• "The Aliens Among Us: Hypnotic Regression Revisited," by Dr. Robert A. Baker 1988

    From Seth Able@RICKSBBS to all on Wed Dec 18 06:40:39 2024
    A letter to the editor in the Summer 1988 issue of the
    Skeptical Inquirer caught my eye. It referred to an article
    called "The Aliens Among Us: Hypnotic Regression Revisited," by
    Dr. Robert A. Baker. In it, Baker challenged UFO abductions by
    coming up with several alternatives to the ET Hypothesis,
    including Fantasy-Prone Personalities and Hypnogogic/Hypnopompic
    Hallucinations. These last two are special dream states
    experienced upon drifting off to sleep/waking up, in which one
    can feel paralyzed and/or see things in their bedroom that
    aren't really there. Out of Body Experiences and Alien
    Abductions have been attributed to this phenomenon by some
    research psychologists.

    Since I received few responses to my post on the ASTRAL echo
    suggesting Hypnogogic/pompic phenomena as a POSSIBLE explanation
    for OOBEs, I thought perhaps this letter would be enlightening:

    ----------------------

    I would like to thank Robert A. Baker for his article "The
    Aliens Among Us: Hypnotic Regression Revisited" (SI, Winter
    1987-88). I have been plagued by hypnogogic hallucinations since
    childhood, but until reading this article I didn't know what
    they were called or even that other people had them.

    My typical hallucination goes something like this: I am on the
    verge of falling asleep. A loud ringing in my ears, sometimes
    accompanied by a montage of unearthly voices, signals the onset
    of another episode. Though I seem awake, my body is completely
    paralyzed. I feel my "spirit" leave my body. The next thing I
    know I am floating somewhere near the ceiling, looking down at
    myself and my wife at my side. Once free of my body, I can often
    control where my ethereal self goes. Sometimes I float all
    around the house, and on one occasion I floated through the wall
    and out into the yard. Occaionally I sense the presence of other
    beings around me. At some point I get bored or frightened by the
    whole thing and return to my body and go to sleep.

    Instead of an out-of-body experience, I sometimes have an
    extremely vivid auditory and/or visual hallucination. Over the
    years I have seen and talked to "ghosts," been visited (though
    not yet abducted) by aliens, seen three-dimensional heads
    floating by my bed, heard knocks on my door (when no one else
    was in the house), and was once attacked by a glowing green
    Doberman. These experiences seem as real as life.

    I have never thought of these experiences as anything more than
    what they certainly are: my mind playing tricks on itself. The
    few other people I've known who have had similar experiences
    were all convinced that they were, in Baker's words,
    "incontrovertible proof of some sort of objective or consensual
    reality." These otherwise rational and intelligent people also
    believe that Uri Geller can really bend spoons with his mind.
    Take one hypnogogic hallucination and one fantasy-prone
    individual and you have all the ingredients you need for a true
    believer.

    Based on my own experience, I believe that hypnogogic and
    hypnopompic hallucinations provide a rational explanation for
    most alien abductions, out-of-body and near-death experiences,
    ghosts and just about any other claim of the paranormal you care
    to name. Baker states that these hallucinations are a "common yet
    little publicized and rarely discussed phenomenon." I recommend
    that SI and CSICOP discuss and publicize them thoroughly in the
    future.

    James A. Stewart
    Coronado, CA

    ---------------

    COMMENT:

    Mind you, I don't think "H/HH"s can fully account for the
    abduction syndrome, due to the striking similarities between
    reports (see SNOBS.UFO, ParaNet Alpha, Library 1). But even in
    this area I'm open to further inquiry.

    I'm also not the least bit impressed with this so-called
    "skeptic's" remark that OOBE's are "certainly" caused by H/HHs,
    "based on [his] own experience." Isn't extrapolation from
    personal experience an unsound method of judging data? It
    certainly is when True Believers do it, as many declared
    skeptics are quick to point out. If he's that "certain," there's
    no use in even arguing with him. He's no longer a skeptic, he's
    become a cynic.

    However, I thought this letter was important, in that it
    presents an alternative, Earth-bound picture of the phenomenon
    from the point of view of one who has experienced it. Rarely do
    declared skeptics acknowledge having actual encounters with the
    bizarre; they choose instead to take a more detached approach. I
    think this mixing of subjective experience with objective
    evaluation is an important element in the Rationalism movement's
    efforts to gain credibility among the credulous.
    <<>>

    Copyright 1988 National Fringe Sciences Information Service, All Rights Reserved.

    Letter Copyright 1988 Committee for the Scientific Investigation of
    Claims of the Paranormal. Used with permission.


    
    Seth,
    telnet://ricksbbs.synchro.net:23
    http://ricksbbs.synchro.net:8080
    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Rick's BBS telnet://ricksbbs.synchro.net:23