| Sysop: | Amessyroom |
|---|---|
| Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
| Users: | 26 |
| Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
| Uptime: | 01:52:05 |
| Calls: | 485 |
| Files: | 1,074 |
| Messages: | 65,515 |
That's simply because people don't want to get caught with their pants
down without shit paper.>
people were going nuts about eggs too. all of a sudden they needed 30 dozen >eggs!
It looks like you were replying to a message from 2020.. Normally you complain >when other people reply to old messages.
Nightfox
MRO wrote to All <=-
people were going nuts about eggs too. all of a sudden they needed 30 dozen >eg
It looks like you were replying to a message from 2020.. Normally you complain
when other people reply to old messages.
Nightfox
hello autistic. I had an issue with my msg pointers and the post sent
out before i deleted it.
I realized that i was on an older message but it sent out anyways.
fuck off,
I realized that i was on an older message but it sent out anyways.
fuck off,
As usual, the actual FACTS mean nothing to you.
Would you deny that you often give people shit for replying to old messages?
But then when YOU do it, and somebody politely points that
out, you have a hissy fit and start calling them names?
MRO wrote to Gamgee <=-
Re: Re: nightfox
By: Gamgee to MRO on Wed Jul 02 2025 08:15 am
Would you deny that you often give people shit for replying to old messages?
those people are doing it intentionally. i had an issue one time with a message pointer.
I literally nuked the post right away but it got sent off because i had
my xfers per day set too high. I've halfed it now.
But then when YOU do it, and somebody politely points that
out, you have a hissy fit and start calling them names?
nobody's having a hissy fit but you.
They're not doing it intentionally, they just don't pay attention because they're idiots. Exactly the same reason that you did it.
"Halved" it.
No hissy fit here, just asking you why you're such a hypocrite. But you don't really need to answer, as we all already know why.
Would you deny that you often give people shit for replying to old
messages?
They're not doing it intentionally, they just don't pay attention because they're idiots. Exactly the same reason that you did it.
MRO wrote to Gamgee <=-
No hissy fit here, just asking you why you're such a hypocrite. But you don't really need to answer, as we all already know why.
"we", you mean the boring leftovers of bbsing?
make sure you cup nick's balls when you're working on him.
or you can work on that boring stock bbs you've been running for years. cant be bothered with that, can you?
Most of the time, I don't see what the big issue is with replying to an old thread. If someone wants to discuss the same topic, maybe add a question or something, why start a new thread when a thread already exists? I don't see why it would automatically mean they're an idiot.
Re: Re: nightfox
By: Gamgee to MRO on Wed Jul 02 2025 06:51 pm
Would you deny that you often give people shit for replying to
old messages?
They're not doing it intentionally, they just don't pay
attention because they're idiots. Exactly the same reason that
you did it.
Most of the time, I don't see what the big issue is with replying to
an old thread. If someone wants to discuss the same topic, maybe add
a question or something, why start a new thread when a thread already
exists? I don't see why it would automatically mean they're an idiot.
Re: Re: nightfox
By: Nightfox to Gamgee on Wed Jul 02 2025 18:48:28
Most of the time, I don't see what the big issue is with replying to an o thread. If someone wants to discuss the same topic, maybe add a question something, why start a new thread when a thread already exists? I don't why it would automatically mean they're an idiot.
I never reply to old posts. How old that is depends on the amount of traffi for that group. Usually it's either no earlier than a month for slow groups or 50 posts for active groups. With the number of groups I follow, there's just not enough time for anthing more.
fuck off,
Would you deny that you often give people shit for replying to old messages? But then when YOU do it, and somebody politely points that out, you have a hissy fit and start calling them names?
Nightfox wrote to Gamgee <=-
Re: Re: nightfox
By: Gamgee to MRO on Wed Jul 02 2025 08:15 am
fuck off,
Would you deny that you often give people shit for replying to old messages? But then when YOU do it, and somebody politely points that out, you have a hissy fit and start calling them names?
While I was fucking off (as MRO asked me to do), it seemed to me that
he really seems to spend significant time being pissed off and wanting
to antagonize other people, and he should try to relax some time. :P
Re: Re: nightfox
Most of the time, I don't see what the big issue is with replying to an old thread. If someone wants to discuss the same topic, maybe add a question or something, why start a new thread when a thread already
people don't bother to search for existing threads to find their answer (which also may reduce the number of new threads started, which might have the same questions as other threads with the same topic).