This seems to be the one thing I've never seen here since I got back.. a fidonet.na
Do we do infopacks and the NA files? the ones with all the proper descriptions of each echo/fileecho?
Do we do infopacks and the NA files? the ones with all the proper descriptions of each echo/fileecho?
Do we do infopacks and the NA files? the ones with all the proper
descriptions of each echo/fileecho?
The ones out there are not exactly accurate and many echoes dead and gone.
On 31 May 24 10:01:26, Jim Howarth said the following to All:
Do we do infopacks and the NA files? the ones with all the proper descriptions of each echo/fileecho?
The ones out there are not exactly accurate and many echoes dead and
gone.
Nick
--- Renegade vY2Ka2
* Origin: Joey, do you like movies about gladiators? (1:229/426)
I thought the .na meant never available :)
| Sysop: | Amessyroom |
|---|---|
| Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
| Users: | 53 |
| Nodes: | 6 (2 / 4) |
| Uptime: | 23:05:45 |
| Calls: | 730 |
| Calls today: | 2 |
| Files: | 1,216 |
| D/L today: |
3 files (19,755K bytes) |
| Messages: | 209,555 |
| Posted today: | 1 |