Sysop: | Amessyroom |
---|---|
Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
Users: | 39 |
Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
Uptime: | 63:10:24 |
Calls: | 171 |
Files: | 117 |
Messages: | 63,109 |
Kirk Spragg wrote to michael goodwind <=-
The Culture works pretty much as you describe... and yes occasionally
the AIs do get corrupted or at least take actions that are somewhat unexpected.
Looking at our current attempts at AI, I'd be concerned that the AI
didn't start out corrupted/biased in the first place. I believe this is still something of a problem. Ultimately AI is currently being made by humans and thus it will end up affected by our biases and
preconceptions. I have no idea how to avoid that.
I believe this s a case of the first mover advantage. China started economic reform earlier and opened up foreign investment & trade in way that worked really well for them. This allowed China to effectively
corner large segments of manufacturing and also to learn/copy from the west.
Then they became successful and the Elitists wanted control. And like every time they've gotten control, they've completely messed things up.
China's economy is not doing so hot. To the point where I've been DW> seeing too many articles about how it's close to collapse.
I don't think you can unless you train AI on **all** content and we've accurately tagged the content bias.
Kirk Spragg wrote to Dr. What <=-
Loosing touch with your market/customers/people doesn't end well.
It will be interesting to see how the CCP intervenes to "fix" this and what wider repercussions this intervention will have.
CCP intervention is the cause. The "fix" will only kick the can down
the road to create an even larger crash later (after the people in
charge are gone).
Kirk Spragg wrote to Dr. What <=-
Agreed, however until the Chinese somehow get rid of the CCP we are
stuck with them and the boneheaded decisions they make. I wonder if the CCP will fall back to the classic diversion tactic of starting a war to distract everyone at home from the economic problems they caused.