phones either. >>>>>>>
    Electric vehicles?

    I don?t think so. Things like power tools, radios, toothbrushes etc. A user
    replaceable EV battery could be quite a dangerous affair.

    It might improve the residual value though.

    Unlikely. Batteries are around £2500 per 10kWhr retail judging by the cost
    of a house battery.

    Would it not allow an aftermarket for generic batteries instead of
    being bound by the OEM? I was offered a second hand Zoe at a very low
    price at one stage but when I realised the battery arrangements (lease
    from Renault) and the very low range of such a model I dismissed the
    idea very quickly.

    EV batteries weigh about 200kg. Consumers aren't going to be changing them >> because they don't have the lifting gear (hydraulic lifts and scissor
    tables). If you have gear unscrewing them from the bottom of the vehicle is >> not complicated, although could be dangerous without safety precautions. In >> no world are consumers going to be changing them like they change wiper
    blades.

    Batteries are designed to fit the car so you need to swap in an OEM battery >> - just like engines it may theoretically be possible to swap something else, >> but it's a lot of work (mechanically, electrically and software). There is >> no standard 1.6 engine that'll fit in every car, and batteries are similarly >> bespoke.

    That puts paid to the idea of having a standard battery for all the
    cars and swapping them from underneath at the filling station using a mechanical arm as was suggested at one time :-)

    No, because those cars and their batteries were designed for this method.

    --
    Cheers, Carlos.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Isaac Montara@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jan 3 00:09:11 2025
    XPost: uk.telecom.mobile, misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    Anyone know how existing & new Google, Samsung & Apple phones are faring? https://energy-efficient-products.ec.europa.eu/product-list/smartphones-and-tablets_en

    1. Resistance to accidental drops or scratches
    & protection from dust & water

    2. Sufficiently durable batteries which can withstand
    at least 800 charge and discharge cycles
    while retaining at least 80% of their initial capacity

    3. Rules on disassembly and repair, including obligations
    for producers to make critical spare parts available
    within 5-10 working days, and for 7 years after
    the end of sales of the product model on the EU market

    4. Availability of operating system upgrades for longer periods
    (at least 5 years from the date of the end of placement on
    the market of the last unit of a product model)

    5. Non-discriminatory access for professional repairers
    to any software or firmware needed for the replacement

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Scott@21:1/5 to IsaacMontara@nospam.com on Fri Jan 3 09:47:10 2025
    XPost: uk.telecom.mobile, misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On Fri, 3 Jan 2025 00:09:11 -0500, Isaac Montara
    <IsaacMontara@nospam.com> wrote:

    Anyone know how existing & new Google, Samsung & Apple phones are faring? >https://energy-efficient-products.ec.europa.eu/product-list/smartphones-and-tablets_en

    1. Resistance to accidental drops or scratches
    & protection from dust & water

    2. Sufficiently durable batteries which can withstand
    at least 800 charge and discharge cycles
    while retaining at least 80% of their initial capacity

    3. Rules on disassembly and repair, including obligations
    for producers to make critical spare parts available
    within 5-10 working days, and for 7 years after
    the end of sales of the product model on the EU market

    4. Availability of operating system upgrades for longer periods
    (at least 5 years from the date of the end of placement on
    the market of the last unit of a product model)

    5. Non-discriminatory access for professional repairers
    to any software or firmware needed for the replacement

    Will these regulations apply in the UK?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Java Jive@21:1/5 to Scott on Fri Jan 3 10:04:03 2025
    XPost: uk.telecom.mobile, misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 2025-01-03 09:47, Scott wrote:

    On Fri, 3 Jan 2025 00:09:11 -0500, Isaac Montara
    <IsaacMontara@nospam.com> wrote:

    Anyone know how existing & new Google, Samsung & Apple phones are faring?
    https://energy-efficient-products.ec.europa.eu/product-list/smartphones-and-tablets_en

    1. Resistance to accidental drops or scratches
    & protection from dust & water

    2. Sufficiently durable batteries which can withstand
    at least 800 charge and discharge cycles
    while retaining at least 80% of their initial capacity

    3. Rules on disassembly and repair, including obligations
    for producers to make critical spare parts available
    within 5-10 working days, and for 7 years after
    the end of sales of the product model on the EU market

    4. Availability of operating system upgrades for longer periods
    (at least 5 years from the date of the end of placement on
    the market of the last unit of a product model)

    5. Non-discriminatory access for professional repairers
    to any software or firmware needed for the replacement

    Will these regulations apply in the UK?

    As you have had explained to you at least twice before, they will become
    a de facto standard, because it won't be worth the cost to the
    manufacturers to produce a substantially different model for every
    different market; on the contrary they will try and keep as much as
    possible of every product the same world-wide.

    --

    Fake news kills!

    I may be contacted via the contact address given on my website:
    www.macfh.co.uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Scott@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jan 3 10:08:16 2025
    XPost: uk.telecom.mobile, misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On Fri, 3 Jan 2025 10:04:03 +0000, Java Jive <java@evij.com.invalid>
    wrote:

    On 2025-01-03 09:47, Scott wrote:

    On Fri, 3 Jan 2025 00:09:11 -0500, Isaac Montara
    <IsaacMontara@nospam.com> wrote:

    Anyone know how existing & new Google, Samsung & Apple phones are faring? >>> https://energy-efficient-products.ec.europa.eu/product-list/smartphones-and-tablets_en

    1. Resistance to accidental drops or scratches
    & protection from dust & water

    2. Sufficiently durable batteries which can withstand
    at least 800 charge and discharge cycles
    while retaining at least 80% of their initial capacity

    3. Rules on disassembly and repair, including obligations
    for producers to make critical spare parts available
    within 5-10 working days, and for 7 years after
    the end of sales of the product model on the EU market

    4. Availability of operating system upgrades for longer periods
    (at least 5 years from the date of the end of placement on
    the market of the last unit of a product model)

    5. Non-discriminatory access for professional repairers
    to any software or firmware needed for the replacement

    Will these regulations apply in the UK?

    As you have had explained to you at least twice before, they will become
    a de facto standard, because it won't be worth the cost to the
    manufacturers to produce a substantially different model for every
    different market; on the contrary they will try and keep as much as
    possible of every product the same world-wide.

    Evidently it is not quite as simple as that. In another thread it is
    explained that Apple have withdrawn phones with lightning connectors
    from the EU market and continue to sell them in the UK. I take your
    point going forward about the de facto standard, but my question was
    whether the new regs would apply de jure.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From MikeS@21:1/5 to Tweed on Fri Jan 3 10:29:32 2025
    XPost: uk.telecom.mobile, misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 03/01/2025 10:14, Tweed wrote:
    Java Jive <java@evij.com.invalid> wrote:
    On 2025-01-03 09:47, Scott wrote:

    On Fri, 3 Jan 2025 00:09:11 -0500, Isaac Montara
    <IsaacMontara@nospam.com> wrote:

    Anyone know how existing & new Google, Samsung & Apple phones are faring? >>>> https://energy-efficient-products.ec.europa.eu/product-list/smartphones-and-tablets_en

    1. Resistance to accidental drops or scratches
    & protection from dust & water

    2. Sufficiently durable batteries which can withstand
    at least 800 charge and discharge cycles
    while retaining at least 80% of their initial capacity

    3. Rules on disassembly and repair, including obligations
    for producers to make critical spare parts available
    within 5-10 working days, and for 7 years after
    the end of sales of the product model on the EU market

    4. Availability of operating system upgrades for longer periods
    (at least 5 years from the date of the end of placement on
    the market of the last unit of a product model)

    5. Non-discriminatory access for professional repairers
    to any software or firmware needed for the replacement

    Will these regulations apply in the UK?

    As you have had explained to you at least twice before, they will become
    a de facto standard, because it won't be worth the cost to the
    manufacturers to produce a substantially different model for every
    different market; on the contrary they will try and keep as much as
    possible of every product the same world-wide.


    Well yes and no. The rules requiring Apple to allow third party App stores
    do not apply to GB and you can’t access them in GB. (I’m being very careful
    to exclude NI as I’m not sure how it works out for them). I pass no comment on the rights and wrongs of such App stores, just pointing out that the EU and GB markets are not entirely coincident.

    Take the rule for battery life. If your phone battery breaches the 800
    cycle 80% rule in the EU you might have rights to get the battery replaced free of charge, and you might not have those rights in GB.

    All of that is related to usage, not the design/construction of the
    phone hardware. Apple may well continue to sell some existing production
    in the UK but as already said it is unlikely they will make special UK
    versions of new hardware.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Java Jive@21:1/5 to Scott on Fri Jan 3 11:33:58 2025
    XPost: uk.telecom.mobile, misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 2025-01-03 10:08, Scott wrote:
    On Fri, 3 Jan 2025 10:04:03 +0000, Java Jive <java@evij.com.invalid>
    wrote:

    On 2025-01-03 09:47, Scott wrote:

    On Fri, 3 Jan 2025 00:09:11 -0500, Isaac Montara
    <IsaacMontara@nospam.com> wrote:

    Anyone know how existing & new Google, Samsung & Apple phones are faring? >>>> https://energy-efficient-products.ec.europa.eu/product-list/smartphones-and-tablets_en

    1. Resistance to accidental drops or scratches
    & protection from dust & water

    2. Sufficiently durable batteries which can withstand
    at least 800 charge and discharge cycles
    while retaining at least 80% of their initial capacity

    3. Rules on disassembly and repair, including obligations
    for producers to make critical spare parts available
    within 5-10 working days, and for 7 years after
    the end of sales of the product model on the EU market

    4. Availability of operating system upgrades for longer periods
    (at least 5 years from the date of the end of placement on
    the market of the last unit of a product model)

    5. Non-discriminatory access for professional repairers
    to any software or firmware needed for the replacement

    Will these regulations apply in the UK?

    As you have had explained to you at least twice before, they will become
    a de facto standard, because it won't be worth the cost to the
    manufacturers to produce a substantially different model for every
    different market; on the contrary they will try and keep as much as
    possible of every product the same world-wide.

    Evidently it is not quite as simple as that. In another thread it is explained that Apple have withdrawn phones with lightning connectors
    from the EU market and continue to sell them in the UK.

    I haven't seen that other thread, but they may well be offloading old
    stock pending newer models. Eventually market forces can be expected to prevail.

    I take your
    point going forward about the de facto standard, but my question was
    whether the new regs would apply de jure.

    Well obviously not as stated in the OP, because since Brexit we're no
    longer bound by that legal system, otherwise Apple would not be selling
    phones with lightning connectors here as claimed above. HMG would have
    to bring in legislation of its own mirroring that of the EU, and I would
    have thought if they were doing so we would have seen something about it
    by now.

    Mind, I've lost access to the BBC News RSS feeds, including the
    Technology news feed, because the supplier of the translation script -
    that enabled me to create on my PCs a web page summarising them - has discontinued the service, so, as I've not had time to write my own, I've
    not been keeping so well up to date for about three or four months now.

    --

    Fake news kills!

    I may be contacted via the contact address given on my website:
    www.macfh.co.uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrew@21:1/5 to Chris on Fri Jan 3 19:07:56 2025
    XPost: uk.telecom.mobile, misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    Chris wrote on Fri, 3 Jan 2025 13:20:20 -0000 (UTC) :

    Apple may well continue to sell some existing production
    in the UK but as already said it is unlikely they will make special UK
    versions of new hardware.

    Definitely true. The UK (or more likely GB) won't get specific models, but, as we're already seeing, will still get any models which do not comply with the EU regs .

    Bear in mind that no iPhone older than the iPhone 15 meets the bare minimum battery lifetime charge cycle EU standard, while Android phones double it.

    The reason?
    Apple has always been addicted to putting cheap components in their iPhone.

    Putting that well known fact in context, it's further evidence that...
    *Apple hates you*.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrew@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jan 3 19:03:11 2025
    XPost: uk.telecom.mobile, misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    Will these regulations apply in the UK?

    As you have had explained to you at least twice before, they will become >>>> a de facto standard, because it won't be worth the cost to the
    manufacturers to produce a substantially different model for every
    different market; on the contrary they will try and keep as much as
    possible of every product the same world-wide.

    Evidently it is not quite as simple as that. In another thread it is
    explained that Apple have withdrawn phones with lightning connectors
    from the EU market and continue to sell them in the UK.

    I haven't seen that other thread, but they may well be offloading old
    stock pending newer models. Eventually market forces can be expected to
    prevail.

    Apple have removed the iphone 14 and SE from sale in the EU and Northern Ireland due to the regulations coming into effect on 30th December.

    Both models are still available in the rest of the UK.

    While Android phones typically *double* the EU minimum standards...

    Bear in mind that Apple is cognizant that their use of cheap batteries in
    the iPhone means they'll have to label those same phones as very clearly
    NOT meeting the upcoming 2025 EU battery charge-cycle lifetime standards.

    Apple has always cheaped out on batteries and hardware (such as RAM).
    Now Apple's addiction to cheap components returns to bite them back.

    Not only has Apple always been cheap on batteries, but on RAM also.
    Which means only the latest iPhones can run the memory intensive AI apps.

    In other words, even the very few iPhones that "can" be sold in the EU
    after June of this year still *barely* squeak by due to cheap components.

    It's just more evidence of the obvious maxim: *Apple hates you*

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Andrew on Fri Jan 3 11:22:24 2025
    XPost: uk.telecom.mobile, misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 2025-01-03 11:07, Andrew wrote:
    Chris wrote on Fri, 3 Jan 2025 13:20:20 -0000 (UTC) :

    Apple may well continue to sell some existing production in the UK
    but as already said it is unlikely they will make special UK versions
    of new hardware.

    Definitely true. The UK (or more likely GB) won't get specific models,
    but,
    as we're already seeing, will still get any models which do not comply
    with
    the EU regs .

    Bear in mind that no iPhone older than the iPhone 15 meets the bare minimum battery lifetime charge cycle EU standard, while Android phones double it.

    Prove it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)