• Re: Canonical (Ubuntu) Requiring Applicants Take "DEI and Belonging" Cl

    From CrudeSausage@21:1/5 to RonB on Wed May 7 20:25:58 2025
    On 2025-05-07 20:21, RonB wrote:
    On 2025-05-07, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
    Yep, yet another one to throw in the bin. A few weeks ago, Lunduke
    suggested that they were alright except for the Snap and Mir
    controversies. It looks like that changed.

    <https://lunduke.substack.com/p/canonical-ubuntu-requiring-applicants>

    You also have to take into account where Canonical is located. In South Africa. That might have some effect on what's required of companies by the government.


    That's a good point. I just wonder why Canonical would be worried about
    there not being enough negroes in the company when that's the majority
    of South Africa. Of course, I imagine that very few of them can do
    anything other than murder and rape. Reading must be a real struggle.

    --
    God be with you,

    CrudeSausage
    KDE & LibreOffice supporter
    John 14:6

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Borax Man@21:1/5 to CrudeSausage on Thu May 8 01:29:03 2025
    On 2025-05-07, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
    Yep, yet another one to throw in the bin. A few weeks ago, Lunduke
    suggested that they were alright except for the Snap and Mir
    controversies. It looks like that changed.

    <https://lunduke.substack.com/p/canonical-ubuntu-requiring-applicants>

    I don't use it, but I'm going to change the only person I know who uses
    Ubuntu to switch. He would definately not be happy about this move from Canonical, and would be more than happy I'm sure, to move to an
    alternative like LMDE.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)