• *NASA URGED TO SEEK OUT INTELLIGENT LIFE*

    From Ricky Sutphin@RICKSBBS/TIME to All on Tue Dec 31 06:36:54 2024
    **********************************************************************

    *NASA URGED TO SEEK OUT INTELLIGENT LIFE*

    Space scientists in America have a new dream - to discover another
    planet like Earth, writes Robin McKie.

    American scientists are planning to go fishing - for planets. A
    growing research lobby believes the United States should channel it's
    space resources towards detecting other solar systems that might
    support life. The move would shift funding away from expensive manned expeditions, for instance to Mars, and would instead exploit
    recently established technologies for building oriting observatories,
    such as the Hubble space telescope.

    Robert Brown of the Space Telescope Science Institute in Baltimore
    says: "Such a hunt would strike a chord with the public. The
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) is trying to
    find a purpose for it's existance. It could do no better than this.
    It would be popular and make a real contribution to history.

    Dr Brown, speaking last week at the American Association for the
    Advancement of Science, is a noted enthusiast for planet-hunting. But
    he is not alone. Several other speakers stressed that they now
    believe solar-system spotting has matured sufficiently to begin
    realistic hunts. Nasa is currently seeking a new rationale. It's
    orbiting space-station, Freedom, only just survived a series of
    congressional budget cuts and the agency's traditional approach of
    planning ever more ambitious manned missions, to culminate in a $50
    billion (u31 billion) landing on Mars early next century looks
    increasingly vulnerable. Critics argue that the two-year mission
    would only prove what we already know - that Mars is red, dead, and
    boring. The popular alternative within the space community would be
    to commit NASA to a search for other worlds, a task which has
    previously stumped astronomers because stars emit a billion times
    more light than even the largest planets, like Jupiter. Observer's
    ability to see smaller, warmer worlds (where life has it's best
    prospects) against the glare of the stars has therefore proved to be
    limited. Nevertheless, the first planets have been hooked. At
    Pennsylvania State University, Dr. Aleksander Wolszczan has detected
    three - in orbit around a star called PSR 1257+12. The star is a
    pulsar, an old, extremely dense object, 12 miles in diameter, which
    revolves at an astonishing 160 times per second. From
    perturberations in the regular pulses emmitted by this "astronomical lighthouse", Dr. Wolszczan detected two planets slightly bigger han
    Earth and one much smaller, about the size of Mercury. His discovery
    suggests planets may be ubiquitous, for if they can survive near
    pulsars, created when starts first explode as supernovae and then
    condense in on themselves, they should exist everywhere. The
    cataclysmic creation of PSR 1257+12 should have destroyed any planets
    in it's vicinity. So how did they get there? Researchers speculate
    that PSR 1257+12 may have had a companion star from which the pulsar
    slowly drew off gas and dust until it's partner was destroyed. From
    the debris planets evolved. Life there must be slightly odd, however.
    "You would have to protect yourself against a giant pulsing x-ray
    machine," Dr. Wolszczan said. "You would have to carry a lead
    umbrella all the time." Not surprisingly, scientists look to other,
    far more "normal" stars for signs of planets that might support life.
    "There are about 1,000 stars like our Sun within 100 light years of
    Earth, so there should be no shortage of fish in our pond," said
    David Latham of the Harvard-Smithsonian Centre for astrophysics. "For
    example, Tau Ceti, near the constellation Pisces, is only 11.7 light
    years distant and is extraordinarily like our Sun. It must be a very
    good prospect." And if there are plenty of promising stars, ans
    evidence that planets are ubiquitous, our extra-terrestial search
    should have considerable promise. Unfortunatly, other conference
    speakers provided evidence that undermined this optimism. Research
    by Andrea Ghez of the university of California, Los Angeles, has
    found that three-quarters of young stars are born with one or more
    companion stars. "That is bad news for planets' prospects," she
    said. "Planets form out of disks of dusk that slowly accrete into
    larger and larger bodies. A companion star would sweep through these
    disks, depleting the dust and rocks. There would not be enough left
    for planets. Solar systems may be the the exception, not the rule,
    in our galaxy."

    Scientists are faced, therefore, with contradictory evidence about
    the ubiquity of other worlds. But now they posses the means to
    begin to find out who is right. "We have finally built a telescope
    outside our atmosphere which will detect other planets," Dr. Brown
    said. "We will soon finish the Copernican Revolution. We have shown
    planets go around the Sun, but may soon be able to show they go round
    other stars as well." Dr. Brown said advanced cameras were due to be
    flown to the space telescope in 2002. These would exploit methods,
    known as Fourier techniques, which would suppress the glare of o star
    and reveal it's planets, if any. Once these new worlds had been
    detected, a new space telescope, on the Moon or in deep space -
    could be built to study such planets' atmospheres for the presence of
    chemicals produced by living beings. Such a telecscope would
    probably exploit the principles of interferometry, in which two
    seperate instruments combine to produce extremely powerful
    observations.
    If it sounds like a dream, consider the words of the
    NASA director Daniel Goldin: "What if we were to build an
    interferometer on the moon? And what if it were big enough that we
    could not only image planets around distant stars, but do
    spectroscopic analyses of their atmospheres? Results might "change
    our society in matters we can't even comprehend". Humanity would
    either learn that life is rare, and therefore precious, or that
    humans are just an "ever so 'umble" species in an alien-filled
    universe. "We should get the answer soon," Dr. Brown said. "We have
    put out hooks. Soon we will be draining the lake.."

    **********************************************************************



    "change our society in matters we can't even comprehend"

    Hmmm.. sounds as if "they" are preparing to "find" some aliens.. :)



    :::%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%:::
    :::%%%ET-=-MAILSYSTEM. "ET" <be1ewt@rgueee.rgu.ac.uk>:::
    :::%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%AMIGA%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%:::

    ---
    ■ Synchronet ■ Time Warp of the Future BBS - Home of League 10 IBBS Games