Sysop: | Amessyroom |
---|---|
Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
Users: | 44 |
Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
Uptime: | 14:33:23 |
Calls: | 255 |
Files: | 854 |
Messages: | 129,647 |
Conclusion: Linux is a modern OS, with much more administrative
flexibility. Complex user-sharing configurations can be set up -- encompassing, if needed, thousands of supplemental groups.
On 8 Dec 2024 05:12:19 GMT, vallor wrote:
Conclusion: Linux is a modern OS, with much more administrative
flexibility. Complex user-sharing configurations can be set up --
encompassing, if needed, thousands of supplemental groups.
Linux is the only real “industrial-strength” OS fit for the 21st
century.
NGROUPS_MAX is the maximum supplemental group count for a Unix login.
On Linux, it is 65536.
But on MacOS and NetBSD, it is 16 -- which is the old standard.
Even worse, MacOS has all but filled the supplemental groups with
gid's for its own housekeeping:
$ for II in `id -G -n`; do echo $II ; done
staff
everyone
localaccounts
_appserverusr
admin
_appserveradm
_lpadmin
_appstore
_lpoperator
_developer
_analyticsusers
com.apple.access_ftp
com.apple.access_screensharing
com.apple.access_ssh
com.apple.access_remote_ae
$ for II in `id -G -n`; do echo $II ; done | wc -l
15
What a waste of space! On Linux:
$ for II in `id -G -n`; do echo $II ; done
scott
adm
cdrom
sudo
dip
plugdev
lpadmin
sambashare
wireshark
libvirt
nordvpn
$ for II in `id -G -n`; do echo $II ; done | wc -l
11
Conclusion: Linux is a modern OS, with much more administrative
flexibility. Complex user-sharing configurations can be set
up -- encompassing, if needed, thousands of supplemental
groups.
p.s. If someone could run this on Windows and report the value,
I'd much appreciate it:
- - %<- cut here - %<- - -
#include <stdio.h>
#include <limits.h>
int main (void)
{
printf("%d\n",NGROUPS_MAX);
return 0;
}
- - %<- cut here - %<- - -
On 12/8/2024 12:12 AM, vallor wrote:
NGROUPS_MAX is the maximum supplemental group count for a Unix login.
On Linux, it is 65536.
But on MacOS and NetBSD, it is 16 -- which is the old standard.
Even worse, MacOS has all but filled the supplemental groups with
gid's for its own housekeeping:
$ for II in `id -G -n`; do echo $II ; done
staff
everyone
localaccounts
_appserverusr
admin
_appserveradm
_lpadmin
_appstore
_lpoperator
_developer
_analyticsusers
com.apple.access_ftp
com.apple.access_screensharing
com.apple.access_ssh
com.apple.access_remote_ae
$ for II in `id -G -n`; do echo $II ; done | wc -l
15
What a waste of space! On Linux:
$ for II in `id -G -n`; do echo $II ; done
scott
adm
cdrom
sudo
dip
plugdev
lpadmin
sambashare
wireshark
libvirt
nordvpn
$ for II in `id -G -n`; do echo $II ; done | wc -l
11
Conclusion: Linux is a modern OS, with much more administrative
flexibility. Complex user-sharing configurations can be set
up -- encompassing, if needed, thousands of supplemental
groups.
p.s. If someone could run this on Windows and report the value,
I'd much appreciate it:
- - %<- cut here - %<- - -
#include <stdio.h>
#include <limits.h>
int main (void)
{
printf("%d\n",NGROUPS_MAX);
return 0;
}
- - %<- cut here - %<- - -
D:\temp>tcc ngroups.c -o ngroups.exe
ngroups.c:6: error: 'NGROUPS_MAX' undeclared
... I don't have a Windows machine to check that on.
On 8 Dec 2024 07:31:59 GMT, vallor wrote:
... I don't have a Windows machine to check that on.
I don’t any of the Windows fan(atic)s here even have the nous to
understand the question.
On Sun, 8 Dec 2024 19:23:50 -0500, DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca>
wrote in <vj5daf$30up$2@dont-email.me>:
On 12/8/2024 12:12 AM, vallor wrote:
NGROUPS_MAX is the maximum supplemental group count for a Unix login.
On Linux, it is 65536.
But on MacOS and NetBSD, it is 16 -- which is the old standard.
Even worse, MacOS has all but filled the supplemental groups with
gid's for its own housekeeping:
$ for II in `id -G -n`; do echo $II ; done
staff
everyone
localaccounts
_appserverusr
admin
_appserveradm
_lpadmin
_appstore
_lpoperator
_developer
_analyticsusers
com.apple.access_ftp
com.apple.access_screensharing
com.apple.access_ssh
com.apple.access_remote_ae
$ for II in `id -G -n`; do echo $II ; done | wc -l
15
What a waste of space! On Linux:
$ for II in `id -G -n`; do echo $II ; done
scott
adm
cdrom
sudo
dip
plugdev
lpadmin
sambashare
wireshark
libvirt
nordvpn
$ for II in `id -G -n`; do echo $II ; done | wc -l
11
Conclusion: Linux is a modern OS, with much more administrative
flexibility. Complex user-sharing configurations can be set
up -- encompassing, if needed, thousands of supplemental
groups.
p.s. If someone could run this on Windows and report the value,
I'd much appreciate it:
- - %<- cut here - %<- - -
#include <stdio.h>
#include <limits.h>
int main (void)
{
printf("%d\n",NGROUPS_MAX);
return 0;
}
- - %<- cut here - %<- - -
D:\temp>tcc ngroups.c -o ngroups.exe
ngroups.c:6: error: 'NGROUPS_MAX' undeclared
No POSIX for you.
Seriously, though, try this:
#define _POSIX_
#include <stdio.h>
#include <limits.h>
int main (void)
{
printf("%d\n",NGROUPS_MAX);
return 0;
}
I know the answer though, because I downloaded tcc and looked
in limits.h -- which you could have done.
(But I don't think
the value in there properly reflects the system value -- couldn't
find a prototype for getgroups(3).)