| Sysop: | Amessyroom |
|---|---|
| Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
| Users: | 39 |
| Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
| Uptime: | 12:40:57 |
| Calls: | 175 |
| Calls today: | 2 |
| Files: | 118 |
| Messages: | 64,081 |
I don't want to flood him, but he's still not receiving my netmail. Everyone else is receiving via Micronet and Fidonet. If he volunteers
on here, could someone with routed netmail send him a message? I'm sure direct would work, but we need to test routed.
On 07 Oct 2024, Shurato said the following...
I don't want to flood him, but he's still not receiving my netmail. Everyone else is receiving via Micronet and Fidonet. If hevolunteers
on here, could someone with routed netmail send him a message? I'msure
direct would work, but we need to test routed.
Just sent him one to 618:250/1 from here.
I don't want to flood him, but he's still not receiving my netmail. Everyone else is receiving via Micronet and Fidonet. If he volunteers on here, could someone with routed netmail send him a message? I'm sure direct would work, but we need to test routed.
I have received one from Jay so far, and have responded.
Weird. Why in the heck aren't you receiving mine? Everyone else I've sent to is...I don't want to flood him, but he's still not receiving my netmail.Everyone
else is receiving via Micronet and Fidonet. If he volunteers on here,could
someone with routed netmail send him a message? I'm sure direct wouldwork,
but we need to test routed.
I have received one from Jay so far, and have responded.
Mike
On 07 Oct 2024, Shurato said the following...
I don't want to flood him, but he's still not receiving my netmail. Everyone else is receiving via Micronet and Fidonet. If hevolunteers
on here, could someone with routed netmail send him a message? I'msure
direct would work, but we need to test routed.
Just sent him one to 618:250/1 from here.
Jay
Weird. Why in the heck aren't you receiving mine? Everyone else I've sent to is...
I'm sending you one...
Weird. Why in the heck aren't you receiving mine? Everyone else I'vesent to
is...
Not sure. Are you sure you sent it to 618:250/1?
On 08 Oct 2024, Shurato said the following...
I'm sending you one...
Haven't seen anything here as of yet.
Jay
I sent it to Warpslide, do I need to use your real name?
Yep, and so did Jay, but you got his. Can someone from net 300 who's routing netmail send a netmail message to Mike Powell @ 618:250/1?
Warpslide wrote to Shurato <=-
Yep, and so did Jay, but you got his. Can someone from net 300 who's routing netmail send a netmail message to Mike Powell @ 618:250/1?
May or may not mean anything. I've sent routed Ping netmails from here
to both 250/1 and 300/1. Only got a response from 250/1.
Neither node flies the PING flag, so they don't have to respond. Just more of an observation.
I sent it to Warpslide, do I need to use your real name?
Neither node flies the PING flag, so they don't have to respond. Just
more of an observation.
I sent it to Warpslide, do I need to use your real name?
You ALWAYS have to use real names in netmail. It was not designed to use aliases and can result in your messages being deleted en route if a name is not found in a nodelist.
It is -required- that you use real names in netmail.
From the Micronet Policy Document in section 1, paragraph 7:
7. Netmail requires real names to be used without exception due to the way netmail is handled by FTN nodes in Micronet. If aliases are used,
your message may not get delivered.
I bet this is why your netmail may be having issues.
Again, always use real names for netmail. You used my full name in your netmails to me.
I didn't know warpslide's real name so I didn't have a choice. This is the only time I've used a handle. He got it.
On 11 Oct 2024, Shurato said the following...
I didn't know warpslide's real name so I didn't have a choice. Thisis
the only time I've used a handle. He got it.
Still haven't received any netmails from you.
You ALWAYS have to use real names in netmail. It was not designed to use aliases and can result in your messages being deleted en route if a name is not found in a nodelist.
From the Micronet Policy Document in section 1, paragraph 7:
7. Netmail requires real names to be used without exception due to the way
netmail is handled by FTN nodes in Micronet. If aliases are used, your
message may not get delivered.
I believe Andrew L. and I are the only ones that have PING and TRACE.
Re: Re: Mike Powell...
By: Sean Dennis to Shurato on Thu Oct 10 2024 04:23 pm
Howdy,
You ALWAYS have to use real names in netmail. It was not designed
to use aliases and can result in your messages being deleted en
route if a name is not found in a nodelist.
From the Micronet Policy Document in section 1, paragraph 7:
7. Netmail requires real names to be used without exception due to
the way netmail is handled by FTN nodes in Micronet. If aliases
are used, your message may not get delivered.
So this sparked some curiosity with me, as I dont see how or why this would occur. (Unless I'm not understanding the context of this discussion?)
It is quite conceivable that user "Teller" on a system could send me a netmail, and:
a) "Teller" wouldnt appear in the nodelist, as he is a user,
b) "Teller" could be a real name.
Is there a spec that I've missed that explains your position in more detail?
When clrghouz processes mail (and netmail) for systems, it does no processing on the "name" fields of a message in a packet (and many
other fields for that matter).
telnet://bbs.roonsbbs.hu:1212 <<=-
Pretty much any Synchronet system will respond to Ping, as will clrghouz.
So this sparked some curiosity with me, as I dont see how or why this would occur. (Unless I'm not understanding the context of this discussion?)