• Re: PING! Michael

    From clams casino@21:1/5 to Jim on Sat Nov 23 15:05:51 2024
    XPost: rec.food.cooking, alt.home.repair, alt.california.illegals
    XPost: alt.politics.trump, alt.idiots

    On 11/23/2024 2:12 PM, Jim wrote:
    clams casino wrote:
    <cross posts trimmed>

    Fuckoff Baghdad Bob, you are universally known as a traitor to your
    own nation, you exterminable filth!


    Not to be a dick but we really should try to
    limit the cross posts coming in here, this
    froup is one of a few that hasn't been run
    over by political flamewars.

    Wot...RFC?!?!

    No seriously!
    I'm guilty of not always checking to see if
    it's x-posted, but I'm going to try to trim
    them now.

    Any chance of you doing the same?

    Not until the TDS filth like Janet, Cindy, Bwuthe, Dave Smith, Hank and
    the rest of the leftist attack pack retire their hateful and
    wrong-minded political rhetoric.

    ||That happens, I go right back to food-only mode, save for some brief
    musical interludes.||

    This lot need to know their precious RFC hidey hole can be turned into a smoking cinder of x-posts and nym warfare.

    I do not initiate, but I will, with consummate dedication, terminate.

    So mote it be.

    (I don't men to be difficult, but anti-Americanism from brain-dead
    foreigners and even worse from within sends me into a lather...)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From clams casino@21:1/5 to Cindy Hamilton on Sun Nov 24 11:22:25 2024
    XPost: rec.food.cooking, rec.arts.tv, alt.home.repair
    XPost: alt.idiots

    On 11/24/2024 11:15 AM, Cindy Hamilton wrote:
    Not everyone thinks the pronoun preference is nonsense.

    It's a form of MIND CONTROL, dear, wakey wakey!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From clams casino@21:1/5 to Dave Smith on Sun Nov 24 10:24:20 2024
    XPost: rec.food.cooking, can.politics, can.general

    On 11/23/2024 7:31 PM, Dave Smith wrote:
    On 2024-11-23 8:28 p.m., Ed P wrote:
    On 11/23/2024 6:39 PM, ItsJoanNotJoAnn wrote:

    If parents object to any bible teaching in public schools
    or the display of the Ten Commandments they are free to
    withdraw their children and home school them. Tens of
    thousands of children are home schooled in the USA and a
    lot of it has to do with the parents not feeling their
    children are getting the education they deserve.  My
    brother and sister-in-law home school their two boys.


    If they want religious training they should send them to the proper
    schools so they get it done right.
    If we, as a nation, stand for religious freedom, we should not be
    forced to a particular one.  If they teach the bible, why not the
    Koran and Hebrew bible and the Book of Mormon?


    Personally, I was happy to see them drop the religious stuff out of
    public events. I thought it was a good thing, but now they seem to be
    pushing Native spiritual crap like sacred fires, smudging, refereneces
    to Turtle Island and other hocus pocus.

    That being said, I have sympathy for the Catholic school system.  It's
    only fair that since they are tax funded they should accept students of
    other faiths. However there have been court cases over  demands to
    exempt non Catholics from religion classes. The Catholic schools around
    here have a lot Muslim students. Going to a Catholic school is an option
    for them, but IMO if they opt for a Catholic school education they
    should be required to attend the Catholic part of it.


    Good one Guts Griping, you finally dropped the "America is our whipping
    post" act and said something about your own nation for a change - bravo!

    In time perhaps you will even address your Turdeau-led thought crimes bill.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From clams casino@21:1/5 to Bruce on Wed Nov 27 10:47:58 2024
    XPost: rec.food.cooking, aus.politics, nz.politics
    XPost: soc.culture.australian

    On 11/27/2024 10:38 AM, Bruce wrote:
    On Wed, 27 Nov 2024 10:17:54 -0700, clams casino <cc@invalid.cc>
    wrote:

    On 11/27/2024 9:56 AM, Bruce wrote:
    On Wed, 27 Nov 2024 11:48:48 -0000, Janet <nobody@home.com> wrote:

    Mexico is one of the countries targeted for Trump's
    tariffs on his first day in office.

    You'll be paying a lot more for them in January.

    The basement dwellers don't realise these things. Aww...

    You truly are a cucked and fucked asset of the deep state and not a
    thing more, ya auztarded trollass.

    How can I tell if I'm part of the deep state? Does it pay?


    You'll _never tell_ which is a day of reckoning merely 2 months hence -
    enjoi!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From clams casino@21:1/5 to Carol on Fri Nov 29 13:12:30 2024
    XPost: rec.food.cooking, alt.survival, misc.survivalism
    XPost: alt.home.repair

    On 11/29/2024 12:54 PM, Carol wrote:
    jmcquown wrote:

    On 11/29/2024 4:40 AM, Cindy Hamilton wrote:
    How are urbanites supposed to grow it themselves?


    Excellent point, Cindy. I'm not citing statistics because I can't be
    bothered, but in 1924 even the poor employed working class people
    living in urban settings had to find a way to buy food, or beg for it
    or steal it. Where were they supposed to plant vegetable gardens?

    Jill

    You do hopefully catch that homeowners aren't growing all their food?
    As listed earlier. 55% of *home owners* have some level of edibles
    growing; That could just be an herb garden in a windowsill, a tomato
    pot or two in the backyard. Apartment dwellers _who have a porch
    suitable_ may have the same (I think the link said 7%).

    Obviously not all apartments have a suitable porch or the complex may
    have rules controlling what is allowed and that's why the link laid
    that out specifically.

    No one said they didn't buy food. I buy food too, but as a hobby I
    also grow some of it. Quite common around here.

    Have you paused to consider just how much resistance, denialism,
    vitriol, and personal enmity you're talking here simply for having a
    home garden, sharing it, and promoting them as useful?

    It appears certain assets here have a coordinated psyop going to chasten Americans off from any efforts at sustainability inside their homesteads.

    That is disturbing, given our uncertain times and future.

    But it is also a very well-documented artifact of the re-toxified RFC
    culture.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)