Sysop: | Amessyroom |
---|---|
Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
Users: | 44 |
Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
Uptime: | 14:48:16 |
Calls: | 255 |
Files: | 854 |
Messages: | 129,647 |
On Mon, 28 Oct 2024 21:56:36 -0400, DFS wrote:
As long as I'm forced to use thunar or dolphin or any of the other
crapware file managers I've tried, not a chance.
So don’t use any of them. You have a choice.
As long as I'm forced into a substandard programming editor, not a
chance (Geany is decent, but Notepad++ is the best)
Pity you can’t just do “apt get install «editor-of-choice»”.
As long as there's no office software as good as MS Office, not a
chance.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!
I've tried a big bunch of file managers on Windows and Linux. I keep
coming back to Windows File Explorer.
But why should anyone have to lower their standards just to use Linux?
Here's the datasource: https://fdc.nal.usda.gov/download-datasets.html
Here's my MS Access 2003 app: https://imgur.com/a/PBpe6Al
It was built against a few tables from SR28. It has one tab control
with 2 pages, 7 listboxes, 2 option groups, one textbox, and small
amounts of VBA code.
Your mission, should you choose to accept it (you won't), is to
replicate that simple app functionality in LibreOffice.
I once spent most of a day writing code only on MousePad on Linux, so I
can adapt to a lesser editor. But why should anyone have to lower their standards just to use Linux?
Here's the datasource: https://fdc.nal.usda.gov/download-datasets.html
Here's my MS Access 2003 app: https://imgur.com/a/PBpe6Al
It was built against a few tables from SR28. It has one tab control
with 2 pages, 7 listboxes, 2 option groups, one textbox, and small
amounts of VBA code.
Your mission, should you choose to accept it (you won't), is to
replicate that simple app functionality in LibreOffice.
DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> wrote:
As long as I'm forced into a substandard programming editor, not a
chance (Geany is decent, but Notepad++ is the best)
Microsoft furnishes a programming editor for GNU C, which looked great.
https://code.visualstudio.com/download
Microsoft furnishes a programming editor for GNU C, which looked great.
https://code.visualstudio.com/download
DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> wrote:
As long as I'm forced into a substandard programming editor, not a
chance (Geany is decent, but Notepad++ is the best)
Microsoft furnishes a programming editor for GNU C, which looked
great.
https://code.visualstudio.com/download
On Tue, 29 Oct 2024 23:45:41 -0400, DFS wrote:
I've tried a big bunch of file managers on Windows and Linux. I keep
coming back to Windows File Explorer.
Could it cope with those 100,000 files we were discussing the other day?
But why should anyone have to lower their standards just to use Linux?
Emacs does it all. It was doing it all before you were born.
Here's the datasource: https://fdc.nal.usda.gov/download-datasets.html
Here's my MS Access 2003 app: https://imgur.com/a/PBpe6Al
It was built against a few tables from SR28. It has one tab control
with 2 pages, 7 listboxes, 2 option groups, one textbox, and small
amounts of VBA code.
Your mission, should you choose to accept it (you won't), is to
replicate that simple app functionality in LibreOffice.
Oh look, somebody already knows how to put it through professional
analysis tools (i.e. not Microsoft): <https://github.com/afogarty85/fooddata_central>.
As the saying does: “Your move, creep.”
On Tue, 29 Oct 2024 23:45:41 -0400, DFS wrote:
I once spent most of a day writing code only on MousePad on Linux, so I
can adapt to a lesser editor. But why should anyone have to lower their
standards just to use Linux?
I highly doubt if I took a screenshot of VS Code you could figure out what platform it was on.
Here's the datasource: https://fdc.nal.usda.gov/download-datasets.html
Here's my MS Access 2003 app: https://imgur.com/a/PBpe6Al
It was built against a few tables from SR28. It has one tab control
with 2 pages, 7 listboxes, 2 option groups, one textbox, and small
amounts of VBA code.
Your mission, should you choose to accept it (you won't), is to
replicate that simple app functionality in LibreOffice.
Why in the name of all that is holy would you take perfectly good CSV
data, stick it in an obsolete version of Access, and manipulate it with
the equally obsolete VBA?
Or suggest using LibreOffice?
Give a man a hammer...
On Tue, 29 Oct 2024 23:31:00 -0400, Joel wrote:
DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> wrote:
As long as I'm forced into a substandard programming editor, not a
chance (Geany is decent, but Notepad++ is the best)
Microsoft furnishes a programming editor for GNU C, which looked great.
https://code.visualstudio.com/download
And a few other languages
https://marketplace.visualstudio.com/vscode
Even Cobol
https://marketplace.visualstudio.com/items?itemName=bitlang.cobol
On this machine I have C/C++, C#, CMake, Jupyter, MicroPico for Picos with Micropython, PlatfromIO for general embedded boards, Python, Raspberry Pi Pico for Pico C++, and Vim emulation.
On this machine I have C/C++, C#, CMake, Jupyter, MicroPico for Picos
with Micropython, PlatfromIO for general embedded boards, Python,
Raspberry Pi Pico for Pico C++, and Vim emulation.
You're posting from a Raspberry Pi?
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
Microsoft furnishes a programming editor for GNU C, which looked
great.
https://code.visualstudio.com/download
Bloated, inefficient, and not as compatible as claimed.
I would take your word for it ...
Hey, why don't you give the simple challenge a try? Just so you know,
it cannot be done in that piece of crap LibreOffice, so don't waste your time. But pick your poison and have at it.
I may do a quick rewrite of it in PyQt and SQLite, which should run
unchanged on Linux.
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
Microsoft furnishes a programming editor for GNU C, which looked
great.
https://code.visualstudio.com/download
Bloated, inefficient, and not as compatible as claimed.
I would take your word for it ...
On 10/30/2024 12:36 AM, rbowman wrote:
Why in the name of all that is holy would you take perfectly good CSV
data, stick it in an obsolete version of Access, and manipulate it with
the equally obsolete VBA?
I built that years ago to:
* smack down that LibreOffice junk
On 10/30/2024 12:16 AM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
On Tue, 29 Oct 2024 23:45:41 -0400, DFS wrote:
Here's the datasource:
https://fdc.nal.usda.gov/download-datasets.html
Here's my MS Access 2003 app: https://imgur.com/a/PBpe6Al
It was built against a few tables from SR28. It has one tab control
with 2 pages, 7 listboxes, 2 option groups, one textbox, and small
amounts of VBA code.
Your mission, should you choose to accept it (you won't), is to
replicate that simple app functionality in LibreOffice.
Oh look, somebody already knows how to put it through professional
analysis tools (i.e. not Microsoft):
<https://github.com/afogarty85/fooddata_central>.
As the saying does: “Your move, creep.”
Told you you would fail.
On Wed, 30 Oct 2024 11:07:01 -0400, DFS wrote:
On 10/30/2024 12:36 AM, rbowman wrote:
Why in the name of all that is holy would you take perfectly good CSV
data, stick it in an obsolete version of Access, and manipulate it with
the equally obsolete VBA?
I built that years ago to:
* smack down that LibreOffice junk
Still ignoring my point about actual data analysis, aren’t you?
On 10/30/2024 5:05 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
On Wed, 30 Oct 2024 11:07:01 -0400, DFS wrote:
On 10/30/2024 12:36 AM, rbowman wrote:
Why in the name of all that is holy would you take perfectly good CSV
data, stick it in an obsolete version of Access, and manipulate it with >>>> the equally obsolete VBA?
I built that years ago to:
* smack down that LibreOffice junk
Still ignoring my point about actual data analysis, aren’t you?
Why are you still running away from the beatdown Access from 2003 puts
on LibreOffice Base from 2024?
On Windows I might use .NET and C# but so far there isn't a decent .NET
GUI on Linux.
On 30 Oct 2024 17:05:47 GMT, rbowman wrote:
On Windows I might use .NET and C# but so far there isn't a decent
.NET GUI on Linux.
There doesn’t seem to be a decent Dotnet GUI on Windows, either.
What’s Microsoft’s current recommendation for a Windows GUI? WinForms? UWP? Silverlight? MFC? WinRT? Maui? Avalon?
The legacy applications are 32-bit
and it's a royal PITA to build them on a 64-bit machine. 64-bit is out
since the legacy Esri ArcObjects is 32-bit.
On Wed, 30 Oct 2024 23:56:55 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
On 30 Oct 2024 17:05:47 GMT, rbowman wrote:
On Windows I might use .NET and C# but so far there isn't a decent
.NET GUI on Linux.
There doesn’t seem to be a decent Dotnet GUI on Windows, either.
What’s Microsoft’s current recommendation for a Windows GUI? WinForms? >> UWP? Silverlight? MFC? WinRT? Maui? Avalon?
Silverlight is dead. MAUI is UMP risen from the grave and both are the descendants of WPF. Microsoft would dearly love to shovel dirt over
WinForms but can't ever quite get the job done.
I don't know the current status of Gtk# for cross-platform.
On Wed, 30 Oct 2024 18:39:06 -0400, DFS wrote:
On 10/30/2024 5:05 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
On Wed, 30 Oct 2024 11:07:01 -0400, DFS wrote:
On 10/30/2024 12:36 AM, rbowman wrote:
Why in the name of all that is holy would you take perfectly good CSV >>>>> data, stick it in an obsolete version of Access, and manipulate it with >>>>> the equally obsolete VBA?
I built that years ago to:
* smack down that LibreOffice junk
Still ignoring my point about actual data analysis, aren’t you?
Why are you still running away from the beatdown Access from 2003 puts
on LibreOffice Base from 2024?
*Yawn* So you managed to make something look pretty. And meaningless.
Not that [Linux] were ever up to the challenge.
On Wed, 30 Oct 2024 23:56:55 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
On 30 Oct 2024 17:05:47 GMT, rbowman wrote:
On Windows I might use .NET and C# but so far there isn't a decent
.NET GUI on Linux.
There doesn’t seem to be a decent Dotnet GUI on Windows, either.
What’s Microsoft’s current recommendation for a Windows GUI? WinForms? >> UWP? Silverlight? MFC? WinRT? Maui? Avalon?
Silverlight is dead. MAUI is UMP risen from the grave and both are the descendants of WPF. Microsoft would dearly love to shovel dirt over
WinForms but can't ever quite get the job done.
I don't know the current status of Gtk# for cross-platform.
On Thu, 31 Oct 2024 00:16:38 -0400, DFS wrote:
Not that [Linux] were ever up to the challenge.
Challenge to make something look pretty?
On Wed, 30 Oct 2024 11:03:04 -0400, DFS wrote:
On 10/30/2024 12:16 AM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
On Tue, 29 Oct 2024 23:45:41 -0400, DFS wrote:
Here's the datasource:
https://fdc.nal.usda.gov/download-datasets.html
Here's my MS Access 2003 app: https://imgur.com/a/PBpe6Al
It was built against a few tables from SR28. It has one tab control
with 2 pages, 7 listboxes, 2 option groups, one textbox, and small
amounts of VBA code.
Your mission, should you choose to accept it (you won't), is to
replicate that simple app functionality in LibreOffice.
Oh look, somebody already knows how to put it through professional
analysis tools (i.e. not Microsoft):
<https://github.com/afogarty85/fooddata_central>.
As the saying does: “Your move, creep.”
Told you you would fail.
Think about why Microsoft has been forced to offer access to Python-based open-source tools to its Excel users: it’s because of the quality of analysis available through examples like the above.
Now think about why Microsoft can get away with charging for those extra tools: it’s because Microsoft users (like yourself) are too dumb to
realize they can bypass Microsoft and use them for free.
On 31 Oct 2024 00:40:52 GMT, rbowman wrote:
On Wed, 30 Oct 2024 23:56:55 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
On 30 Oct 2024 17:05:47 GMT, rbowman wrote:
On Windows I might use .NET and C# but so far there isn't a decent
.NET GUI on Linux.
There doesn’t seem to be a decent Dotnet GUI on Windows, either.
What’s Microsoft’s current recommendation for a Windows GUI? WinForms? >>> UWP? Silverlight? MFC? WinRT? Maui? Avalon?
Silverlight is dead. MAUI is UMP risen from the grave and both are the
descendants of WPF. Microsoft would dearly love to shovel dirt over
WinForms but can't ever quite get the job done.
I don't know the current status of Gtk# for cross-platform.
So, no decent GUI on Windows? On the world’s foremost platform that inextricably integrates the GUI into the OS?
Anybody else see the irony in that?
rbowman wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
On Wed, 30 Oct 2024 23:56:55 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
On 30 Oct 2024 17:05:47 GMT, rbowman wrote:
On Windows I might use .NET and C# but so far there isn't a decent
.NET GUI on Linux.
There doesn’t seem to be a decent Dotnet GUI on Windows, either.
What’s Microsoft’s current recommendation for a Windows GUI? WinForms? >>> UWP? Silverlight? MFC? WinRT? Maui? Avalon?
Silverlight is dead. MAUI is UMP risen from the grave and both are the
descendants of WPF. Microsoft would dearly love to shovel dirt over
WinForms but can't ever quite get the job done.
I don't know the current status of Gtk# for cross-platform.
Qt is decent, and cross-platform. And it's, I think, better maintained
on Windows than is Gtkmm (for example).
And avoids Microsoft's chronic churn.
On 10/31/2024 1:32 AM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
Challenge to make something look pretty?
I only ever said functionality ...
On 10/30/2024 5:16 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
Think about why Microsoft has been forced to offer access to
Python-based open-source tools to its Excel users: it’s because of the
quality of analysis available through examples like the above.
Now think about why Microsoft can get away with charging for those
extra tools: it’s because Microsoft users (like yourself) are too dumb
to realize they can bypass Microsoft and use them for free.
[dissembling]
On Thu, 31 Oct 2024 04:17:19 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
On 31 Oct 2024 00:40:52 GMT, rbowman wrote:
On Wed, 30 Oct 2024 23:56:55 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
On 30 Oct 2024 17:05:47 GMT, rbowman wrote:
On Windows I might use .NET and C# but so far there isn't a decent
.NET GUI on Linux.
There doesn’t seem to be a decent Dotnet GUI on Windows, either.
What’s Microsoft’s current recommendation for a Windows GUI?
WinForms?
UWP? Silverlight? MFC? WinRT? Maui? Avalon?
Silverlight is dead. MAUI is UMP risen from the grave and both are the
descendants of WPF. Microsoft would dearly love to shovel dirt over
WinForms but can't ever quite get the job done.
I don't know the current status of Gtk# for cross-platform.
So, no decent GUI on Windows? On the world’s foremost platform that
inextricably integrates the GUI into the OS?
What I see is the irony of your claim there is no decent GUI for an OS
that dominates the desktop market.
On 31 Oct 2024 17:49:50 GMT, rbowman wrote:
On Thu, 31 Oct 2024 04:17:19 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
On 31 Oct 2024 00:40:52 GMT, rbowman wrote:
On Wed, 30 Oct 2024 23:56:55 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
On 30 Oct 2024 17:05:47 GMT, rbowman wrote:
On Windows I might use .NET and C# but so far there isn't a decent >>>>>> .NET GUI on Linux.
There doesn’t seem to be a decent Dotnet GUI on Windows, either.
What’s Microsoft’s current recommendation for a Windows GUI?
WinForms?
UWP? Silverlight? MFC? WinRT? Maui? Avalon?
Silverlight is dead. MAUI is UMP risen from the grave and both are
the descendants of WPF. Microsoft would dearly love to shovel dirt
over WinForms but can't ever quite get the job done.
I don't know the current status of Gtk# for cross-platform.
So, no decent GUI on Windows? On the world’s foremost platform that
inextricably integrates the GUI into the OS?
What I see is the irony of your claim there is no decent GUI for an OS
that dominates the desktop market.
How do developers create those “decent” GUIs without adequate tools?
On Thu, 31 Oct 2024 19:42:38 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
On 31 Oct 2024 17:49:50 GMT, rbowman wrote:
On Thu, 31 Oct 2024 04:17:19 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
On 31 Oct 2024 00:40:52 GMT, rbowman wrote:
On Wed, 30 Oct 2024 23:56:55 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: >>>>>
On 30 Oct 2024 17:05:47 GMT, rbowman wrote:
On Windows I might use .NET and C# but so far there isn't a
decent .NET GUI on Linux.
There doesn’t seem to be a decent Dotnet GUI on Windows, either. >>>>>>
What’s Microsoft’s current recommendation for a Windows GUI?
WinForms? UWP? Silverlight? MFC? WinRT? Maui? Avalon?
Silverlight is dead. MAUI is UMP risen from the grave and both are
the descendants of WPF. Microsoft would dearly love to shovel dirt
over WinForms but can't ever quite get the job done.
I don't know the current status of Gtk# for cross-platform.
So, no decent GUI on Windows? On the world’s foremost platform that
inextricably integrates the GUI into the OS?
What I see is the irony of your claim there is no decent GUI for an OS
that dominates the desktop market.
How do developers create those “decent” GUIs without adequate tools?
Just what do you consider adequate tools?
On Thu, 31 Oct 2024 09:54:17 -0400, DFS wrote:
On 10/30/2024 5:16 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
Think about why Microsoft has been forced to offer access to
Python-based open-source tools to its Excel users: it’s because of the >>> quality of analysis available through examples like the above.
Now think about why Microsoft can get away with charging for those
extra tools: it’s because Microsoft users (like yourself) are too dumb >>> to realize they can bypass Microsoft and use them for free.
[dissembling]
Says the one who was so desperate to find something nice that someone
had said about Microsoft Office, they had to go hang out on a Liberal-leaning media site!
On 10/31/2024 3:44 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
Says the one who was so desperate to find something nice that someone
had said about Microsoft Office, they had to go hang out on a
Liberal-leaning media site!
The story was mentioned at the bottom of the page on some tech site.
On Tue, 29 Oct 2024 23:31:00 -0400, Joel wrote:
Microsoft furnishes a programming editor for GNU C, which looked great.
https://code.visualstudio.com/download
Bloated, inefficient, and not as compatible as claimed.
... VS Code looked pretty cool ... it shows they really do support
Linux.
On Thu, 07 Nov 2024 16:49:51 -0500, Joel wrote:
... VS Code looked pretty cool ... it shows they really do support
Linux.
And they did it without using any of their own much-vaunted GUI
development tools. Instead they built it out of Electron, of all things.
Vote of confidence in your own platform, much?
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
... VS Code looked pretty cool ... it shows they really do support
Linux.
And they did it without using any of their own much-vaunted GUI
development tools. Instead they built it out of Electron, of all
things.
Vote of confidence in your own platform, much?
Feel free not to use it, then, jeez.