• All About Gravitational W

    From Jim Singleton@RICKSBBS to all on Tue Nov 26 17:54:00 2024
    Tommy's Holiday Camp Remote Online Systems International +1 604 361 1464

    All About Gravitational Waves - by Gregory Hodowanec
    Reproduced without permission from Radio-Electronics magazine April 1986
    by The Trace - June 1, 1991

    Abstract:

    Are gravitational waves the source of noise in electronic devices? The
    author believes so, and describes a simple circuit to detect the waves.

    The author has developed a new cosmology that predicts the existance of
    a new type of gravitational signal. We are publishing the results of
    some of his experiments in the hope that it will foter experimentation
    as well as alternate explanations for his results.

    ------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Einstein predicted the existence of gravity waves - the
    counterpart of light and radio waves - many years ago. However, he
    predicted the existence of quadrature-type gravity waves.
    Unfortunately, no one has been able to detect quadrature-type gravity
    waves.

    Consequently, the author developed, over the years, a new
    cosmology, or theory of the universe, in which monopole gravity waves
    are predicted. The author's theory does not preclude the existence of Einsteinian gravity waves, but they are viewed as being extremely weak,
    very long in wavelength, and therefore very difficult to detect
    unequivocally. Monopole signals, however, are relatively strong, so
    they are much more easily detected.

    Monopole gravity waves have been detected for many years; it's
    just that we've been used to calling them 1/f "noise" signals or flicker
    noise. Those noise signals can be seen in low-frequency electronic
    circuits. More recently, such signals have been called Microwave
    Background Radiation (MBR); most scientists believe that to be a relic
    of the so-called "big bang" that created the universe.

    In the author's cosmology, the universe is considered to be a
    finite, spherical, closed system; in other words, it is a black body.
    Monopole gravity waves "propagate" any distance in Planck time, which is
    about 10^-44 seconds; hence, their effects appear everywhere almost instantaneously. The sum total of background flux in the universe gives
    rise to the observed microwave temperature, in our universe, of about
    three degrees kelvin.

    Sources of monopole gravity waves include common astrophysical phenomena like supernovas, novas, starquakes, etc., as well as earthly phenomena like earthquakes, core movements, etc. Those sorts of cosmic
    and earthly events cause delectable temporary variations in the amount
    of gravitational-impule radiation present in the universe.

    Novas, especially supernovas (which are large exploding stars),
    are very effective generators of oscillatory monopole gravity waves.
    Those signals have a Gaussian waveshape and a lifetime of only a few
    tens of milliseconds. They can readily impart a portion of their energy
    to free particles like molecules, atoms, and electrons.

    The background flux, in general, is fairly constant. Variations
    in the backgrouns flux are caused by movements of large mass
    concentrations like galaxies, super-galaxies, and black holes. These
    movements create gravitational "shadows," analogous to optical shadows.
    When the earth-moon-sun alignment is just right, the gravtational shadow
    of a small, highly concentrated mass -- a black hole, for example -- can
    be detected and tracked from the Earth. So, keeping those facts in
    mind, let's look at several practical methods of detecting gravitational energy.

    Electrons and Capacitors
    ------------------------

    As stated above, gravity-wave energy can be imparted to ordinary objects. Of special interest to us are the loosely-bound electrons in
    ordinary capacitors. Perhaps you have wondered how a discharged
    high-valued electrolytic capacitor (say 1000 uF at 35 volts) can develop
    a charge even though it is disconnected from an electrical circuit.

    While some of that charging could be attributed to a chemical
    reaction in the capacitor, I believe that much of it is caused by
    gravity-wave impulses bathing the capacitor at all times. And the means
    by which gravity waves transfer energy is similar to another means of
    energy transfer that is well known to readers of Radio-Electronics: the electric field.

    As shown in Fig. 1-a, the presence of a large mass near the
    plates of a capacitor causes a polarized alignment of the molecules in
    the capacitor, as though an external DC voltage had been applied to the capacitor, as shown in Fig. 1-b.

    You can verify that yourself: Drop a fully-discharged 1000-uF,
    35-volt electrolytic capacitor broadside on a hard surface from a height
    of two or three feet. Then measure the voltage across the capacitor
    with a high-impedance voltmeter. You will find a voltage of about 10 to
    50 mV. Drop the capacitor several times on opposite sides, don't let it bounce, and note how charge builds up to a saturation level that may be
    as high as one volt.

    In that experiment, the energy of free-fall is converted to polarization energy in the capacitor. The loosely-bound electrons are literally "jarred" into new polarization positions. In a similar
    manner, gravitational impulses from space "jar" electrons into new
    polarization positions.

    Here's another experiment: Monitor a group of similar capacitors
    that have reached equilibrium conditions while being bathed by normal background gravitational impulses. You'll observe that, over a period
    of time, the voltage across all those open-circuited capacitors will be
    equal, and that it will depend only on the average background flux at
    the time. Temperature should be kept constant for that experiment.

    I interpret those facts to mean that a capacitor develops a
    charge that reflects the monopole gravity-wave signals existing at that particular location in the universe. So, although another device could
    be used, we will use a capacitor as the sensing element in the
    gravity-wave detectors described next.

    The simplest detector
    ---------------------

    Monopole gravity waves generate small impulse currents that may
    be coupled to an op-amp configured as a current-to-voltage converter, as
    shown in Fig. 2. The current-to-voltage converter is a nearly lossless current-measuring device. It gives an output voltage that is
    proportional to the product of the input current (which can be in the picoampere range) and resistor R1. Linearity is assured because the non-DC-connected capacitor maintains the op-amp's input terminals at
    virtual ground.

    The detector's output may be coupled to a high-impedance digital
    or analog voltmeter, an audio amplifier, or an oscilloscope. In
    addition, a chart recorder could be used to record the DC output over a
    period of time, thus providing a record of long-term "shadow-drift"
    effects. Resistor R2 and capacitor C2 protect the output of the
    circuit; their values will depend on what you're driving. To
    experiment, try a 1k resistor and a 0.1 uF capacitor.

    The output of the detector (Eo) may appear in two forms,
    depending on whether or not stabilizing capacitor Cx is connected. When
    it is, the output will be highly amplified 1/f noise signals, as shown
    in Fig. 3-a. Without Cx, the circuit becomes a "ringing" circuit with a slowly-decaying output that has a resonant frequency of 500-600 Hz for
    the component values shown. In that configuration, the circuit is a
    Quantum Non-Demolition (QND) circuit, as astrophysicists call it; it
    will now actually display the amplitude variations (waveshapes) of the
    passing gravitational-impulse bursts, as shown in Fig. 3-b.

    An interesting variation on the detector may be built by
    increasing the value of sensing capacitor C1 to about 1000-1600 uF.
    After circuit stability is achieved, the circuit will respond to almost
    all gravity-wave signals in the universe. By listening carefully to the
    audio output of the detector you can hear not only normal 1/f noise, but
    also many "musical" sounds of space, as well as other effects that will
    not be disclosed here.

    An improved detector
    --------------------

    Adding a buffer stage to the basic circuit, as shown in Fig. 4,
    makes the detector easier to work with. The IC used is a common 1458
    (which is a dual 741). One op-amp is used as the detector, and the
    other op-amp multiplies the detector's output by a factor of 20.
    Potentiometer R3 is used to adjust the output to the desired level.

    When used unshielded, the circuits presented here are not only sensitive detectors of gravitational impulses, but also of
    *electromagnetic* signals ranging from 50-500 GHz! Hence, these
    circuits could be used to detect many types of signals, including radar signals.

    To detect only gravity waves, and not EMI, the circuit should be shielded against all electromagnetic radiation. Both circuits are low
    in cost and easy to build. Assembly is non-critical, although proper
    wiring practices should be followed. Initially, you should use the
    op-amps specified; don't experiment with other devices until you attain satisfactory results with the devices called for. Later you can
    experiment with other components, like low-poer op-amps, especially CMOS
    types, which have diodes across their inputs to protect them against
    high input voltages. Those diodes make them much less sensitive to electromagnetic radiation, so circuits that use those devices may be
    used to detect gravity-waves without shielding.

    The circuit in Fig. 4 is the QND or ringing type, but the
    feedback resistance is variable from 0.5 to 2 megohms. That allows you
    to tune the circuit to the natural oscillating frequency of different astrophysical events. Huge supernova bursts, for example, have much
    larger amplitudes, and much lower frequencies of oscillation than normal supernovas and novas. Hence you can tune the detector for the supernova
    burst rate that interests you. With the component values given in Fig.
    4, the resonant frequency of the circuitcan be varied between 300-900
    Hz. The circuit of Fig. 4, or a variant thereof, was used to obtain all
    the experimental data discussed below.

    In addition, the circuits that we've described in this article
    were built in an aluminum chassis and then located within an additional
    steel box to reduce pickup of stray EMI. Power and output connections
    were made through filter-type feedthrough capacitors.

    In the QND mode, coupling the detector's output to an audio
    amplifier and an oscilloscope gives impressive sound and sight effects. Fluctuations generally reflect passing gravitational shadows. The
    author has taken much data of the sort to be discussed; let's examine a
    few samples of that data to indicate the kind of results you can expect,
    and ways of interpreting those results.

    Sample scans
    ------------

    Shown in Fig. 5 is an unusual structure that was repeated
    exactly the next day, but four minutes earlier. The pattern was
    followed for several weeks, moving four minutes earlier per day. That
    confirms the observation that the burst response of the detector was
    related to our location on earth with respect to the rest of the
    universe. The change of four minutes per day corresponds with the
    relative movements of the earth and the body that was casting the
    "shadow."

    The plot of Fig. 6 appears to be a supernova, probably in our
    own galaxy, caught in the act of exploding. The plot of Fig. 7 was made
    four days after another supernova explosion; that plot reveals that that supernova left a well-developed black hole and "ring" structure. You
    may find it interesting to consider that visual indications of those
    supernovas will not be seen for several thousand years! As such, it
    might be "quite a while" before we get a visual confirmation of our
    suspected supernova!

    Last, Fig. 8 shows a plot of the moon's gravitational shadow
    during the eclipse of May 30, 1984. Note that the gravitational shadow preceded the optical shadow by about eight minutes! That gives credence
    to our claim that gravitational effects propagate instantaneously.
    Relatedly, but not shown here, a deep shadow is consistently detected
    whenever the center of the galaxy appears on the meridian (180 degrees)
    hinting of the existence of a "black hole" in that region.

    Conclusions
    -----------

    In this article we discussed the highlights of a new theory of
    the universe that predicts the existence of monopole gravity waves. We
    then presented details of a circuit that can be used to detect monopole
    gravity waves. The author has monitored those signals for ten years so
    is confident that you will be able to duplicate those results. Needless
    to say, the subject of gravity waves is a largely unexplored one, and
    there is much yet to be learned. Perhaps this article will inspire you
    to contribute to that knowledge. In your experiments, you might
    consider trying the following: Operate several detector circuits at the
    same time and record the results. Separate the detectors -- even by
    many miles -- and record their outputs. In such experiments, the author
    found that the circuits' outputs were very similar. Those results would
    seem to count out local EMI or pure random noise as the cause of the
    circuit response.

    For more information on the subject of gravity you might consult _Gravitation_ by C. Misner, K. Thorne, and J. Wheeler, published by W.H. Freeman and Co., 1973. Also, the article, "Quantum Non-Demolition Measurements" in _Science_, Volume 209, August 1 1980 contains useful information on the QND type of measurement used here.

    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Sidebar: Rhysmonic Cosmology

    Ancient and Renaissance physicists postulated the existence of
    an all-pervasive medium they called the _ether_. Since the advent of sub-atomic physics and relativity, theories of the ether have fallen
    into disuse. Rhysmonic cosmology postulates the existence of rhysmons,
    which are the fundamental particles of nature, and which pervade the
    universe, as does the ether.

    Each rhysmon has the attributes of size, shape, position, and
    velocity; rhysmons are arranged in space in a matrix structure, the
    density of which varies according to position in the universe. The
    matrix structure of rhysmons in free space gives rise to the fundamental
    units of length, time, velocity, mass, volume, denisty, and energy
    discovered by physicist Max Planck.

    Fundamental postulates of the Rhysmonic Universe can be
    summarized as follows:

    o The universe is finite and spherical
    o Euclidean geometry is sufficient to describe Rhysmonic Space.
    o The edge of the universe is a perfect reflector of energy.
    o Matter forms only in the central portion of the universe.

    The matrix structure of rhysmons allows the instantaneous
    transmission of energy along a straight line, called an energy vector,
    from the point of origin to the edge of the universe, where it would be reflected according to laws similar those giverning spherical optics.

    In Rhysmonic Cosmology, mass, inertia, and energy are treated as
    they are in classical mechanics. Mass arises, according to the author,
    because "particles in rhysmonic cosmology must be the result of changes
    in the `density' of the rhysmonic structure, since the universe is
    nothing more than rhysmons and the void."

    In a "dense" area of the universe, such as the core of a
    particle, a number of rhysmons are squeezed togther. This means that
    every particle has a correlating anti-particle, or an area of
    correspondingly low density. In addition, a particle has an excess of outward-directed energy vectors, and an anti-particle has an excess of inward-directed energy vectors. Those vectors are what we usually call electric charge.

    Gravity is not a force of attraction between objects; rather,
    two objects are impelled towards each other by energy vectors impinging
    on the surfaces of those objects that do not face each other. Netwon's
    laws of gravitation hold, although their derivation is different than in Newton's system.

    Gravitational waves arise in various ways, but, in general, a
    large astronomical disturbance, such as the explosion of a supernova, instantaneously modulates the rhysmonic energy vectors. That modulation
    might then appear, for example, superimposed on the Earth's
    gravitaional-field flux -- and it would be detectable by circuits like
    those described here.

    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Diagrams
    --------
    Fig. 2 - A Basic gravity-wave detector is very
    - - - - )| - - - - - - - - - simple. The charge build-up on capacitor C1
    . Cx 470pF . due to gravity-wave impulses is amplified by
    . . IC1 for output.
    . .
    . R1 1.3M . R2 see text
    o----v^v^v^----------------o -----v^v^v^--------------------O DC Output
    | | |
    | ^ | |
    | _ | +9V | |
    | 2| \_|7 | |
    o---------| \_ | |
    _|_ |IC1 \_ 6 | | C2 see text
    ___ C1 | 741 _>--------o---o-----|(-----------------------O Audio Output
    | .22 3| _/
    o---------| _/4
    | |_/ |
    | v -9V
    |
    |-------------------------------------------------------------O Gnd



    O Output
    R1 500K R2 1.5M R5 100K |
    -----^v^v^v------^v^v^v-- |----^v^v^v----------------------o
    | ^ | | |
    | | | | |
    | _ |___| | _ ^ +9V |
    | 2| \_ | | 6| \_ | |
    o---------| \_ | o------| \_|8 |
    _|_C1 |IC1-a\_ 1 | >R4 |IC1-b\_ 7 |
    ___ .22 |1/2 _>-----o >5K |1/2 _>-----------------|
    | 3|1458_/ | > 5|1458_/
    o---------| _/ R3> | |---| _/ |4
    | |_/ 10K><---| | |_/ |
    | > | v -9V
    | | |
    |-----------------------o-------o-----------------------------O Gnd

    Fig. 4 -- A buffered output stage makes the gravity-wave detector easier
    to use.

    Parts List - Simple Detector Parts List - Buffered Detector
    All resistors 1/4-watt, 5%. All fixed resistors 1/4-watt, 5%.
    R1 - 1.3 megohm R1 - 500,000 ohms
    R2 - see text R2 - 1.5 megohms, potentiometer Capacitors R3 - 10,000 ohms, potentiometer
    C1 - 0.22 uF R4 - 5000 ohms
    C2 - see text R5 - 100,000 ohms
    Cx - see text Capacitors
    Semiconductors C1 - 0.22 uF
    IC1 - 741 op-amp Semiconductors
    IC1 - 1458 dual op-amp

    Tommy's Holiday Camp Remote Online Systems International +1 604 361 1464


    X-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-X

    Another file downloaded from: NIRVANAnet(tm)

    & the Temple of the Screaming Electron Jeff Hunter 510-935-5845
    Rat Head Ratsnatcher 510-524-3649
    Burn This Flag Zardoz 408-363-9766
    realitycheck Poindexter Fortran 415-567-7043
    Lies Unlimited Mick Freen 415-583-4102

    Specializing in conversations, obscure information, high explosives,
    arcane knowledge, political extremism, diversive sexuality,
    insane speculation, and wild rumours. ALL-TEXT BBS SYSTEMS.

    Full access for first-time callers. We don't want to know who you are,
    where you live, or what your phone number is. We are not Big Brother.

    "Raw Data for Raw Nerves"

    X-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-X

    Jim Singleton
    telnet://ricksbbs.synchro.net:23
    http://ricksbbs.synchro.net:8080
    ---
    ■ Synchronet ■ Rick's BBS telnet://ricksbbs.synchro.net:23