• What Neopagan Druids Believe, (c) 1984 P. E. I. Bonewits

    From Carolyn Hoffman@RICKSBBS to ALL on Sun Mar 2 07:15:05 2025
    What Neopagan Druids Believe
    (c) 1984 P. E. I. Bonewits
    Reprinted from "The Druids' Progress" #1

    Here's a brief introduction to the basic beliefs that I expect
    will characterize most members of ADF (a Neopagan Druid organiza-
    tion). These spiritual beliefs are similar to most of those held
    by other Neopagans (see Margot Adler's book, "Drawing Down the
    Moon") and the similarities are far more important than whatever
    specific distinctions of doctrine or ethnic focus there might be
    between us and other Neopagans. I should also mention that not
    all Neopagans who consider themselves Druids will necessarily
    agree with every point of the following list. Nonetheless, these
    beliefs will be the roots of ADF's polytheology, the source of
    the spiritual grove we seek to plant.

    1) We believe that divinity is both immanent (internal) and
    transcendent (external). We see the Gods as being able to mani-
    fest at any point in space or time, including within human
    beings, which they might choose, although they may often have
    their preferences. Often this develops among some Neopagans into
    pantheism ("the physical world is divine") or panentheism ("the
    Gods are everywhere"). We tend more towards the latter position.

    2) We believe that divinity is as likely to manifest in a
    female form as it is in a male form, and that therefore women and
    men are spiritually equal. We insist on a dynamic balance between
    female and male deities honored and/or invoked at every ceremony,
    and a strict gender balance in whatever theories of polytheology
    that we eventually develop. We're "liberals" about women's rights
    and gay rights, but not "radicals;" that is to say, we're unwill-
    ing to subordinate all our other principles in order to promote
    this particular principle. People who wish to make feminism or
    gay activism the absolute center of all their spiritual activity
    will probably be happier in other groups.

    3) We believe in a multiplicity of gods and goddesses, all of
    whom are likely to be worthy of respect, love and worship. Some-
    times we believe in these divinities as individual and inde-
    pendent entities; sometimes as Jungian "archetypes of the collec-
    tive unconscious" or "circuits in the psychic Switchboard;" some-
    times as aspects or faces of one or two major deities (the "High
    God/dess" and/or "the Goddess and the Horned God"); and sometimes
    as "all of the above!" We feel that this sort of flexibility
    leads to pluralism (instead of monism), multi-valued logic sys-
    tems and an increased tolerance of other people's beliefs and
    lifestyles. All of these are vital if our species is ever going
    to learn to live in peace and harmony amid a multiplicity of
    human cultures.

    4) We believe that it is necessary to have a respect and love
    for Nature as divine in her own right, and to accept ourselves as
    a part of Nature and not as her "rulers." We tend to accept what
    has come to be known as "the Gaia hypothesis," that the biosphere
    of our planet is a living being, who is due all the love and
    support that we, her children, can give her. This is especially
    important in our modern era, when 3000 years of monotheistic
    belief that "mankind is to have dominion over the Earth" have
    come close to destroying the ability of the biosphere to maintain
    itself. Many Neopagan groups refer to themselves as "Earth reli-
    gions" and this is a title which we believe Neopagan Druidism
    should proudly claim, and which we should work to earn. Thus we
    consider ecological awareness and activism to be sacred duties.
    If the ecology, conservation and anti-nuclear movements are ever
    to have "chaplains," we should be among them.

    5) We believe in accepting the positive aspects of western
    science and technology, but in maintaining an attitude of worry-
    ness towards their supposed ethical neutrality. The overwhelming
    majority of Neopagans are technophiles, not technophobes. We tend
    to be better scientifically educated than the general population,
    and thus we have a religious duty to speak out about the econo-
    mics, political and ecological uses and abuses of science and
    technology.

    6) We share with most other Neopagans a distaste for monolith-
    ic religious organizations and would-be messiahs and gurus. Ob-
    viously, this places the founders of Neopagan religious tradi-
    tions in a complex position: they need enough religious authority
    to focus the organizations they're founding, but not so much as
    to allow them (or their successors) to become oppressive. Since
    the pluralistic approach denies the existence of any One True
    Right and Only Way, and since Neopagans insist upon their own
    human fallibility, we expect to be able to steer ADF between the
    Scylla of tyranny and the Charybdis of anarchy.

    7) In keeping with this, we believe that healthy religions
    should have a minimum amount of dogma and a maximum amount of
    eclectism and flexibility. Neopagans tend to be reluctant to
    accept any idea without personally investigating both its practi-
    cality and its long-range consequences. They are also likely to
    take useful ideas from almost any source that doesn't run too
    fast to get away. We intend ADF to be a "reconstructionist"
    tradition of Druidism, but we know that eventually concepts from
    nonDruidic sources will be grafted on to our trees. There's no
    harm in this, as long as we stay aware of what we are doing at
    every step of the way, and make a legitimate effort to find
    authentic (and therefore spiritually and esthetically congruent)
    parallels in genuine Indo-European sources first. As for flexi-
    bility, Neopagan Druidism is an organic religion, and like all
    other organisms it can be expected to grow, change and produce
    offshoots as the years go by.

    8) We believe that ethics and morality should be based upon
    joy, self-love and respect; the avoidance of actual harm to
    others; and the increase of public benefit. We try to balance out
    people's needs for personal autonomy and growth, with the neces-
    sity of paying attention to the impact of each individual's
    actions on the lives and welfare of others. The commonest Neo-
    pagan ethical expression is "If it doesn't hurt anyone, do what
    you like." Most Neopagans believe in some variant or another of
    the principle of karma, and state that the results of their
    actions will always return to them. It's difficult for ordinary
    humans to successfully commit "offenses against the Gods," short
    of major crimes such as ecocide or genocide, and our deities are
    perfectly capable of defending their own honor without any help
    from mortal busybodies. We see the traditional monotheistic con-
    cepts of sin, guilt and divine retribution for thought-crimes as
    sad misunderstandings of natural growth experiences.

    9) We believe that human beings were meant to lead lives
    filled with joy, love, pleasure, beauty and humor. Most Neopagans
    are fond of food, drink, music, sex and bad puns, and consider
    all of these (except possibly the puns) to be sacraments. Al-
    though the ancient Druids appear to have had ascetics within
    their ranks, they also had a sensualist tradition, and the common
    folk have always preferred the latter. Neopagan Druids try to
    keep these two approaches in balance and harmony with each other
    by avoiding dualistic extremes. But the bedrock question is, "If
    your religion doesn't enable you to enjoy life more, why bother?"

    10) We believe that with proper training, art, discipline and
    intent, human minds and hearts are fully capable of performing
    most of the magic and miracles they are ever likely to need.
    This is done through the use of what we perceive as natural,
    divinely granted psychic powers. As with many other Neopagan
    traditions, the conscious practice of magic is a central part of
    most of our religious rituals. Unlike monotheists, we see no
    clearcut division between magic and prayer. Neither, however, do
    we assume an automatic connection between a person's ability to
    perform "miracles" and either (a) their personal spirituality or
    (b) the accuracy of their poly/theological opinions.

    11) We believe in the importance of celebrating the solar,
    lunar and other cycles of our lives. Because we see ourselves as
    a part of Nature, and because we know that repeating patterns can
    give meaning to our lives, we pay special attention to astronomi-
    cal and biological cycles. By consciously observing the sol-
    stices, equinoxes and the points in between, as well as the
    phases of the moon, we are not only aligning ourselves with the
    movements and energy patterns of the external world, but we are
    also continuing customs that reach back to the original Indo-
    European peoples and beyond. These customs are human universals,
    as are the various ceremonies known as "rites of passage" --
    celebrations of birth, puberty, personal dedication to a given
    deity or group, marriage, ordination, death, etc. Together these
    various sorts of observations help us to find ourselves in space
    and time -- past, present and future.

    12) We believe that people have the ability to solve their
    current problems, both personal and public, and to create a
    better world. Hunger, poverty, war and disease are not necessary,
    nor inevitable. Pain, depression, lack of creative opportunity
    and mutual oppression are not necessary either. What is necessary
    is a new spiritual consciousness in which short-sighted greed, power-mongering and violence are seen as absurd, rather than
    noble. This utopian vision, tempered with common sense, leads us
    to a strong commitment to personal and global growth, evolution
    and balance.

    13) We believe that people can progress far towards achieving
    growth, evolution and balance through the carefully planned
    alteration of their "normal" states of consciousness. Neopagans
    use both ancient and modern methods of aiding concentration,
    meditation, reprogramming and ecstasy. We seek to avoid being
    locked into single-valued, monistic "tunnel realities," and in-
    stead work on being able to switch worldviews according to their appropriateness for each given situation, while still maintaining
    a firm spiritual, ethical and practical grounding.

    14) We believe that human interdependence implies community
    service. Neopagan Druids are encouraged to use their talents to
    help others, both inside and outside of the Neopagan community.
    Some of us are active in political, social, ecological and chari-
    table organizations, while others prefer to work for the public
    good primarily through spiritual means (and many of us do both).
    As Neopagan Druids we have the right and the obligation to
    actively oppose (physically and spiritually) those forces which
    would kill our planet, oppress our fellow human beings, and
    destroy our freedom of religion. Also, however, we have a con-
    stant need to evaluate our own methods and motives, and to make
    sure that our actions are coming from the depths of our spiritual
    beings, and not from petty or short-sighted desires for power.

    15) We believe that if we are to achieve any of our goals, we
    must practice what we preach. Neopagan Druidism should be a way
    of life, not merely a weekly or monthly social function. Thus we
    must always strive to make our lives consistent with our pro-
    claimed beliefs. In a time when many people are looking for
    something solid to hang on to in the midst of rapid technological
    and cultural changes, Neopagan Druidism can offer a natural and
    creative alternative to the repressive structures of mainstream
    monotheism. But our alternative will not be seen as such unless
    we can manage to make it a complete lifestyle -- one with con-
    cern, if not always immediate answers, for the problems of every-
    day life, as well as the grand cosmic questions.

    Obviously, there's a great deal more to Neopaganism in general
    and our version of it in particular. The details of Neopagan
    polytheology will take years to develop. The section of the
    "Druid Handbook" dealing with beliefs will consist of statements
    with commentaries (and even arguments) about the meanings of the
    statements. The purpose of this format is multiple: to emphasize
    that there are no final answers to the great questions of human
    existence; to express clearly that Neopagans can disagree with
    each other about subtle details of interpretation, while still
    remaining members of the same religion; and to allow the belief
    system to grow and adapt to changing cultural and technological
    needs. Neopagan Druidism is to be a religion of the future, as
    well as of the present and the past.

    *****************************************************************
    This article has been reprinted from "The Druids' Progress",
    issue #1, and is copyright 1984 by P. E. I. Bonewits. "DP" is the
    irregular journal of a Neopagan Druid group called "Ar nDraiocht
    Fein", founded by Bonewits (author of "Real Magic"). For more
    data, send an S.A.S.E. to: Box 9398, Berkeley, CA, USA 94709.
    Permission to distribute via BBS's is hereby granted, provided
    that the entire article, including this notice, is kept intact. *****************************************************************


    The term "Pagan" comes from the Latin paganus, which appears to
    have originally meant "country dweller," "villager," or "hick."
    The members of the Roman army seem to have used it to mean
    "civilian." When Christianity took over the Empire and continued
    it under new management, the word took on the idea of "one who is
    not a soldier of Christ." Today, the word means "atheist" or
    "devil worshiper" to many devout monotheists. But those who call
    themselves Pagan use it differently; as a general term for na-
    tive, natural and polytheistic religions, and their members.
    The following definitions have been coined in recent years in
    order to keep the various polytheological and historical distinc-
    tions clear: "Paleopaganism" refers to the original tribal faiths
    of Europe, Africa, Asia, the Americas, Oceania and Australia,
    where and when they were (or are) still practiced as intact
    belief systems. Of the so-called "Great Religions of the World,"
    Hinduism, Taoism and Shinto fall under this category.
    "Mesopaganism" is the word used for those religions founded as
    attempts to recreate, revive or continue what their founders
    thought of as the (usually European) Paleopagan ways of their
    ancestors (or predecessors), but which were heavily influenced (accidentally, deliberately or involuntarily) by the monotheistic
    and/or dualistic worldviews of Judaism, Christianity and/or Is-
    lam. Examples of Mesopagan belief systems would include the
    Masonic Druids, Rosicrucianism, Spiritualism, Crowleyianity, and
    the many Afro-American faiths (Voudoun, Macumba, etc.).
    "Neopaganism" refers to those religions created since 1940 or
    so that have attempted to blend what their founders perceived as
    the best aspects of different types of Paleopaganism with modern
    "Aquarian Age" ideals, while eliminating as much as possible of
    the traditional western dualism. The title of this section should
    now make a great deal more sense. So let's look at the state of
    Paleopaganism in Europe prior to the arrival of Christianity.
    It's important to remember that a lot of history happened in
    Europe before anyone got around to writing it down. Around 4000
    B.C.E. ("Before the Common Era") the tribes that spoke Proto-
    Indo-European began to migrate away from their original homeland,
    which was probably the territory around the northwest shores of
    the Black Sea. Some went southeast and founded the Armenian,
    Iranian and Indic cultures. Others went south to Anatolia and
    Palestine, and became known as Hittites and Mitanni. Those who
    went southwest to the Balkans became Thracians and Greeks. Others
    who went west and north established the Celtic, Slavic, Germanic,
    and Baltic cultures.
    All this migrating around took many centuries and involved a
    lot of bloodshed. Previous inhabitants of a given piece of terri-
    tory had to be persuaded, usually at swordpoint, to let the
    newcomers in -- and there went the neighborhood! The pre-Indo-
    European cultures in Europe (which were not necessarily "peaceful matriarchies") were all still in the late Neolithic ("New Stone
    Age") cultural era, with only stone axes, spears and knives with
    which to defend themselves. The invaders had bronze weapons and
    armor with which to fight, plus bronze axes with which to clear
    the great forests that covered the continent, bronze plows to
    till the soil, etc.
    The impact of this superior technology can be judged by the
    fact that, by the time of the Roman Empire, nearly every language
    spoken in Europe (except Basque, Lappish and Finnish) was a
    member of the Western branch of Indo-European. Everything west of
    the Urals was pretty much dominated by a loosely interlinked conglomeration of related cultures, each of which was a mixture
    of the PIE culture and that of the previous holders of its terri-
    tory. The largest group of cultures north of the Roman borders
    was that of the Celts, and the second largest that of the Germans
    (some scholars consider the Germans to be so closely related
    culturally to the Celts as to be practically a subset, at least
    in archaeological terms).
    Thanks to the work of Georges Dumezil, James Duran and others,
    we are beginning to have a clear idea of the social, political,
    magical and religious functions of the priestly "class" in Indo-
    European Paleopaganism. I use the word "class" deliberately, for
    the Western Indo-European cultures seem to have been built on the
    same fundamental social pattern as that with which we are famil-
    iar in Vedic India: clergy, warriors, and providers (farmers,
    craftspeople, traders, herders, etc.). In fact, it appears that a
    close to exact correspondence can be made between the religious,
    political and social functions originally performed by a Latin
    flamen, a Celtic draoi, or a Vedic brahman.
    The Indo-European clergy basically included the entire intelli-
    gensia of their cultures: poets, musicians, historians, astrono-
    mers, genealogists, judges, diviners, and of course, leaders and
    supervisors of religious rituals. Officially, they ranked imme-
    diately below the local tribal chieftains or "kings" and above
    the warriors. However, since the kings were quasi-religious fig-
    ures, usually inaugurated by the clergy, and often dominated by
    them, it was frequently a tossup as to who was in charge in any
    given tribe. The clergy were exempt from taxation and military
    service, and in some cultures are said to have spent decades in
    specialized training.
    They seem to have been responsible for all public religious
    rituals (private ones were run by the heads of each household).
    Public ceremonies were most often held in fenced groves of sacred
    trees. These were usually of birch, yew, and oak (or ash where
    oaks were rare), depending upon the subset of deities or ances-
    tors being addressed, as well as the specific occasion. Various
    members of the priestly caste would be responsible for music,
    recitation of prayers, sacrificing of animals (or occasionally
    human criminals or prisoners of war), divination from the flames
    of the ritual fire or the entrails of the sacrificial victim, and
    other minor ritual duties. Senior members of the caste ("the"
    Druids, "the" brahmans or "the" flamens as such) would be respon-
    sible for making sure that the rites were done exactly according
    to tradition. Without such supervision, public rituals were gen-
    erally impossible; thus Caesar's comment that all public Gaulish
    sacrifices required a Druid to be present.
    There are definite indications that the Indo-European clergy
    held certain polytheological and mystical opinions in common,
    although only the vaguest outlines are known at this point. There
    was a belief in reincarnation (with time spent between lives in
    an Other World very similar to the Earthly one), in the sacred-
    ness of particular trees, in the continuing relationship between
    mortals, ancestors and deities, and naturally in the standard
    laws of magic (see Real Magic). There was an ascetic tradition of
    the sort that developed into the various types of yoga in India,
    complete with the Pagan equivalent of monasteries and convents.
    There was also, I believe, a European "tantric" tradition of sex
    and drug magic, although it's possible that this was mostly the
    native shamanic traditions being absorbed and transmuted.
    Only the western Celtic clergy (the Druids) seem to have had
    any sort of organized inter-tribal communications network. Most
    of the rest of the IE clergy seem to have kept to their own local
    tribes. Among the Germanic peoples, the priestly class had weak-
    ened by the early centuries of the Common Era to the point where
    the majority of ritual work was done by the heads of households.
    We don't know whether or not any but the highest ranking clergy
    were full-time priests and priestesses. At the height of the
    Celtic cultures, training for the clergy was said to take twenty
    years of hard work, which would not have left much time or energy
    for developing other careers. Among the Scandinavians, there seem
    to have been priests and priestesses (godar, gydjur) who lived in
    small temples and occasionally toured the countryside with sta-
    tues of their patron/matron deities, whom they were considered to
    be "married" to. In the rest of the Germanic, Slavic and Baltic
    cultures, however, many of the clergy may have worked part-time,
    a common custom in many tribal societies.
    It's also common for such cultures to have full- or part-time
    healers, who may use herbs, hypnosis, psychology, massage, magic
    and other techniques. Frequently they will also have diviners and
    weather predictors (or controllers). Midwives, almost always
    female, are also standard and, as mentioned above, there is
    usually a priestess or priest working at least part-time. What
    causes confusion, especially when dealing with extinct cultures,
    is that different tribes combine these offices into different
    people.
    At the opening of the Common Era, European Paleopaganism con-
    sisted of three interwoven layers: firstly, the original pre-
    Indo-European religions (which were of course also the results of
    several millenia of religious evolution and cultural conquests);
    secondly, the proto-Indo-European belief system held by the PIE
    speakers before they began their migrations; and thirdly, the
    full scale "high religions" of the developed Indo-European cul-
    tures. Disentangling these various layers is going to take a very
    long time, if indeed it will ever be actually possible.
    The successful genocide campaigns waged against the Druids and
    their colleagues are complex enough to warrant a separate discus-
    sion. Suffice it to say that by the time of the seventh century
    C.E., Druidism had been either destroyed or driven completely
    underground throughout Europe. In parts of Wales and Ireland,
    fragments of Druidism seem to have survived in disguise through
    the institutions of the Celtic Church and of the Bards and Poets.
    Some of these survivals, along with a great deal of speculation
    and a few outright forgeries, combined to inspire the ("Meso-
    pagan") Masonic/Rosicrucian Druid fraternities of the 1700's.
    These groups have perpetuated these fragments (and speculations
    and forgeries) to this very day, augmenting them with a great
    deal of folkloric and other research.
    These would seem to most Americans to be the only sources of
    information about Paleopagan Druidism. However, research done by
    Russian and Eastern European folklorists, anthropologists and
    musicologists among the Baltic peoples of Latvia, Lithuania and
    Estonia indicates that Paleopagan traditions may have survived in
    small villages, hidden in the woods and swamps, even into the
    current century! Some of these villages still had people dressing
    up in long white robes and going out to sacred groves to do
    ceremonies, as recently as World War One! Iron Curtain social
    scientists interviewed the local clergy, recorded the ceremonies
    and songs, and otherwise made a thorough study of their "quaint
    traditions" preparatory to turning them all into good Marxists.
    Ironically enough, some of the oldest "fossils" of preserved
    Indo-European traditions (along with bits of vocabulary from
    Proto-German and other early IE tongues) seem to have been kept
    by Finno-Ugric peoples such as the Cheremis. Most of this re-
    search has been published in a variety of Soviet academic books
    and journals, and has never been translated into English. This
    material, when combined with the Vedic and Old Irish sources, may
    give us most of the missing links necessary to reconstruct Paleo-
    pagan European Druidism.
    The translation of this material, along with some of the writ-
    ings of Dumezil (and others) that are not yet in English, is
    going to be an important part of the research work of ADF for the
    first few years. And we're going to see if we can get copies of
    some of the films...
    But there are some definite "nonfacts" about the ancient Druids
    that need to be mentioned: There are no real indications that
    they used stone altars (at Stonehenge or anywhere else); that
    they were better philosophers than the classical Greeks or Egyp-
    tians; that they had anything to do with the mythical continents
    of Atlantis or Mu; or that they wore gold Masonic regalia or used
    Rosicrucian passwords. They were not the architects of (a) Stone-
    henge, (b) the megalithic circles and lines of Northwestern
    Europe, (c) the Pyramids of Egypt, (d) the Pyramids of the Ameri-
    cas, (e) the statues of Easter Island, or (f) anything other than
    wooden barns and stone houses. There is no proof that any of them
    were monotheists, or "Prechristian Christians," that they under-
    stood or invented either Pythagorean or Gnostic or Cabalistic
    mysticism; or that they all had long white beards and golden
    sickles.
    Separating the sense from the nonsense, and the probabilities
    from the absurdities, about the Paleopagan clergy of Europe is
    going to take a great deal of work. But the results should be
    worth it, since we will wind up with a much clearer image of the
    real "Old Religions" than Neopagans have ever had available
    before. This will have liturgical, philosophical and political
    consequences, some of which we'll be discussing in future issues
    of "The Druids' Progress".


    The Political Implications of Reviving Druidism
    (c) 1984 P. E. I. Bonewits
    Reprinted from "The Druids' Progress" #1

    Throughout all known human history, people who had hidden
    knowledge (whether of healing, weather prediction, mathematics,
    or magic) have used their exclusive possession of that knowledge
    as a source of power, for purposes that were good, bad or weird.
    The warrior caste has always done its level best to take that
    knowledge away from the clergy and to put it to political, econo-
    mic and military use. Today, almost all the hard and soft scien-
    ces have become tools for those who wish to control their fellow
    human beings. The polluters, the exploiters, the oppressors, the
    conquerors -- whether calling themselves "capitalists" or "commu-
    nists" -- they are the ones who control nearly all the technology
    of overt power and a great deal of the tech for covert tyranny.
    One of the very few ways we have of defending ourselves and
    our fellow passengers (human and other) on this Spaceship Earth
    is through the careful and judicious use of magic. National
    governments and private enterprises are spending millions of
    dollars (and rubles and pounds and yen) trying to develop psychic
    powers into dependable tools for warfare and oppression; while
    most of us who should be learning precise techniques and careful
    timing, in order to use magic and the power of the Gods to defend
    ourselves and our Mother Earth, have been busy being misty-eyed
    romantics, not wanting to "sully our karma" by trying to do magic
    that might really work (that is to say, for which we would have
    to take personal responsibility).
    As a result, we have assisted the very forces of oppression
    which we claim to oppose. We are partly responsible for the
    poverty, hunger, pollution, disease and early deaths which domi-
    nate so much of our planet. Occultists have assisted by being
    unwilling to put their talents to the test by using them for
    "mundane" or "lowly-evolved" purposes. Ecologists, Celtic nation-
    alists, and would-be revolutionaries have assisted by being un-
    willing to use nonmaterialistic technologies to cause changes in
    the material world (after all, if Freud and Marx didn't mention
    magic as real, it can't possibly work). The creation of Neopagan
    Druidism may be able to help change those attitudes.
    Despite the efforts of liberal Christian clergymen to make us
    forget the physical and cultural genocide committed by organized
    Christianity against the peoples of Europe, there is simply no
    way to ignore the fact that monotheists in power always seek to
    silence competing voices. We cannot look to the mainstream
    churches for our physical and spiritual liberation, for they are
    the ones who took our freedom away in the first place. Marxist
    atheism is no answer either, for it is also a product of the
    monotheistic tunnel-reality, and seeks to impose its dogmas and
    holy scriptures just as strenuously as ever the churches have.
    Those who want to live in a world of peace, freedom and cultural
    pluralism, must look beyond the currently available, "respect-
    able" (i.e., monistic) alternatives they have been presented with
    by the mass media, and consider new alternatives.
    Many people think of Neopaganism in general, or Druidism in
    particular (if they think of them at all), as just being "odd"
    religions, with no political implications worth investigating.
    But I believe that Neopagan Druidism has important political
    ideas which should be considered, especially by those concerned
    with the survival and revival of the Celtic peoples.
    Druidism is political because one of the primary tasks of the
    clergy has always been to ride herd on the warriors. (This may be
    one reason why barbarian warriors welcomed the Christian mission-
    aries, because they perceived (correctly) that the Christian
    priests would be far more likely to play ball with them than the
    Druids had been. After all, if the world is ending any day now,
    why bother controlling your local warriors?) Since the primary
    threat to life on this planet now comes from out-of-control
    warriors, it's time we started taking that duty seriously again.
    Druidism is political because only a Nature worshipping reli-
    gion can give people sufficient concern for the environment.
    Monotheism is a major cause of the current state of the world's
    ecology. We need a strong public religion that tells the pollut-
    ers, "No, it's not divinely sanctioned for you to rape the
    Earth."
    Druidism is political because the Druids have always been the
    preservers of the best of their traditional cultures. The Meso-
    pagan Druids of Brittany and Wales, for example, are directly
    responsible for assisting the revival of the Cornish language and
    tradition from the very edge of extinction. The various tradi-
    tional preservation and independence movements, such as the Celt-
    ic, Flemish, Baltic and other related movements in Europe, need
    religious and cultural leadership based in their own cultures.
    Druidism can help create an environment in which such leadership
    can develop.
    Druidism is political because it offers a worldview completely
    different from that of the monotheistic/monistic tyranny that now
    controls our planet. One of the many things that any religion
    does is to shape the ways in which people see the world around
    them. We need a religion that offers people a multitude of op-
    tions, rather than traditional western either/or, black/white,
    win/lose choices.
    Druidism is political, at the bedrock level, because it can
    teach people how to use their Gods-given psychic and other tal-
    ents to change the way things are. Make no mistake, magic works,
    at least as often as poetry, music or political rallies do. Magic
    is a form of power that we, the people of the Earth, have avail-
    able to use, not just for psychological "empowerment" (making
    ourselves feel better) but to actually control the individuals
    and institutions responsible for our planet's current mess. If we
    are unwilling to use magic, then we had might as well resign
    ourselves and our descendants to either a life of slavery in a
    homogenized, pasteurized world, or a quick and painful nuclear
    death. And what excuse will we give to the "Lords of Karma" then?
    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Rick's BBS telnet://ricksbbs.synchro.net:23