• Re: EU law mandating universal chargers for devices comes into force

    From Andy Burns@21:1/5 to Frank Slootweg on Mon Dec 30 12:07:11 2024
    XPost: uk.telecom.mobile, misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    Frank Slootweg wrote:

    Stan Brown wrote:
    my Google Pixel 8a, purchased at the end of November. the box
    contained a USB-C cable, and a USB-A (female) to USB-C (male) dongle.
    I have no use for the dongle.

    The dongle is probably for being able to connect two phones together
    (by means of the correct USB-something to USB-A cable) to transfer all
    one's stuff from one's 'old' phone to one's 'new' phone.
    I think the most recent phone I bought which used a cable to do the data migration was Pixel3, can't remember what the pixel5a did, NFC bonk perhaps?

    The pixel8a just needed a QR code scanning from one phone to the other
    and leave them to it ...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Frank Slootweg@21:1/5 to Andy Burns on Mon Dec 30 12:32:48 2024
    XPost: uk.telecom.mobile, misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> wrote:
    Frank Slootweg wrote:

    Stan Brown wrote:
    my Google Pixel 8a, purchased at the end of November. the box
    contained a USB-C cable, and a USB-A (female) to USB-C (male) dongle.
    I have no use for the dongle.

    The dongle is probably for being able to connect two phones together
    (by means of the correct USB-something to USB-A cable) to transfer all one's stuff from one's 'old' phone to one's 'new' phone.

    I think the most recent phone I bought which used a cable to do the data migration was Pixel3, can't remember what the pixel5a did, NFC bonk perhaps?

    The pixel8a just needed a QR code scanning from one phone to the other
    and leave them to it ...

    You aren't an Apple seed, who get their knickers in a twist at the
    near mention of USB, are you!? :-)

    As I mentioned, a USB cable is just an option. There are others like
    Wi-Fi (direct), 'cloud', etc.. What is faster probably depends on the
    hardware of both phones and your network. In my case, I used Wi-Fi
    (direct).

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Stan Brown@21:1/5 to Frank Slootweg on Mon Dec 30 06:21:07 2024
    XPost: uk.telecom.mobile, misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 29 Dec 2024 19:25:41 GMT, Frank Slootweg wrote:
    My advice is to keep the USB dongle, it may come in handy one day.

    Of course!

    --
    Stan Brown, Tehachapi, California, USA
    https://BrownMath.com/
    Shikata ga nai...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Carlos E.R.@21:1/5 to Alan on Mon Dec 30 16:44:11 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, uk.telecom.mobile

    On 2024-12-30 04:40, Alan wrote:
    On 2024-12-29 19:37, knuttle wrote:
    On 12/29/2024 9:45 PM, Alan wrote:
    On 2024-12-29 18:42, Andrew wrote:
    Chris wrote on Sun, 29 Dec 2024 18:27:04 -0000 (UTC) :

    ...


    Please explain how to get an apple to work with a PC.  Especially how
    do you get pictures from you Apple phone to your Windows 10 PC

    'Import to your Windows PC

    You can import photos to your PC by connecting your device to your
    computer and using the Apple Devices app:

    Install the Apple Devices app from the Microsoft Store.
    Connect your iPhone or iPad to your PC with a USB cable.
    If asked, unlock your iOS or iPadOS device using your passcode.
    If you see a prompt on your iOS or iPadOS device asking you to Trust
    This Computer, tap Trust or Allow to continue.'

    <https://support.apple.com/en-us/120267>

    Done!

    How about Linux? Just curious.

    --
    Cheers, Carlos.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Theo@21:1/5 to Carlos E.R. on Mon Dec 30 15:56:51 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, uk.telecom.mobile

    In comp.mobile.android Carlos E.R. <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote:
    On 2024-12-30 04:40, Alan wrote:
    On 2024-12-29 19:37, knuttle wrote:
    On 12/29/2024 9:45 PM, Alan wrote:
    On 2024-12-29 18:42, Andrew wrote:
    Chris wrote on Sun, 29 Dec 2024 18:27:04 -0000 (UTC) :

    ...


    Please explain how to get an apple to work with a PC.  Especially how
    do you get pictures from you Apple phone to your Windows 10 PC

    'Import to your Windows PC
    [...]

    Done!

    How about Linux? Just curious.

    https://libimobiledevice.org/
    which is used by various file managers (Dolphin, Nautilus, etc), or ifuse
    makes it available as a FUSE filesystem that can be accessed from anywhere.

    (it's possible native MTP works for photo access without a driver - I've not tried that)

    Theo

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Carlos E.R.@21:1/5 to Chris on Mon Dec 30 16:36:26 2024
    XPost: uk.telecom.mobile, misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 2024-12-29 19:21, Chris wrote:
    Jan K. <janicekoziol@nie.ma.spamu.prosze.com> wrote:
    W Sun, 29 Dec 2024 09:00:21 -0500, bad sector napisal:

    Given Apple hates the consumer (but loves their money), this is a good >>>> thing since Apple has abused its (admittedly loyal) consumers for too long.

    *EU law mandating universal chargers for devices comes into force*
    <https://www.france24.com/en/europe/20241228-eu-law-mandating-universal- >>>> chargers-for-devices-comes-into-force>

    This Saturday is the day Apple's executives saying they were "terrified" of
    interoperating with non-Apple devices begins to (finally) come into force. >>>
    Good move but it has a snag; it will only perpetuate the USB inteface
    wich (after microcancer $trangleware) is the worst piece of shit the
    industry has ever produced.

    It took a decade, but the EU has finally achieved what no other major union >> of countries has done: mandating a single universal connector. As the
    world's largest single consumer market (500 million people), this decision >> sets a global standard, with the rest of the world following suit.
    The delay was largely due to intense lobbying from manufacturers,
    especially Apple, which profited significantly from licensing their
    proprietary Lightning port.

    Next up on the EU's list for 2026: Easily Changeable Batteries (you know,
    what every cell phone 20 years ago had before Apple).

    Which almost no-one made use of and the only "feature" of it was that
    phones regularly broke into three pieces every time they were dropped.

    It's cheap to replace batteries currently. Not sure what benefit mandating
    it will have.

    It is not only phones. I had to replace the battery in my Kobo touch
    ebook, and it was difficult.

    So yes, I welcome that law a lot.

    --
    Cheers, Carlos.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Carlos E.R. on Mon Dec 30 08:47:50 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, uk.telecom.mobile

    On 2024-12-30 07:44, Carlos E.R. wrote:
    On 2024-12-30 04:40, Alan wrote:
    On 2024-12-29 19:37, knuttle wrote:
    On 12/29/2024 9:45 PM, Alan wrote:
    On 2024-12-29 18:42, Andrew wrote:
    Chris wrote on Sun, 29 Dec 2024 18:27:04 -0000 (UTC) :

    ...


    Please explain how to get an apple to work with a PC.  Especially how
    do you get pictures from you Apple phone to your Windows 10 PC

    'Import to your Windows PC

    You can import photos to your PC by connecting your device to your
    computer and using the Apple Devices app:

    Install the Apple Devices app from the Microsoft Store.
    Connect your iPhone or iPad to your PC with a USB cable.
    If asked, unlock your iOS or iPadOS device using your passcode.
    If you see a prompt on your iOS or iPadOS device asking you to Trust
    This Computer, tap Trust or Allow to continue.'

    <https://support.apple.com/en-us/120267>

    Done!

    How about Linux? Just curious.


    I don't know about Linux, sorry.

    I do computer support for a living and I've had precisely one client in
    more than 25 years of doing this who had a Linux system.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrew@21:1/5 to Theo on Mon Dec 30 19:11:28 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, uk.telecom.mobile

    Theo wrote on 30 Dec 2024 15:56:51 +0000 (GMT) :

    How about Linux? Just curious.

    https://libimobiledevice.org/
    which is used by various file managers (Dolphin, Nautilus, etc), or ifuse makes it available as a FUSE filesystem that can be accessed from anywhere.

    1. Copying photos from iOS to Windows is easy
    2. Going the other way is not

    Apple murdered interoperability.

    While it's trivial to copy an iOS DCIM image or video from the iOS device,
    one way only, to the Windows device, where Linux excels is two way file transfer of not only photos, but almost anything on the iOS device.

    You have to know a few tricks though - but once you know them - it works.
    <https://i.postimg.cc/s2x0f9Js/files14.jpg> Simultaneous Linux, win & iOS
    <https://i.postimg.cc/g269S8rT/files13.jpg> It's easy if you know how
    <https://i.postimg.cc/pVJf72fN/files12.jpg> iOS hacks very often will fail
    <https://i.postimg.cc/cChf8mx1/files11.jpg> idiot iOS hacks just to copy
    <https://i.postimg.cc/9MGdc2s7/files10.jpg> Android is 2-way fast over USB
    <https://i.postimg.cc/mDx3xkp4/files09.jpg> iOS only DCIM & only 1-way
    <https://i.postimg.cc/3xcCBngd/files08.jpg> iOS is just a dumb brick
    <https://i.postimg.cc/KjK4nHwf/files07.jpg> Ubuntu is two-way, everything
    <https://i.postimg.cc/Jhmy9KH7/files06.jpg> Ubuntu uses iFuse for magic
    <https://i.postimg.cc/qqg61Rh8/files05.jpg> Ubuntu, movies _to_ iOS on USB
    <https://i.postimg.cc/QMk7tvZW/files04.jpg> Ubuntu is two way, everything
    <https://i.postimg.cc/d3SGkdgr/files03.jpg> Android is two way, everything
    <https://i.postimg.cc/L8b18Zmx/files02.jpg> iOS "Files" is not useful
    <https://i.postimg.cc/NFkXsJ0X/files01.jpg> iOS/Win is 1-way & DCIM only

    (it's possible native MTP works for photo access without a driver - I've not tried that)

    A driver is automatically installed on Windows when you plug in an iOS
    device over USB - but without adding bloatware, you can't copy TO the iOS device.

    Worse, the bloatware requires the Apple ID of every device you wish to
    connect to - and each and ever iOS users' password too.

    Fancy that.
    Nothing works in the walled garden when it comes to the real world.

    By way of contrast, you can connect any Android device to any Windows PC to then copy bidirectionally to almost anywhere on that Android device.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Andrew on Mon Dec 30 11:23:58 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, uk.telecom.mobile

    On 2024-12-30 11:11, Andrew wrote:
    Theo wrote on 30 Dec 2024 15:56:51 +0000 (GMT) :

    How about Linux? Just curious.

    https://libimobiledevice.org/
    which is used by various file managers (Dolphin, Nautilus, etc), or ifuse
    makes it available as a FUSE filesystem that can be accessed from
    anywhere.

    1. Copying photos from iOS to Windows is easy
    2. Going the other way is not

    False.

    You not knowing how to do something doesn't make it difficult.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrew@21:1/5 to Frank Slootweg on Mon Dec 30 19:17:31 2024
    XPost: uk.telecom.mobile, misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    Frank Slootweg wrote on 30 Dec 2024 12:32:48 GMT :

    As I mentioned, a USB cable is just an option. There are others like
    Wi-Fi (direct), 'cloud', etc.. What is faster probably depends on the hardware of both phones and your network. In my case, I used Wi-Fi
    (direct).

    Frank is correct that with Android & Windows, there are many options.

    For example, I connect my Android phone over Wi-Fi as a Windows drive
    letter all the time - such that batch scripts work fine copying files.

    In addition, USB works even better (in that there is much less setup).

    Better yet, only Android has portable memory - which Apple has never had.

    With portable memory, if you're intelligent enough to realize that each
    sdcard has a volume label that you can set yourself when formatting, then
    you can format your volume label to XXXX-XXXX (or whatever) and if you do
    that, you can swap out sdcards any time you want and the phone won't even
    know you did that.

    An example I've recently done is I doubled the size of my sdcard.

    On Windows:
    a. I formatted the *new* sdcard to the same volume label as the old
    b. I copied all the old sdcard data to the new sdcard
    c. I swapped them out

    The phone didn't even realize I had done that, where all the data worked perfectly - and yet - I went from 64GB of external sdcard to 128 GB.

    By way of contrast, iOS is so brain dead, it can't do anything like that.
    Apple hates you.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Andrew on Mon Dec 30 11:24:39 2024
    XPost: uk.telecom.mobile, misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 2024-12-30 11:17, Andrew wrote:
    Frank Slootweg wrote on 30 Dec 2024 12:32:48 GMT :

      As I mentioned, a USB cable is just an option. There are others like
    Wi-Fi (direct), 'cloud', etc.. What is faster probably depends on the
    hardware of both phones and your network. In my case, I used Wi-Fi
    (direct).

    Frank is correct that with Android & Windows, there are many options.

    For example, I connect my Android phone over Wi-Fi as a Windows drive
    letter all the time - such that batch scripts work fine copying files.

    In addition, USB works even better (in that there is much less setup).

    Better yet, only Android has portable memory - which Apple has never had.

    With portable memory, if you're intelligent enough to realize that each sdcard has a volume label that you can set yourself when formatting, then
    you can format your volume label to XXXX-XXXX (or whatever) and if you do that, you can swap out sdcards any time you want and the phone won't even know you did that.

    An example I've recently done is I doubled the size of my sdcard.

    On Windows:
    a. I formatted the *new* sdcard to the same volume label as the old
    b. I copied all the old sdcard data to the new sdcard c. I swapped them out

    The phone didn't even realize I had done that, where all the data worked perfectly - and yet - I went from 64GB of external sdcard to 128 GB.

    By way of contrast, iOS is so brain dead, it can't do anything like that. Apple hates you.

    Apple chose not to provide SDCard functionality.

    It doesn't mean they "hate" anyone.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David Woolley@21:1/5 to Alan on Mon Dec 30 19:25:41 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, uk.telecom.mobile

    On 30/12/2024 16:47, Alan wrote:
    I do computer support for a living and I've had precisely one client in
    more than 25 years of doing this who had a Linux system.

    So you don't serve companies that use Android phones? You will also
    find Linux embedded in many devices, such as TV set top boxes, routers, industrial control systems, etc.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrew@21:1/5 to Chris on Mon Dec 30 19:33:35 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, uk.telecom.mobile

    Chris wrote on Mon, 30 Dec 2024 15:20:48 -0000 (UTC) :

    Anyone who claims iOS interoperates with Windows knows nothing about iOS.

    You made a blanket statement about Apple devices. Not iOS.

    WTF?

    These are all mobile device groups - so it's presumed you understand that.

    *How to read/write access iOS file systems on Ubuntu/Windows over USB cable*
    <https://groups.google.com/g/alt.os.linux/c/z_KXY4IHLe0>

    The fact you don't realize these are mobile phone groups is your problem.
    Not mine.

    Stop disputing everything simply because you are ignorant Chris.
    It's annoying to have to defend what everyone already knows - except you.

    Not only is that task impossible to do on Windows without adding additional >> bloatware (e.g., the iTunes abomination which Apple clearly has never
    tested for bugs - which is why iTunes is always full of zero-day holes!)...

    And yet you claim to be able to access the whole iOS operating system...?

    Jesus Christ, Chris.

    You dispute everything simply because you're stupid, Chris.
    It's not my fault you're stupid. You can fix that. Read the links provided.

    With iFuse, you can access even the internal system files of iOS, Chris.

    *Simultaneously slide Windows Linux iOS Android files back and forth*
    *over USB at 7GB per minute speeds using 100% native devices*
    *(no proprietary software needed)*
    <https://groups.google.com/g/alt.os.linux/c/WqIDiVbawRs/>

    Were you lying?

    OMG, Chris!
    Stop accusing me of "lying" simply because you're stupid, Chris.

    Your utter ignorance of everything doesn't constitute me lying, Chris.
    It just means you're incredibly stupid. And I'm not.

    So we can't converse, mano a mano, until you triple your low IQ first.

    Read this before responding please - do not respond until you read it!
    *How to copy files both ways anywhere you want to/from iPhone/iPad*
    *over USB between Windows & iOS using Linux*
    <https://groups.google.com/g/alt.os.linux/c/Nxyt6qmE7YA/>

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Zaidy036@21:1/5 to Alan on Mon Dec 30 14:39:04 2024
    XPost: uk.telecom.mobile, misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 12/30/2024 2:24 PM, Alan wrote:
    On 2024-12-30 11:17, Andrew wrote:
    Frank Slootweg wrote on 30 Dec 2024 12:32:48 GMT :

      As I mentioned, a USB cable is just an option. There are others like
    Wi-Fi (direct), 'cloud', etc.. What is faster probably depends on the
    hardware of both phones and your network. In my case, I used Wi-Fi
    (direct).

    Frank is correct that with Android & Windows, there are many options.

    For example, I connect my Android phone over Wi-Fi as a Windows drive
    letter all the time - such that batch scripts work fine copying files.

    In addition, USB works even better (in that there is much less setup).

    Better yet, only Android has portable memory - which Apple has never had.

    With portable memory, if you're intelligent enough to realize that each
    sdcard has a volume label that you can set yourself when formatting, then
    you can format your volume label to XXXX-XXXX (or whatever) and if you do
    that, you can swap out sdcards any time you want and the phone won't even
    know you did that.

    An example I've recently done is I doubled the size of my sdcard.

    On Windows:
    a. I formatted the *new* sdcard to the same volume label as the old
    b. I copied all the old sdcard data to the new sdcard c. I swapped
    them out

    The phone didn't even realize I had done that, where all the data worked
    perfectly - and yet - I went from 64GB of external sdcard to 128 GB.

    By way of contrast, iOS is so brain dead, it can't do anything like that.
    Apple hates you.

    Apple chose not to provide SDCard functionality.

    It doesn't mean they "hate" anyone.

    DropBox and eMail are easy transfers also

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to All on Mon Dec 30 11:48:42 2024
    XPost: uk.telecom.mobile, misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 2024-12-30 11:39, Zaidy036 wrote:
    On 12/30/2024 2:24 PM, Alan wrote:
    On 2024-12-30 11:17, Andrew wrote:
    Frank Slootweg wrote on 30 Dec 2024 12:32:48 GMT :

      As I mentioned, a USB cable is just an option. There are others like >>>> Wi-Fi (direct), 'cloud', etc.. What is faster probably depends on the
    hardware of both phones and your network. In my case, I used Wi-Fi
    (direct).

    Frank is correct that with Android & Windows, there are many options.

    For example, I connect my Android phone over Wi-Fi as a Windows drive
    letter all the time - such that batch scripts work fine copying files.

    In addition, USB works even better (in that there is much less setup).

    Better yet, only Android has portable memory - which Apple has never
    had.

    With portable memory, if you're intelligent enough to realize that each
    sdcard has a volume label that you can set yourself when formatting,
    then
    you can format your volume label to XXXX-XXXX (or whatever) and if
    you do
    that, you can swap out sdcards any time you want and the phone won't
    even
    know you did that.

    An example I've recently done is I doubled the size of my sdcard.

    On Windows:
    a. I formatted the *new* sdcard to the same volume label as the old
    b. I copied all the old sdcard data to the new sdcard c. I swapped
    them out

    The phone didn't even realize I had done that, where all the data worked >>> perfectly - and yet - I went from 64GB of external sdcard to 128 GB.

    By way of contrast, iOS is so brain dead, it can't do anything like
    that.
    Apple hates you.

    Apple chose not to provide SDCard functionality.

    It doesn't mean they "hate" anyone.

    DropBox and eMail are easy transfers also

    Dropbox, Google Drive, iCloud Drive, OneDrive...

    ...the list is long.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to David Woolley on Mon Dec 30 11:49:34 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, uk.telecom.mobile

    On 2024-12-30 11:25, David Woolley wrote:
    On 30/12/2024 16:47, Alan wrote:
    I do computer support for a living and I've had precisely one client
    in more than 25 years of doing this who had a Linux system.

    So you don't serve companies that use Android phones?  You will also
    find Linux embedded in many devices, such as TV set top boxes, routers, industrial control systems, etc.

    I don't consider a device with an OS that one never interacts with
    directly to have an OS that I support.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Andrew on Mon Dec 30 11:51:04 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, uk.telecom.mobile

    On 2024-12-30 11:33, Andrew wrote:
    Chris wrote on Mon, 30 Dec 2024 15:20:48 -0000 (UTC) :

    Anyone who claims iOS interoperates with Windows knows nothing about
    iOS.

    You made a blanket statement about Apple devices. Not iOS.

    WTF?

    These are all mobile device groups - so it's presumed you understand that.

    *How to read/write access iOS file systems on Ubuntu/Windows over USB
    cable*
    <https://groups.google.com/g/alt.os.linux/c/z_KXY4IHLe0>

    The fact you don't realize these are mobile phone groups is your problem.
    Not mine.

    Stop disputing everything simply because you are ignorant Chris.
    It's annoying to have to defend what everyone already knows - except you.

    Not only is that task impossible to do on Windows without adding
    additional
    bloatware (e.g., the iTunes abomination which Apple clearly has never
    tested for bugs - which is why iTunes is always full of zero-day
    holes!)...

    And yet you claim to be able to access the whole iOS operating system...?

    Jesus Christ, Chris.

    You dispute everything simply because you're stupid, Chris.
    It's not my fault you're stupid. You can fix that. Read the links provided.

    With iFuse, you can access even the internal system files of iOS, Chris.

    *Simultaneously slide Windows Linux iOS Android files back and forth*
    *over USB at 7GB per minute speeds using 100% native devices*
    *(no proprietary software needed)* <https://groups.google.com/g/alt.os.linux/c/WqIDiVbawRs/>

    Were you lying?

    OMG, Chris!
    Stop accusing me of "lying" simply because you're stupid, Chris.

    Your utter ignorance of everything doesn't constitute me lying, Chris.
    It just means you're incredibly stupid. And I'm not.

    So we can't converse, mano a mano, until you triple your low IQ first.

    Read this before responding please - do not respond until you read it!
    *How to copy files both ways anywhere you want to/from iPhone/iPad*
    *over USB between Windows & iOS using Linux* <https://groups.google.com/g/alt.os.linux/c/Nxyt6qmE7YA/>

    You're lying or really, really stupid...

    ...or, most likely of all, both!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Nick Charles@21:1/5 to knuttle on Mon Dec 30 17:41:43 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, uk.telecom.mobile

    On 12/29/2024 10:37 PM, knuttle wrote:

    Please explain how to get an apple to work with a PC.  Especially how do
    you get pictures from you Apple phone to your Windows 10 PC

    Its all automatic here. Why people are desperately trying to do it
    manually using USB cables is a mystery to me.

    Install iTunes on your PC. Not the fake iTunes in the "Microsoft
    Store". The REAL iTunes from Apple. Set it up to automagically
    download photos from your iCloud account. I have all my photos on my iPads/iPhone and Windows 7/10/11 PCs. Added bonus is that the photos
    on your PC are permanent. Deleting pics from your iPhone/iPad/iCloud
    are NOT removed from your PC. So its an automatic, local, full backup
    of your iCloud photos. Could not be easier.

    Apple loves me.

    Its 2025. These things can and should be automated. But if you want to
    live in 2005 - where you plugged your camera into your PC and manually transferred photos - then knock yourself out.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Carlos E.R.@21:1/5 to Theo on Mon Dec 30 23:17:47 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, uk.telecom.mobile

    On 2024-12-30 16:56, Theo wrote:
    In comp.mobile.android Carlos E.R. <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote:
    On 2024-12-30 04:40, Alan wrote:
    On 2024-12-29 19:37, knuttle wrote:
    On 12/29/2024 9:45 PM, Alan wrote:
    On 2024-12-29 18:42, Andrew wrote:
    Chris wrote on Sun, 29 Dec 2024 18:27:04 -0000 (UTC) :

    ...


    Please explain how to get an apple to work with a PC.  Especially how >>>> do you get pictures from you Apple phone to your Windows 10 PC

    'Import to your Windows PC
    [...]

    Done!

    How about Linux? Just curious.

    https://libimobiledevice.org/
    which is used by various file managers (Dolphin, Nautilus, etc), or ifuse makes it available as a FUSE filesystem that can be accessed from anywhere.

    (it's possible native MTP works for photo access without a driver - I've not tried that)

    MTP (Media Transfer Protocol) as present in Android, works perfectly in
    Linux, on several file browsers. I don't have an iPhone nor my friends,
    so I haven't tried there.

    --
    Cheers, Carlos.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrew@21:1/5 to Carlos E.R. on Tue Dec 31 00:58:59 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, uk.telecom.mobile

    Carlos E.R. wrote on Mon, 30 Dec 2024 23:17:47 +0100 :

    (it's possible native MTP works for photo access without a driver - I've not >> tried that)

    MTP (Media Transfer Protocol) as present in Android, works perfectly in Linux, on several file browsers. I don't have an iPhone nor my friends,
    so I haven't tried there.

    iFuse on Linux is what does all the read/write magic of turning the entire
    iOS device into, essentially, a dumb USB stick.

    I wish iFuse were ported to Windows; but it's not.

    Dunno why though. Would love to know why if someone here knows more than I.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrew@21:1/5 to David Woolley on Tue Dec 31 01:05:11 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, uk.telecom.mobile

    David Woolley wrote on Mon, 30 Dec 2024 19:25:41 +0000 :

    I do computer support for a living and I've had precisely one client in
    more than 25 years of doing this who had a Linux system.

    So you don't serve companies that use Android phones? You will also
    find Linux embedded in many devices, such as TV set top boxes, routers, industrial control systems, etc.

    Just so you know whom you're dealing with, this Alan Baker Apple troll
    (who claims to "support" customers and yet has never even once used Windows
    or Linux or Android) had insisted for weeks on end that it's physically impossible to change any of the headers in a Usenet post - specifically he swore over & over that it's impossible to add a spoofed news client header.

    Who is *that* stupid?

    He's insisted that simply by owning a BMW he knows everything about it, and yet, he doesn't even know the difference between a bimmer & a beemer
    (which, I might add, originated in the UK racing circles).

    Who is *that* stupid?

    Speaking of racing circles, this Alan Baker moron claims to be an expert in racing such that he claims he "teaches" racing - and yet - he has no idea
    what curves are called. To him - all curves are exactly the same in all
    ways.

    His IQ, if it's even 40, would be overstating his ability to think.

    There's a reason he's one of fewer than ten people I've plonked in decades
    on Usenet. He simply disputes everything he doesn't have any knowledge of.

    Which is everything.

    Just watch.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrew@21:1/5 to Nick Charles on Tue Dec 31 01:11:49 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, uk.telecom.mobile

    Nick Charles wrote on Mon, 30 Dec 2024 17:41:43 -0500 :

    Apple loves me.

    The proof that Apple hates you is simply that it costs you lots of money to maintain that expensive iCloud account (over the free 5GB which is a
    pittance) even if you have other ways of slightly increasing the free allocation.

    Why do you think Apple doesn't allow you to insert a ten dollar 256GB card? Apple hates you (but loves your money).

    Why do you think Apple removed the aux jack?
    Apple hates you (but loves your money).

    Why do you think Apple uses the cheapest batteries in the industry?
    Apple hates you (but loves your money).

    Why do you think Apple removed the charger (claiming it's "green" for them
    to do so)? Apple hates you (but loves your money).

    Why do you think only Apple uses non proprietary cabling for its devices.
    Apple hates you (but loves your money).

    Why do you think Apple forces you to log into their privacy robbing servers 24/7./365 just for the privilege of copying files from one device to
    another?

    Apple hates you (but loves your money).

    With respect to universal chargers, Apple murdered interoperability; but...
    the EU is forcing Apple to NOT hate you for the first time in its history.

    Note: Same with batteries where Apple is no longer allowed to sell their iPhones in Europe which fail the minimum charge cycle lifetime limits.

    Nobody else failed.
    Just Apple.

    Why?
    Apple hates you.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrew@21:1/5 to All on Tue Dec 31 01:17:08 2024
    XPost: uk.telecom.mobile, misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    Zaidy036 wrote on Mon, 30 Dec 2024 14:39:04 -0500 :

    DropBox and eMail are easy transfers also

    In other words, the only solution for copying 128 GB (or so) of data from
    any Apple device that is five inches away from any Windows PC is to use the classic Apple clusterfuck method of purchasing an expensive cloud account
    and then transferring 128GB (or so) of data from that dumb iOS device to someone elses' (expensive) servers on the Internet and then copy that 128
    GB (or so) back to the PC which was five inches away the entire time.

    The fact that Apple clusterfuck is how you'd do it proves the maxim:
    *Apple hates you*

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bob Martin@21:1/5 to Alan on Tue Dec 31 07:04:40 2024
    On 30 Dec 2024 at 16:47:50, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

    I do computer support for a living and I've had precisely one client in
    more than 25 years of doing this who had a Linux system.


    Linux users don't need constant hand-holding.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Bob Martin on Mon Dec 30 23:05:36 2024
    On 2024-12-30 23:04, Bob Martin wrote:
    On 30 Dec 2024 at 16:47:50, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

    I do computer support for a living and I've had precisely one client in
    more than 25 years of doing this who had a Linux system.


    Linux users don't need constant hand-holding.


    That's probably true.

    Because to be a Linux user, you have to have become more of an expert at maintaining computers rather than using them.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Andrew on Mon Dec 30 22:34:16 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, uk.telecom.mobile

    On 2024-12-30 17:05, Andrew wrote:
    David Woolley wrote on Mon, 30 Dec 2024 19:25:41 +0000 :

    I do computer support for a living and I've had precisely one client
    in more than 25 years of doing this who had a Linux system.

    So you don't serve companies that use Android phones?  You will also
    find Linux embedded in many devices, such as TV set top boxes,
    routers, industrial control systems, etc.

    Just so you know whom you're dealing with, this Alan Baker Apple troll
    (who claims to "support" customers and yet has never even once used Windows or Linux or Android)

    Why must you lie about me?

    had insisted for weeks on end that it's physically
    impossible to change any of the headers in a Usenet post - specifically he swore over & over that it's impossible to add a spoofed news client header.

    Who is *that* stupid?

    He's insisted that simply by owning a BMW he knows everything about it, and yet, he doesn't even know the difference between a bimmer & a beemer
    (which, I might add, originated in the UK racing circles).

    I've never insisted anythign of the kind.


    Who is *that* stupid?

    Speaking of racing circles, this Alan Baker moron claims to be an expert in racing such that he claims he "teaches" racing - and yet - he has no idea what curves are called. To him - all curves are exactly the same in all
    ways.

    1. I claim I teach racing...because I teach racing. Last year I was
    chairman of the Race Drivers Committee of the Sports Car Club of BC.

    <https://web.archive.org/web/20230422005048/https://www.sccbc.net/about-sccbc/race-drivers/>

    "Alan Baker" there? That's me.

    'The Race Drivers Committee organizes and operates the SCCBC Race Driver Training Program. The driver training program is an important part of
    preparing to enter the sport of racing at Mission and is a prerequisite
    to acquiring a Novice race license. The twice annual Race Driver
    Training program provides unparalleled instruction on handling vehicles
    under extreme conditions. For more information, visit the Race Drivers
    Training Program page.

    Membership on the Race Drivers Committee is by invitation only. The
    committee is comprised of some of the best racers in British Columbia.
    Most committee members have won championships in their class while
    others have done consistently well over the years and have proven
    themselves capable of excelling in all race conditions.

    2. I've never claimed "all curves are exactly the same in all ways."

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Frank Slootweg@21:1/5 to Carlos E.R. on Tue Dec 31 12:10:16 2024
    XPost: uk.telecom.mobile, misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    Carlos E.R. <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote:
    On 2024-12-29 19:21, Chris wrote:
    Jan K. <janicekoziol@nie.ma.spamu.prosze.com> wrote:
    [...]
    Next up on the EU's list for 2026: Easily Changeable Batteries (you know, >> what every cell phone 20 years ago had before Apple).

    Which almost no-one made use of and the only "feature" of it was that phones regularly broke into three pieces every time they were dropped.

    It's cheap to replace batteries currently. Not sure what benefit mandating it will have.

    It is not only phones. I had to replace the battery in my Kobo touch
    ebook, and it was difficult.

    So yes, I welcome that law a lot.

    Same here with my wife's Kobo Auro E2 eReader. Battery charge lasted
    only for a few days, when *not* used.

    Also other devices with internal rechargeable batteries which are not replaceable by the user and often also not - or at least not
    economically feasible - by the supplier.

    For me/us for example, Bluetooth headphone, small Bluetooth
    transmitter [1], Fitbit activity trackers ('smartwatches') [2], etc..

    Apparently we're supposed to throw these devices away after only a few
    years. Not only wasting money, but also wasting precious and limited materials/metals and addiding to electronic waste.

    Of course user/easy replaceable batteries would make these devices
    somewhat larger and somewhat more expensive. But I would like to have
    that choice.

    [1] This one is already basically dead. Only lasts for a few hours after charging.

    [2] Already had to throw away three of those.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Frank Slootweg@21:1/5 to Carlos E.R. on Tue Dec 31 11:42:47 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, uk.telecom.mobile

    Carlos E.R. <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote:
    On 2024-12-30 16:56, Theo wrote:
    In comp.mobile.android Carlos E.R. <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote:
    On 2024-12-30 04:40, Alan wrote:
    On 2024-12-29 19:37, knuttle wrote:
    On 12/29/2024 9:45 PM, Alan wrote:
    On 2024-12-29 18:42, Andrew wrote:
    Chris wrote on Sun, 29 Dec 2024 18:27:04 -0000 (UTC) :

    ...


    Please explain how to get an apple to work with a PC.á Especially how >>>> do you get pictures from you Apple phone to your Windows 10 PC

    'Import to your Windows PC
    [...]

    Done!

    How about Linux? Just curious.

    https://libimobiledevice.org/
    which is used by various file managers (Dolphin, Nautilus, etc), or ifuse makes it available as a FUSE filesystem that can be accessed from anywhere.

    (it's possible native MTP works for photo access without a driver - I've not
    tried that)

    MTP (Media Transfer Protocol) as present in Android, works perfectly in Linux, on several file browsers. I don't have an iPhone nor my friends,
    so I haven't tried there.

    AFAIK, the easiest method with iPhone/iPad devices is to use PTP
    (Picture Transfer Protocol), not MTP (Media Transfer Protocol) to access
    the photo storage of the device, i.e. what is DCIM\Camera on Android. On Windows, that will show the device as a camera, not a phone. If Linux
    can - automatically - use PTP, then that should also work on Linux.

    Note however that the PTP protocol is only for pictures ('photos'), so
    videos are probably not accessible.

    BTW, AFAIK, iOS does not support/offer MTP. If it did, there would be
    no problem to connect an iPhone/iPad to Windows and all this iTunes c.q.
    Apple Devices app hoopla would be unneeded for a simple USB connection.
    would be unneeded.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From bad sector@21:1/5 to Alan on Tue Dec 31 08:39:53 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, uk.telecom.mobile

    On 12/29/24 13:02, Alan wrote:
    On 2024-12-29 09:25, bad sector wrote:
    On 12/29/24 10:18, Jan K. wrote:
    W Sun, 29 Dec 2024 09:00:21 -0500, bad sector napisal:

    Given Apple hates the consumer (but loves their money), this is a good >>>>> thing since Apple has abused its (admittedly loyal) consumers for
    too long.

    *EU law mandating universal chargers for devices comes into force*
    <https://www.france24.com/en/europe/20241228-eu-law-mandating-
    universal- chargers-for-devices-comes-into-force>

    This Saturday is the day Apple's executives saying they were
    "terrified" of
    interoperating with non-Apple devices begins to (finally) come into
    force.

    Good move but it has a snag; it will only perpetuate the USB
    inteface wich (after microcancer $trangleware) is the worst piece of
    shit the industry has ever produced.

    It took a decade, but the EU has finally achieved what no other major
    union
    of countries has done: mandating a single universal connector. As the
    world's largest single consumer market (500 million people), this
    decision
    sets a global standard, with the rest of the world following suit.
    The delay was largely due to intense lobbying from manufacturers,
    especially Apple, which profited significantly from licensing their
    proprietary Lightning port.

    Next up on the EU's list for 2026: Easily Changeable Batteries (you
    know,
    what every cell phone 20 years ago had before Apple).

    https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42534851

    Yeh, I could draw up a very long list of required legislation, all
    notion of reason, discipline and oversight has left the entire industry.

    Tell us all:

    Which industries governed by "long list[s] of required legislation" have worked out well?

    Irrelevant, no industry has to work out well, or at all for that matter.
    In a democracy it is the majoritary value systen that is supposed to
    rule and not 'anything/anyone making money is sacred'. We have
    standardized wall outlets instead of a design for each supplier even
    though captive houses cannot run away to a different grid.




    --
    All species of mobile phones, media devices, Bluetooth or not, and
    onboard presentation systems beyond what is essential for vehicle
    control should automatically disable themselves within 10 meters of any
    vehicle in motion at any speed. "Hands-Free does NOT mean Brain-Free".
    In the case of approaching vehicles (pedestrian use included) that
    distance should be multiplied (prorated) for every 5km/h of CLOSURE
    speed (i.e. no such device should be operable within 200 meters of any
    vehicle approaching at 100 km/h). Manufacturers of devices in which such
    an automatic lockout feature is missing or can be disabled should first
    pay large fines and then be barred from the jurisdiction market. With
    respect to other road-hog conduct, in addition to intoxication or attention-diverting use of lethal-technology while driving,
    brake-checking and tailgating should also be hanging crimes. Any
    irresponsible vehicle handling should in fact be punished exactly as it
    would be in the case of irresponsible weapons handling (which ALSO needs
    to be beefed up).

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Carlos E.R.@21:1/5 to Alan on Tue Dec 31 15:22:59 2024
    On 2024-12-31 08:05, Alan wrote:
    On 2024-12-30 23:04, Bob Martin wrote:
    On 30 Dec 2024 at 16:47:50, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

    I do computer support for a living and I've had precisely one client in
    more than 25 years of doing this who had a Linux system.


    Linux users don't need constant hand-holding.


    That's probably true.

    Because to be a Linux user, you have to have become more of an expert at maintaining computers rather than using them.

    Not at all. Once we do something, it stays put. From that point, we just
    use the machine.

    We know more because we have to rely on our selves, not being another
    person nearby to help with our problems. We have to read documentation,
    solve problems, and ask on internet.

    We were not taught on school, either, as Windows things are.

    --
    Cheers, Carlos.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Carlos E.R.@21:1/5 to Frank Slootweg on Tue Dec 31 15:26:45 2024
    XPost: uk.telecom.mobile, misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 2024-12-31 13:10, Frank Slootweg wrote:
    Carlos E.R. <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote:
    On 2024-12-29 19:21, Chris wrote:
    Jan K. <janicekoziol@nie.ma.spamu.prosze.com> wrote:
    [...]
    Next up on the EU's list for 2026: Easily Changeable Batteries (you know, >>>> what every cell phone 20 years ago had before Apple).

    Which almost no-one made use of and the only "feature" of it was that
    phones regularly broke into three pieces every time they were dropped.

    It's cheap to replace batteries currently. Not sure what benefit mandating >>> it will have.

    It is not only phones. I had to replace the battery in my Kobo touch
    ebook, and it was difficult.

    So yes, I welcome that law a lot.

    Same here with my wife's Kobo Auro E2 eReader. Battery charge lasted
    only for a few days, when *not* used.

    The Kobo Libra Colour announced that it is serviceable. I take it to
    mean that there will be spares.



    Also other devices with internal rechargeable batteries which are not replaceable by the user and often also not - or at least not
    economically feasible - by the supplier.

    For me/us for example, Bluetooth headphone, small Bluetooth
    transmitter [1], Fitbit activity trackers ('smartwatches') [2], etc..

    Right.

    Apparently we're supposed to throw these devices away after only a few years. Not only wasting money, but also wasting precious and limited materials/metals and addiding to electronic waste.

    Of course user/easy replaceable batteries would make these devices somewhat larger and somewhat more expensive. But I would like to have
    that choice.

    Yes.


    [1] This one is already basically dead. Only lasts for a few hours after charging.

    [2] Already had to throw away three of those.

    :-(

    --
    Cheers, Carlos.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Davey@21:1/5 to Frank Slootweg on Tue Dec 31 14:42:05 2024
    XPost: uk.telecom.mobile, misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 31 Dec 2024 12:10:16 GMT
    Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> wrote:

    For me/us for example, Bluetooth headphone, small Bluetooth
    transmitter [1], Fitbit activity trackers ('smartwatches') [2],

    [2] Already had to throw away three of those.

    Thereby confirming that the term 'smart' means no such thing. Again.

    --
    Davey.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Carlos E.R.@21:1/5 to Frank Slootweg on Tue Dec 31 15:17:21 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, uk.telecom.mobile

    On 2024-12-31 12:42, Frank Slootweg wrote:
    Carlos E.R. <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote:
    On 2024-12-30 16:56, Theo wrote:
    In comp.mobile.android Carlos E.R. <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote:
    On 2024-12-30 04:40, Alan wrote:
    On 2024-12-29 19:37, knuttle wrote:
    On 12/29/2024 9:45 PM, Alan wrote:
    On 2024-12-29 18:42, Andrew wrote:
    Chris wrote on Sun, 29 Dec 2024 18:27:04 -0000 (UTC) :

    ...


    Please explain how to get an apple to work with a PC.  Especially how >>>>>> do you get pictures from you Apple phone to your Windows 10 PC

    'Import to your Windows PC
    [...]

    Done!

    How about Linux? Just curious.

    https://libimobiledevice.org/
    which is used by various file managers (Dolphin, Nautilus, etc), or ifuse >>> makes it available as a FUSE filesystem that can be accessed from anywhere. >>>
    (it's possible native MTP works for photo access without a driver - I've not
    tried that)

    MTP (Media Transfer Protocol) as present in Android, works perfectly in
    Linux, on several file browsers. I don't have an iPhone nor my friends,
    so I haven't tried there.

    AFAIK, the easiest method with iPhone/iPad devices is to use PTP
    (Picture Transfer Protocol), not MTP (Media Transfer Protocol) to access
    the photo storage of the device, i.e. what is DCIM\Camera on Android. On Windows, that will show the device as a camera, not a phone. If Linux
    can - automatically - use PTP, then that should also work on Linux.

    AFAIK, Linux uses PTP if the phone (Android) decides to activate only PTP.



    Note however that the PTP protocol is only for pictures ('photos'), so videos are probably not accessible.

    BTW, AFAIK, iOS does not support/offer MTP. If it did, there would be
    no problem to connect an iPhone/iPad to Windows and all this iTunes c.q. Apple Devices app hoopla would be unneeded for a simple USB connection.
    would be unneeded.

    Ah.


    --
    Cheers, Carlos.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Frank Slootweg@21:1/5 to Davey on Tue Dec 31 15:28:03 2024
    XPost: uk.telecom.mobile, misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    Davey <davey@example.invalid> wrote:
    On 31 Dec 2024 12:10:16 GMT
    Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> wrote:

    For me/us for example, Bluetooth headphone, small Bluetooth
    transmitter [1], Fitbit activity trackers ('smartwatches') [2],

    [2] Already had to throw away three of those.

    Thereby confirming that the term 'smart' means no such thing. Again.

    To be fair, Fitbit doesn't call them 'smartwatches', that's why I used
    scare quotes, but these devices are also watches - as they tell the time,
    have alarms, etc. - and are somwhat 'smart'. AFAIK, there isn't a
    clear-cut definition as to what is/isn't a 'smartwatch' (contrary to
    what is/isn't a 'smartphone').

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Frank Slootweg@21:1/5 to Carlos E.R. on Tue Dec 31 15:36:29 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, uk.telecom.mobile

    Carlos E.R. <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote:
    On 2024-12-31 12:42, Frank Slootweg wrote:
    Carlos E.R. <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote:
    On 2024-12-30 16:56, Theo wrote:
    In comp.mobile.android Carlos E.R. <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote:
    On 2024-12-30 04:40, Alan wrote:
    On 2024-12-29 19:37, knuttle wrote:
    On 12/29/2024 9:45 PM, Alan wrote:
    On 2024-12-29 18:42, Andrew wrote:
    Chris wrote on Sun, 29 Dec 2024 18:27:04 -0000 (UTC) :

    ...


    Please explain how to get an apple to work with a PC.á
    Especially how do you get pictures from you Apple phone to your
    Windows 10 PC

    'Import to your Windows PC
    [...]

    Done!

    How about Linux? Just curious.

    https://libimobiledevice.org/
    which is used by various file managers (Dolphin, Nautilus, etc),
    or ifuse makes it available as a FUSE filesystem that can be
    accessed from anywhere.

    (it's possible native MTP works for photo access without a driver
    - I've not tried that)

    MTP (Media Transfer Protocol) as present in Android, works
    perfectly in Linux, on several file browsers. I don't have an
    iPhone nor my friends, so I haven't tried there.

    AFAIK, the easiest method with iPhone/iPad devices is to use PTP (Picture Transfer Protocol), not MTP (Media Transfer Protocol) to
    access the photo storage of the device, i.e. what is DCIM\Camera on Android. On Windows, that will show the device as a camera, not a
    phone. If Linux can - automatically - use PTP, then that should also
    work on Linux.

    AFAIK, Linux uses PTP if the phone (Android) decides to activate only
    PTP.

    That means that you *could* test if an iPhone is likely to work in
    PTP mode: Just connect your Android phone to your Linux system and in
    the 'USB settings' of the phone select 'Transferring images' (is PTP
    mode) instead of 'Transferring files / Auto Auto' (is MTP mode).

    If your Linux system can then access the photos in DCIM\Camera of the
    phone, it's likely that it can also can access an iPhone as a camera.

    Note however that the PTP protocol is only for pictures
    ('photos'), so videos are probably not accessible.

    BTW, AFAIK, iOS does not support/offer MTP. If it did, there
    would be no problem to connect an iPhone/iPad to Windows and all
    this iTunes c.q. Apple Devices app hoopla would be unneeded for a
    simple USB connection. would be unneeded.

    Ah.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andy Burns@21:1/5 to Andrew on Tue Dec 31 16:03:40 2024
    XPost: uk.telecom.mobile, misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    Andrew wrote:

    Frank is correct that with Android & Windows, there are many options.
    I wasn't talking about general data transfer to/from android, but the out-of-the-box "wizard" that transfers apps, data and settings from old
    phone to new phone, which is a slick process.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Davey@21:1/5 to Frank Slootweg on Tue Dec 31 17:00:10 2024
    XPost: uk.telecom.mobile, misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 31 Dec 2024 15:28:03 GMT
    Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> wrote:

    Davey <davey@example.invalid> wrote:
    On 31 Dec 2024 12:10:16 GMT
    Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> wrote:

    For me/us for example, Bluetooth headphone, small Bluetooth
    transmitter [1], Fitbit activity trackers ('smartwatches') [2],

    [2] Already had to throw away three of those.

    Thereby confirming that the term 'smart' means no such thing.
    Again.

    To be fair, Fitbit doesn't call them 'smartwatches', that's why I
    used scare quotes, but these devices are also watches - as they tell
    the time, have alarms, etc. - and are somwhat 'smart'. AFAIK, there
    isn't a clear-cut definition as to what is/isn't a
    'smartwatch' (contrary to what is/isn't a 'smartphone').

    I see 'smartwatches' mainly being used to buy things with, or to
    register a loyalty card. Watching somebody with large fingers
    'swiping' a 1-inch diameter screen always makes me laugh.
    And my scepticism of the 'smart' nomenclature extends to 'smartphones'.
    But then, I am a happy Luddite. Just because we can make something,
    doesn't mean we have to use it. See: Land-based wind turbines. ULEZ
    zones.
    --
    Davey.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Chris on Tue Dec 31 10:01:40 2024
    XPost: uk.telecom.mobile, misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 2024-12-31 07:58, Chris wrote:
    Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
    On 2024-12-29 09:25, bad sector wrote:
    On 12/29/24 10:18, Jan K. wrote:
    W Sun, 29 Dec 2024 09:00:21 -0500, bad sector napisal:

    Given Apple hates the consumer (but loves their money), this is a good >>>>>> thing since Apple has abused its (admittedly loyal) consumers for
    too long.

    *EU law mandating universal chargers for devices comes into force* >>>>>> <https://www.france24.com/en/europe/20241228-eu-law-mandating-
    universal- chargers-for-devices-comes-into-force>

    This Saturday is the day Apple's executives saying they were
    "terrified" of
    interoperating with non-Apple devices begins to (finally) come into >>>>>> force.

    Good move but it has a snag; it will only perpetuate the USB inteface >>>>> wich (after microcancer $trangleware) is the worst piece of shit the >>>>> industry has ever produced.

    It took a decade, but the EU has finally achieved what no other major
    union
    of countries has done: mandating a single universal connector. As the
    world's largest single consumer market (500 million people), this
    decision
    sets a global standard, with the rest of the world following suit.
    The delay was largely due to intense lobbying from manufacturers,
    especially Apple, which profited significantly from licensing their
    proprietary Lightning port.

    Next up on the EU's list for 2026: Easily Changeable Batteries (you know, >>>> what every cell phone 20 years ago had before Apple).

    https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42534851

    Yeh, I could draw up a very long list of required legislation, all
    notion of reason, discipline and oversight has left the entire industry. >>>


    Tell us all:

    Which industries governed by "long list[s] of required legislation" have
    worked out well?

    Domestic airlines is the clearest example. There are plenty others.


    In what world have domestic airlines worked out well for the consumer;
    what country?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Frank Slootweg@21:1/5 to Davey on Tue Dec 31 19:00:41 2024
    XPost: uk.telecom.mobile, misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    Davey <davey@example.invalid> wrote:
    On 31 Dec 2024 15:28:03 GMT
    Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> wrote:

    Davey <davey@example.invalid> wrote:
    On 31 Dec 2024 12:10:16 GMT
    Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> wrote:

    For me/us for example, Bluetooth headphone, small Bluetooth
    transmitter [1], Fitbit activity trackers ('smartwatches') [2],

    [2] Already had to throw away three of those.

    Thereby confirming that the term 'smart' means no such thing.
    Again.

    To be fair, Fitbit doesn't call them 'smartwatches', that's why I
    used scare quotes, but these devices are also watches - as they tell
    the time, have alarms, etc. - and are somwhat 'smart'. AFAIK, there
    isn't a clear-cut definition as to what is/isn't a
    'smartwatch' (contrary to what is/isn't a 'smartphone').

    I see 'smartwatches' mainly being used to buy things with, or to
    register a loyalty card. Watching somebody with large fingers
    'swiping' a 1-inch diameter screen always makes me laugh.

    Exactly, that's what you *see*. What you don't see, is their
    'invisible' uses, Not 'defending' smartwatches in any way, but only
    objecting to judging things by what one sees.

    And my scepticism of the 'smart' nomenclature extends to 'smartphones'.
    But then, I am a happy Luddite. Just because we can make something,
    doesn't mean we have to use it. See: Land-based wind turbines. ULEZ
    zones.

    As to the last two (well, mainly the first one of the two), fully
    agreed. Don't get me started! :-(

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Carlos E.R.@21:1/5 to Frank Slootweg on Tue Dec 31 20:15:26 2024
    XPost: uk.telecom.mobile, misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 2024-12-31 20:00, Frank Slootweg wrote:
    Davey <davey@example.invalid> wrote:
    On 31 Dec 2024 15:28:03 GMT
    Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> wrote:

    Davey <davey@example.invalid> wrote:
    On 31 Dec 2024 12:10:16 GMT
    Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> wrote:

    For me/us for example, Bluetooth headphone, small Bluetooth
    transmitter [1], Fitbit activity trackers ('smartwatches') [2],

    [2] Already had to throw away three of those.

    Thereby confirming that the term 'smart' means no such thing.
    Again.

    To be fair, Fitbit doesn't call them 'smartwatches', that's why I
    used scare quotes, but these devices are also watches - as they tell
    the time, have alarms, etc. - and are somwhat 'smart'. AFAIK, there
    isn't a clear-cut definition as to what is/isn't a
    'smartwatch' (contrary to what is/isn't a 'smartphone').

    I see 'smartwatches' mainly being used to buy things with, or to
    register a loyalty card. Watching somebody with large fingers
    'swiping' a 1-inch diameter screen always makes me laugh.

    Exactly, that's what you *see*. What you don't see, is their
    'invisible' uses, Not 'defending' smartwatches in any way, but only
    objecting to judging things by what one sees.

    Years ago, I said I would never wear a smartwatch. Yet here I am, the
    happy user of one :-)

    The first one very cheap, the second one a better choice, more
    expensive, and works much better.

    --
    Cheers, Carlos.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Carlos E.R.@21:1/5 to Frank Slootweg on Tue Dec 31 20:18:00 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, uk.telecom.mobile

    On 2024-12-31 16:36, Frank Slootweg wrote:
    Carlos E.R. <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote:
    On 2024-12-31 12:42, Frank Slootweg wrote:
    Carlos E.R. <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote:
    On 2024-12-30 16:56, Theo wrote:
    In comp.mobile.android Carlos E.R. <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote: >>>>>> On 2024-12-30 04:40, Alan wrote:
    On 2024-12-29 19:37, knuttle wrote:
    On 12/29/2024 9:45 PM, Alan wrote:
    On 2024-12-29 18:42, Andrew wrote:
    Chris wrote on Sun, 29 Dec 2024 18:27:04 -0000 (UTC) :

    ...


    Please explain how to get an apple to work with a PC.
    Especially how do you get pictures from you Apple phone to your >>>>>>>> Windows 10 PC

    'Import to your Windows PC
    [...]

    Done!

    How about Linux? Just curious.

    https://libimobiledevice.org/
    which is used by various file managers (Dolphin, Nautilus, etc),
    or ifuse makes it available as a FUSE filesystem that can be
    accessed from anywhere.

    (it's possible native MTP works for photo access without a driver
    - I've not tried that)

    MTP (Media Transfer Protocol) as present in Android, works
    perfectly in Linux, on several file browsers. I don't have an
    iPhone nor my friends, so I haven't tried there.

    AFAIK, the easiest method with iPhone/iPad devices is to use PTP
    (Picture Transfer Protocol), not MTP (Media Transfer Protocol) to
    access the photo storage of the device, i.e. what is DCIM\Camera on
    Android. On Windows, that will show the device as a camera, not a
    phone. If Linux can - automatically - use PTP, then that should also
    work on Linux.

    AFAIK, Linux uses PTP if the phone (Android) decides to activate only
    PTP.

    That means that you *could* test if an iPhone is likely to work in
    PTP mode: Just connect your Android phone to your Linux system and in
    the 'USB settings' of the phone select 'Transferring images' (is PTP
    mode) instead of 'Transferring files / Auto Auto' (is MTP mode).

    Oh, yes, my Android phone certainly works in this mode, but I almost
    never do.

    ...


    --
    Cheers, Carlos.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Frank Slootweg@21:1/5 to Carlos E.R. on Tue Dec 31 21:15:01 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, uk.telecom.mobile

    Carlos E.R. <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote:
    On 2024-12-31 16:36, Frank Slootweg wrote:
    Carlos E.R. <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote:
    On 2024-12-31 12:42, Frank Slootweg wrote:
    Carlos E.R. <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote:
    On 2024-12-30 16:56, Theo wrote:
    In comp.mobile.android Carlos E.R. <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote: >>>>>> On 2024-12-30 04:40, Alan wrote:
    On 2024-12-29 19:37, knuttle wrote:
    On 12/29/2024 9:45 PM, Alan wrote:
    On 2024-12-29 18:42, Andrew wrote:
    Chris wrote on Sun, 29 Dec 2024 18:27:04 -0000 (UTC) :

    ...


    Please explain how to get an apple to work with a PC.
    Especially how do you get pictures from you Apple phone to your >>>>>>>> Windows 10 PC

    'Import to your Windows PC
    [...]

    Done!

    How about Linux? Just curious.

    https://libimobiledevice.org/
    which is used by various file managers (Dolphin, Nautilus, etc),
    or ifuse makes it available as a FUSE filesystem that can be
    accessed from anywhere.

    (it's possible native MTP works for photo access without a driver
    - I've not tried that)

    MTP (Media Transfer Protocol) as present in Android, works
    perfectly in Linux, on several file browsers. I don't have an
    iPhone nor my friends, so I haven't tried there.

    AFAIK, the easiest method with iPhone/iPad devices is to use PTP
    (Picture Transfer Protocol), not MTP (Media Transfer Protocol) to
    access the photo storage of the device, i.e. what is DCIM\Camera on
    Android. On Windows, that will show the device as a camera, not a
    phone. If Linux can - automatically - use PTP, then that should also
    work on Linux.

    AFAIK, Linux uses PTP if the phone (Android) decides to activate only
    PTP.

    That means that you *could* test if an iPhone is likely to work in
    PTP mode: Just connect your Android phone to your Linux system and in
    the 'USB settings' of the phone select 'Transferring images' (is PTP
    mode) instead of 'Transferring files / Auto Auto' (is MTP mode).

    Oh, yes, my Android phone certainly works in this mode, but I almost
    never do.

    Of course you don't use it in that mode, I don't either. It's just a
    *test* to determine if an *iPhone* is likely to work in the same way.
    From your positive test result, it's likely that an iPhone will work as
    well.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Frank Slootweg@21:1/5 to Carlos E.R. on Tue Dec 31 21:19:33 2024
    XPost: uk.telecom.mobile, misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    Carlos E.R. <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote:
    On 2024-12-31 20:00, Frank Slootweg wrote:
    Davey <davey@example.invalid> wrote:
    On 31 Dec 2024 15:28:03 GMT
    Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> wrote:

    Davey <davey@example.invalid> wrote:
    On 31 Dec 2024 12:10:16 GMT
    Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> wrote:

    For me/us for example, Bluetooth headphone, small Bluetooth
    transmitter [1], Fitbit activity trackers ('smartwatches') [2],

    [2] Already had to throw away three of those.

    Thereby confirming that the term 'smart' means no such thing.
    Again.

    To be fair, Fitbit doesn't call them 'smartwatches', that's why I
    used scare quotes, but these devices are also watches - as they tell
    the time, have alarms, etc. - and are somwhat 'smart'. AFAIK, there
    isn't a clear-cut definition as to what is/isn't a
    'smartwatch' (contrary to what is/isn't a 'smartphone').

    I see 'smartwatches' mainly being used to buy things with, or to
    register a loyalty card. Watching somebody with large fingers
    'swiping' a 1-inch diameter screen always makes me laugh.

    Exactly, that's what you *see*. What you don't see, is their
    'invisible' uses, Not 'defending' smartwatches in any way, but only objecting to judging things by what one sees.

    Years ago, I said I would never wear a smartwatch. Yet here I am, the
    happy user of one :-)

    The first one very cheap, the second one a better choice, more
    expensive, and works much better.

    Yes, and yours and mine can also be used for payments, but as long as
    we don't use that functionality, Davey won't notice ('see') that we have 'smartwatches'! :-)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Carlos E.R.@21:1/5 to Frank Slootweg on Tue Dec 31 23:00:35 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, uk.telecom.mobile

    On 2024-12-31 22:15, Frank Slootweg wrote:
    Carlos E.R. <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote:
    On 2024-12-31 16:36, Frank Slootweg wrote:
    Carlos E.R. <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote:
    On 2024-12-31 12:42, Frank Slootweg wrote:
    Carlos E.R. <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote:
    On 2024-12-30 16:56, Theo wrote:
    In comp.mobile.android Carlos E.R. <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2024-12-30 04:40, Alan wrote:
    On 2024-12-29 19:37, knuttle wrote:
    On 12/29/2024 9:45 PM, Alan wrote:
    On 2024-12-29 18:42, Andrew wrote:
    Chris wrote on Sun, 29 Dec 2024 18:27:04 -0000 (UTC) :

    ...


    Please explain how to get an apple to work with a PC.
    Especially how do you get pictures from you Apple phone to your >>>>>>>>>> Windows 10 PC

    'Import to your Windows PC
    [...]

    Done!

    How about Linux? Just curious.

    https://libimobiledevice.org/
    which is used by various file managers (Dolphin, Nautilus, etc), >>>>>>> or ifuse makes it available as a FUSE filesystem that can be
    accessed from anywhere.

    (it's possible native MTP works for photo access without a driver >>>>>>> - I've not tried that)

    MTP (Media Transfer Protocol) as present in Android, works
    perfectly in Linux, on several file browsers. I don't have an
    iPhone nor my friends, so I haven't tried there.

    AFAIK, the easiest method with iPhone/iPad devices is to use PTP >>>>> (Picture Transfer Protocol), not MTP (Media Transfer Protocol) to
    access the photo storage of the device, i.e. what is DCIM\Camera on
    Android. On Windows, that will show the device as a camera, not a
    phone. If Linux can - automatically - use PTP, then that should also >>>>> work on Linux.

    AFAIK, Linux uses PTP if the phone (Android) decides to activate only
    PTP.

    That means that you *could* test if an iPhone is likely to work in
    PTP mode: Just connect your Android phone to your Linux system and in
    the 'USB settings' of the phone select 'Transferring images' (is PTP
    mode) instead of 'Transferring files / Auto Auto' (is MTP mode).

    Oh, yes, my Android phone certainly works in this mode, but I almost
    never do.

    Of course you don't use it in that mode, I don't either. It's just a *test* to determine if an *iPhone* is likely to work in the same way.
    From your positive test result, it's likely that an iPhone will work as well.

    I just by chance tried it minutes ago, and of course it worked.

    --
    Cheers, Carlos.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Frank Slootweg@21:1/5 to Chris on Tue Dec 31 22:22:57 2024
    XPost: uk.telecom.mobile, misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> wrote:
    Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> wrote:

    And my scepticism of the 'smart' nomenclature extends to 'smartphones'.
    But then, I am a happy Luddite. Just because we can make something,
    doesn't mean we have to use it. See: Land-based wind turbines. ULEZ
    zones.

    As to the last two (well, mainly the first one of the two), fully
    agreed. Don't get me started! :-(

    Do you prefer to see the world burn...?

    False dilemma. And note that Davey/it says "Land-based". We (The
    Netherlands) are a (very) small country and have one of the largest - if
    not the largest - conglomerate of at-sea windfarms and justifiably so
    (i.e. the lesser of the evils). As to land-based wind turbines, as I
    said, don't get me started. Proponents have no clue (read: don't want to
    hear) about all the negatives, and no, I do *not* mean 'just' horizon
    pollution and audible sound.

    EOD.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Dave Royal@21:1/5 to Carlos E.R. on Tue Dec 31 22:25:29 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, uk.telecom.mobile

    "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> Wrote in message:

    On 2024-12-31 22:15, Frank Slootweg wrote:
    Carlos E.R. <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote:
    On 2024-12-31 16:36, Frank Slootweg wrote:
    Carlos E.R. <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote:
    On 2024-12-31 12:42, Frank Slootweg wrote:
    Carlos E.R. <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote:
    On 2024-12-30 16:56, Theo wrote:
    In comp.mobile.android Carlos E.R. <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 2024-12-30 04:40, Alan wrote:
    On 2024-12-29 19:37, knuttle wrote:
    On 12/29/2024 9:45 PM, Alan wrote:
    On 2024-12-29 18:42, Andrew wrote:
    Chris wrote on Sun, 29 Dec 2024 18:27:04 -0000 (UTC) :

    ...


    Please explain how to get an apple to work with a PC.
    Especially how do you get pictures from you Apple phone to your >>>>>>>>>>> Windows 10 PC

    'Import to your Windows PC
    [...]

    Done!

    How about Linux? Just curious.

    https://libimobiledevice.org/
    which is used by various file managers (Dolphin, Nautilus, etc), >>>>>>>> or ifuse makes it available as a FUSE filesystem that can be
    accessed from anywhere.

    (it's possible native MTP works for photo access without a driver >>>>>>>> - I've not tried that)

    MTP (Media Transfer Protocol) as present in Android, works
    perfectly in Linux, on several file browsers. I don't have an
    iPhone nor my friends, so I haven't tried there.

    AFAIK, the easiest method with iPhone/iPad devices is to use PTP >>>>>> (Picture Transfer Protocol), not MTP (Media Transfer Protocol) to
    access the photo storage of the device, i.e. what is DCIM\Camera on >>>>>> Android. On Windows, that will show the device as a camera, not a
    phone. If Linux can - automatically - use PTP, then that should also >>>>>> work on Linux.

    AFAIK, Linux uses PTP if the phone (Android) decides to activate only >>>>> PTP.

    That means that you *could* test if an iPhone is likely to work in >>>> PTP mode: Just connect your Android phone to your Linux system and in
    the 'USB settings' of the phone select 'Transferring images' (is PTP
    mode) instead of 'Transferring files / Auto Auto' (is MTP mode).

    Oh, yes, my Android phone certainly works in this mode, but I almost
    never do.

    Of course you don't use it in that mode, I don't either. It's just a
    *test* to determine if an *iPhone* is likely to work in the same way.
    From your positive test result, it's likely that an iPhone will work as
    well.

    I just by chance tried it minutes ago, and of course it worked.


    FWIW if I connect my iPhone (8) to Linux (SuSE) it mounts DCIM
    as a gvfs filesystem under gvfsd-fuse. In thunar it appears as a
    gphoto2: URL. So I see images and videos taken by the camera.
    Unlike with Android, that's all I can access.
    --
    Remove numerics from my email address.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Carlos E.R.@21:1/5 to Dave Royal on Wed Jan 1 00:16:46 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, uk.telecom.mobile

    On 2024-12-31 23:25, Dave Royal wrote:
    "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> Wrote in message:
    On 2024-12-31 22:15, Frank Slootweg wrote:
    Carlos E.R. <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote:
    On 2024-12-31 16:36, Frank Slootweg wrote:
    Carlos E.R. <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote:
    On 2024-12-31 12:42, Frank Slootweg wrote:
    Carlos E.R. <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote:
    On 2024-12-30 16:56, Theo wrote:
    In comp.mobile.android Carlos E.R. <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2024-12-30 04:40, Alan wrote:
    On 2024-12-29 19:37, knuttle wrote:
    On 12/29/2024 9:45 PM, Alan wrote:
    On 2024-12-29 18:42, Andrew wrote:
    Chris wrote on Sun, 29 Dec 2024 18:27:04 -0000 (UTC) : >>>>>>>>>>
    ...


    Please explain how to get an apple to work with a PC.
    Especially how do you get pictures from you Apple phone to your >>>>>>>>>>>> Windows 10 PC

    'Import to your Windows PC
    [...]

    Done!

    How about Linux? Just curious.

    https://libimobiledevice.org/
    which is used by various file managers (Dolphin, Nautilus, etc), >>>>>>>>> or ifuse makes it available as a FUSE filesystem that can be >>>>>>>>> accessed from anywhere.

    (it's possible native MTP works for photo access without a driver >>>>>>>>> - I've not tried that)

    MTP (Media Transfer Protocol) as present in Android, works
    perfectly in Linux, on several file browsers. I don't have an
    iPhone nor my friends, so I haven't tried there.

    AFAIK, the easiest method with iPhone/iPad devices is to use PTP >>>>>>> (Picture Transfer Protocol), not MTP (Media Transfer Protocol) to >>>>>>> access the photo storage of the device, i.e. what is DCIM\Camera on >>>>>>> Android. On Windows, that will show the device as a camera, not a >>>>>>> phone. If Linux can - automatically - use PTP, then that should also >>>>>>> work on Linux.

    AFAIK, Linux uses PTP if the phone (Android) decides to activate only >>>>>> PTP.

    That means that you *could* test if an iPhone is likely to work in >>>>> PTP mode: Just connect your Android phone to your Linux system and in >>>>> the 'USB settings' of the phone select 'Transferring images' (is PTP >>>>> mode) instead of 'Transferring files / Auto Auto' (is MTP mode).

    Oh, yes, my Android phone certainly works in this mode, but I almost
    never do.

    Of course you don't use it in that mode, I don't either. It's just a >>> *test* to determine if an *iPhone* is likely to work in the same way.
    From your positive test result, it's likely that an iPhone will work as >>> well.

    I just by chance tried it minutes ago, and of course it worked.


    FWIW if I connect my iPhone (8) to Linux (SuSE) it mounts DCIM
    as a gvfs filesystem under gvfsd-fuse. In thunar it appears as a
    gphoto2: URL. So I see images and videos taken by the camera.
    Unlike with Android, that's all I can access.

    Ah. Thanks, that's the information that was missing.

    --
    Cheers, Carlos.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Spike@21:1/5 to Chris on Wed Jan 1 00:18:40 2025
    XPost: uk.telecom.mobile, misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> wrote:
    Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
    On 2024-12-31 07:58, Chris wrote:
    Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
    On 2024-12-29 09:25, bad sector wrote:
    On 12/29/24 10:18, Jan K. wrote:
    W Sun, 29 Dec 2024 09:00:21 -0500, bad sector napisal:

    Given Apple hates the consumer (but loves their money), this is a good >>>>>>>> thing since Apple has abused its (admittedly loyal) consumers for >>>>>>>> too long.

    *EU law mandating universal chargers for devices comes into force* >>>>>>>> <https://www.france24.com/en/europe/20241228-eu-law-mandating- >>>>>>>> universal- chargers-for-devices-comes-into-force>

    This Saturday is the day Apple's executives saying they were
    "terrified" of
    interoperating with non-Apple devices begins to (finally) come into >>>>>>>> force.

    Good move but it has a snag; it will only perpetuate the USB inteface >>>>>>> wich (after microcancer $trangleware) is the worst piece of shit the >>>>>>> industry has ever produced.

    It took a decade, but the EU has finally achieved what no other major >>>>>> union
    of countries has done: mandating a single universal connector. As the >>>>>> world's largest single consumer market (500 million people), this
    decision
    sets a global standard, with the rest of the world following suit. >>>>>> The delay was largely due to intense lobbying from manufacturers,
    especially Apple, which profited significantly from licensing their >>>>>> proprietary Lightning port.

    Next up on the EU's list for 2026: Easily Changeable Batteries (you know,
    what every cell phone 20 years ago had before Apple).

    https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42534851

    Yeh, I could draw up a very long list of required legislation, all
    notion of reason, discipline and oversight has left the entire industry. >>>>>


    Tell us all:

    Which industries governed by "long list[s] of required legislation" have >>>> worked out well?

    Domestic airlines is the clearest example. There are plenty others.

    In what world have domestic airlines worked out well for the consumer;
    what country?

    I mean, not dying is quite an important benefit for the consumer.
    Regulation has created the safest form of transport in the world.

    The safest form of transport is the passenger lift, but of course is
    regulated.

    --
    Spike

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrew@21:1/5 to Andy Burns on Wed Jan 1 01:20:54 2025
    XPost: uk.telecom.mobile, misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    Andy Burns wrote on Tue, 31 Dec 2024 16:03:40 +0000 :

    Frank is correct that with Android & Windows, there are many options.
    I wasn't talking about general data transfer to/from android, but the out-of-the-box "wizard" that transfers apps, data and settings from old
    phone to new phone, which is a slick process.

    I understand. Thanks for clarifying. I'm one of the best on earth for
    migrating apps and data so I don't need all those marketing crutches.

    However, I agree that "migration" from one phone to another is pretty well handled nowadays (whether the owner is migrating an iOS or Android device).

    All the highly marketed migration strategies simply involve "the cloud".
    (IMHO)

    Me?

    I put nothing on "the cloud" so my migration is pre-planned years ahead.

    For example, my app migration is planned years ahead of time.
    1. All my apps APKs are automatically backed up at the time of install.
    2. My highly-organized home screen is periodically backed up.
    3. I can install all my apps in a few seconds by sliding them over.
    4. They always go EXACTLY in the new phone where they were in the old.

    As for my data migration, that's even easier:
    1. I format my external sd card to a known volume name.
    2. I tell all my apps (if possible) to store data on that external card.
    3. I just pluck the card out of the old phone & pop it into the new phone.

    My migration is nearly 100% successful with those two simple strategies.
    None of this can be done with iOS as iOS is a brain dead dumb terminal.

    But, if you're intelligent, it can all easily be done with Android.

    But I'm probably one out of a million Android users who can do all that.
    So are you.

    But most people need the clusterfuck of needing to use the cloud for that.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrew@21:1/5 to Andrew on Wed Jan 1 01:41:18 2025
    XPost: uk.telecom.mobile, misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    Andrew wrote on Wed, 1 Jan 2025 01:36:02 -0000 (UTC) :

    Here's a table of 2023 wind power generation per capita (i.e., per person).
    <https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/wind-electricity-per-capita>

    Netherlands = 1644KWh
    USA = 1251KWh
    China = 621KWh

    In 2023, the Netherlands produced about 1-1/3rd more power from wind (per capita) than the USA did, per capita.

    Since the UK is involved in this discussion, at 1217KWh of wind generation
    per person for Great Britain is pretty good by way of comparison.

    Netherlands = 1644KWh per capita
    USA = 1251KWh per capita
    GB = 1217KWh per capita
    China = 621KWh per capita

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrew@21:1/5 to Chris on Wed Jan 1 01:47:31 2025
    XPost: uk.telecom.mobile, misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    Chris wrote on Tue, 31 Dec 2024 15:37:20 -0000 (UTC) :

    So yes, I welcome that law a lot.

    I agree with other devices there are benefits. Particularly, the smaller things like earpods or smartwatches. I don't understand why people accept spending hundreds on essentially disposable products.

    There's a reason EU regulations forbid Apple selling any new iPhones prior
    to the iPhone 15 in Europe (because of Apple's cheap iPhone batteries).

    While almost every major Android brand easily proved to be *double* the
    minimum battery life specified by the EU regulations, these latest iPhones *barely* squeak by (which shows, as usual, how much *Apple hates you*).

    Apple has no intention of allowing the consumer the luxury of long device
    life without having to replace the battery just to keep the iPhone alive.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrew@21:1/5 to Frank Slootweg on Wed Jan 1 01:36:02 2025
    XPost: uk.telecom.mobile, misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    Frank Slootweg wrote on 31 Dec 2024 22:22:57 GMT :

    False dilemma. And note that Davey/it says "Land-based". We (The Netherlands) are a (very) small country and have one of the largest - if
    not the largest - conglomerate of at-sea windfarms and justifiably so
    (i.e. the lesser of the evils). As to land-based wind turbines, as I
    said, don't get me started. Proponents have no clue (read: don't want to hear) about all the negatives, and no, I do *not* mean 'just' horizon pollution and audible sound.

    Interesting distinction.

    I googled who has more power generation (all types) from windmills:
    <https://www.google.com/search?q=chart+windmill+power+generation+by+country+2024>

    Here's a table of all countries, by
    <https://www.datapandas.org/ranking/wind-power-by-country>

    The USA is number 2 (China is number 1) and the Netherlands number 17.
    (1/4 of the USA wind-based power generation is in the state of Texas.)
    <https://www.chooseenergy.com/data-center/wind-generation-by-state/>

    We should probably normalize that per capita though as size matters.
    <https://duckduckgo.com/&q=2024+wind+power+generation+per+capita>

    Here's a table of 2023 wind power generation per capita (i.e., per person).
    <https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/wind-electricity-per-capita>

    Netherlands = 1644KWh
    USA = 1251KWh
    China = 621KWh

    In 2023, the Netherlands produced about 1-1/3rd more power from wind (per capita) than the USA did, per capita.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Andrew on Tue Dec 31 22:55:13 2024
    XPost: uk.telecom.mobile, misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 2024-12-31 17:47, Andrew wrote:
    Chris wrote on Tue, 31 Dec 2024 15:37:20 -0000 (UTC) :

    So yes, I welcome that law a lot.

    I agree with other devices there are benefits. Particularly, the smaller
    things like earpods or smartwatches. I don't understand why people accept
    spending hundreds on essentially disposable products.

    There's a reason EU regulations forbid Apple selling any new iPhones prior
    to the iPhone 15 in Europe (because of Apple's cheap iPhone batteries).

    While almost every major Android brand easily proved to be *double* the minimum battery life specified by the EU regulations, these latest iPhones *barely* squeak by (which shows, as usual, how much *Apple hates you*).

    Utterly false, everyone.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Andrew on Wed Jan 1 12:56:01 2025
    XPost: uk.telecom.mobile, misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 2024-12-31 17:47, Andrew wrote:
    Chris wrote on Tue, 31 Dec 2024 15:37:20 -0000 (UTC) :

    So yes, I welcome that law a lot.

    I agree with other devices there are benefits. Particularly, the smaller
    things like earpods or smartwatches. I don't understand why people accept
    spending hundreds on essentially disposable products.

    There's a reason EU regulations forbid Apple selling any new iPhones prior
    to the iPhone 15 in Europe (because of Apple's cheap iPhone batteries).

    False.

    The EU has mandated the USB-C port for charging and the first iPhone to
    use it was the iPhone 15.



    While almost every major Android brand easily proved to be *double* the minimum battery life specified by the EU regulations, these latest iPhones *barely* squeak by (which shows, as usual, how much *Apple hates you*).

    This is also false.


    Apple has no intention of allowing the consumer the luxury of long device life without having to replace the battery just to keep the iPhone alive.

    Battery life is measured in charging cycles.

    How many years of use you get from a battery depends on how often you
    need to charge it.

    If a phone has a battery that is only good for (say) 1,000 charging
    cycles, and it only runs for one day on a full charge, then you're going
    to need a new battery in about 2 years 9 months.

    If a phone with the very same battery could last for two days on a
    charge, then you'd need a new battery in 5 years 6 months.

    So, you see, battery life in terms of replacement very much depends on
    battery life in terms of run time.

    iPhones have among the best run times in the entire smartphone industry:

    Best phone battery life at a glance (hours:minutes)

    Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro: 20:34
    Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro: 18:48
    OnePlus 12R: 18:08

    iPhone 16 Pro Max: 17:17

    OnePlus 12: 17:05
    Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra: 17:01
    Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra: 16:45

    iPhone 16 Plus: 16:29

    Samsung Galaxy S24 Plus: 15:58
    Moto G Stylus 5G (2024): 15:01
    CMF Phone 1: 14:47
    Moto G 5G (2024): 14:36
    Nothing Phone 2a: 14:28

    iPhone 15 Plus: 14:14

    Motorola Razr Plus (2024): 14:10

    <https://www.tomsguide.com/us/smartphones-best-battery-life,review-2857.html>


    From GSMArena:

    1 Apple iPhone 16 Plus
    6 Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
    13 Apple iPhone 15 Plus
    18 Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
    20 Apple iPhone 16
    39 Apple iPhone 16 Pro
    65 Apple iPhone 15
    74 Apple iPhone 15 Pro

    Out a total of 165 smartphones they list.

    <https://www.gsmarena.com/battery-test-v2.php3>

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Davey@21:1/5 to Chris on Thu Jan 2 00:18:43 2025
    XPost: uk.telecom.mobile, misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On Wed, 1 Jan 2025 16:32:47 -0000 (UTC)
    Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> wrote:

    Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> wrote:
    Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> wrote:
    Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> wrote:

    And my scepticism of the 'smart' nomenclature extends to
    'smartphones'. But then, I am a happy Luddite. Just because we
    can make something, doesn't mean we have to use it. See:
    Land-based wind turbines. ULEZ zones.

    As to the last two (well, mainly the first one of the two), fully
    agreed. Don't get me started! :-(

    Do you prefer to see the world burn...?

    False dilemma. And note that Davey/it says "Land-based". We (The Netherlands) are a (very) small country and have one of the largest
    - if not the largest - conglomerate of at-sea windfarms and
    justifiably so (i.e. the lesser of the evils). As to land-based
    wind turbines, as I said, don't get me started. Proponents have no
    clue (read: don't want to hear) about all the negatives, and no, I
    do *not* mean 'just' horizon pollution and audible sound.

    EOD.

    Shame. Would have liked to hear all your negatives. I have no issues
    with them and being in Scotland we have a lot of off-share and
    on-shore windfarms.

    You don't mention your reservations on ULEZ, but again in Scotland
    all the main cities have them.


    For us Southerners, the main issue with ULEZ is the way that Sadiq Kahn
    imposed it on a huge area of London which did not need them, and
    against all advice and the public's desire.
    As with land-based windfarms, the differences in geography between
    Scotland and the Home Counties mean that one size does not fit all.

    --
    Davey

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ken@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jan 2 09:53:59 2025
    XPost: uk.telecom.mobile, misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On Thu, 2 Jan 2025 00:18:43 +0000, Davey <davey@example.invalid>
    wrote:

    On Wed, 1 Jan 2025 16:32:47 -0000 (UTC)
    Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> wrote:

    Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> wrote:
    Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> wrote:
    Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> wrote:

    And my scepticism of the 'smart' nomenclature extends to
    'smartphones'. But then, I am a happy Luddite. Just because we
    can make something, doesn't mean we have to use it. See:
    Land-based wind turbines. ULEZ zones.

    As to the last two (well, mainly the first one of the two), fully
    agreed. Don't get me started! :-(

    Do you prefer to see the world burn...?

    False dilemma. And note that Davey/it says "Land-based". We (The
    Netherlands) are a (very) small country and have one of the largest
    - if not the largest - conglomerate of at-sea windfarms and
    justifiably so (i.e. the lesser of the evils). As to land-based
    wind turbines, as I said, don't get me started. Proponents have no
    clue (read: don't want to hear) about all the negatives, and no, I
    do *not* mean 'just' horizon pollution and audible sound.

    EOD.

    Shame. Would have liked to hear all your negatives. I have no issues
    with them and being in Scotland we have a lot of off-share and
    on-shore windfarms.

    You don't mention your reservations on ULEZ, but again in Scotland
    all the main cities have them.


    For us Southerners, the main issue with ULEZ is the way that Sadiq Kahn >imposed it on a huge area of London which did not need them, and
    against all advice and the public's desire.
    As with land-based windfarms, the differences in geography between
    Scotland and the Home Counties mean that one size does not fit all.

    I think you'll find it was Johnson who imposed it in the central area.
    It was always going to be extended but Khan extended it ahead of
    schedule on the orders of Grant Shapps.

    Still, if you think it was Khan then I suppose Shapp's plan worked.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Davey@21:1/5 to Ken on Thu Jan 2 10:34:50 2025
    XPost: uk.telecom.mobile, misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On Thu, 02 Jan 2025 09:53:59 +0000
    Ken <ken@birchanger.com> wrote:

    On Thu, 2 Jan 2025 00:18:43 +0000, Davey <davey@example.invalid>
    wrote:

    On Wed, 1 Jan 2025 16:32:47 -0000 (UTC)
    Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> wrote:

    Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> wrote:
    Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> wrote:
    Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> wrote:

    And my scepticism of the 'smart' nomenclature extends to
    'smartphones'. But then, I am a happy Luddite. Just because we
    can make something, doesn't mean we have to use it. See:
    Land-based wind turbines. ULEZ zones.

    As to the last two (well, mainly the first one of the two),
    fully agreed. Don't get me started! :-(

    Do you prefer to see the world burn...?

    False dilemma. And note that Davey/it says "Land-based". We
    (The Netherlands) are a (very) small country and have one of the
    largest
    - if not the largest - conglomerate of at-sea windfarms and
    justifiably so (i.e. the lesser of the evils). As to land-based
    wind turbines, as I said, don't get me started. Proponents have
    no clue (read: don't want to hear) about all the negatives, and
    no, I do *not* mean 'just' horizon pollution and audible sound.

    EOD.

    Shame. Would have liked to hear all your negatives. I have no
    issues with them and being in Scotland we have a lot of off-share
    and on-shore windfarms.

    You don't mention your reservations on ULEZ, but again in Scotland
    all the main cities have them.


    For us Southerners, the main issue with ULEZ is the way that Sadiq
    Kahn imposed it on a huge area of London which did not need them, and >against all advice and the public's desire.
    As with land-based windfarms, the differences in geography between
    Scotland and the Home Counties mean that one size does not fit all.

    I think you'll find it was Johnson who imposed it in the central area.
    It was always going to be extended but Khan extended it ahead of
    schedule on the orders of Grant Shapps.

    Still, if you think it was Khan then I suppose Shapp's plan worked.

    Whatever its origins, Khan was very happy to take the 'credit' for it.
    I entered "Did Grant Shapps order the expansion of the London ULEZ?"
    into a search engine, and it came up with lots of contradictory
    evidence, both confirming and denying that Grant Shapps was
    ultimately responsible.
    You pays your money and you takes your choice.

    --
    Davey.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)